Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2021; 13(02): e242-e246
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740325
Research Article

The Impact of Virtual Interviews on the Geographic Distribution of Ophthalmology Match Results in the 2020–2021 Cycle

Chandruganesh Rasendran
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Eye Institute and the Case Western Reserve, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Sarah Rahman 
2   School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Uthman Younis
3   Faculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Raoul Wadhwa
4   Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Manasvee Kapadia
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Eye Institute and the Case Western Reserve, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Jonathan H. Lass
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Eye Institute and the Case Western Reserve, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Linda H. Ohsie-Bajor
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Eye Institute and the Case Western Reserve, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations Financial Support There was no financial support for this article.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Instead of the traditional in-person interviews, the 2020 to 2021 ophthalmology application cycle was conducted with virtual interviews due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019). Little is known about differences between the results of this application cycle with previous years.

Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the effect of virtual interviews on the geographic distribution of matched ophthalmology residency applicants.

Methods Information was collected on the medical school location and matched residency program location for 2020 to 2021 applicants as well as applicants during the 2016 to 2017, 2017 to 2018, and 2018 to 2019 cycles from publicly available Web sites. Pearson chi-squared tests were conducted to determine whether there was a significant difference in the proportion of applicants matching in the same region, state, and institution as their medical schools in the 2020 to 2021 interview cycle when compared with past cycles.

Results Three-hundred seventy-five applicants from 2020 to 2021 and 1,190 applicants from 2016 to 2019 application cycles were analyzed. There was no difference in the type of medical school attended (allopathic vs. osteopathic vs. international medical graduate) (p = 0.069), the likelihood of attending a residency program in the same region as the home medical school (54% for 2020–2021 vs. 57% for 2016–2019 applicants, p = 0.3), and the likelihood of attending a residency program in the same state as the home medical school (31 vs. 28%, p = 0.2). There was a higher likelihood of applicants during the 2020 to 2021 cycle matching at a residency program affiliated with their home medical school than previous cycles (23 vs. 18%, p = 0.03).

Conclusions Virtual interviews did not increase the likelihood of medical students staying in the same region or state as their medical school, while there was a higher likelihood of applicants matching at residency programs at institutions affiliated with their medical schools. A hybrid approach to maintain geographic diversity of applicants' final residency programs involving virtual interviews with the addition of in-person away rotations is suggested.

Keywords

virtual interviews - COVID-19 - visiting student - applicants - ophthalmology residency

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 21 July 2021

Accepted: 12 October 2021

Article published online:
25 December 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Quillen DA, Siatkowski RM, Feldon S. of the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology. COVID-19 and the ophthalmology match. Ophthalmology 2021; 128 (02) 181-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Venincasa MJ, Steren B, Young BK. et al. Ophthalmology residency match in the Covid-19 Era: applicant and program director perceptions of the 2020-2021 application cycle. Semin Ophthalmol 2021; •••: 1-6 DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1906917.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology. 2021–22 Ophthalmology Residency Match FAQs. Published 2021https://aupo.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/Residency Match FAQs_2021.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 2010 Census Regions and Divisions of the United States. Published 2010. https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-maps/2010/geo/2010-census-regions-and-divisions-of-the-united-states.html. Accessed October 25, 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Published 2017. https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed October 25, 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fried JG. Cost of Applying to Residency Questionnaire Report: Association of American Medical Colleges. Published 2015. https://www.aamc.org/system/files/c/2/430902-costofapplyingtoresidency.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Venincasa MJ, Cai LZ, Gedde SJ, Uhler T, Sridhar J. Current applicant perceptions of the ophthalmology residency match. JAMA Ophthalmol 2020; 138 (05) 460-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Seifi A, Mirahmadizadeh A, Eslami V. Perception of medical students and residents about virtual interviews for residency applications in the United States. PLoS One 2020; 15 (08) e0238239 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238239.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Steren B, Parikh A, Ahmed B, Young B, Sridhar J, Kombo N. COVID-19 and the ophthalmology residency match: data from applicants' perspectives. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13 (01) e73-e77
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Higgins E, Newman L, Halligan K, Miller M, Schwab S, Kosowicz L. Do audition electives impact match success?. Med Educ Online 2016; 21: 31325 DOI: 10.3402/meo.v21.31325.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Boyd CJ, Inglesby DC, Corey B. et al. Impact of COVID-19 on away rotations in surgical fields. J Surg Res 2020; 255: 96-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tso HL, Young J, Boente CS, Yung CW. The impact of away rotations on the ophthalmology residency match. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13 (01) e19-e25
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hammoud MM, Standiford T, Carmody JB. Potential implications of COVID-19 for the 2020-2021 residency application cycle. JAMA 2020; 324 (01) 29-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Prescott J. Best Practices for Conducting Residency Program Interviews. Published 2016. https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2020-05/best practices for conducting residency program interviews.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lo C, Rai A, Micieli JA. Effect of COVID-19 on Canadian Medical Student Attitudes toward Ophthalmology Residency Application. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13 (01) e5-e10
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Tsui E, Wells MB, Mohamed M, Felix CM, Giaconi JA. Virtual ophthalmology rotations—a real possibility during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Acad Ophthalmol 2020; 12 (02) e195-e199
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar