Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36(08): 572-576
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713149
Original Article

Concurrent Ventral Hernia Repair Is Effective in Patients Undergoing Abdominally Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

Casey T. Kraft
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
,
Albert H. Chao
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The abdomen remains the most preferable donor site for autologous breast reconstruction. Many patients in this population will have had prior abdominal surgery, which is the chief risk factor for having a ventral hernia. While prior studies have examined the impact of prior abdominal surgery on breast reconstruction, limited data exist on the management of patients with a preexisting ventral hernia. The objective of this study was to investigate outcomes of performing ventral hernia repair concurrent with abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Methods A 5-year retrospective review of patients undergoing abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction was performed. The experimental group consisted of patients with a preexisting ventral hernia that was repaired at the time of breast reconstruction, and was compared with a historical cohort of patients without preexisting hernias.

Results There were a total of 18 and 225 patients in the experimental and control groups, respectively. There was a higher incidence of prior abdominal surgery in the experimental group (p = 0.0008), but no other differences. Mean follow-up was 20.5 ± 5.2 months. There were no instances of recurrent hernia or flap loss in the experimental group. No significant differences were observed between the experimental and control groups in the incidence of donor-site complications (27.8 vs. 20.9%, respectively; p = 0.55), recipient site complications (27.8 vs. 24.0%, respectively; p = 0.78), operative time (623 ± 114 vs. 598 ± 100 minutes, respectively; p = 0.80), or length of stay (3.4 ± 0.5 vs. 3.1 ± 0.4 days, respectively; p = 0.98).

Conclusion Concurrent ventral hernia repair at the time of abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction appears to be safe and effective. Larger studies are needed to further define this relationship.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - hernia - hernia repair


Publication History

Received: 12 January 2020

Accepted: 20 April 2020

Article published online:
15 June 2020

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 

  • References

  • 1 Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, Allen RJ. Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: history and an update on current technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (06) 571-579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Holoyda KA, Simpson AM, Ye X, Agarwal JP, Kwok AC. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction using abdominally based flaps: an analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample database. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (08) 594-601
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kwok AC, Simpson AM, Ye X, Tatro E, Agarwal JP. Immediate unilateral breast reconstruction using abdominally based flaps: analysis of 3,310 cases. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (01) 74-82
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Center for Disease Control United States Cancer Statistics Data Visualizations. Available at: https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/USCS/DataViz.html . Accessed December 8, 2019
    PubMed
  • 5 Roostaeian J, Yoon AP, Sanchez IS. , et al. The effect of prior abdominal surgery on abdominally based free flaps in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (03) 247e-255e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, Watson JP, Dalio AL, Crisera CA. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (05) 1519-1526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (05) 1100-1109 , discussion 1110–1111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Laporta R, Longo B, Sorotos M, Santanelli di Pompeo F. Tips and tricks for DIEP flap breast reconstruction in patients with previous abdominal scar. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (04) 282-292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Doval AF, Lamelas AM, Daly LT. , et al. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction in women with previous abdominal incisions: a comparison of complication rates. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 81 (05) 560-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Manrique OJ, Bustos SS, Mohan AT. , et al. Robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest for autologous breast reconstruction: a comparative feasibility study on a cadaveric model. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Di Candia M, Asfoor AA, Jessop ZM, Kumiponjera D, Hsieh F, Malata CM. Previous multiple abdominal surgeries: a valid contraindication to abdominal free flap breast reconstruction?. Eplasty 2012; 12: e31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hsieh F, Kumiponjera D, Malata CM. An algorithmic approach to abdominal flap breast reconstruction in patients with pre-existing scars--results from a single surgeon's experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (12) 1650-1660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dayhim F, Wilkins EG. The impact of Pfannenstiel scars on TRAM flap complications. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53 (05) 432-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Parrett BM, Caterson SA, Tobias AM, Lee BT. DIEP flaps in women with abdominal scars: are complication rates affected?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (05) 1527-1531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Takeishi M, Shaw WW, Ahn CY, Borud LJ. TRAM flaps in patients with abdominal scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (03) 713-722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schoeller T, Huemer GM, Kolehmainen M, Otto-Schoeller A, Wechselberger G. Management of subcostal scars during DIEP-flap raising. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57 (06) 511-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hughes KC, Weider L, Fischer J. , et al. Ventral hernia repair with simultaneous panniculectomy. Am Surg 1996; 62 (08) 678-681
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Saxe A, Schwartz S, Gallardo L, Yassa E, Alghanem A. Simultaneous panniculectomy and ventral hernia repair following weight reduction after gastric bypass surgery: is it safe?. Obes Surg 2008; 18 (02) 192-195 , discussion 196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fischer JP, Tuggle CT, Wes AM, Kovach SJ. Concurrent panniculectomy with open ventral hernia repair has added risk versus ventral hernia repair: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (05) 693-701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Fischer JP, Basta MN, Wink JD, Wes AM, Kovach SJ. Optimizing patient selection in ventral hernia repair with concurrent panniculectomy: an analysis of 1974 patients from the ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (11) 1532-1540
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Warren JA, Epps M, Debrux C. , et al. Surgical site occurrences of simultaneous panniculectomy and incisional hernia repair. Am Surg 2015; 81 (08) 764-769
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar