Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2013; 34(04): 302-311
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312603
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A Field-Test Battery for Elite, Young Soccer Players

M. A. Hulse
1   Manchester United Limited, Manchester United Football Club, Manchester, United Kingdom
,
J. G. Morris
2   Institute of Youth Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough, United Kingdom
,
R. D. Hawkins
1   Manchester United Limited, Manchester United Football Club, Manchester, United Kingdom
,
A. Hodson
3   Alan Hodson Medical Associates Limited, Telford, United Kingdom
,
A. M. Nevill
4   Schoool of Sport, Performing Arts and Leisure, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
,
M. E. Nevill
2   Institute of Youth Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 11 April 2012

Publication Date:
09 November 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The validity and reliability of a battery of field-based performance tests was examined. The opinions of coaches, fitness professionals and players (n=170, 172 and 101 respectively) on the importance of performance testing were established using a questionnaire. On 2 occasions, separated by 7 days, 80 elite, young soccer players (mean±SD [and range]: age 13.2±2.6 [8.9–19.1] years; stature 1.59±0.18 m [1.32–1.91]; body mass 50.6±17.1 [26.5–88.7] kg) completed a battery of field-based tests comprised of heart rate response to a submaximal Multi-stage fitness test, 3 types of vertical jump, sprints over 10 and 20 m, and an agility test. Physical performance testing was considered important by coaches (97%), fitness professionals (94%) and players (83%). The systematic bias ratio and the random error components of the 95% ratio limits of agreement for the first and second tests, for the U9–U11 vs. U12–U14 vs. U15–U18 age groups, were [Systematic bias (*/÷ ratio limits)]: Heart rate (Level 5): 0.983 (*/÷ 1.044) vs. 0.969 (*/÷ 1.056) vs. 0.983 (*/÷ 1.055); Rocket jump: 0998 (*/÷ 1.112) vs. 0.999 (*/÷ 1.106) vs. 0.996 (*/÷ 1.093); 10 m sprint: 0.997 (*/÷ 1.038) vs. 0.994 (*/÷ 1.033) vs. 0.994 (*/÷ 1.038); Agility test: 1.010 (*/÷1.050) vs. 1.014 (*/÷1.050) vs. 1.002 (*/÷1.053). All tests, except heart rate recovery from the Multi-stage fitness test, were able to distinguish between different ability and age groups of players (p<0.05). Thus, the field-test battery demonstrated logical and construct validity, and was shown to be a reliable and objective tool for assessing elite, young soccer players.

Key words

validity - reliability - vertical jump - speed - agility - heart rate
 

  • References

  • 1 Achten J, Jeukendrup AE. Heart rate monitoring: applications and limitations. Sports Med 2003; 33: 517-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Alricsson M, Harms-Ringdahl K, Werner S. Reliability of sports related functional tests with emphasis on speed and agility in young athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2001; 11: 229-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Alricsson M, Harms-Ringdahl K, Werner S. Reliability of sports related functional tests with emphasis on speed and agility in young athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2001; 11: 229-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Aragon-Vargas LF. Evaluation of four vertical jumps: methodology, reliability, validity, and accuracy. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2000; 4: 215-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998; 26: 217-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bland M. An Introduction To Medical Statistics. 3rd Edition Oxford: University Press; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Bradley PS, Mohr M, Bendiksen M, Randers MB, Flindt M, Barnes C, Hood P, Gomez A, Andersen JL, Di Mascio M, Bangsbo J, Krustrup P. Sub-maximal and maximal Yo-Yo intermittent endurance test level 2: heart rate response, reproducibility and application to elite soccer. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 969-978
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Buchheit M, Mendez-Villanueva A, Simpson BM, Bourdon PC. Match running performance and fitness in youth soccer. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 818-825
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Castagna C, Impellizzeri FM, Belardinelli R, Abt G, Coutts A, Chamari K, D’Ottavio S. Cardiorespiratory responses to Yo-yo Intermittent Endurance Test in nonelite youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 326-330
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Castagna C, Impellizzeri FM, Chamari K, Carlomagno D, Rampinini E. Aerobic fitness and Yo-Yo continuous and intermittent tests performances in soccer players: a correlation study. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 320-325
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Currell K, Jeukendrup AE. Validity, reliability and sensitivity of measures of sporting performance. Sports Med 2008; 38: 297-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Denegar CR, Ball DW. Assessing reliability and precision of measurement: An introduction to intraclass correlation and standard error of measurement. J Sport Rehabil 1993; 2: 35-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Faina M, Gallozzi C, Lupo S, Colli R, Sassi R, Marini C. Definition of the physiological profile of the soccer player. In: Reilly T, Lees A, Davids K, Murphy WJ. (eds.). Science and Football. London: E & FN Spon; 1988: 158-163
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Figueiredo AJ, Goncalves CE, Coelho ESMJ, Malina RM. Youth soccer players, 11–14 years: maturity, size, function, skill and goal orientation. Ann Hum Biol 2009; 36: 60-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Franks AM, Williams AM, Reilly T, Nevill AM. Talent identification in elite youth soccer players: physical and physiological characteristics. In: Spinks W, Reilly T, Murphy A. (eds.). Science and Football IV. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group; 2002: 265-270
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Gil S, Ruiz F, Irazusta A, Gil J, Irazusta J. Selection of young soccer players in terms of anthropometric and physiological factors. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2007; 47: 25-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jankovic S, Heimer N, Matkovic BR. Physiological profile of prospective soccer players. In: Reilly T, Clarys J, Stibbe A. (eds.). Science and Football II. London: E & FN Spon; 1993: 295-297
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Krustrup P, Mohr M, Amstrup T, Rysgaard T, Johansen J, Steensberg A, Pedersen PK, Bangsbo J. The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test: physiological response, reliability, and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 697-705
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Krustrup P, Mohr M, Nybo L, Jensen JM, Nielsen JJ, Bangsbo J. The Yo-Yo IR2 test: physiological response, reliability, and application to elite soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 1666-1673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 le Gall F, Carling C, Williams M, Reilly T. Anthropometric and fitness characteristics of international, professional and amateur male graduate soccer players from an elite youth academy. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13: 90-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Leatt P, Shephard RJ, Plyley MJ. Specific muscular development in under-18 soccer players. J Sports Sci 1987; 5: 165-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Little T, Williams AG. Effects of differential stretching protocols during warm-ups on high-speed motor capacities in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 203-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Malina RM, Eisenmann JC, Cumming SP, Ribeiro B, Aroso J. Maturity-associated variation in the growth and functional capacities of youth football (soccer) players 13-15 years. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 91: 555-562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Markovic G, Dizdar D, Jukic I, Cardinale M. Reliability and factorial validity of squat and countermovement jump tests. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 551-555
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Mendez-Villanueva A, Buchheit M, Kuitunen S, Douglas A, Peltola E, Bourdon P. Age-related differences in acceleration, maximum running speed, and repeated-sprint performance in young soccer players. J Sports Sci 2011; 29: 477-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mirkov D, Nedeljkovic A, Kukolj M, Ugarkovic D, Jaric S. Evaluation of the reliability of soccer-specific field tests. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 1046-1050
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mujika I, Santisteban J, Impellizzeri FM, Castagna C. Fitness determinants of success in men’s and women’s football. J Sports Sci 2009; 27: 107-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Nevill AM, Atkinson G. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. Br J Sports Med 1997; 31: 314-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ortega FB, Artero EG, Ruiz JR, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Bergman P, Hagstromer M, Ottevaere C, Nagy E, Konsta O, Rey-Lopez JP, Polito A, Dietrich S, Plada M, Beghin L, Manios Y, Sjostrom M, Castillo MJ. Reliability of health-related physical fitness tests in European adolescents. The HELENA Study. Int J Obesity (2005) 2008; 32 (Suppl. 05) S49-S57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pitetti KH, Fernhall B, Figoni S. Comparing two regression formulas that predict VO2peak using the 20-m shuttle run for children and adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2002; 14: 125-134
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Rampinini E, Bishop D, Marcora SM, Ferrari Bravo D, Sassi R, Impellizzeri FM. Validity of simple field tests as indicators of match-related physical performance in top-level professional soccer players. Int J Sports Med 2007; 28: 228-235
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Rampinini E, Sassi A, Azzalin A, Castagna C, Menaspa P, Carlomagno D, Impellizzeri FM. Physiological determinants of Yo-Yo intermittent recovery tests in male soccer players. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 401-409
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sporis G, Jukic I, Milanovic L, Vucetic V. Reliability and factorial validity of agility tests for soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 679-686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Strand BN, Wilson R. Assessing Sports Skills. Champaign, IL.: Human Kinetics; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Stratton G, Reilly T, Williams AM, Richardson D. Youth Soccer: From Science to Performance. London: Taylor and Francis; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Svensson M, Drust B. Testing soccer players. J Sports Sci 2005; 23: 601-618
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Tumilty D. Physiological characteristics of elite soccer players. Sports Med 1993; 16: 80-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Vaeyens R, Malina RM, Janssens M, Van Renterghem B, Bourgois J, Vrijens J, Philippaerts RM. A multidisciplinary selection model for youth soccer: The Ghent Youth Soccer Project. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40: 928-934 discussion 934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 231-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Williams CA, Oliver JL, Faulkner J. Seasonal monitoring of sprint and jump performance in a soccer youth academy. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2011; 6: 264-275
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Williford HN, Scharff-Olson M, Duey WJ, Pugh S, Barksdale JM. Physiological status and prediction of cardiovascular fitness in highly trained youth soccer athletes. J Strength Cond Res 1999; 13: 10-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar