Endoscopy 2012; 44(09): 844-848
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1310059
DDW Highlights
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Colon tumors and colonoscopy

R. Singh
1   Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
2   University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
,
M. J. Bourke
3   Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
,
M. Jayanna
1   Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
,
G. Nind
1   Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 August 2012 (online)

The 2012 Digestive Disease Week (DDW; 19 – 22 May, San Diego, California, USA) received a record number of submissions on colonoscopy and colorectal cancer (CRC). Scientific presentations focused primarily on colonic polyps and can be broadly divided into polyp detection, characterization, and resection. Among the more interesting topics were the novel concept of polypectomy rate, newer-generation optical imaging technology, and advanced endoscopic resection techniques.

 
  • References

  • 1 Gohel T, Lankaala P, Podugu A et al. Polypectomy rate (PR) – a simple reliable tool that endoscopists can use to monitor quality during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB163
  • 2 Sanaka MR, Parsi MA, Burke CA et al. Comparison of adenoma detection by inspection during both insertion and withdrawal phases versus only withdrawal phase of colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB167
  • 3 Yague AS, Kaltenbach T, Anglemyer A et al. To CAP or not to CAP during screening colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB166-AB167
  • 4 Bisschops R, Bessissow T, Baert FJ et al. Chromoendoscopy versus narrow band imaging in ulcerative colitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB148
  • 5 Lau JY, Teo EK, Rerknimitr R et al. An interim analysis of an Asia-Pacific multicenter randomized study comparing colonoscopy using a new high definition system in either white light or narrow band imaging in the detection of adenomas in subjects undergoing screening. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB173
  • 6 Schoen RE, Pinsky P, Weissfeld J et al. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer in the PLCO Screening Trail. Gastroenterology 2012; 142 (05) 115
  • 7 Kaltenbach T, Rastogi A, Rouse RV et al. The valid colonoscopy study – results of a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial on real time colorectal polyp diagnosis using narrow band imaging (NBI). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB151
  • 8 Hazewinkel Y, Lopez-Ceron M, Rastogi A et al. Validation of endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas by international experts using high resolution endoscopy and narrow band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB323-AB333
  • 9 Rastogi A, Rao DS, Gupta N et al. Impact of a computer based teaching module on characterization of diminutive colon polyps using narrow band imaging (NBI) by non-experts in academics and community practice – a video based study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB152-AB153
  • 10 Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF et al. Long term recurrence following wide field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia – results of the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) multicenter prospective study of 940 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB177
  • 11 Holt BA, Bassan MS, Trivedi S et al. Interrogation of the mucosal defect after advanced endoscopic resection: predicting post-procedural outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB421
  • 12 Takeuchi Y, Saito Y, Iishi H et al. Outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and risk factors for technical difficulty: a prospective multi-center study on endoscopic treatment of large early colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 324-325
    • Additional references

      • Detection

      • 13 Patel NC, Islam S, Wu Q et al. Measurement of polypectomy rate using administration claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB163
      • 14 Borg FT, Brouwer EJ, Arbouw M et al. Hyoscine N-butylbromide does not improve polyp detection during colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB168
      • 15 Bisschops R, Tejpar S, Willekens H et al. I-SCAN detects more polyps in Lynch Syndrome (HNPCC) patients: a prospective controlled randomized back-to-back study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB330
      • 16 Dzeletovic I, Pasha SF, Crowell MD et al. Comparison of single-balloon versus double-balloon assisted colonoscopy for colon examination after previous incomplete colonoscopy using a standard colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB332
      • 17 Uddin FS, Iqbal R, Harford W et al. Prone vs. standard, left lateral decubitus position colonoscopy for obese patients: a randomised prospective study.. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB155
      • 18 Daker C, Brier T, Besherdas K. Is colonoscopy required post CT scan confirming diverticultis?. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB404
      • 19 Gupta S, Balasubramanian BA, Lash RH et al. Polyps with advanced neoplasia are smaller in right versus left colon: A possible explanation as to why colonoscopy inconsistently protects against right-sided cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 142 (05) 141
      • 20 Coe SG, Wallace MB. Gender trends in detection: Should the guidelines for ADR change?. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB167-AB168
      • Characterization

      • 21 André B, Vercauteren TK, Buchner A et al. Image-based semantic learning software for automatic detection of discriminative criteria used for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) diagnosis of colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB329
      • 22 Coe SG, Almansa C, Crook J et al. Accuracy of in-vivo colorectal polyp discrimination using dual focus high definition narrow band imaging colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial; preliminary results. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB172-AB173
      • 23 Singh R, Tam W, Jayanna M et al. Preliminary feasibility study using a novel narrow band imaging system with dual focus magnification capability in differentiating colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB327
      • 24 Ladabaum U, Fioritto A, Paik J et al. A standardized learning module improves the accuracy of ex-vivo endoscopic diagnosis of polyp histology with narrow band imaging (NBI) by community based endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB152
      • 25 Pohl H, Bensen SP, Berk BS et al. Real time diminutive polyp diagnosis accurately determines colonoscopy surveillance interval in clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB151
      • Resection

      • 26 Ikematsu H, Yoda Y, Saito Y et al. A large scale multi-center study of long-term outcomes after resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancer (colon vs. rectum).. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB178
      • 27 Sasajima K, Chinzei R, Oshima T et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal neoplasm: detailed analysis and strategy against fibrosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB417
      • 28 Cha JM, Lee II J, Joo KR et al. Clinicopathological risk factors for early carcinoma in colorectal neoplasias according to Japanese and Western criteria. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB423