Split Anterolateral Thigh Flap: A New Classification of Anatomical Variants and a Surgical Planning Algorithm

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Split anterolateral thigh flap is a versatile reconstruction option, yet long underestimated as no practical perforator classification and no optimal strategy were present. Harvesting “capillary nonsizable perforators” could potentially expand flap splits to those with no existing multiple sizable perforators. Concerns over defect characteristics, recipient vessels, pedicle length, and split timing should all be weighted equally in designing the suitable flap. Refinement is thus required to enable precise reconstructions.

Methods All patients undergoing anterolateral thigh flap harvests between 2014 and 2021 performed by a single surgeon were included. The perforator patterns of sizable pedicle, course, origin, and further successful flap-split methods were documented. Surgical outcome of flap survival was analyzed.

Results Anatomical variants of 134 (48.4%) dual, 123 (44.4%) single, and 20 (7.2%) no sizable perforators were found in a total of 277 anterolateral thigh flaps. The overall flap survival rate was 97.5%. Flap split was performed in 82 flaps, including 29 single and 5 no sizable perforator cases previously considered “unsplittable,” by utilizing a series of direct skin paddle split, capillary nonsizable perforators harvesting, and flow-through anastomosis technique. Comparable flap survivals were found between split and nonsplit flaps as well as between split segments supplied by sizable and capillary nonsizable perforators. Primary closure was achieved in 98.9% of the thigh donor sites.

Conclusion A new classification of the common anterolateral thigh flap anatomical variants was proposed and a comprehensive algorithm of split flap strategy was developed along with the innovative “fabricate” concept.

^# Both the authors contributed equally to this work.

Publication History

Received: 06 June 2023

Accepted: 18 December 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
11 January 2024

Article published online:
13 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2219-2226 , discussion 2227–2230
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Yildirim S, Gideroğlu K, Aköz T. Anterolateral thigh flap: ideal free flap choice for lower extremity soft-tissue reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (04) 225-233
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Frohwitter G, Rau A, Kesting MR, Fichter A. Microvascular reconstruction in the vessel depleted neck - a systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018; 46 (09) 1652-1658
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Yazar S, Lin CH. Selection of recipient vessel in traumatic lower extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (03) 199-204
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Chang NJ, Waughlock N, Kao D, Lin CH, Lin CH, Hsu CC. Efficient design of split anterolateral thigh flap in extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (06) 1242-1249
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Tsai FC, Yang JY, Mardini S, Chuang SS, Wei FC. Free split-cutaneous perforator flaps procured using a three-dimensional harvest technique for the reconstruction of postburn contracture defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (01) 185-193 , discussion 194–195
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Lin SJ, Rabie A, Yu P. Designing the anterolateral thigh flap without preoperative Doppler or imaging. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (01) 67-72
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Moore R, Mullner D, Nichols G, Scomacao I, Herrera F. Color Doppler ultrasound versus computed tomography angiography for preoperative anterolateral thigh flap perforator imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (07) 563-570
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Visconti G, Bianchi A, Hayashi A, Salgarello M. Designing an anterolateral thigh flap using ultrasound. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (03) 206-216
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Lindsey Jr JT, Smith C, Lee J, St Hilaire H, Lindsey Sr JT. Mapping 216 perforator flaps using highly portable tablet-based color Doppler ultrasound (PT-CDU). J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (02) 115-120
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Schneider CM, Palines PA, Womac DJ, Tuggle CT, St Hilaire H, Stalder MW. Preoperative computed tomography angiography for ALT flaps optimizes design and reduces operative time. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (06) 491-498
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Lu JC, Zelken J, Hsu CC. et al. Algorithmic approach to anterolateral thigh flaps lacking suitable perforators in lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (05) 1476-1485
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Zapata-Ospina A, Chen J, Tee R, Jeng SF, Karki B, Shih HS. Harvesting the anterolateral thigh flap with non-sizable perforators. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (05) 1022-1030
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Lee YC, Chen WC, Chou TM, Shieh SJ. Anatomical variability of the anterolateral thigh flap perforators: vascular anatomy and its clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (04) 1097-1107
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Lamba S, Reddy KA, Gohil AJ, Gupta AK. A simple method of intraoperative identification of a reliable perforator while dissecting an anterolateral thigh flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (03) e1-e2
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Taylor GI. The angiosomes of the body and their supply to perforator flaps. Clin Plast Surg 2003; 30 (03) 331-342 , v
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 O'Brien AL, Jadallah E, Chao AH. Reconstruction of a radical total vulvectomy defect with a single split anterolateral thigh perforator flap: a case report and review of the literature. Microsurgery 2021; 41 (01) 70-74
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Fukuta T, Ichikawa Y, Mizuno H, Hayashi A. Split-skin paddle anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of giant dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in groin. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (12) e2528
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Scaglioni MF, Barth AA, Giovanoli P. Reconstruction of an upper posterior thigh extensive defect with a free split-anterolateral thigh (s-ALT) flap by perforator-to-perforator anastomosis: a case report. Microsurgery 2019; 39 (01) 91-94
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Boca R, Kuo YR, Hsieh CH, Huang EY, Jeng SF. A reliable parameter for primary closure of the free anterolateral thigh flap donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (05) 1558-1562
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Pachón Suárez JE, Sadigh PL, Shih HS, Hsieh CH, Jeng SF. Achieving direct closure of the anterolateral thigh flap donor site-an algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014; 2 (10) e232
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Jacobson AS, Eloy JA, Park E, Roman B, Genden EM. Vessel-depleted neck: techniques for achieving microvascular reconstruction. Head Neck 2008; 30 (02) 201-207
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Wei FC, Yazar S, Lin CH, Cheng MH, Tsao CK, Chiang YC. Double free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2005; 32 (03) 303-308 , v
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Wells MD, Luce EA, Edwards AL, Vasconez HC, Sadove RC, Bouzaglou S. Sequentially linked free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1994; 21 (01) 59-67
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Blackwell KE, Buchbinder D, Biller HF, Urken ML. Reconstruction of massive defects in the head and neck: the role of simultaneous distant and regional flaps. Head Neck 1997; 19 (07) 620-628
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Revenaugh PC, Haffey TM, Seth R, Fritz MA. Anterolateral thigh adipofascial flap in mucosal reconstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2014; 16 (06) 395-399
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Choi JW, Kim YC, Oh TS, Koh KS, Jeong WS. The versatile use of revisited de-epithelialization concept in superficial circumflex iliac and anterolateral thigh perforator free flap for head and neck reconstructions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017; 45 (06) 872-880
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Yu P. Characteristics of the anterolateral thigh flap in a Western population and its application in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2004; 26 (09) 759-769
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Lakhiani C, Lee MR, Saint-Cyr M. Vascular anatomy of the anterolateral thigh flap: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (06) 1254-1268
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Nakatsuka T, Harii K. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (05) 1517-1523
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Masia J, Olivares L, Koshima I. et al. Barcelona consensus on supermicrosurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (01) 53-58
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Panse NS, Bhatt YC, Tandale MS. What is safe limit of the perforator flap in lower extremity reconstruction? Do we have answers yet?. Plast Surg Int 2011; 2011: 349357
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Song S, Jeong HH, Lee Y. et al. Direction of flap rotation in propeller flaps: does it really matter?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (08) 549-556
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Yokota K, Sunagawa T, Suzuki O, Nakanishi M, Ochi M. Short interposed pedicle of flow-through anterolateral thigh flap for reliable reconstruction of damaged upper extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (02) 109-114
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Hsieh CH, Yang JC, Chen CC, Kuo YR, Jeng SF. Alternative reconstructive choices for anterolateral thigh flap dissection in cases in which no sizable skin perforator is available. Head Neck 2009; 31 (05) 571-575
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Celik N, Wei FC, Lin CH. et al. Technique and strategy in anterolateral thigh perforator flap surgery, based on an analysis of 15 complete and partial failures in 439 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2211-2216 , discussion 2217–2218
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Abdelrahman M, McGarry K, Alsharkawy K, Wu JC, Cheong DC. A constant harvest technique for chimeric anterolateral thigh flaps and patient outcomes following their use in reconstructive head and neck surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (05) 1013-1021
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Boyd JB, Morris S, Rosen IB, Gullane P, Rotstein L, Freeman JL. The through-and-through oromandibular defect: rationale for aggressive reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (01) 44-53
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Di Taranto G, Chen SH, Elia R. et al. Outcomes following head neck free flap reconstruction requiring interposition vein graft or vascular bridge flap. Head Neck 2019; 41 (09) 2914-2920
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Yegin ME, Chen SH, Chen HC. Vascular pedicle division during free flap re-inset in pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (02) 154-159
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Hamilton K, Wolfswinkel EM, Weathers WM. et al. The delay phenomenon: a compilation of knowledge across specialties. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2014; 7 (02) 112-118
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Khouri RK, Upton J, Shaw WW. Prefabrication of composite free flaps through staged microvascular transfer: an experimental and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87 (01) 108-115
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar