J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39(08): 640-647
DOI: 10.1055/a-2040-1651
Original Article

Anatomical View of Thoracodorsal Artery Variants Using Computed Tomography Angiography

Hyun Geun Cho
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
,
Byeongju Kang
2   Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
,
Jeong Yeop Ryu
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
,
Kang Young Choi
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
,
Jung Dug Yang
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
,
Ho Yun Chung
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
,
Byung Chae Cho
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
,
Jeeyeon Lee
2   Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
,
Ho Yong Park
2   Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
,
Joon Seok Lee
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Background The latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle has a dominant pedicle with one thoracodorsal artery and receives sufficient blood by segmental circulation through several perforators. Thus, it is widely used in various reconstructive surgeries. We are reporting on the patterns of the thoracodorsal artery analyzed by chest computed tomography (CT) angiography.

Methods We analyzed the preoperative chest CT angiography results of 350 patients scheduled to undergo LD flap breast reconstruction following complete mastectomy for breast cancer between October 2011 and October 2020.

Results A total of 700 blood vessels were classified according to the Kyungpook National University Plastic Surgery-Thoracodorsal Artery (KNUPS-TDA) classification: 388 (185 right and 203 left), 126 (64 right and 62 left), 91 (49 right and 42 left), 57 (27 right and 30 left), and 38 (25 right and 13 left) vessels were classified as type I, type II, type III, type IV, and type V, respectively. Among 350 patients, 205 patients showed matching types for left and right vessels, whereas 145 patients showed mismatching types. For 205 patients with matching types, the distribution by type was 134, 30, 30, 7, and 4 patients with type I, type II, type III, type IV, and type V, respectively. For 145 patients with mismatching types, the distribution by different combinations was 48, 25, 28, 19, 2, 9, 7, 3, 1, and 3 patients with type I + type II, type I + type III, type I + type IV, type I + type V, type II + type III, type II + type IV, type II + type V, type III + type IV, type III + type V, and type IV + type V, respectively.

Conclusion While there is some diversity in the vascular anatomical structures of the LD flap, the dominant vessel can be found in a similar location in almost all cases and no flap had absence of a dominant vessel. Therefore, in surgical procedures using the thoracodorsal artery as the pedicle, preoperative radiological confirmation is not absolutely necessary; however, due to variants, performing the surgery with an understanding of this aspect should lead to good outcomes.

Ethical Statement

• The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.


• All the procedures performed in human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for the publication of these cases and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editorial office of this journal.


Reporting Checklist

The authors have completed the CARE reporting checklist.




Publication History

Received: 17 August 2022

Accepted: 08 January 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
21 February 2023

Article published online:
31 March 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Saint-Cyr M, Nagarkar P, Schaverien M, Dauwe P, Wong C, Rohrich RJ. The pedicled descending branch muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (01) 13-24
  • 2 Boucher F, Pinatel B, Shipkov H. et al. Anatomical study of muscular latissimus dorsi surface vascularized by the transverse branch of thoraco-dorsal artery [in French]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2014; 59 (05) 327-332
  • 3 Sood R, Easow JM, Konopka G, Panthaki ZJ. Latissimus dorsi flap in breast reconstruction: recent innovations in the workhorse flap. Cancer Contr 2018; 25 (01) 1073274817744638
  • 4 Thomsen JB, Gunnarsson GL. The evolving breast reconstruction: from latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap to a propeller thoracodorsal fasciocutaneous flap. Gland Surg 2014; 3 (03) 151-154
  • 5 Amin AA, Rifaat M, Ellabban MA, Zedan M, Kamel M, Bassiouny M. Transaxillary thoracodorsal artery perforator flap: a versatile new technique for hypopharyngeal reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (06) 397-404
  • 6 Rezaei E, Pouryousef K, Karimi M, Hajebi Khaniki S, Baradaran Sirjani E. Latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap inset innovation in breast reconstruction. World J Plast Surg 2019; 8 (03) 394-400
  • 7 Brambilla L, Parisi P, Gatto A. et al. A retrospective comparative analysis of latissimus dorsi (LD) flap versus thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap in total breast reconstruction with implants: a pilot study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (06) 451-459
  • 8 Salgarello M, Visconti G. Designing lateral thoracic wall perforator flaps for breast reconstruction using ultrasound. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (03) 228-232
  • 9 Kumar N, Aithal AP, Nayak SB, Bhaskar R. A rare case of atypical thoracodorsal artery: a challenge for flap reconstruction. Surg Radiol Anat 2018; 40 (08) 899-902
  • 10 Duke Whan Chung MD, Chung Soo Han MD, Jae Hoon Lee MD. The report for atypical vascular variations in the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps. J Korean Soc Surg Hand 2002; 11 (02) 135-140
  • 11 Hwang KT, Kim SW, Kim YH. Anatomical variation of the accessory thoracodorsal artery as a direct cutaneous perforator. Clin Anat 2013; 26 (08) 1024-1027
  • 12 Mohan AT, Saint-Cyr M. Advances in imaging technologies for planning breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2016; 5 (02) 242-254
  • 13 Elzawawy EM, Kelada MN, Al Karmouty AF. Design of mini latissimus dorsi flap based on thoracodorsal vascular patterns. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (06) 607-615
  • 14 Mayer HF, Piedra Buena I, Petersen ML. The value of preoperative computed tomography angiography (CT-A) in patients undergoing delayed latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction after axillary lymph node dissection or irradiation and suspicion of pedicle injury. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (11) 2086-2102
  • 15 Rowsell AR, Davies DM, Eisenberg N, Taylor GI. The anatomy of the subscapular-thoracodorsal arterial system: study of 100 cadaver dissections. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37 (04) 574-576
  • 16 Hassan AM, Tesfaye EA, Rashiwala A, Roubaud MJ, Mericli AF. Functional muscle transfer after oncologic extremity resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (03) 195-208
  • 17 Dast S, Havet E, Dessena L. et al. Anatomical basis of the extended TDAP flap: study of its territories of vascularization and its volume. Surg Radiol Anat 2017; 39 (08) 821-826 [Erratum in: Surg Radiol Anat. 2017 Aug 18; PMID: 28260217]
  • 18 Yang JD, Huh JS, Min YS, Kim HJ, Park HY, Jung TD. Physical and functional ability recovery patterns and quality of life after immediate autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction: a 1-year prospective observational study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (06) 1146-1154
  • 19 Lee JS, Park E, Lee JH. et al. Alteration in skeletal posture between breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap and mastectomy: a prospective comparison study. Gland Surg 2021; 10 (05) 1587-1597
  • 20 Bas S, Oner C, Eren HI, Hacikerim Karsidag S, Yilmaz A. Reconstruction of complex scalp defects in different locations: suggestions for puzzle. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul 2021; 55 (03) 349-358
  • 21 He J, Qing L, Wu P, Zhou Z, Yu F, Tang J. Large wounds reconstruction of the lower extremity with combined latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap and flow-through anterolateral thigh perforator flap transfer. Microsurgery 2021; 41 (06) 533-542
  • 22 Bigdeli AK, Thomas B, Falkner F, Radu CA, Gazyakan E, Kneser U. Microsurgical reconstruction of extensive lower extremity defects with the conjoined parascapular and latissimus dorsi free flap. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (06) 639-648
  • 23 Li BH, Jung HJ, Choi SW, Kim SM, Kim MJ, Lee JH. Latissimus dorsi (LD) free flap and reconstruction plate used for extensive maxillo-mandibular reconstruction after tumour ablation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40 (08) e293-e300
  • 24 Dennis M, Granger A, Ortiz A, Terrell M, Loukos M, Schober J. The anatomy of the musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap for neophalloplasty. Clin Anat 2018; 31 (02) 152-159
  • 25 Haq EU, Javaid RH, Hameed S. et al. Thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for upper limb reconstruction. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2015; 27 (02) 451-457
  • 26 Mohan AT, Saint-Cyr M. Anatomic and physiological fundamentals for autologous breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2015; 4 (02) 116-133
  • 27 Jesus RC, Lopes MC, Demarchi GT, Ruiz CR, Wafae N, Wafae GC. The subscapular artery and the thoracodorsal branch: an anatomical study. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2008; 67 (01) 58-62
  • 28 Demiri EC, Tsimponis A, Pagkalos A. et al. Fat-augmented latissimus dorsi versus deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: comparative study in delayed autologous breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (03) 208-215
  • 29 Stein MJ, Frank SG, Lui A, Zhang T, Zhang J. Ambulatory latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (12) 1950-1955
  • 30 Lee JH, Ryu JY, Choi KY. et al. Useful vertical latissimus dorsi flap for partial breast reconstruction in every tumor location. BMC Surg 2022; 22 (01) 294
  • 31 Hattori Y, Doi K, Sakamoto S, Satbhai N. Anatomic variations in branching patterns of the axillary artery: a multidetector-row computed tomography angiography study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (08) 531-536
  • 32 Freeman ME, Perdikis G, Sternberg EG, TerKonda SP, Waldorf JC. Latissimus dorsi reconstruction: a good option for patients with failed breast conservation therapy. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57 (02) 134-137