CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Sports Med Int Open 2021; 5(02): E45-E52
DOI: 10.1055/a-1400-1897
Clinical Sciences

Blood Pressure Response and Vascular Function of Professional Athletes and Controls

1   Medizinische Klinik I- Kardiologie/Angiologie, Justus Liebig Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
,
Lutz Kraushaar
2   Adiphea, Adiphea GmbH, Werbach, Germany
,
Sophie Hoelscher
1   Medizinische Klinik I- Kardiologie/Angiologie, Justus Liebig Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
,
Rebecca Weber
1   Medizinische Klinik I- Kardiologie/Angiologie, Justus Liebig Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
,
Ebru Akdogan
1   Medizinische Klinik I- Kardiologie/Angiologie, Justus Liebig Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
,
Stanislav Keranov
1   Medizinische Klinik I- Kardiologie/Angiologie, Justus Liebig Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
,
Oliver Dörr
1   Medizinische Klinik I- Kardiologie/Angiologie, Justus Liebig Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
,
Holger Nef
1   Medizinische Klinik I- Kardiologie/Angiologie, Justus Liebig Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
,
Christian W Hamm
1   Medizinische Klinik I- Kardiologie/Angiologie, Justus Liebig Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
3   Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH, Bad Nauheim, Germany
,
Astrid Most
1   Medizinische Klinik I- Kardiologie/Angiologie, Justus Liebig Universitat Giessen, Giessen, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Workload-indexed blood pressure response (wiBPR) to exercise has been shown to be superior to peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) in predicting mortality in healthy men. Thus far, however, markers of wiBPR have not been evaluated for athletes and the association with vascular function is unclear. We examined 95 male professional athletes (26±5 y) and 30 male controls (26±4 y). We assessed vascular functional parameters at rest and wiBPR with a graded bicycle ergometer test and compared values for athletes with those of controls. Athletes had a lower pulse wave velocity (6.4±0.9 vs. 7.2±1.5 m/s, p=0.001) compared to controls. SBP/Watt slope (0.34±0.13 vs. 0.44±0.12 mmHg/W), SBP/MET slope (6.2±1.8 vs. 7.85±1.8 mmHg/MET) and peak SBP/Watt ratio (0.61±0.12 vs. 0.95±0.17 mmHg/W) were lower in athletes than in controls (p<0.001). The SBP/Watt and SBP/MET slope in athletes were comparable to the reference values, whereas the peak SBP/Watt-ratio was lower. All vascular functional parameters measured were not significantly correlated to the wiBPR in either athletes or controls. In conclusion, our findings indicate the potential use of the SBP/Watt and SBP/MET slope in pre-participation screening of athletes. Further, vascular functional parameters, measured at rest, were unrelated to the wiBPR in athletes and controls.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 31 January 2021
Received: 22 February 2021

Accepted: 24 February 2021

Article published online:
19 April 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Keller K, Stelzer K, Ostad MA. et al. Impact of exaggerated blood pressure response in normotensive individuals on future hypertension and prognosis: Systematic review according to PRISMA guideline. Adv Med Sci 2017; 62: 317-329 DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2016.11.010.
  • 2 Percuku L, Bajraktari G, Jashari H. et al. The exaggerated systolic hypertensive response to exercise associates cardiovascular events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pol Arch Intern Med 2019; 129: 855-863 DOI: 10.20452/pamw.15007.
  • 3 Caselli S, Serdoz A, Mango F. et al. High blood pressure response to exercise predicts future development of hypertension in young athletes. Eur Heart J 2019; 40: 62-68 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy810.
  • 4 Niebauer J, Borjesson M, Carre F. et al. Brief recommendations for participation in competitive sports of athletes with arterial hypertension: Summary of a Position Statement from the Sports Cardiology Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019; 26: 1549-1555 DOI: 10.1177/2047487319852807.
  • 5 Mont L, Pelliccia A, Sharma S. et al. Pre-participation cardiovascular evaluation for athletic participants to prevent sudden death: Position paper from the EHRA and the EACPR, branches of the ESC. Endorsed by APHRS, HRS, and SOLAECE. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017; 24: 41-69 DOI: 10.1177/2047487316676042.
  • 6 Hedman K, Cauwenberghs N, Christle JW. et al. Workload-indexed blood pressure response is superior to peak systolic blood pressure in predicting all-cause mortality. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019; 27: 978-987 DOI: 10.1177/2047487319877268.
  • 7 Hedberg P, Ohrvik J, Lonnberg I. et al. Augmented blood pressure response to exercise is associated with improved long-term survival in older people. Heart 2009; 95: 1072-1078 DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2008.162172.
  • 8 Kim D, Ha JW. Hypertensive response to exercise: mechanisms and clinical implication.. Clin Hypertens 2016; 22: 17 doi:10.1186/s40885-016-0052-y
  • 9 Schultz MG, Otahal P, Picone DS. et al. Clinical relevance of exaggerated exercise blood pressure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 1843-1845 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.015.
  • 10 Sabbahi A, Arena R, Kaminsky LA. et al. Peak blood pressure responses during maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing: reference standards from FRIEND (Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise: A National Database). Hypertension 2018; 71: 229-236 DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10116.
  • 11 Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W. et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 3021-3104 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
  • 12 Currie KD, Floras JS, La Gerche A. et al. Exercise blood pressure guidelines: time to re-evaluate what is normal and exaggerated?. Sports Med 2018; 48: 1763-1771 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-018-0900-x.
  • 13 Miyata M. Noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness using oscillometric methods: baPWV, CAVI, API, and AVI. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018 doi:10.5551/jat.ED098
  • 14 Trinkmann F, Benck U, Halder J. et al. Automated non-invasive central blood pressure measurements by oscillometric radial pulse wave analysis – results of the MEASURE-cBP validation studies. Am J Hypertens. 2020 DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa174
  • 15 Miyai N, Shiozaki M, Terada K. et al. Exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise is associated with subclinical vascular impairment in healthy normotensive individuals. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2020 DOI: 10.1080/10641963.2020.1806292
  • 16 Thanassoulis G, Lyass A, Benjamin EJ. et al. Relations of exercise blood pressure response to cardiovascular risk factors and vascular function in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2012; 125: 2836-2843 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.063933.
  • 17 Haarala A, Kahonen E, Koivistoinen T. et al. Pulse wave velocity is related to exercise blood pressure response in young adults. The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Blood Press. 2020: 1-8 DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2020.1750944
  • 18 Thompson PD, Arena R, Riebe D. et al. ACSM's new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ninth edition. Curr Sports Med Rep 2013; 12: 215-217 DOI: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31829a68cf.
  • 19 Bauer P, Kraushaar L, Dorr O. et al. Workload-indexed blood pressure response to a maximum exercise test among professional indoor athletes. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020: 2047487320922043 DOI: 10.1177/2047487320922043
  • 20 Bauer P, Kraushaar L, Most A. et al. Impact of vascular function on maximum power output in elite handball athletes. Res Q Exerc Sport 2019; 90: 600-608 DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1639602.
  • 21 Hedman K, Lindow T, Elmberg V. et al. Age- and gender-specific upper limits and reference equations for workload-indexed systolic blood pressure response during bicycle ergometry. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020: 2047487320909667 DOI: 10.1177/2047487320909667
  • 22 Harriss DJ, MacSween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817 doi:10.1055/a-1015-3123
  • 23 Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition 1989; 5: 303-311 discussion 312–303
  • 24 Schumacher G, Kaden JJ, Trinkmann F. Multiple coupled resonances in the human vascular tree: Refining the Westerhof model of the arterial system. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2018; 124: 131-139 doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00405.2017
  • 25 Samora M, Incognito AV, Vianna LC. Sex differences in blood pressure regulation during ischemic isometric exercise: The role of the beta-adrenergic receptors. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2019; 127: 408-414 doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00270.2019
  • 26 Green DJ, Hopman MT, Padilla J. et al. Vascular adaptation to exercise in humans: role of hemodynamic stimuli. Physiol Rev 2017; 97: 495-528 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00014.2016.
  • 27 Vlachopoulos C, Kardara D, Anastasakis A. et al. Arterial stiffness and wave reflections in marathon runners. Am J Hypertens 2010; 23: 974-979 DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2010.99.
  • 28 Ashor AW, Lara J, Siervo M. et al. Effects of exercise modalities on arterial stiffness and wave reflection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2014; 9: e110034 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110034.
  • 29 Sardeli AV, Gaspari AF, Chacon-Mikahil MP. Acute, short-, and long-term effects of different types of exercise in central arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2018; 58: 923-932 DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07486-2.
  • 30 Bhuva AN, D'Silva A, Torlasco C. et al. Training for a first-time marathon reverses age-related aortic stiffening. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75: 60-71 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.045.