Download PDF
Skull Base 2006; 16(1): 015-018
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-922095
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Copyright © 2006 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Endoscopic Nasal and Anterior Craniotomy Resection for Malignant Nasoethmoid Tumors Involving the Anterior Skull Base

Paolo G. Castelnuovo1 , Evaristo Belli3 , Maurizio Bignami1 , Paolo Battaglia1 , Federica Sberze1 , Giustino Tomei2
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Ospedale di Circolo, Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
  • 2Unit of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Ospedale di Circolo, Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
  • 3Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Rome “La Sapienza,” Rome, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 December 2005 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The traditional approach to sinonasal tumors involving the skull base has been the anterior craniofacial resection. The first report by Ketcham et al (American Journal of Surgery, 1963;106:698-703) documented their experience with 17 anterior craniofacial resections for malignant tumors of the sinonasal tract. Later experience with this technique at several centers has resulted in the publication of many refinements of technique and further reduction in the morbidity and mortality associated with this procedure. In our hands, endoscopic techniques have allowed us to approach the intranasal aspect of skull base lesions without external incisions and yet still achieve an en bloc resection. The type of lesions suitable for this approach and the associated technical issues are discussed in this article. Methods: Between 1999 and 2004, 18 patients with malignant nasoethmoid tumors underwent endoscopic nasal and anterior craniotomy resections. The average age of the patients 60.2 years, with a male-to-female distribution of 15 to 3. Mean follow-up period was 25.1 months. Results: Two patients died from postoperative complications, three died from recurrent disease and two from unrelated causes. Eleven patients are free of disease with a mean survival of 19.8 months. Conclusions: Although we do not consider this approach a replacement for the traditional anterior craniofacial resection, it is an important adjunct in the skull base surgeon's armamentarium.

KEYWORDS

Cranionasal - endoscopic - malignant tumors

REFERENCES

  • 1 Ketcham A S, Wilkins R H, Van Buren J M, Smith R R. A combined intracranial facial approach to the paranasal sinuses.  Am J Surg. 1963;  106 698-703
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Yuen A P, Fung C F, Hung K N. Endoscopic cranionasal resection of anterior skull base tumor.  Am J Otolaryngol. 1997;  18 431-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Thaler E R, Kotapka M, Lanza D C, Kennedy D W. Endoscopically assisted anterior cranial skull base resection of sinonasal tumors.  Am J Rhinol. 1999;  13 303-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Devaiah A K, Larsen C, Tawfik O, O'Boynick P, Hoover L A. Esthesioneuroblastoma: endoscopic nasal and anterior caniotomy resection.  Laryngoscope. 2003;  113 2086-2090
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 American Joint Committee on Cancer .AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. 6th ed. New York, NY; Springer 2002: 73-80
    Google Scholar

Federica SberzeM.D. 

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Ospedale di Circolo, Fondazione Macchi

University of Insubria, Viale Borri 57, 21100 Varese, Italy

Email: fedefranci.sberze@libero.it

      >