Cap-assisted colonoscopy and detection of Adenomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aim: Cap-assisted colonoscopy has improved adenoma detection in some but not other studies. Most previous studies have been limited by small sample sizes and few participating endoscopists. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether cap-assisted colonoscopy improves adenoma detection in a two-center, multi-endoscopist, randomized trial.

Patients and methods: Consecutive patients who presented for an elective colonoscopy were randomized to cap-assisted colonoscopy (4-mm cap) or standard colonoscopy performed by one of 10 experienced endoscopists. Primary outcome measures were mean number of adenomas per patient and adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes included procedural measures and endoscopist variation; a logistic regression model was employed to examine predictors of increased detection with cap use.

Results: A total of 1113 patients (64 % male, mean age 62 years) were randomized to cap-assisted (n = 561) or standard (n = 552) colonoscopy. The mean number of adenomas detected per patient in the cap-assisted and standard groups was similar (0.89 vs. 0.82; P = 0.432), as was the ADR (42 % vs. 40 %; P = 0.452). Cap-assisted colonoscopy achieved a faster cecal intubation time (4.9 vs. 5.8 minutes; P < 0.001), a similar cecal intubation rate (99 % vs. 98 %; P = 0.326), and a higher terminal ileum intubation rate (93 % vs. 89 %; P < 0.028). Cap-assisted colonoscopy resulted in a 20 % increase in ADR for some endoscopists and in a 15 % decrease for others. Individual preference for the cap was an independent predictor of increased adenoma detection in adjusted analysis (P < 0.001), whereas baseline low adenoma detection was not.

Conclusion: Although the efficiency of cecal and terminal ileum intubation was slightly improved by cap-assisted colonoscopy, adenoma detection was not. Cap-assisted colonoscopy may be beneficial for selected endoscopists.

Trial registration: clinicalTrials.gov (NCT01935180).

• References

• 1 van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 343-350
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 858-864
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut 2014; 63: 949-956
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-2541
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 873-885
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Gralnek IM, Siersema PD, Halpern Z et al. Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 353-360
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Dik VK, Gralnek IM, Segol O et al. Comparing standard colonoscopy with EndoRings™ colonoscopy: a randomized, multicenter tandem colonoscopy study – interim results of the Clever Study. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: 160
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kato N et al. Hood-assisted colonoscopy is more effective in detection of colorectal adenomas than narrow-band imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 379-383
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Watabe H et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 75-81
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Rastogi A, Bansal A, Rao DS et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2012; 61: 402-408
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Hewett DG, Rex DK. Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 775-781
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Park SM, Lee SH, Shin KY et al. The cap-assisted technique enhances colonoscopy training: prospective randomized study of six trainees. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2939-2943
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K et al. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 444-447
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Frieling T, Neuhaus F, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R et al. Prospective and randomized study to evaluate the clinical impact of cap assisted colonoscopy (CAC). Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 1383-1388
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM et al. Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2012; 61: 1426-1434
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Morgan J, Thomas K, Lee-Robichaud H et al. Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for investigation of gastrointestinal tract conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 2: CD008211
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH. Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 2667
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Snover D, Ahnen D, Burt R et al. Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated polyposis. In: Bosman T, Carneiro F, Hruban R, et al. eds. WHO classification of tumors of the digestive system. Lyon, France: 2010: 160-165
  Google Scholar
• 19 Morgan JL, Thomas K, Braungart S et al. Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2013; 17: 353-360
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Ng SC, Tsoi KK, Hirai HW et al. The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1165-1173
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar