Communication Disorders in Speakers of Tone Languages: Etiological Bases and Clinical Considerations

 

 Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Lexical tones are a phonetic contrast necessary for conveying meaning in a majority of the world's languages. Various hearing, speech, and language disorders affect the ability to perceive or produce lexical tones, thereby seriously impairing individuals' communicative abilities. The number of tone language speakers is increasing, even in otherwise English-speaking nations, yet insufficient emphasis has been placed on clinical assessment and rehabilitation of lexical tone disorders. The similarities and dissimilarities between lexical tones and other speech sounds make a richer scientific understanding of their physiological bases paramount to more effective remediation of speech and language disorders in general. Here we discuss the cognitive and biological bases of lexical tones, emphasizing the neural structures and networks that support their acquisition, perception, and cognitive representation. We present emerging research on lexical tone learning in the context of the clinical disorders of hearing, speech, and language that this body of research will help to address.

REFERENCES

• 1 U.S. Census Bureau .Language Use and English-speaking Ability. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-29.pdf Retrieved June 24, 2008
  Google Scholar
• 2 Fromkin V. Linguistics: An Introduction to Linguistic Theory. Malden, MA; Blackwell 2000
  Google Scholar
• 3 Chao Y-R. Cantonese Primer. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press 1947
  Google Scholar
• 4 Pulleyblank D. Tone in Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Reidel 1986
  Google Scholar
• 5 Yip M. Tone. In: de Lacy P The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. New York, NY; Cambridge University Press 2007
  Google Scholar
• 6 Hyman L M. Tone: is it different?. In: Goldsmith J, Riggle J, Yu A The Handbook of Phonological Theory. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA; Blackwell 2007
  Google Scholar
• 7 Nazzi T, Floccia C, Bertoncini J. Discrimination of pitch contours by neonates.  Infant Behav Dev. 1998;  21 779-784
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Bendor D, Wang X Q. Cortical representations of pitch in monkeys and humans.  Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;  16(4) 391-399
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Mattock K, Burnham D. Chinese and English infants' tone perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization.  Infancy. 2006;  10 241-265
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Mattock K, Molnar M, Polka L, Burnham D. The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life.  Cognition. 2008;  106(3) 1367-1381
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Werker J F, Tees R C. Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life.  Infant Behav Dev. 1984;  7 49-63
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Werker J F, Tees R C. The organization and reorganization of human speech perception.  Annu Rev Neurosci. 1992;  15 377-402
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Bent T, Bradlow A R, Wright B A. The influence of linguistic experience on the cognitive processing of pitch in speech and nonspeech sounds.  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006;  32(1) 97-103
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Gandour J T, Harshman R A. Crosslanguage differences in tone perception: a multidimensional scaling investigation.  Lang Speech. 1978;  21(1) 1-33
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Gandour J T. Tone perception in Far Eastern languages.  J Phonetics. 1983;  11 149-175
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Lee L, Nusbaum H C. Processing interactions between segmental and suprasegmental information in native speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese.  Percept Psychophys. 1993;  53(2) 157-165
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Gandour J, Dardarananda R. Identification of tonal contrasts in Thai aphasic patients.  Brain Lang. 1983;  18(1) 98-114
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Gandour J, Ponglorpisit S, Dardarananda R. Tonal disturbances in Thai after brain damage.  J Neurolinguistics. 1992;  7 133-145
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Gandour J, Ponglorpisit S, Khunadorn F et al.. Lexical tones in Thai after unilateral brain damage.  Brain Lang. 1992;  43(2) 275-307
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Yiu E, Fok A. Lexical tone disruption in Cantonese aphasic speakers.  Clin Linguist Phon. 1995;  9 79-92
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Gandour J. Aphasia in tone languages. In: Coppens P, Lebrun Y, Basso A Aphasia in Atypical Populations. Mahwah, NJ; Erlbaum 1998: 117-141
  Google Scholar
• 22 Wong P CM. Hemispheric specialization of linguistic pitch patterns.  Brain Res Bull. 2002;  56 83-95
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Xu Y. Production and perception of coarticulated tones.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;  95(4) 2240-2253
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Wong P CM, Diehl R L. Perceptual normalization for inter- and intratalker variation in Cantonese level tones.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;  46(2) 413-421
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Wang Y, Jongman A, Sereno J A. Dichotic perception of Mandarin tones by Chinese and American listeners.  Brain Lang. 2001;  78(3) 332-348
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Zatorre R J, Evans A C, Meyer E, Gjedde A. Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing.  Science. 1992;  256(5058) 846-849
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Klein D, Zatorre R J, Milner B, Zhao V. A cross-linguistic PET study of tone perception in Mandarin Chinese and English speakers.  Neuroimage. 2001;  13(4) 646-653
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Gandour J, Wong D, Hutchins G. Pitch processing in the human brain is influenced by language experience.  Neuroreport. 1998;  9(9) 2115-2119
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Wong P CM, Parsons L M, Martinez M, Diehl R L. The role of the insular cortex in pitch pattern perception: the effect of linguistic contexts.  J Neurosci. 2004;  24(41) 9153-9160
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Xu Y-S, Gandour J, Talavage T et al.. Activation of the left planum temporale in pitch processing is shaped by language experience.  Hum Brain Mapp. 2006;  27(2) 173-183
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Hickok G, Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing.  Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;  8(5) 393-402
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Griffiths T D, Warren J D. The planum temporale as a computational hub.  Trends Neurosci. 2002;  25(7) 348-353
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Schirmer A, Tang S L, Penney T B, Gunter T C, Chen H C. Brain responses to segmentally and tonally induced semantic violations in Cantonese.  J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;  17(1) 1-12
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34a Chandrasekaran B, Krishnan A, Gandour J T. Mismatch negativity to pitch contours is influenced by language experience.  Brain Res. 2007;  1128(1) 148-156
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34b Chandrasekaran B, Krishnan A, Gandour J T. Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours.  Brain Lang. 2009;  108(1) 1-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Chandrasekaran B, Gandour J T, Krishnan A. Neuroplasticity in the processing of pitch dimensions: a multidimensional scaling analysis of the mismatch negativity.  Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;  25(3-4) 195-210
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Chandrasekaran B, Krishnan A, Gandour J T. Experience-dependent neural plasticity is sensitive to shape of pitch contours.  Neuroreport. 2007;  18(18) 1963-1967
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Luo H, Ni J-T, Li Z-H et al.. Opposite patterns of hemisphere dominance for early auditory processing of lexical tones and consonants.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;  103(51) 19558-19563
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Boemio A, Fromm S, Braun A, Poeppel D. Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices.  Nat Neurosci. 2005;  8(3) 389-395
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Krishnan A, Xu Y-S, Gandour J, Cariani P. Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience.  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005;  25(1) 161-168
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Suga N, Xiao Z, Ma X, Ji W. Plasticity and corticofugal modulation for hearing in adult animals.  Neuron. 2002;  36(1) 9-18
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Ma X, Suga N. Augmentation of plasticity of the central auditory system by the basal forebrain and/or somatosensory cortex.  J Neurophysiol. 2003;  89(1) 90-103
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Wong P CM, Skoe E, Russo N M, Dees T, Kraus N. Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns.  Nat Neurosci. 2007;  10(4) 420-422
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Wang Y, Spence M M, Jongman A, Sereno J A. Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1999;  106(6) 3649-3658
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Wang Y, Jongman A, Sereno J A. Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;  113(2) 1033-1043
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Wayland R P, Guion S G. Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: a preliminary report.  Lang Learn. 2004;  54 681-712
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Francis A L, Ciocca V, Ma L, Fenn K. Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers.  J Phonetics. 2008;  36 268-294
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Wong P CM, Perrachione T K. Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults.  Appl Psycholinguist. 2007;  28 565-585
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Wang Y, Sereno J A, Jongman A, Hirsch J. fMRI evidence for cortical modification during learning of Mandarin lexical tone.  J Cogn Neurosci. 2003;  15(7) 1019-1027
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Wong P CM, Perrachione T K, Parrish T B. Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults.  Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;  28(10) 995-1006
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Kaan E, Wayland R, Bao M-Z, Barkley C M. Effects of native language and training on lexical tone perception: an event-related potential study.  Brain Res. 2007;  1148 113-122
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Song J H, Skoe E, Wong P CM, Kraus N. Plasticity in the adult human auditory brainstem following short-term linguistic training.  J Cogn Neurosci. 2008;  20(10) 1892-1902
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Iverson P, Kuhl P K, Akahane-Yamada R et al.. A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes.  Cognition. 2003;  87(1) B47-B57
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Wayland R P, Li B. Effects of two training procedures in cross-language perception of tones.  J Phonetics. 2008;  36 250-267
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Chen T H, Massaro D W. Seeing pitch: visual information for lexical tones of Mandarin-Chinese.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;  123(4) 2356-2366
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Ross L A, Saint-Amour D, Leavitt V M, Javitt D C, Foxe J J. Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments.  Cereb Cortex. 2007;  17(5) 1147-1153
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Ghazanfar A A, Chandrasekaran C, Logothetis N K. Interactions between the superior temporal sulcus and auditory cortex mediate dynamic face/voice integration in rhesus monkeys.  J Neurosci. 2008;  28(17) 4457-4469
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Lee J Y, Perrachione T K, Dees T M, Wong P CM. Differential effects of stimulus variability and learners' pre-existing pitch perception ability in lexical tone learning by native English speakers. Paper presented at: 16th Meeting of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences August 2007 Saarbrücken, Germany;
  Google Scholar
• 58 Wong P CM, Warrier C M, Penhune V B et al.. Volume of left Heschl's gyrus and linguistic pitch learning.  Cereb Cortex. 2008;  18(4) 828-836
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Schneider P, Sluming V, Roberts N et al.. Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl's gyrus reflects pitch perception preference.  Nat Neurosci. 2005;  8(9) 1241-1247
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Krumbholz K, Patterson R D, Seither-Preisler A, Lammertmann C, Lütkenhöner B. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.  Cereb Cortex. 2003;  13(7) 765-772
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Schneider P, Scherg M, Dosch H G, Specht H J, Gutschalk A, Rupp A. Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians.  Nat Neurosci. 2002;  5(7) 688-694
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Peper J S, Brouwer R M, Boomsma D I, Kahn R S, Hulshoff Pol H E. Genetic influences on human brain structure: a review of brain imaging studies in twins.  Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;  28(6) 464-473
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Dediu D, Ladd D R. Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;  104(26) 10944-10949
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Whitehill T L, Ciocca V. Perceptual-phonetic predictors of single-word intelligibility: a study of Cantonese dysarthria.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;  43 1451-1465
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Whitehill T L, Ciocca V, Chow DTY. Acoustic analysis of lexical tone contrasts in dysarthria.  J Med Speech-Lang Pathol. 2000;  8 337-344
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Ciocca V, Whitehill T L, Ng S-S. Contour tone production by Cantonese speakers with cerebral palsy.  J Med Speech-Lang Pathol. 2002;  10 243-248
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Wong P CM, Diehl R L. The effect of reduced tonal space in Parkinsonian speech on the perception of Cantonese tones. Paper presented at: 137th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the 2nd Convention of the European Acoustics Association March 1999 Berlin, Germany;
  Google Scholar
• 68 Canter G J. Speech characteristics of patients with Parkinson's disease: I. Intensity, pitch, and duration.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1963;  28 221-229
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Duffy J R. Motor Speech Production: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management. St. Louis, MO; Mosby 2005
  Google Scholar
• 70 Whitehill T L, Wong L L. Effect of intensive voice treatment on tone-language speakers with Parkinson's disease.  Clin Linguist Phon. 2007;  21(11-12);  919-925
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Ciocca V, Whitehill T L, Yin Joan M K. The impact of cerebral palsy on the intelligibility of pitch-based linguistic contrasts.  J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2004;  23(6) 283-287
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Jeng J-Y, Weismer G, Kent R D. Production and perception of Mandarin tone in adults with cerebral palsy.  Clin Linguist Phon. 2006;  20(1) 67-87
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Callan D E, Kent R D, Guenther F H, Vorperian H K. An auditory-feedback-based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;  43(3) 721-736
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Wong A O, Wong L L. Tone perception of Cantonese-speaking prelingually hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;  130(6) 751-758
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Ciocca V, Francis A L, Aisha R, Wong L. The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;  111(5 Pt 1) 2250-2256
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Law Z W, So L K. Phonological abilities of hearing-impaired Cantonese-speaking children with cochlear implants or hearing aids.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006;  49(6) 1342-1353
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Han D, Zhou N, Li Y, Chen X, Zhao X, Xu L. Tone production of Mandarin Chinese speaking children with cochlear implants.  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;  71 875-880
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 Khouw E, Ciocca V. Acoustic and perceptual study of Cantonese tones produced by profoundly hearing-impaired adolescents.  Ear Hear. 2006;  27(3) 243-255
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Yiu E M. Linguistic assessment of Chinese-speaking aphasics: development of a Cantonese aphasia battery.  J Neurolinguistics. 1992;  7 379-424
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 80 Zatorre R J, Gandour J T. Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies.  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;  363(1493) 1087-1104
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 81 Centeno J G. Considerations for an ethnopsycholinguistic framework for aphasia intervention. In: Ardila A, Ramos E Speech and Language Disorders in Bilinguals. New York, NY; Nova Science 2007: 213-234
  Google Scholar
• 82 Kohnert K. Language Disorders in Bilingual Children and Adults. San Diego, CA; Plural 2008
  Google Scholar

Patrick WongPh.D. 

Communication Neural Systems Research Group, The Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University

2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208

Email: pwong@northwestern.edu