Prediction of Total Knee Arthroplasty Sizes with Demographics, including Hand and Foot Sizes

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Anticipating implant sizes before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) allows the surgical team to streamline operations and prepare for potential difficulties. This study aims to determine the correlation and derive a regression model for predicting TKA sizes using patient-specific demographics without using radiographs. We reviewed the demographics, including hand and foot sizes, of 1,339 primary TKAs. To allow for comparison across different TKA designs, we converted the femur and tibia sizes into their anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimensions. Stepwise multivariate regressions were performed to analyze the data. Regarding the femur component, the patient's foot, gender, height, hand circumference, body mass index, and age was the significant demographic factors in the regression analysis (R-square 0.541, p < 0.05). For the tibia component, the significant factors in the regression analysis were the patient's foot size, gender, height, hand circumference, and age (R-square 0.608, p < 0.05). The patient's foot size had the highest correlation coefficient for both femur (0.670) and tibia (0.697) implant sizes (p < 0.05). We accurately predicted the femur component size exactly, within one and two sizes in 49.5, 94.2, and 99.9% of cases, respectively. Regarding the tibia, the prediction was exact, within one and two sizes in 53.0, 96.0, and 100% of cases, respectively. The regression model, utilizing patient-specific characteristics, such as foot size and hand circumference, accurately predicted TKA femur and tibia sizes within one component size. This provides a more efficient alternative for preoperative planning.

Publication History

Received: 28 April 2023

Accepted: 23 October 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
25 October 2023

Article published online:
22 November 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Peek AC, Bloch B, Auld J. How useful is templating for total knee replacement component sizing?. Knee 2012; 19 (04) 266-269
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Aslam N, Lo S, Nagarajah K, Pasapula C, Akmal M. Reliability of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2004; 70 (06) 560-564
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Unnanuntana A, Arunakul M, Unnanuntana A. The accuracy of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thai 2007; 90 (11) 2338-2343
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Howcroft DW, Fehily MJ, Peck C, Fox A, Dillon B, Johnson DS. The role of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty: comparison of three prostheses. Knee 2006; 13 (06) 427-429
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Wallace SJ, Murphy MP, Schiffman CJ, Hopkinson WJ, Brown NM. Demographic data is more predictive of component size than digital radiographic templating in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 2020; 32 (01) 63
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Trickett RW, Hodgson P, Forster MC, Robertson A. The reliability and accuracy of digital templating in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (07) 903-906
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Blevins JL, Rao V, Chiu YF, Lyman S, Westrich GH. Predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty using demographic variables. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B (6_Supple_A): 85-90
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Miller AG, Purtill JJ. Total knee arthroplasty component templating: a predictive model. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (09) 1707-1709
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Sershon RA, Courtney PM, Rosenthal BD, Sporer SM, Levine BR. Can demographic variables accurately predict component sizing in primary total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (10) 3004-3008
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Ren AN, Neher RE, Bell T, Grimm J. Using patient demographics and statistical modeling to predict knee tibia component sizing in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (06) 1732-1736
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Bhowmik-Stoker M, Scholl L, Khlopas A. et al. Accurately predicting total knee component size without preoperative radiographs. Surg Technol Int 2018; 33: 337-342
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Marino D, Patel J, Popovich Jr JM, Cochran J. Patient demographics and anthropometric measurements predict tibial and femoral component sizing in total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 2020; 6 (04) 860-865
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 van Egmond JC, Verburg H, Hesseling B, Mathijssen NMC. The correlation of shoe size and component size of primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2020; 33 (03) 260-264
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Rehman H, MacDonald DRW, Smith M, Zainudin S, Robertson G, Mitchell M. A novel technique for estimating component sizes in total knee arthroplasty. Int J Surg 2018; 52: 7-10
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Berend ME, Ritter MA, Hyldahl HC, Meding JB, Redelman R. Implant migration and failure in total knee arthroplasty is related to body mass index and tibial component size. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (6, Suppl 1): 104-109
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Abdel MP, Bonadurer III GF, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD. Increased aseptic tibial failures in patients with a BMI ≥35 and well-aligned total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (12) 2181-2184
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Ooka NHM, Campos ALS, da Fonseca VM. et al. Pre-operative templating for knee arthroplasty shows low accuracy with standard X-rays. Int Orthop 2018; 42 (06) 1275-1282
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Trainor S, Collins J, Mulvey H, Fitz W. Total knee replacement sizing: shoe size is a better predictor for implant size than body height. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2018; 6 (02) 100-104
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 US Census Bureau. USA QuickFacts 2010
  PubMed
• 20 Fong TS, Kim SC, Kim JE, Lee ES, Kim TW, Lee YS. Morphometric assessment of resected femoral cut surface in Korean knees and its fitting with western-designed femoral components. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (09) 1929-1937
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 McNamara CA, Hanano AA, Villa JM, Huaman GM, Patel PD, Suarez JC. Anthropometric measurements of knee joints in the Hispanic population. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (08) 2640-2646
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Mohan H, Chhabria P, Bagaria V, Tadepalli K, Naik L, Kulkarni R. Anthropometry of nonarthritic Asian knees: is it time for a race-specific knee implant?. Clin Orthop Surg 2020; 12 (02) 158-165
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Del Gaizo D, Soileau ES, Lachiewicz PF. Value of preoperative templating for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2009; 22 (04) 284-293
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Vaishya R, Vijay V, Krishnan M, Agarwal AK. Fallacies of CT based component size prediction in total knee arthroplasty - are patient specific instruments the answer?. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2018; 9 (01) 34-39
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Kunze KN, Polce EM, Patel A, Courtney PM, Levine BR. Validation and performance of a machine-learning derived prediction guide for total knee arthroplasty component sizing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141 (12) 2235-2244
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar