International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Technical NotesTechnical considerations in distraction osteogenesis
References (39)
- et al.
Bimaxillary osteodistraction for the treatment of facial asymmetry in adults
Br J Plast Surg
(2001) - et al.
Original sagittal split osteotomy revisited for mandibular distraction
J Maxillofac Surg
(2001) - et al.
Positional changes and stability of bone segments during simultaneous bilateral mandibular lengthening and widening by distraction
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2001) - et al.
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate children using an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device: A report of 2 cases
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2001) - et al.
A novel modular retention system for midfacial distraction osteogenesis
BJOMFS
(2000) - et al.
Endoscopically assisted intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2001) - et al.
Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular lengthening with different rates of distraction
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2001) - et al.
Preprosthetic vertical distraction osteogenesis of the mandible using an L-shaped osteotomy and titanium membranes for guided bone regeneration
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2001) Reflections on: distraction osteogenesis. Distraction osteogenesis
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2001)- et al.
Mandibular angle augmentation with the use of distraction and homologous lyophilized cartilage in a case of morphing to Michael Jackson surgery
Ann Chir Plast Esthet
(2001)
Vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis of the posterior edentulous mandible: a case report
Ann Chir Plast Esthet
Vertical distraction of the severely resorbed mandible. The Groningen Distraction Device
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Intraoral distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Reflections on: distraction osteogenesis. Distraction osteogenesis— the future?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis: special attention to treatment planning
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
Condylar resorption following distraction osteogenesis: a case report
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature: Part 1: clinical studies
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Shortening of mandibular linear distance with multivector distraction
J Craniofac Surg
Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in very young patients to correct airway obstruction
Plast Reconstr Surg
Cited by (33)
Vertical mandibular bone augmentation by the osteodistraction of the transplanted fibula free flap: A case series with long-term follow-up
2021, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :As the circulation of the osteotomized segments is partially maintained via the periosteum, less bone volume is lost than with GTR. A further advantage is that the expansion of the surrounding soft tissues is proportional to bone growth (Ilizarov, 1989b, a; Suhr et al., 2004). A major disadvantage of osteodistraction, however, is that it is time-consuming and may be uncomfortable to the patient.
Five-year follow-up of intraoral maxillary distraction with tooth-borne distractor in unilateral cleft lip and palate: A case report
2015, Journal of the World Federation of OrthodontistsSoft tissue changes during distraction osteogenesis
2011, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :It was used for the reconstruction of bone deformities in the maxillofacial region in the 1980s. Despite its advantages, there are some case reports describing complications18,20,24,25. Ilizarov presented the first systematic research about distraction osteogenesis.
Complication rates and associated factors in alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a comprehensive review
2009, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Complications were only sporadically reported in the literature. Problems and difficulties encountered in DO were mainly reported as case reports or case series14,17,24,70,73. A limited number of recently published articles have reported complications in widely varying ranges, including 36%45, 55%78, 57%74, 60%2, 66%52, 70%72, 76%15, 7964 and 100%14.
Advancement of the midface, from conventional Le Fort III osteotomy to Le Fort III distraction: review of the literature
2008, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUnderstanding Distraction Osteogenesis on the Maxillofacial Complex: A Literature Review
2007, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :All these deformities present hard and soft tissue deficiencies, and treatment with conventional techniques is extremely challenging. The main advantage of osteodistraction is its capability of promoting, at the same time, correction of bone defects and expansion of soft tissues.1,3,42-47 The tensional stress applied to bone determines adaptive changes on the adjacent soft tissues, in a process that could be appropriately named distraction histogenesis.2,3
- f1
Address: Mr Manfred A. A. Suhr FRCS (Edinburgh) FDSRCS (England), Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum Nord, Tangstedter Landstrasse 400, 22417 Hamburg, Germany, Tel.: 0049-40-5271-3760; Fax: 0049-40-5271-3767; E-mail:[email protected]