Articles
Epidemiology of spine tumors presenting to musculoskeletal physiatrists

https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2003.50125Get rights and content

Abstract

Slipman CW, Patel RK, Botwin K, Huston C, Zhang L, Lenrow D, Garvan C. Epidemiology of spine tumors presenting to musculoskeletal physiatrists. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:492-5. Objective: To report the incidence and epidemiologic formation of previously undetected primary and secondary spine tumors presenting as spinal and/or extremity pain to a physiatrist practicing in an academic or private practice multidisciplinary spine center. Design: Multicenter retrospective chart review. Setting: Three multidisciplinary spine settings (1 academic, 2 private). Participants: Charts of patients from 33 academic and 18 private practice settings. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Epidemiologic data collected included incidence, age, gender, race, and duration of symptoms before initial presentation. Symptom presentation data collected included intensity of pain when supine, sitting, standing, or walking; character of the pain; pain intensity as measured on the visual analog scale (VAS); spontaneous versus traumatic etiology; unexplained weight loss; presence of night pain; and fever. In addition, the results of radiographic studies including plain films, imaging, bone scan, and magnetic resonance imaging were recorded. The type of neoplastic disease was also assessed, primary versus metastatic, as well as the metastatic source. Results: The incidence of spine tumors was .69% in academic multidisciplinary spine centers and .12% in private practice multidisciplinary spine centers. Patients with spinal pain because of neoplastic disease who presented to musculoskeletal physiatrists were an average age of 65.3 years and reported a relatively high likelihood of night pain, aching character of symptom manifestation, spontaneous onset of symptoms, history of cancer, standing and walking provoking symptoms, and unexplained weight loss. In addition, the pain intensity level ranged widely, with an average VAS score of 6.8. Conclusions: There are many similarities and differences in the clinical presentation of patients with spinal pain from spine tumors who present to musculoskeletal physiatrists practicing in multidisciplinary spine centers when compared with those presenting to a primary care setting.

References (0)

Cited by (33)

  • Broadening the Differential for Unilateral Knee Pain: A Diagnostic Case Study

    2021, Journal for Nurse Practitioners
    Citation Excerpt :

    The ACR Appropriateness Criteria outline evidence-based recommendations of initial diagnostic imaging with knee radiography for an adult or a child 5 years of age or older with chronic knee pain, which is defined as joint pain for greater than 6 weeks’ duration.1,12,13 In this case, plain radiographs were obtained to rule out a bone tumor given the presenting red flag symptoms of chronicity and nighttime awakenings.4 Plain radiographs of the knee showed a mixed lytic and sclerotic lesion, with a soft tissue mass posteriorly.

  • Low Back Strain or Sprain

    2018, Essentials of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Musculoskeletal Disorders, Pain, and Rehabilitation
  • Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Classification Criteria

    2016, Pathology and Intervention in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
  • Predicting the evolution of low back pain patients in routine clinical practice: Results from a registry within the Spanish National Health Service

    2012, Spine Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    Pain not caused by systemic diseases was defined as pain in patients who had not been diagnosed with cancer, fibromyalgia, or inflammatory diseases (eg, rheumatoid arthritis or Bechterew's disease) and who did not show signs, which may suggest fibromyalgia (defined as diffuse pain with unexplained fatigue or sleep disturbances) or “red flags” for potential underlying systemic diseases, unless the appropriate diagnostic tests had ruled out this possibility. “Red flags” were defined as oncologic disease during the previous 5 years; constitutional symptoms such as unexplained weight loss, fever, chills; history of intravenous drug use; or immunocompromised host [7–10]. “Criteria for immediate referral to surgery” were defined as signs suggesting cauda equina syndrome (relevant or progressive paresia, loss of sphincter control, or saddle anesthesia), potential nerve root compression by disc herniation qualifying for surgery (disabling sciatic pain lasting 6 weeks or more, caused by nerve root compression from a disc protrusion or hernia, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), or symptomatic spinal stenosis for more than 3 months (defined as claudication unrelated to peripheral vascular disease with evidence of stenosis on MRI or computed tomography [CT] scans) [10–13].

  • The prognostic value of catastrophizing for predicting the clinical evolution of low back pain patients: A study in routine clinical practice within the Spanish National Health Service

    2012, Spine Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    Pain not caused by systemic diseases was defined as pain in patients who had not been diagnosed with cancer, fibromyalgia, or inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis or Bechterew disease (ankylosing spondylitis), and who did not show signs suggesting fibromyalgia or “red flags” for potential underlying systemic diseases. “Signs suggesting fibromyalgia” were defined as diffuse pain with unexplained fatigue or sleep disturbances, and “red flags” for potential underlying systemic diseases were defined as oncologic disease during the previous 5 years, constitutional symptoms (unexplained weight loss, fever, and chills), history of intravenous drug use, or immunocompromised host [1,33–35]. Criteria for referral to surgery were defined as signs suggesting cauda equina syndrome or nerve root compression resulting from disc herniation or spinal stenosis potentially qualifying for surgery.

  • Clinical reasoning for a patient with neck and upper extremity symptoms: A case requiring referral

    2012, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
    Citation Excerpt :

    Indeed, studies have shown that unexplained weight loss is not always a consistent finding. In particular, it has been found only in 15–24% of cases of tumors involving the spine (Deyo and Diehl, 1988; Slipman et al., 2003), whereas other features, such as night pain, have been reported in nearly half of the patients with spine tumors (Slipman et al., 2003). Perhaps though, the most striking and noteworthy feature of this case problem was the patient's shoulder presentation.

View all citing articles on Scopus

No commercial party having adirect financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

View full text