Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Automated multi-target tracking with kinematic and non-kinematic information

Automated multi-target tracking with kinematic and non-kinematic information

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The authors address an automated multi-target tracking (MTT) problem. In particular, our study is focused on robust data association considering an additional feature and the reliable track management by avoiding track duplications. As the additional feature, the amplitude information is combined with position measurements to improve the performance of the data association so as to effectively distinguish target-originated measurements from clutters. Because of its form of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which is often fluctuated according to targets' aspect and effective radar cross section, the usage of the amplitude information is not straightforward. To reduce the certain level of uncertainty of the SNR, the authors propose the SNR estimation algorithm. Moreover, the authors avoid the track duplication problem to achieve the reliability of track maintenance. Specifically, the authors solve the problem by exploiting well-known mean shift algorithm to merge duplications into appropriate clusters. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness and high estimation accuracy of the proposed MTT filter compared to existing methods.

References

    1. 1)
      • B. Ristic , S. Arulampalm , N. Grodon . (2004) Beyond the Kalman filter: particle filter for tracking application.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • Ehrman, L.M., Blair, W.D.: `Comparison of methods for using target amplitude to improve measurement-to-track association in multi-target tracking', Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, 10–13 July 2006, Florence, Italy.
    5. 5)
      • D. Simon . (2006) Optimal state estimation: Kalman, H infinity, and nonlinear approach.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • Song, T.L., Kim, D.S.: `Highest probability data association for active sonar tracking', Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, 10–13 July 2006, Florence.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Lerro, D., Bar-Shalom, Y.: `Automated tracking with target amplitude information', American Control Conf., 2009, p. 2875–2880.
    14. 14)
      • Y. Bar-Shalom , X.R. Li . (1995) Multitarget–multisensor tracking: principles and techniques.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • Slocumb, B.J., Klusman, M.E.: `A multiple model SNR/ RCS likelihood ratio score for radar-based feature-aid tracking', Proc. SPIE. Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets 2005, 2 August 2005, San Diego, CA, USA, 5913.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • Bar-Shalom, Y., Chang, K.C., Blom, H.A.P.: `Automatic track formation in clutter with recursive algorithm', Proc. 28th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, 13–15 December 1989, Tampa, Florida, p. 1402–1408.
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2011.0154
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2011.0154
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address