Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Assessment of MW-mile method for pricing transmission services: a negative flow-sharing approach

Assessment of MW-mile method for pricing transmission services: a negative flow-sharing approach

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A negative flow-sharing approach to allocate transmission transaction charges among users of transmission services is proposed. The approach uses the properties of the MW-mile method but takes into account the economic benefits of both trading parties by analysing their shares in negative power flow or counterflow. This approach is incorporated with the justified distribution factor for power flow tracing purposes. Two case studies based on a 5-bus system and an IEEE 14-bus system are used to illustrate the proposed approach. The results show that the proposed approach has merit over the traditional MW-mile approaches in the context of revenue reconciliation of transmission services, regardless of transaction arrangements and locations. The profit-sharing concept introduced here provides a better economic signal in allocating charges for counterflows, which could benefit trading parties.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • J.W. Marangon Lima . Allocation of transmission fixed charges: an overview. IEEE Trans. Power Trans. Power Appart. Syst. , 3 , 1409 - 1418
    3. 3)
      • W.J. Lee , C.H. Lin , L.D. Swift . Wheeling charge under a deregulated environment. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. , 1 , 178 - 183
    4. 4)
      • Y.S.C. Yuen , K.L. Lo . Simulation of bilateral energy markets using matlab. Int. J. Comput. Math. Electr. and Electron. Eng. , 2 , 424 - 443
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • R.K. Ross , L.L. Allen . A load flow based method for calculating embedded, incremental and marginal cost of transmission capacity. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 1 , 272 - 278
    8. 8)
      • Lo, K.L., Hassan, M.Y.: `Positive and negative aspects of MW-mile method for costing transmission transaction', 37thInt. Universities Power Engineering Conf. (UPEC), September 2002, 1, p. 358–362.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • D. Shirmohammedi , P.R. Gribik , E.T.K. Law , J.H. Malinowaski , R.E. O'Donnell . Evaluation of transmission network capacity use for wheeling transactions. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 4 , 1405 - 1413
    11. 11)
      • D. Shirmohammedi , X.V. Filho , B. Gorenstin , M.V.P. Pereira . Some fundamental technical concepts about cost based transmission pricing. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , 2 , 1002 - 1008
    12. 12)
      • D. Shirmohammadi , C. Rajagopalan , E.R. Alward , C.L. Thomas . Cost of transmission transactions: an introduction. IEEE Trans. on Power Syst. , 4 , 1546 - 1560
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd_20060416
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd_20060416
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address