Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Non-linear position control for hover and automatic landing of unmanned aerial vehicles

Non-linear position control for hover and automatic landing of unmanned aerial vehicles

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Control Theory & Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study presents a disturbance attenuation controller for horizontal position stabilisation for hover and automatic landings of a rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (RUAV) operating close to the landing deck in rough seas. Based on a helicopter model representing aerodynamics during the landing phase, a non-linear state feedback ℋ controller is designed to achieve rapid horizontal position tracking in a gusty environment. Practical constraints including flapping dynamics, servo dynamics and time lag effect are considered. A high-fidelity closed-loop simulation using parameters of the Vario XLC gas-turbine helicopter verifies performance of the proposed horizontal position controller. The proposed controller not only increases the disturbance attenuation capability of the RUAV, but also enables rapid position response when gusts occur. Comparative studies show that the ℋ controller exhibits performance improvement and can be applied to ship/RUAV landing systems.

References

    1. 1)
      • K. Zhou , J.C. Doyle , K. Glover . (1996) Robust and optimal control.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • Yang, C.D., Liu, W.H., Kung, C.C.: `Nonlinear ℋ', Proc. American Control Conf., May 2002, 6, p. 4353–4358.
    5. 5)
      • M.A. Khalaf , J. Huang , F.L. Lewis . (2006) Nonlinear ℋ.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • Toffoletto, R., Reddy, R., Lewis, J.: `Effect of ship frontal shape variation on flow field in flight deck region', Proc. Second Int. Conf. on Computational Fluid Dynamics, ICCFD, 15–19 July 2002, Sydney, Australia.
    8. 8)
      • Yang, C.D., Liu, W.H.: `Nonlinear ℋ', Proc. American Control Conf., June 2003, Denver, CO, USA, 4, p. 3454–3459.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • G.D. Padfield . (2007) Helicopter flight dynamics: the theory and applications of flying qualities and simulation modelling.
    12. 12)
      • R. Fang , P.J.A. Booij . (2006) Helicopter-ship qualification testing.
    13. 13)
      • Garratt, M.A.: `Biologically inspired vision and control for an autonomous flying vehicle', October 2007, PhD, Australian National University, Australia.
    14. 14)
      • H. Xin , C. He , J. Lee . (2001) Combined finite state rotor wake and panel ship deck models for simulation of helicopter shipboard operations.
    15. 15)
      • Yang, X., Pota, H., Garratt, M.: `Design of a gust-attenuation controller for landing operations of unmanned autonomous helicopters', 18thIEEE Int. Conf. on Control Applications, July 2009, Saint Petersburg, Russia, p. 1300–1305.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • Kung, C.C.: `Nonlinear ℋ', Proc. 17th World Congress, The Int. Federation of Automatic Control, July 2008, Seoul, Korea, p. 11346–11351.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2011.0046
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2011.0046
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address