Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Integrated predictive control and scheduling co-design for networked control systems

Integrated predictive control and scheduling co-design for networked control systems

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Control Theory & Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A predictive control and scheduling co-design approach is proposed to deal with the controller and scheduler design for a set of networked control systems which are connected to a shared communication network. In the proposed approach, a predictive controller is applied to generate the control predictions for each system using delayed sensing data and previous control information, and a time delay compensator is designed at the actuator side to actively compensate for the network-induced delay in the forward channel when the control action is taken. Two different scheduling algorithms, the existing static rate monotonic (RM) scheduling algorithm and a new dynamic scheduling algorithm called dynamic feedback scheduling (DFS), are considered to schedule the transmissions of the control signals generated by the predictive controller, which are packed and transmitted to the actuator in one packet simultaneously. Both the scheduling algorithms are designed with the guarantee of the stability of all the systems, which is achieved by ensuring that the time delay of the systems do not exceed the upper bound under which the systems are stable. It is also pointed out that the RM algorithm is a special case of the proposed DFS algorithm, in the sense that the former can work only in a private network environment, whereas the latter extends its application to such networks where other components occupying the network. Simulations for both the RM and the DFS algorithms, illustrate the validity of the proposed approach.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • L. Zhang , F. Hua-Jing . A novel controller design and evaluation for networked control systems with time-variant delays. J. Frankl. Inst., Eng. Appl. Math. , 161 - 167
    5. 5)
      • Ling, Q., Lemmon, M.D.: `Optimal dropout compensation in networked control systems', Proc. 42nd IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, December 2003, Maul, Hawali, USA, p. 670–675.
    6. 6)
      • Cervin, A.: `Integrated control and realtime scheduling', April 2003, PhD, Department of Automatic Control, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden.
    7. 7)
      • G.P. Liu , J.X. Mu , D. Rees , S.C. Chai . Design and stability analysis of networked control systems with random communication time delay using the modified MPC. Int. J. Control , 4 , 288 - 297
    8. 8)
      • Branicky, M.S., Liberatore, V., Phillips, S.M.: `Networked control system co-simulation for co-design', Proc. American Control Conf., June 2003, 4, Denver, USA, p. 3341–3346.
    9. 9)
      • Hristu-Varsakelis, D.: `Stabilization of networked control systems with access constraints and delays', Proc. 45th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, December 2006.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • Branicky, M.S., Phillips, S.M., Zhang, W.: `Scheduling and feedback co-design for networked control systems', Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, December 2002, Las Vegas, USA.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • J. Colandairaj , G.W. Irwin , W.G. Scanlon . Wireless networked control systems with qos-based sampling. IEE Proc., Control Theory Appl. , 1 , 430 - 438
    14. 14)
      • Hristu Varsakelis, D., Kumar, P.R.: `Interrupt-based feedback control over a shared communication medium', Proc. 41st IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, December 2002, 3, p. 3223–3228.
    15. 15)
      • M. Ben Gaid , A. Çela , Y. Hamam . Optimal integrated control and scheduling of networked control systems with communication constraints: application to a car suspension system. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. , 4 , 776 - 787
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • Brochett, R.W.: `Stabilization of motor networks', Proc. 34th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, 1995, Phoenix, USA, p. 1484–1488.
    20. 20)
      • F.L. Lian , J.K. Yook , D.M. Tilbury , J. Moyne . Network architecture and communication modules for guaranteeing acceptable control and communication performance for networked multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. , 1 , 12 - 24
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • T.C. Yang . Networked control systems: a brief survey. IET Proc., Control Theory Appl. , 4 , 403 - 412
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta_20070005
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta_20070005
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address