Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Non-recursive max* operator with reduced implementation complexity for turbo decoding

Non-recursive max* operator with reduced implementation complexity for turbo decoding

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In this study, the authors deal with the problem of how to effectively approximate the max* operator when having n>2 input values, with the aim of reducing implementation complexity of conventional Log-MAP turbo decoders. They show that, contrary to previous approaches, it is not necessary to apply the max* operator recursively over pairs of values. Instead, a simple, yet effective, solution for the max* operator is revealed having the advantage of being in non-recursive form and thus, requiring less computational effort. Hardware synthesis results for practical turbo decoders have shown implementation savings for the proposed method against the most recent published efficient turbo decoding algorithms by providing near optimal bit error rate (BER) performance.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • ‘Air interface for fixed and mobile broadband wireless access sytems: physical and medium access control layers for combined fixed and mobile operation in licensed bands’. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, IEEE P802.16e-2005 Amendment 2, February 2006.
    4. 4)
      • ‘Consulative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS): telemetry channel coding’, ser. Blue Book, May 1999.
    5. 5)
      • Berrou, C., Glavieux, A., Thitimajhima, P.: `Near Shannon limit error correcting coding and decoding: Turbo codes', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Communication (ICC), 1993, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 1064–1070.
    6. 6)
      • http://www.synopsys.com/Tools/Implementation/RTLSynthesis/DCUltra/Pages/default.aspx, accessed 2011.
    7. 7)
      • T.H. Cormen , C.E. Leiserson , R.L. Rivest , C. Stein . (2009) Introduction to algorithms.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • M.R. Spiegel . (1968) Mathematical handbook of formulas and tables.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • ‘3GPP TS 36.212 v8.0.0: multiplexing and channel coding’, 3rd Generation Partnership Project, 2007–2009.
    13. 13)
      • Robertson, P., Villebrun, E., Hoeher, P.: `A comparison of optimal and sub-optimal MAP decoding algorithms operating in the log domain', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Communication (ICC), 1995, Seattle, USA, p. 1009–1013.
    14. 14)
      • Miyauchi, T., Yamamoto, K., Yokokawa, T., Kan, M., Mizutani, Y., Hattori, M.M.: `High-performance programmable SISO decoder VLSI implementation for decoding turbo codes', Proc. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conf., 2001, San Antonio, USA, p. 305–309.
    15. 15)
      • ‘Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB): interaction channel for satellite distribution systems’. European Telecommunications Standards Institute. ETSI EN 301 790, March 2003, vol. 1.3.1.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2011.0217
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2011.0217
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address