Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Taylor approximation pricing for K-user multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) interference channels

Taylor approximation pricing for K-user multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) interference channels

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study considers the immense problem of sum rate maximisation in K-user multiple-input multiple-output interference channels (IFC). In order to address this problem, the authors propose an iterative Taylor approximation algorithm to find the optimal transmit covariance matrices, where each user maximises the sum rate function through Taylor expansion. Owing to the distributed nature of the ITA algorithm, Taylor terms can be treated as prices, where each user collects current prices from the others to perform update. This process further leads us modelling it as a more general concave n-person game to analyse the existence and uniqueness of the Nash equilibrium (NE). Then an iterative covariance-price updating (ICP) algorithm is proposed for flexible updating and establishing a convergence process to obtain the optimal solution under NE uniqueness conditions. Simulation results show that both algorithms come with similar performance and both significantly outperform the conventional iterative waterfilling algorithm.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • Shi, C.X., Schmidt, D.A., Berry, R.A., Honig, M.L., Utschick, W.: `Distributed interference pricing for the MIMO interference channel', Proc. 2009 IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., June 2009, Dresden, Germany, p. 1–5.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • Chen, Z., Vorobyov, S.A., Wang, C.-X., Thompson, J.: `Nash bargaining over MIMO interference systems', Proc. 2009 IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., June 2009, Dresden, Germany, p. 1–5.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Ho, Z.K.M., Gesbert, D.: `Balancing egoism and altruism on the interference channel: The MIMO case', Proc. 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., May 2010, Cape Town, South Africa, p. 1–5.
    14. 14)
      • M. Benaim , J. Azema . (1999) Dynamics of stochastic approximation algorithms, Seminaire de Probabilites XXXIII.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • S. Boyd , L. Vandenberghe . (2004) Convex optimization.
    17. 17)
      • J.F. Bonnans , A. Shapiro . (2000) Perturbation analysis of optimization problems.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • R. Horn , C. Johnson . (1985) Matrix analysis.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2010.0848
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2010.0848
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address