Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Combined methodology for measurement of available bandwidth and link capacity in wired packet networks

Combined methodology for measurement of available bandwidth and link capacity in wired packet networks

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Accurate measurement of network parameters such as available bandwidth (ABW), link capacity, delay, packet loss and jitter are used to support and monitor several network functions, for example traffic engineering, quality-of-service (QoS) routing, end-to-end transport performance optimisation and link capacity planning. However, proactive network measurement schemes can impact both the data traffic and the measurement process itself, affecting the accuracy of the estimation if a significant amount of probe traffic is injected into the network. In this work, the authors propose two measurement schemes, one for measuring ABW and the other for measuring link capacity, both of them use a combination of data probe packets and Internet control messaging protocol (ICMP) packets. Our schemes perform ABW and link-capacity measurements in a short time and with a small amount of probe traffic. The authors show a performance study of our measurement schemes and compare their accuracy to those of other existing measurement schemes and also show that the proposed schemes achieve shorter convergence time than other existing schemes and high accuracy.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • Dovrolis, C., Ramanathan, R., Moore, D.: `What do packet dispersion techniques measure?', Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2001, p. 905–914.
    3. 3)
      • Melander, B., Bjorkmann, M., Gunningberg, P.: `A new end-to-end probing and analysis method for estimating bandwidth bottlenecks', Proc. IEEE GLOBECOMM – Global Internet Symp., November 2002, p. 415–420.
    4. 4)
      • Pasztor, A., Veitch, D.: `Active probing using packet quartets', Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, November 2002, p. 293–305.
    5. 5)
      • http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns, accessed July 2007.
    6. 6)
      • W.H. Hesselink . Ternary search.
    7. 7)
      • Balakrishnan, H., Seshan, S., Stemm, M., Katz, R.H.: `Analyzing stability in wire-area network performance', Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS, June 1997, p. 2–12.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • Pasztor, A., Veitch, D.: `The packet size dependence of packet pair like methods', Proc. IEEE/IFIP Int. Workshop Quality of Service, May 2002, p. 204–213.
    10. 10)
      • V. Jacobson . Pathchar – a tool to infer characteristics of Internet paths.
    11. 11)
      • Zhang, Y., Duffield, N., Paxson, V., S. Shenker., Y.: `On the consistency of Internet path properties', Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop, November 2001, p. 197–211.
    12. 12)
      • B. De Schepper , B. Steyart , S. Wittevrongel , M. Moeneclaey , H. Bruneel . Constant hardware delay in integrated switching elements with multiserver output queues. IEE Proc. Commun. , 664 - 670
    13. 13)
      • Strauss, J., Katabi, D., Kaashoek, J.: `A measurement study of available bandwidth estimation tool', Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conf., October 2003, p. 39–44.
    14. 14)
      • R. Carter , M. Crovella . Measuring bottleneck link speed in packet-switched networks. Perform. Eval. , 297 - 318
    15. 15)
      • Jain, M., Dovrolis, C.: `Pathload: a measurement tool for end-to-end available bandwidth', Proc. Passive and Active Measurement, March 2002, p. 14–25.
    16. 16)
      • N. Hu , P. Steenkiste . Evaluation and characterization of available bandwidth probing techniques. IEEE JSAC (Special Issue in Internet WWW Meas., Mapping, Modeling) , 6 , 879 - 864
    17. 17)
      • Anagnostakis, K.G., Greenwald, M.B., Ryger, R.S.: `cing: Measuring network-internal delays using only existing infrastructure', Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, March–April 2003, p. 2112–2121.
    18. 18)
      • http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg, accessed 2007.
    19. 19)
      • P. Chimento , J. Ishac . Defining network capacity (RFC).
    20. 20)
      • K.G. Anagnostakis , M.B. Greenwald . Direct measurement vs indirect inference for determining network internal delays. Performance Eval. , 165 - 177
    21. 21)
      • S. Shalunov , B. Teitelbaum , A. Karp , J. Boote , M. Zekauskas . A one-way active measurement protocol (RFC).
    22. 22)
      • V. Paxson . End-to-end Internet packet dynamics. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. , 3 , 277 - 292
    23. 23)
      • http://www.nist.gov/dads/HTML/binarySearch.html, accessed May 2007.
    24. 24)
      • http://www.cs.unc.edu/~jasleen/research/ab-estimation, accessed September 2007.
    25. 25)
      • Timotijevic, T., Leung, C., Schormans, J.: `Accuracy of measurement techniques supporting QoS in packet based Intranet and Extranet VPNs', IEE Proc. Communications Special Edition on VPNs and Broadband Technology, February 2004, 151, p. 89–94.
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • Downey, A.: `Using Pathchar to estimate Internet link characteristics', Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, August 1999, p. 241–250.
    28. 28)
      • Johnsson, A.: `On the comparison of packet pair and packet train measurement', Proc. Swedish National Computer Networking Workshop, September 2003, p. 241–250.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2009.0249
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2009.0249
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address