Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Barriers to initiating depression treatment in primary care practice

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: This study used qualitative and quantitative methods to examine the reasons primary care physicians and nurses offered for their inability to initiate guideline-concordant acute-phase care for patients with current major depression.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Two hundred thirty-nine patients with 5 or more symptoms of depression seeing 12 physicians in 6 primary care practices were randomized to the intervention arm of a trial of the effectiveness of depression treatment. Sixty-six (27.6%) patients identified as failing to meet criteria for guideline-concordant treatment 8 weeks following the index visit were the focus of this analysis.

METHODS: The research team interviewed the 12 physicians and 6 nurse care managers to explore the major reasons depressed patients fail to receive guideline-concordant acutephase care. This information was used to develop a checklist of barriers to depression care. The 12 physicians then completed the checklist for each of the 64 patients for whom he or she was the primary care provider. Physicians chose which barriers they felt applied to each patient and weighted the importance of the barrier by assigning a total of 100 points for each patient. Cluster analysis of barrier socores identified naturally occurring groups of patients with common barrier profiles.

RESULTS: The cluster analysis produced a 5-cluster solution with profiles characterized by patient resistance (19 patients, 30.6%), patient noncompliance with visits (15 patients, 24.2%), physician judgment overruled the guideline (12 patients, 19.3%), patient psychosocial burden (8 patients, 12.9%), and health care system problems (8 patients, 12.9%). The physicians assigned 4,707 (75.9%) of the 6,200 weighting points to patient-centered barriers. Physician-centered barriers accounted for 927 (15.0%) and system barriers accounted for 566 (9.1%) of weighting points. Twenty-eight percent of the patients not initiating guideline-concordant acute-stage care went on to receive additional care and met criteria for remission at 6 months, with no statistical difference across the 5 patient clusters.

CONCLUSIONS: Current interventions fail to address barriers to initiating guideline-concordant acute-stage care faced by more than a quarter of depressed primary care patients. Physicians feel that barriers arise most frequently from factors centered with the patients, their psychosocial circumstances, and their attitudes and beliefs about depression and its care. Physicians less frequently make judgments that overrule the guidelines, but do so when patients have complex illness patterns. Further descriptive and experimental studies are needed to confirm and further examine barriers to depression care. Because few untreated patients improve without acute-stage care, additional work is also needed to develop new intervention components that address these barriers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tiemens BG, Ormel J, Jenner JA, Van der Meer K, van Os TWDP, van den Brink W. Training primary-care physicians to recognize, diagnose and manage depression: does it improve patient outcomes? Psychol Med. 1999;29:833–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, et al. Stepped collaborative care for primary care patients with persistent symptoms of depression: a randomized trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:1109–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Worrall G, Angel J, Chaulk C, Robbins M. Effectiveness of an educational strategy to improve family physicians’ detection and management of depression: a randomized controlled trial. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;161:37–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schulberg HC, Block MR, Madonia MJ, et al. Treating major depression in primary care practice: Eight-month clinical outcomes. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53:913–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Katon W, Von Kroff M, Lin E, et al. Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines: impact on depression in primary care. JAMA. 1995;273:1026–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Katon W, Robinson P, Von Korff M, et al. A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of depression in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53:924–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wells KB, Sherbourne C, Schoenbaum M, et al. Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;283:212–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Simon GE, VonKorff M, Rutter C, Wagner E. Randomised trial of monitoring, feedback, and management of care by telephone to improve treatment of depression in primary care. BMJ. 2000;320:550–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Katzelnick DJ, Simon GE, Pearson SD, et al. Randomized trial of a depression management program in high utilizers of medical care. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:345–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunkeler EM, Meresman J, Hargreaves WA, et al. Efficacy of nurse telehealth care and peer support in augmenting treatment of depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:434–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rost K, Nutting P, Smith J, Werner J, Duan N. Improving depression outcomes in community primary care practice: a randomized trial of the QuEST intervention. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:143–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rost K, Nutting PA, Smith J, Werner JJ. Designing and implementing a primary care intervention trial to improve the quality and outcome of care for major depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000;22:66–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Depression Guideline Panel. Depression in Primary Care, Vol 1. Detection and Diagnosis. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 5. Rockville, Md: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1993. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR Publication 93-0550.

  14. Depression Guideline Panel. Depression in Primary Care, Vol 2. Treatment of Major Depression. Clinical Practice Guideline, Number 5. Rockville, Md: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1993. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR Publication 93-0551.

  15. Prochaska JA, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams JW Jr, Rost K, Dietrich AJ, Ciotti M, Zyzanski S, Cornell J. Primary care physicians approach to depressive disorders: effects of physician specialty and practice structure. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:58–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Glasser M, Gravdal JA. Assessment and treatment of geriatric depression in primary care settings. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:433–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shao WA, Williams JW Jr, Lee S, Badgett RG, Aaronson B, Cornell JE. Knowledge and attitudes about depression among nongeneralists and generalists. J Fam Pract. 1997;44:161–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Callahan CM, Dittus RS, Tierney WM. Primary care physicians’ medical decision making for late-life depression. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:218–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hirschfeld RM, Keller MB, Panico S, et al. The National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association consensus statement on the undertreatment of depression. JAMA. 1997;277:333–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hartley D, Korsen N, Bird D, Agger M. How do primary care practitioners manage depression, treatment or referral? Analytic Rural Health Working Paper, Series 7. Portland, Me: Rural Health Research Center; 1996:37.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rost K, Humphrey J, Kelleher K. Physician management preferences and barriers to care for rural patients with depression. Arch Fam Med. 1994;3:409–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Blashfield RK. Mixture model tests of cluster analysis: accuracy of four hierarchical agglomerative methods. Psychol Bull. 1976;83:377–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Everitt BS. Cluster Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tunis SR, Hayward RS, Wilson MC, et al. Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. [see comments]. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:956–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayward RS, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, Bass EB. Practice guidelines. What are internists looking for? [see comments]. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:176–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rost K, Nutting P, Smith J, Coyne JC, Cooper-Patrick L, Rubenstein L. The role of competing demands in the treatment provided primary care patients with major depression. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:150–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nutting PA, Rost K, Smith J, Werner JJ. Competing demands from physical problems: effect on initiating and completing depression care over six months. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1059–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith JL, Rost KM, Nutting PA, Elliott CE, Duan N. A primary care intervention for depression. J Rural Health. 2000;16:313–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith JL, Rost KM, Nutting PA, Elliott CE. Resolving disparities in antidepressant treatment and quality-of-life outcomes between uninsured and insured primary care patients with depression. Med Care. 2001;39:910–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brown JM, Miller WR. Impact of motivational interviewing on participation and outcome in residential alcoholism treatment. Psychol Addict Behav. 1993;7:211–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rollnick S, Miller WR. What is motivational interviewing? Behav Cognitive Psychother. 1995;23:325–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mynors-Wallis L. Problem-solving treatment: evidence for effectiveness and feasibility in primary care. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1996;26:249–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mynors-Wallis LM, Gath DH, Lloyd-Thomas AR, Tomlinson D. Randomised controlled trial comparing problem-solving treatment with amitriptyline and placebo for major depression in primary care. BMJ. 1995;310:441–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Green LA, Miller RS, Reed FM, Iverson DC, Barley GE. How representative of typical practice are practice-based research networks? A report from ASPN. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:939–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gilchrist V, Miller RS, Gillanders WR, et al. Does family practice at residency teaching sites reflect community practice? J Fam Pract. 1993;37:555–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nutting PA, Baier M, Werner JJ, et al. Practice patterns of family physicians in practice-based research networks: a report from ASPN. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1999;12:278–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kottke TE, Brekke ML, Solberg LI. Making “time” for preventive services. Mayo Clinic Proc. 1993;68:785–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizating care for patients with chronic illness. Millbank Q. 1996;74:511–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wasson J, Keller A, Rubenstein L, et al. Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings: the clinician’s point of view. Med Care. 1992;20:42S-9S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cohen MZ, Tripp RT, Smith C, Sorofman B, Lively S. Explanatory models of diabetes: patient-practitioner variation. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:59–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cassell EJ. The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Clark NM, Becker MH, Janz NK, Lorig K, Dakowski W, Anderson L. Self-management of chronic disease by older adults: a review and questions for research. J Aging Health. 1991;3:3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Nutting MD, MSPH.

Additional information

This research was supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation through its Initiative on Depression and Primary Care, and by the National Institute of Mental Health, grant no. MH54444.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nutting, P.A., Rost, K., Dickinson, M. et al. Barriers to initiating depression treatment in primary care practice. J GEN INTERN MED 17, 103–111 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10128.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10128.x

Key words

Navigation