Skip to main content
Log in

A new instrument for residency program evaluation

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to develop a comprehensive program evaluation instrument. Following pilot work with residents, a 69-item instrument consisting of statements with 5-point strongly agree to strongly disagree response options was distributed to 107 residents; 104 responded. Psychometric analyses revealed no ceiling or floor effects; 9 items were deleted. There were three subscales: workload (19 items; α=.76); educational environment (29 items; α=.72) and lifestyle issues (12 items; α=.62). Mean item scores were significantly higher for educational environment (3.53; SD 0.28) than for workload (2.78; SD 0.39) and lifestyle (2.96; SD 0.42). Items with the lowest scores reflected issues that were largely fixable. The 60-item instrument appears to be psychometrically sound, comprehensive, and exportable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. 1996–1977 Graduate Medical Education Directory. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association: 1996.

  2. Gray JD. Global rating scales in residency education. Acad Med. 1996:71(suppl):S55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Butterfield PS. The stress of residency: a review of literature. Arch Intern Med. 1988:148:1428–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Norcini JJ, Grosso LJ, Shea JA, Webster GD. The relationship between features of residency training and ABIM certifying examination performance. J Gen Intern Med. 1987;2:330–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Norcini JJ, Webster GD, Grosso LJ, Blank LL, Benson JA. Ratings of residents’ clinical competence and performance on certifying examination. J Med Educ. 1987:62:457–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grosso L, Norcini JJ. Does feedback on examination performance help directors of internal medicine residencies evaluate the medical knowledge of their residents against national norms? Acad Med. 1990:69:979–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCue JD. The distress of internship: causes and prevention. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:449–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Small GW. House officer stress syndrome. Psychosomatics. 1981: 22:860–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Residency Services Committee, Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine. Stress and impairment during residency training: strategies for reduction, identification, and management. Ann Intern Med. 1988;148:1428–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwartz AJ, Black ER, Goldstein MG. Jozefowicz RF, Emmings FG. Levels and causes of stress among residents. J Med Educ. 1987;62:744–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Trontell MC, Carson JL, Taragin MI, Duff A. The impact of the night float system on internal medicine residency programs. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:445–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seelig CB. Quantifying qualitative issues in residency training: development and testing of a scaled program evaluation questionnaire. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:610–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Seelig CB, DuPre CT, Adelman HM. Development and validation of a scaled questionnaire for evaluation of residency programs. S Med J. 1995;88:745–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guilford JP, Fruchter B. Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill: 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Asch is the recipient of a Health Services Research and Development career development award from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bellini, L., Shead, J.A. & Asch, D.A. A new instrument for residency program evaluation. J GEN INTERN MED 12, 707–710 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07139.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07139.x

Key Words

Navigation