Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceived adequacy of tangible social support and health outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Health outcomes of patients with chronic disease might be influenced by assistance from others in performing daily activities. We examined whether perceived adequacy of such tangible support was associated with prognosis in a cohort of patients with coronary artery disease.

Design

Longitudinal cohort study.

Setting/Participants

In spring 1993, a cohort of 1,468 patients with chronic artery disease was identified using claims data. The cohort consisted of all surviving residents of Manitoba. Canada, who had been hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction from 1991 to 1992: 820 patients completed the initial survey, and 734 completed a follow-up survey approximately 1 year later.

Measurements and Main Results

Adequacy of tangible support was assessed by asking if respondents needed help at home because of health problems, and whether these needs were met. We examined the association between perceived adequacy of tangible support and health outcomes at 1 year (mortality, physical function). Of 820 participants, 74% perceived no need for help, 13% has sufficient help, 9% needed more help, and 5% needed much more help; 31 patients died during follow-up. After adjustment for age and initial health status, odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for death were: sufficient help 1.8 (0.61, 5.8); need more help 3.2 (1.1, 9.4); and need much more help 6.5 (2.0, 21.6) compared with respondents with no perceived need. Decline in physical function was also linearly related to perceiving less-adequate tangible support. Sensitivity analyses indicated it is highly improbable that results were due to selection bias.

Conclusions

Perceived lack of needed assistance was related to mortality and to decline in physical functioning. Adequacy of tangible support was an important prognostic factor for these patients with coronary artery disease and may be a determinant of health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Case R, Moss A, Case N, McDermott M, Eberly S. Living alone after myocardial infarction. Impact on prognosis. JAMA, 1992:267:515–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eriksen W. The role of social support in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease. A literature review. Fam Pract. 1994;11:201–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bucher H. Lack of social support reduces survival after first myocardial infarction. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:409–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berkman L. The relationship of social networks and social support to morbidity and mortality. In: Cohen S, Syme SL, eds. Social Support and Health. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press: 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen S, Syme L. The study and application of social support. In: Cohen S, Syme L, eds. Social Support and Health. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press: 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Orth-Gomer K, Rosengren A, Wilhelmsen L. Lack of social support and incidence of coronary heart disease in middle-aged Swedish men. Psychosom Med. 1993;55:37–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Berkman L, Leo-Summers L, Horwitz R. Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction. A prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:1003–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jenkinson CM, Madeley RJ, Mitchell RA, Turner ID. The influence of psychosocial factors on survival after myocardial infarction. Public Health. 1993;107:305–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Medalie JH, Goldbourt U. Angina pectoris among 10,000 men. Am J Med. 1976;60:910–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Seeman TE, Syme SL. Social networks and coronary artery disease: a comparison of the structure and function of social relations as predictors of disease. Psychosom Med. 1987;49:341–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vogt T, Mullooly J, Ernst D, Pope C, Hollis J. Social networks as predictors of ischemic heart disease, cancer, stroke and hypertension: incidence, survival and mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:659–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams R, Barefoot J, Califf R, et al. Prognostic importance of social and economic resources among medically treated patients with anglographically documented coronary artery disease. JAMA. 1992;267:520–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruberman W, Weinblatt E, Goldberg J, Chaudhary B. Psychosocial influences on mortality after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:552–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Spiegel D, Kraemer HC, Bloom JR, Gottheil E. Effect of psychosocial treatment on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Lancet. 1989;2:888–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schaefer C, Coyne JC, Lazarus RS. The health-related functions of social support. J Behav Med. 1981;4:381–406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oxman TE, Berkman LF, Kasl S, Freeman DH, Barrett J. Social support and depressive symptoms in the elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:356–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fleming R, Baum A, Singer JE. Social support and community mental health. In: Cohen S, Syme SL, eds. Social Support and Health. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press: 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kulik J, Mahler H. Social support and recovery from surgery. Health Psychol. 1989;8(2):221–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Norbeck J, Tilden V. Life stress, social support and emotional equilibrium in complications of pregnancy: a prospective multivariate study. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:30–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weinberger M, Tierney WM, Booher P, Hiner SL. Social support, stress and functional status in patients with osteoarthritis. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30:503–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. House JS, Robbins C, Metzner HM, et al. The association of social relationships and activities with mortality: prospective evidence from the Tecumseh Community Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1982; 116:123–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Berkman LF, Syme L. Social networks, host resistance and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;109:186–204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. House JS, Kahn RL. Measures and concepts of social support. In: Cohen S, Syme SL, eds. Social Support and Health. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chappell NL, Badger M. Social isolation and well-being. J Gerontol. 1989;44:S169–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s Manual. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roos N. From research to policy: what have we learned from designing the population health information system? Med Care. 1995;33(suppl):DS132–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, Mass: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ware J, Bayliss M, Rogers W, Kosinski M, Tarlov A. Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1996;276:1039–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ware J, Kosinski M, Bayliss M, McHorney C, Roger W, Raczek A. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1995;33:264–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Campeau L. Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation. 1976;54:522–3. Letter.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rose G. Cardiovascular Survey Methods. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1982. World Health Organization monograph series.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Diehr P, Patrick D, Hedrick S, et al. Including deaths when measuring health status over time. Med Care. 1995;33(suppl):AS164–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Friedman MM. Social support sources and psychological well-being in older women with heart disease. Res Nurs Health. 1993;16:405–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown, Inc.; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Drs. Woloshin and Schwartz are supported by a Veterans Affairs Fellowship in Ambulatory Care.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L.M., Tosteson, A.N.A. et al. Perceived adequacy of tangible social support and health outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. J GEN INTERN MED 12, 613–618 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07121.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07121.x

Key words

Navigation