Skip to main content
Log in

Did I answer your question?

Attending physicians’ recognition of residents’ perceived learning needs in ambulatory settings

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurately recognizing the learning goals of trainees should enhance teachers’ effectiveness. We sought to determine how commonly such recognition occurs and whether it improves residents’ satisfaction with the teaching interaction. In a cross-sectional survey of 97 internal medicine residents and 42 ambulatory clinic preceptors in five ambulatory care clinics in Washington and Oregon, we systematically sampled 236 dyadic teaching interactions. Each dyad participant independently indicated the residents’ perceived learning needs from a standardized list. Overall, the preceptors’ recognition of the residents’ learning needs, as measured by percentage of agreement between preceptors and residents on the learning topics, was modest (k 0.21, p=.02). The percentage of agreement for all topics was 43%, ranging from 8% to 66%. Greater time pressures were associated with lower agreement (38% vs 56% for the highest and lowest strata of resident-reported time pressure; 15% vs 43% for highest and lowest strata of preceptor-reported time pressure). Agreement increased as the number of sessions the pair had worked together increased (62% for pairs with >20 vs 17% for pairs with 0 previous sessions). Satisfaction with teaching encounters was high (4.5 on a 5-point scale) and unrelated to the degree of agreement (p=.92). These findings suggest that faculty development programs should emphasize precepting skills in recognizing residents’ preceived learning needs and that resident clinics should be redesigned to maximize preceptor-resident continuity and minimize time pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Beder HW, Darkenwald GG. Differences between teaching adults and pre-adults: some propositions and findings. Adult Educ. 1982;32:142–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hewson MG. Clinical teaching in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:76–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tibbles L. The accuracy of supervisors’ perceptions of family practice residents’ educational needs. Fam Med. 1985;17:13–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatt HR, Mendelson T. Teaching behaviors in the ambulatory care setting: are residents interested in what preceptors are teaching? J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(suppl 1):87. Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  5. O’Malley PG, Kroenke K, Ritter J, Dy N, Omon DM, Pangaro L. What do learners and teachers value most in the ambulatory setting and do they agree? J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(suppl 1):84. Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Irby DM. What clinical teachers in medicine need to know. Acad Med. 1994;69:333–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lonka K, Lindblom-Ylanne S. Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Educ. 1996;31:5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowen JL, Carline J. Learning in the social context of ambulatory care clinics. Acad Med. 1997;72:187–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McGlynn TJ, Wynn JB, Munzenrider RF. Resident education in primary care: how residents learn. J Med Educ. 1978;53:973–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was conducted while Dr. Laidley was an Ambulatory Care Fellow in the Northwest Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Wash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laidley, T.L., Braddock, C.H. & Fihn, S.D. Did I answer your question?. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 46–50 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.11318.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.11318.x

Key Words

Navigation