Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Urethral catheter removal 3 days after radical retropubic prostatectomy is feasible and desirable

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to assess the feasibility of urethral catheter removal 3 days after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Twenty-two patients who underwent RRP with a watertight eight-suture vesicourethral anastomosis had their urethral catheter removed usually on postoperative day (POD) 3. The average day of urethral catheter removal was POD 3.2. At 3 months, 56% of patients required no or one protective pad to stay dry and 68.4% of patients ‘never leaked’ or ‘leaked occasionally’. Following RRP, the urethral catheter can be removed as early as POD 3 if the intraoperative anastomosis is watertight without compromising urinary continence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walsh PC . Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy In: Walsh PC, Retik B, Vaughn ED et al (eds). Campbell's Urology, 7th edn. WB Saunders: Philadelphia 1998 pp 2565–2588

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sanda MG, Osterline JE, Montie JE . Postoperative care In: Resnick MI, and Thompson IM Jr (eds). Surgery of the Prostate Churchill Livingstone: New York 1998

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abbou CC et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary results Urology 2000 55: 630–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G . Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Montsouris Technique J Urol 2000 163: 1643–1649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nadu A et al. Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy J Urol 2001 166: 1662–1664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Litwin M et al. Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer JAMA 1995 273: 129–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dalton DP et al. Radiographic assessment of the vesicourethral anastomosis directing early decatheterization following nerve-sparing radical retropbubic prostatectomy J Urol 1989 141: 79–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Little J Jr et al. Early urethral catheter removal following radical prostatectomy: a pilot study Urology 1995 46: 429–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coogan C et al. Urethral catheter removal prior to hospital discharge following radical prostatectomy Urology 1997 49: 400–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Souto CA et al. Experience with early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy J Urol 2000 163: 865–866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Santis WF, Hoffman MA, Dewolf WC . Early catheter removal in 100 consecutive patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy BJU Int 2000 85: 1067–1068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lepor H, Nieder A, Fraiman M . Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable Urology 2001 58: 425–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kielb S et al. Assessment of early continence recovery after radical prostatectomy: patient reported symptoms and impairment J Urology 2001 66: 958–961

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albani, J., Zippe, C. Urethral catheter removal 3 days after radical retropubic prostatectomy is feasible and desirable. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 5, 291–295 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500601

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links