Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Restoring mismatch repair does not stop the formation of reciprocal translocations in the colon cancer cell line HCA7 but further destabilizes chromosome number

Abstract

An important anticarcinogenic function of the mismatch repair (MMR) system is its role in preventing recombination between similar, but nonidentical (homeologous) sequences, thus preventing chromosomal rearrangements. We recently identified a novel chromosomal instability (CIN) phenotype in an MMR defective colon cancer cell line (HCA7) characterized by an ongoing tendency to multiple reciprocal chromosomal translocations. To analyse the relation between MMR and chromosomal changes more closely, the HCA7 stem clone was divided into three stocks. The first was stably transfected with MLH1 expression plasmid, the second was regularly exposed to the demethylating agent 5-azacytidin to re-express the hypermethylated MLH1 gene, and the third was an unmanipulated control stock. All stocks were propagated in vitro for 55–80 passages and, furthermore, some of the early passages were irradiated to induce DNA double-strand breaks. Multiplex-fluorescent in situ hybridization (M-FISH) analysis showed that all three stocks acquired varying numbers of reciprocal translocations and other structural changes at some point. Interestingly, the control stock, which is MMR defective, maintained its numerical chromosomal stability, while some of the MMR-proficient clones showed additional numerical instability. Although the control stock was less sensitive to irradiation, its surviving clones showed marked stability of chromosome structure and number compared to the MMR-competent stocks. These results show that restoring MMR does not prevent the development of reciprocal translocations but rather predisposes cells to numerical CIN after irradiation. Thus, the accumulating data suggest that MMR defect may not be necessary for the development of reciprocal chromosomal translocations but might be permissive.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Rahman WM, Katsura K, Rens W, Gorman PA, Sheer D, Bicknell D, Bodmer WF, Arends MJ, Wyllie AH and Edwards PAW . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 2538–2543.

  • Bardelli A, Cahill CP, Lederer G, Speicher MR, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B and Lengauer C . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 5770–5775.

  • Bocker T, Schlegel J, Kullmann F, Stumm G, Zirngibl H, Epplen JT and Ruschoff J . (1996). J. Pathol., 179, 15–19.

  • Buermeyer AB, Wilson-Van Patten C, Baker SM and Liskay M . (1999). Cancer Res., 59, 538–541.

  • Chan TL, Curtis LC, Leung SY, Farrington SM, Ho JW, Chan ASY, Lam PWY, Tse CW, Dunlop MG, Wyllie AH and Yuen ST . (2001). Oncogene, 20, 4871–4876.

  • Chauveinc L, Dutrillaux AM, Validire P, Padoy E, Sabatier L, Couturier J and Dutrillaux B . (1999). Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 114, 1–8.

  • Ciotta C, Ceccotti S, Aquilina G, Humbert O, Palombo F, Jiricny J and Bignami M . (1998). J. Mol. Biol., 276, 705–719.

  • de Wind N, Dekker M, Berns A, Radman M and Riele HT . (1995). Cell, 82, 321–330.

  • Deans B, Griffin CS., O’Regan P, Jasin M and Thacker J . (2003). Cancer Res., 63, 8181–8187.

  • Dutrillaux B . (1995). Adv. Cancer Res., 67, 59–82.

  • Elliott B and Jasin M . (2001). Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 2671–2682.

  • Eshleman JR, Casey G, Kochera ME, Sedwick WD, Swinler SE, Veigl ML, Willson JKV, Schwartz S and Markowitz SD . (1998). Oncogene, 17, 719–725.

  • Ferguson DO, Sekiguchi JM, Chang S, Frank KM, Gao YJ, DePinho RA and Alt FW . (2000). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 6630–6633.

  • Georgiades IB, Curtis LJ, Morris RM, Bird CC and Wyllie AH . (1999). Oncogene, 18, 7933–7940.

  • Giannini G, Ristori E, Cerignoli F, Rinaldi C, Zani M, Viel A, Ottini L, Crescenzi M, Martinotti S, Bignami M, Frati L, Screpanti I and Gulino A . (2002). EMBO Rep., 3, 248–254.

  • Harfe BD and Jinks-Robertson S . (2000). Mutat. Res.-Fund. Mol. M., 451, 151–167.

  • Jasin M . (2000). Cancer Invest., 18, 78–86.

  • Kim NG, Choi YR, Baek MJ, Kim YH, Kang H, Kim NK, Min JS and Kim H . (2001). Cancer Res., 61, 36–38.

  • Lambert B, Holmberg K, Hackman P and Wennborg A . (1998). Mutat. Res., 405, 161–170.

  • Lefevre SH, Vogt N, Dutrillaux AM, Chauveinc K, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Doz F, Desjardins L, Dutrillaux B, Chevillard S and Malfoy B . (2001). Oncogene, 20, 8092–8099.

  • Limoli CL, Corcoran JJ, Jordan R, Morgan WF and Schwartz JL . (2001). Br. J. Cancer, 84, 489–492.

  • Moynahan ME, Cui TY and Jasin M . (2001). Cancer Res., 61, 4842–4850.

  • Peltomäki P . (2001). Mutat. Res.-Rev. Mutat. Res., 488, 77–85.

  • Richardson C and Jasin M . (2000). Nature, 405, 697–700.

  • Richardson C, Stark JM, Ommundsen M and Jasin M . (2004). Oncogene, 23, 546–553.

  • Risinger JI, Umar A, Glaab WE, Tindall KR, Kunkel TA and Barrett JC . (1998). Cancer Res., 58, 2978–2981.

  • Roschke AV, Stover K, Tonon G, Schaffer AA and Kirsch IR . (2002). Neoplasia, 4, 19–31.

  • Schlegel J, Stumm G, Scherthan H, Bocker T, Zirngibl H, Ruschoff J and Hofstadter F . (1995). Cancer Res., 55, 6002–6005.

  • Schweizer P, Moisio AL, Kuismanen SA, Truninger K, Vierumaki R, Salovaara R, Arola J, Butzow R, Jiricny J, Peltomäki P and Nyström-Lahti M . (2001). Cancer Res., 61, 2813–2815.

  • Sonoda E, Sasaki MS, Buerstedde JM, Bezzubova O, Shinohara A, Ogawa H, Takata M, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y and Takeda S . (1998). EMBO J., 17, 598–608.

  • Szostak JW, Orrweaver TL and Rothstein RJ . (1983). Cell, 33, 25–35.

  • Tsuji T, Sawai T, Nakagoe T, Hidaka S, Shibasaki S, Tanaka K, Nanashima A, Yamaguchi H, Yasutake T and Tagawa Y . (2003). J. Gastroenterol., 38, 1185–1188.

  • Wheeler JM, Beck NE, Kim HC, Tomlinson IP, Mortensen NJ and Bodmer WF . (1999). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 10296–10301.

  • Yu V, Koehler M, Steinlein C, Schmid M, Hanakahi LA, van Gool AJ, West SC and Venkitaraman AR . (2000). Gene Dev., 14, 1400–1406.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Paul Edwards for valuable advice, Lauri Aaltonen for access to mycoplasma-free tissue culture facility, Pekka Ellonen for computer support, and Tuija Lundan, Amber Alsop, Reetta Kariola and Saila Saarinen for expert technical advice/assistance. This work is funded by the Academy of Finland, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Finnish Cancer Foundation, the Helsinki University Central Hospital and the NIH Grant CA82282.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wael M Abdel-Rahman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdel-Rahman, W., Lohi, H., Knuutila, S. et al. Restoring mismatch repair does not stop the formation of reciprocal translocations in the colon cancer cell line HCA7 but further destabilizes chromosome number. Oncogene 24, 706–713 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208129

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208129

Keywords

Search

Quick links