Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

The Cochrane Library: more systematic reviews on nutrition needed

Abstract

The knowledge and relevance of nutrition as well as the demand for well-funded advices increase. The Cochrane Collaboration plays a leading role within the evidence-based medicine and practice. We advocate therefore more specialized nutritional interest within the Cochrane Collaboration. In case ‘Nutrition’ needs more attention within the Cochrane Library, one of the first priorities is deciding about whether to include non-randomized studies into the Specialized Register and generating lists of journals to handsearch for such a Specialized Register. Preparatory to these activities an inventory of Nutritional content within the Cochrane Library is needed. We estimate that reviews directly related to nutrition and those of borderline interest to nutrition represent less than 4% of all published reviews in The Cochrane Library.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker L & van Binsbergen JJ (2005): How can a proposed Cochrane Diet and Nutrition Field work effectively? Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 59, S167–S171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane (2004): The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

  • Garrow JS (1992): Would clinical nutrition benefit from meta-analyses and trials registers? Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 46, 843–845.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lind. The James Lind Library Website—www.jameslindlibrary.org.

  • Lodge M, Becker L, Rosser W, Van Weel C & van Binsbergen JJ (2005): Organisation of a proposed Cochrane Diet and Nutrition Field. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 59, S162–S166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves B, van Binsbergen JJ & Van Weel C (2005): Methodology within a proposed Cochrane Diet and Nutrition Field. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 59, S155–S161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten R, Clarke M & Hetherington J (2005): The Cochrane Collaboration. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 59, S147–S149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Binsbergen JJ van (1997): Nutritional factors in Dutch family medicine: an inventory. Suppl. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 65 (Suppl.), 1967S–1973S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Binsbergen JJ & Drenthen AJM (2003): Patient information letters on nutrition; development and implementation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. (Suppl), 1035S–1038S.

  • van Binsbergen JJ, Delaney BC & Van Weel C (2003): Nutrition in primary care: scope and relevance of output from the Cochrane Collaboration. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. (Suppl), 1083S–1088S.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C D Summerbell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Summerbell, C., Chinnock, P., O'Malley, C. et al. The Cochrane Library: more systematic reviews on nutrition needed. Eur J Clin Nutr 59 (Suppl 1), S172–S178 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602193

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602193

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links