Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Prediction of DXA-determined whole body fat from skinfolds: importance of including skinfolds from the thigh and calf in young, healthy men and women

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the relationship of percent body fat (%fat), assessed by dual energy-X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or a four-compartment model, with upper body and lower limb skinfolds.

Design:

Cross-sectional design involving forward stepwise and hierarchical multiple regression analyses to assess the relationship of %fat with skinfolds and a combination of four commonly used upper body skinfolds (biceps, triceps, subscapular and iliac crest) with the calf and thigh skinfolds.

Setting:

University research laboratory.

Subjects:

In all, 31 females, mean age 20.9 (±2.0) y, and 21 males, mean age 22.3 (±5.5) y volunteered for this study, which was approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor.

Measurements:

%fat from DXA in both groups, and %fat from a four-compartment (water, bone mineral mass, fat and residual) model (%fat4C) in females only. Skinfolds were measured at the abdomen, iliac crest, biceps, triceps, subscapular, calf and thigh.

Results:

All skinfolds were positively associated with DXA estimates of %fat (P<0.01). In males and females, the thigh skinfold had the highest correlation with %fat. This was also observed when %fat4C was used as the criterion in females. Stepwise multiple regression analysis using %fatDXA as the criterion selected the thigh (R2=0.82), calf (R2 change 0.04) and iliac crest (R2 change=0.03) for females, and the thigh (R2=0.79), iliac crest (R2 change=0.11) and abdomen (R2 change=0.03) for males (all P<0.01). When %fat4C was used as the criterion in the females, only the thigh was selected as a significant predictor (R2=0.76). Independent prediction factors were created from the sum of biceps, triceps, subscapular and iliac crest (∑4skf) and from the sum of the thigh and calf (∑thigh+calf). These factors were then entered into a hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis to predict percent fat. Order of entry was varied to allow the assessment of unique variance accounted for by each predictor. The sum of the thigh and calf explained more variance in %fatDXA than that explained by the ∑4skf alone, irrespective of the order of entry in both males and females. This was also observed when %fat4C was used as the criterion in the females.

Conclusions:

The results of this study confirm that lower body skinfolds are highly related to percent body fat in fit and healthy young men and women, and uphold current recommendations by the British Olympic Association to include the thigh skinfold with ∑4skf. Conventional use of the ∑4skf to estimate percent body fat is significantly enhanced by the inclusion of the thigh and calf skinfolds, either independently or in combination. In this group of males and females, the sum of the thigh and calf skinfolds accounted for the most variance in percent fat.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brožek J, Grande F, Anderson JT & Keys A (1963): Densitometric analysis of body composition: revision of some quantitative assumptions. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 110, 113–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarys JP, Martin AD, Drinkwater DT & Marfell-Jones MJ (1987): The skinfold: myth and reality. J. Sports Sci. 5, 3–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clasey JL, Kanaley JA, Wideman L, Heymsfield SB, Teates CD, Gutgeswell ME, Thorner MO, Hartman ML & Weltman A (1999): Validity of methods of body composition assessment in young and older men and women. J. Appl. Physiol. 86, 1728–1738.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Lorenzo A, Andreoli A, Mathie J & Withers P (1997): Predicting body cell mass with bioimpedance by using theoretical models: a technological review. J. Appl. Physiol. 82, 1542–1558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durnin JVGA & Rahaman MM (1967): The assessment of the amount of fat in the human body from measurements of skinfold thickness. Br. J. Nutr. 21, 681–689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durnin JVGA. & Womersley J (1974): Body fat assessment from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br. J. Nutr. 32, 77–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durnin JVGA (1997): Skinfold thickness measurement. Br. J. Nutr. 78, 1042–1043.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eliakim A, Burke GS & Cooper DM (1997): Fitness, fatness, and the effect of training assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and skinfold-thickness measurements in healthy adolescent females. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 66, 223–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eston RG, Evans R & Fu F (1994): Estimation of body composition in Chinese and British males by ultrasonic assessment of segmental adipose tissue volume. Br. J. Sports Med. 28, 9–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eston RG, Fu F & Fung L (1995): Validity of conventional anthropometric techniques for predicting body composition in healthy Chinese adults. Br. J. Sports Med. 29, 52–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eston RG (2003): Prediction of body fat from skinfolds: the importance of including sites from the lower limb. J. Sports Sci. 21, 369–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eston RG & Powell C (2003): Prediction of percent body fat in children using skinfolds from the upper and lower body. Revista Portuguesa de Ciencias do Desporto 3, 63 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, Heo M, Jebb SA, Murgatroyd PR & Sakamato Y (2000): Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72, 694–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Going SB (1996): Densitometry. In Human Body Composition, eds AF Roche, SB Heymsfield & TG Lohman, pp 3–24. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudivaka R, Schoeller DA, Kushner RF & Bolt MJG (1999): Single- and multifrequency models for bioelectrical impedance analysis of body water compartments. J. Appl. Physiol. 87, 1087–1096.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes MR & Martin AD (2001): Human body composition. In Kinanthropometry and Exercise Physiology Laboratory Manual: Tests, Procedures and Data Volume 1: Anthropometry, eds R Eston & T Reilly, pp 7–46. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymsfield SB, Wang J, Kehayias J, Heshka S, Lichtman S & Pierson RN (1989): Chemical determination of human body density in vivo: relevance to hydrodensitometry. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 50, 1282–1289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heymsfield SB, Lichtman S, Baumgartner J, Wang J, Kamen Y, Aliprantis A & Pierson RN (1990): Body composition of humans: comparison of two improved four compartment models that differ in expense, technical complexity and radiation exposure. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 52, 52–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heyward VH & Stolarczyk LM (1996): Applied Body Composition Assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson AS & Pollock ML (1978): Generalised equations for predicting body density of men. Br. J. Nutr. 40, 497–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson AS, Pollock ML & Ward A (1980): Generalised equations for predicting body density of women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 12, 175–181.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jebb SA, Goldberg GR, Jennings G & Elia M (1995): Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements of body composition: effects of depth and tissue thickness, including comparisons with direct analysis. Clin. Sci. (London) 88, 319–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohrt W (1998): Preliminary evidence that DEXA provides an accurate assessment of body composition. J. Appl. Physiol. 84, 372–377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laskey MA, Lyttle KD, Flaxman ME & Barber RW (1992): The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual energy x-ray absorptiometer whole body scanning mode. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 46, 39–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman TG (1996): Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. In Human Body Composition, eds AF Roche, SB Heymsfield & TG Lohman, pp 63–78. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malina RM (1996): Regional body composition: age, sex and ethnic variation. In Human Body Composition, eds AF Roche, SB Heymsfield & TG Lohman, pp 217–255. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malina RM & Bouchard C (1988): Subcutaneous fat distribution during growth. In Fat Distribution During Growth and Later Outcomes, eds C Bouchard & FE Johnston, pp 63–84. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin AD, Ross WD, Drinkwater DT & Clarys JP (1985): Prediction of body fat by skinfold calliper: assumptions and cadaver evidence. Int. J. Obes. 9, 31–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez J, Keys A, Anderson JT & Grande F (1960): Density of fat and bone mineral of the mammalian body. Metabolism 9, 472–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton K (1996): Anthropometric estimation of body fat. In Anthropometrica, eds K Norton & T Olds, pp 171–198. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli A, Formica C, Wang Z & Heymsfield SB (1996): Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition model: review of physical concepts. Am. J. Physiol. 271, E941–E951.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli A, Wang Z, Formica C & Heymsfield SB (1998): Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: fat estimation errors due to variation in soft tissue hydration. Am. J. Physiol. 274, E808–E816.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prior BM, Cureton KJ, Modlesky CM, Evans EM, Sloniger MA, Saunders M & Lewis RD (1997): In- vivo validation of whole body composition estimates from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J. Appl. Physiol. 83, 623–630.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly T, Maughan RJ & Hardy L (1996): Body fat consensus statement of the steering groups of the British Olympic Association. Sports Exerc. Injury 2, 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeller DA (1996): Hydrometry. In Human Body Composition, eds AF Roche, SB Heymsfield & TG Lohman, pp 25–44. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter MH, Lohman TG, Boileau RA, Horswill CA, Stillman RJ, Van Loan MD & Bemben DA (1988): Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth. Hum. Biol. 60, 709–723.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart A (2003): Fat patterning: indicators and implications. Nutrition 19, 559–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart A & Eston RG (1997): Skinfold thickness measurement. Br. J. Nutr. 78, 1040–1042.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart A & Hannan WJ (2000): Prediction of fat and fat free mass in male athletes using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference method. J. Sports Sci. 18, 263–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg GE, Gunn SM, Withers RT & Modra AC (2003): Use of anthropometric variables to predict relative body fat determined by a four-compartment body composition model. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 57, 1009–1016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Towsley M, Lindsay R, Markhard L & Dempster D. (1985): Dual-photon Gd-153 absorptiometry of bone. Radiology 156, 203–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZM, Deurenberg P, Guo SS, Pietrobelli A, Wang J, Pierson RN & Heymsfield SB (1998): Six-compartment body composition model: inter-method comparisons of total body fat measurement. Int. J. Obes. 22, 329–337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmore JH, Vodak PA, Parr RB, Girandola RN & Billing JE (1980): Further simplification of a method for determination of residual lung volume. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 12, 216–218.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Withers RT, LaForgia J, Pillans RK, Shipp NJ, Chatterton BE, Schultz G & Leaney F (1998): Comparisons of two-, three-, and four-compartment models of body composition analysis in men and women. J. Appl. Physiol. 85, 238–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Mr James Clarke of the School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor for providing valuable technical assistance for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R G Eston.

Additional information

Guarantors: All authors.

Contributors: RGE was the main author of the manuscript, who organized and helped with the data collection, initiated and conceived the study, and carried out the statistical analysis and interpretation. AVR assisted in the statistical analysis and interpretation of the data, assisted in the data collection and in the writing of the manuscript. SC, AD and TH helped with collecting the data and writing the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eston, R., Rowlands, A., Charlesworth, S. et al. Prediction of DXA-determined whole body fat from skinfolds: importance of including skinfolds from the thigh and calf in young, healthy men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 695–702 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602131

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602131

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links