Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Medical artificial intelligence is as much social as it is technological

Nature Machine Intelligence volume 5, pages 98–100 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Despite the promise of medical artificial intelligence applications, their acceptance in real-world clinical settings is low, with lack of transparency and trust being barriers that need to be overcome. We discuss the importance of the collaborative process in medical artificial intelligence, whereby experts from various fields work together and tackle transparency issues and build trust over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Tonekaboni, S., Joshi, S., McCradden, M. D. & Goldenberg, A. Proc. 4th Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference 106, 359–380 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grote, T. & Berens, P. J. Med. Eth. 46, 205–211 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Montani, S. & Striani, M. Yearb. Med. Inform. 28, 120–127 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Markus, A. F., Kors, J. A. & Rijnbeek, P. R. J. Biomed. Inform. 113, 103655 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shortliffe, E. H. & Sepùlveda, M. J. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 320, 2199–2200 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. London, A. J. Hastings Cent. Rep. 49, 15–21 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Baalen, S. & Carusi, A. Synthese 196, 4469–4492 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Winter, P. & Carusi, A. Sci. Technol. Stud. 35, 58–77 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Winter, P. & Carusi, A. Med. Humanit. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2021-012318 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Winter, P. & Carusi, A. J. Responsib. Technol. 12, 100052 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oakden-Rayner, L. https://lukeoakdenrayner.wordpress.com/2018/01/24/chexnet-an-in-depth-review/ (24 January 2018).

  12. Scheek, D., Rezazade Mehrizi, M. H. & Ranschaert, E. Eur. Radiol. 31, 7960–7968 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elish, M. C. & Watkins, E. A. Data & Society https://datasociety.net/pubs/repairing-innovation.pdf (2020).

  14. Oakden-Rayner, L. & Palmer, L. J. in Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (eds Ranschaert, E. R., Morozov, S. & Algra, P. R.) 83–104 (Springer, 2019).

  15. Nagendran, M. et al. Br. Med. J. 368, m689 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carusi, A. Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 48, 28–37 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carusi, A. Humana-Mente J. Philos. Stud. 30, 67–86 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Anderson for helpful feedback. The research informing this Comment was supported by a Wellcome Grant for the project ‘AI in the Clinic’ (grant number WT/213606).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Interchange Research, University College London, London, UK

    Annamaria Carusi

  2. University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Peter D. Winter

  3. Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK

    Iain Armstrong, David G. Kiely & Andy Swift

  4. Università di Torino, Dipartimento di Informatica, Turin, Italy

    Fabio Ciravegna

  5. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    David G. Kiely, Haiping Lu, Ian Sabroe & Andy Swift

  6. Imperial College London, London, UK

    Allan Lawrie

Authors
  1. Annamaria Carusi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter D. Winter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Iain Armstrong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fabio Ciravegna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David G. Kiely
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Allan Lawrie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Haiping Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ian Sabroe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Andy Swift
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter D. Winter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Machine Intelligence thanks James Anderson for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carusi, A., Winter, P.D., Armstrong, I. et al. Medical artificial intelligence is as much social as it is technological. Nat Mach Intell 5, 98–100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00603-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00603-3

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing