Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases, but no disease modifying therapies have been successful in clinical translation presenting a major unmet medical need. A promising target is alpha-synuclein or its aggregated form, which accumulates in the brain of PD patients as Lewy bodies. While it is not entirely clear which alpha-synuclein protein species is disease relevant, mere overexpression of alpha-synuclein in hereditary forms leads to neurodegeneration. To specifically address gene regulation of alpha-synuclein, we developed a CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) system based on the nuclease dead S. aureus Cas9 (SadCas9) fused with the transcriptional repressor domain Krueppel-associated box to controllably repress alpha-synuclein expression at the transcriptional level. We screened single guide (sg)RNAs across the SNCA promoter and identified several sgRNAs that mediate downregulation of alpha-synuclein at varying levels. CRISPRi downregulation of alpha-synuclein in iPSC-derived neuronal cultures from a patient with an SNCA genomic triplication showed functional recovery by reduction of oxidative stress and mitochondrial DNA damage. Our results are proof-of-concept in vitro for precision medicine by targeting the SNCA gene promoter. The SNCA CRISPRi approach presents a new model to understand safe levels of alpha-synuclein downregulation and a novel therapeutic strategy for PD and related alpha-synucleinopathies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Parkinson’s disease (PD) represents one of the two most common neurodegenerative diseases of aging, Alzheimer’s disease being the other. Approximately 1–2% of the population over 65 years of age are affected by this disorder, but the disease can also occur at an earlier age due to causative mutations and specific genetic susceptibility and/or exposure to environmental factors, drugs, or trauma1,2,3. While symptomatic forms of therapy are available, proven disease-modifying agents have yet to be discovered4,5.
In the last two decades, genetics has greatly advanced our understanding of PD and many newly discovered genes have become targets for therapeutic developments6. The first PD gene was alpha-synuclein (SNCA) in which causative mutations have been described that can be grouped into single point mutations and large copy number variants leading to genomic duplications and triplications on chromosome 4q22.17. Clinically, there is a well documented gene dosage effect with earlier onset and faster progression in cases with SNCA genomic triplications8,9,10. These medical genetic findings together with molecular and structural characterization of toxic alpha-synuclein aggregates and neuropathological evidence of alpha-synuclein accumulation in Lewy bodies has led to a wide-spread hypothesis that lowering alpha-synuclein levels could be of therapeutic benefit for PD and related alpha-synucleinopathies4. However, it is not clear what safe levels of alpha-synuclein downregulation are.
As a proof-of-concept that modulation of alpha-synuclein expression can lead to neuroprotection, the use of small interference RNAs (siRNA) in the brain has recently been shown be effective against endogenous murine alpha-synuclein11,12,13,14. In a translational non-human primate model, siRNA showed consistent knockdown of alpha-synuclein in MPTP-exposed squirrel monkeys15. Another line of evidence that lowering alpha-synuclein expression levels are neuroprotective shows that a small molecule beta2-adrenoreceptor agonist is a regulator of the SNCA gene by modifying the histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation of the SNCA promoter and ameliorates mitochondrial dysfunction in human stem cell-derived neuronal cultures with an SNCA genomic triplication16.
New versatile CRISPR gene-engineering technologies to precisely target positions in the human genome can also be exploited to lower alpha-synuclein mRNA expression level. Beyond editing, CRISPR/Cas can also activate or inhibit gene expression via steric hindrance of transcription itself or epigenetic changes such as DNA methylation or chromatin modification17,18. The first proof that nuclease-dead CRISPR/Cas9 regulates alpha-synuclein expression was published in 201619. A limited number of small guide (sg)RNAs with a PAM recognition sequence for the 4.2 kb S. pyogenes version of Cas9 were tested and one sgRNA was experimentally found to downregulate alpha-synuclein expression by approximately 50% in human cancer cell lines and human induced-pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) models19.
Here, we developed a different gene-engineering approach of a smaller nuclease-dead CRISPR/S. aureus Cas9 fused to Krueppel-associated box (KRAB) domains to regulate alpha-synuclein expression in a patient-derived iPSC model. In a screen of 32 sgRNAs, we identified a panel of sgRNAs that allows for regulating alpha-synuclein to specific expression levels. We demonstrate that downregulation of alpha-synuclein in an iPSC-derived neuronal model reduces oxidative stress and shows decrease is mitochondrial DNA damage. Our results provide further proof-of-concept by directly targeting the SNCA gene promoter and regulating transcription which present a new experimental model and potentially novel precision medicine for Parkinson’s disease and related alpha-synucleinopathies.
Results
S. aureus Cas9 sgRNA design and selection
Previous studies have shown that targeting of a nuclease-dead Cas9 (dCas9) to the promoter region of coding genes lead to robust and specific gene silencing due to interference with the gene transcription machinery. This has been achieved by introduction of inactivating mutations in the Cas9 gene in the two catalytic domains HNH and RuvC, which abolishes the nuclease activity without altering its ability to bind target DNA, blocking the transcriptional process as an RNA-guided DNA-binding complex20,21,22. When dCas9 is fused to one or more KRAB domains, the downregulation is even more pronounced presumably due to epigenetic changes in histone modification with loss of histone H3-acetylation and an increase in H3 lysine 9 trimethylation in the promoter target region23,24.
For this study, we chose the S. aureus dCas9 (SadCas9) which has a more complex PAM sequence (5’-NNGRRT-3’) compared to S. pyogenes Cas9 (5’-NGG-3’) but is smaller in size (1053aa versus 1368aa) and more suitable for downstream in vivo applications e.g. when applied by gene therapy vector (Morato Torres et al., https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.05.556425v1).
We hypothesized that guiding SadCas9 to the promoter region of SNCA could downregulate alpha-synuclein in human iPSC-derived neuronal cultures. We followed sgRNA design criteria of targeting dCas9-KRAB to a genomic window from − 50 to + 300 bp relative to the transcriptional start site (TSS) in the promoter, assuming a maximum in the ~ 50–100 bp region downstream of the TSS25. Specifically, for sgRNA design in the SNCA promoter we selected a region comprising approximately 3 kb upstream of the translation start site in exon 2 (GRCh37/hg19; chr4:90,756,651–90,759,650) including the three TSS for the SNCA gene. The CRISPOR online tool26 predicted 101 sgRNAs in the SNCA promoter containing the 5’-NNGRRT-3’ PAM sequence for SadCas9 irrespective of regulatory control regions. We then selected for our in vitro screen in HEK293T cells 32 sgRNAs based on the following selection criteria: (1) absence of termination signals, (2) proximity to TSS -50 bp/ + 300 bp, and (3) when two sgRNAs were superimposed (e.g. forward and reverse strand), the sgRNA with higher CRISPOR score was selected (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1). Off-target analysis was performed by CRISPOR tool and is summarized for sgRNAs that we selected for further functional testing in human iPSC cultures (Supplementary Table 2). In Supplementary Fig. 1, we illustrate transcription factor binding sites for four sgRNAs (382R, 228R, 510R, and 792F). We used the JASPER CORE 2022 database27 as a prediction tool and visualized them as custom tracks in the UCSC Genome Browser. Two of the predicted transcription factors ZNF784 (NCBI Gene: 147,808) and EBR1 (NCBI Gene: 1879) are thought to be involved in regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II, which supports the mechanism of Cas9 blocking transcriptional machinery.
CRISPR interference screen by transient transfection of SadCas9/sgRNA in HEK293T cells
To test the ability of the 32 selected sgRNAs to downregulate SNCA mRNA, HEK293T cells were transiently co-transfected with three plasmids: (i) tetracycline-inducible SadCas9 tagged with tdTomato (pHR:TRE3G-SadCas9-2xKRAB-p2a-tdTomato, Addgene ID: 209298), (ii) sgRNAs tagged with blue fluorescent protein (pHR:mU6-sgRNA-EF1A-Puro-p2a-BFP), and (iii) a trans-activator molecule (pCMV-rtTA), henceforth SadCas9-tdTomato, sgRNA-BFP and rTTA. Transient transfection in HEK293T cells had efficiency of about 65%. Cells were treated with doxycycline for 48 h to induce expression of SadCas9. SNCA mRNA levels were measured 72 h post-transfection using Taqman qPCR. A non-targeting sgRNA (gal4) was used as negative control.
We identified 23 sgRNAs that significantly reduced mRNA expression of SNCA (Fig. 1D). Around TSS3 which is closest to the translational start site of the SNCA (555 bp upstream of translational start site), four sgRNAs showed 50–60%, and two sgRNAs showed 70–80% of SNCA expression compared to non-targeting control. Interestingly, one sgRNA showed an increase SNCA mRNA expression by approximately 20% compared to sgRNA gal4 (dark blue columns, Fig. 1D). Around TSS2 (TSS2.1 and TSS2.2 are overlapping) 12 sgRNAs exhibited a significant downregulation, with seven showing 45–55% expression and the remaining five sgRNAs reaching 65–75% compared to the gal4 sgRNA expression (turquoise and light blue, Fig. 1D). Lastly, around the most upstream located TSS1, we identified four sgRNAs that downregulated SNCA mRNA expression to 60–70% of gal4 sgRNA control levels (very light blue, Fig. 1D). To further characterize the CRISPRi system in human iPSCs and neuronal cultures, we selected sgRNAs with different levels of downregulation in HEK293T cultures (approximately 45% for 382R, 60% for 228R and 510F, and approximately 70% for 792F). We conducted experiments involving combinatorial sgRNAs on HEK293 cells targeting three different TSSs. This investigation aimed to understand the impact of multiple sgRNAs on downregulating alpha-synuclein. However, our findings indicated that there were no additional effects observed when utilizing two sgRNAs or more from different TSSs(Supplementary Fig. 2).
CRISPR interference downregulates the expression of alpha-synuclein mRNA and protein in patient-derived SNCA-triplication and healthy control iPSCs
Next, we prepared lentivirus for SadCas9-tdTomato and rtTA constructs to generate stable inducible SadCas9 human iPSC lines. We transduced human iPSCs from a patient with an SNCA genomic triplication and a mutation-negative healthy sibling9,28 with both vectors (Fig. 2A), henceforth called SadCas9-iPSC. After SadCa9 activation with doxycycline in the iPSC culture, we used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to select only cells that expressed tdTomato indicating lentivirus integration (Supplementary Fig. 3). Within this pool of tdTomato positive cells, there were heterogenous levels of SadCas9-tdTomato expression probably due to differences in location and number of lentiviral integrations. Since different SadCa9 expression levels might affect the regulation of the target gene, in a subsequent step, we derived clonal iPSC lines by serial dilution and selected clonal iPSC lines with an intermediate expression level of SadCas9 (Fig. 2A). Clonal iPSC lines remained pluripotent after transduction and selection and expressed pluripotency marker OCT4 (Supplementary Fig. 4).
After generating clonal SadCas9-iPSC lines, we tested different sgRNAs identified from the HEK293T cell screen. First, we prepared lentivirus for selected sgRNAs (382R, 228R, 510F, and 792F) using the sgRNA-BFP construct. We then transduced the clonal SadCa9-iPSCs with the sgRNA lentivirus and sorted the cell population for blue fluorescence. It was critical to perform these steps sequentially without introduction of doxycycline during the selection process, as we observed prolonged downregulation of the SNCA gene when cells were exposed to doxycycline in the presence of both SadCa9 and sgRNA expression (data not shown). We then exposed the different sgRNA-transduced clonal iPSC cultures to doxycycline for 48 h and measured SNCA mRNA expression. The level of downregulation was more pronounced when compared to the HEK293T cultures as 100% of cells expressed both the doxycycline-inducible SadCas9 and sgRNA-BFP. In clones from both the patient with the SNCA genomic triplication (H4C2) and sibling control (H5C2), two of the SadCas9/sgRNAs showed approximately 25% expression compared to SadCas9/gal4 sgRNA control (75% downregulation for 382R and 510F), one SadCas9/sgRNA 228R had 50% expression compared to SadCas9/gal4 sgRNA control (50% downregulation), and one SadCas9/sgRNA 792F had 75% expression level compared to SadCas9/gal4 sgRNA control (25% downregulation) (Fig. 2B,C). By immunoblotting, we detected a consistent reduction in alpha-synuclein protein levels across all SadCas9-sgRNA iPSC lines when compared to the control group of SadCas9/gal4 sgRNA (Fig. 2D).
SNCA isoform downregulation in patient iPSC-derived floorplate progenitors (FPp1)
Besides the full-length mRNA transcript of the SNCA gene (SNCA140), there are three alternative transcript isoforms that are found in the brain. The canonical SNCA isoform contains all 5 coding exons and codes for a protein of 140 amino acid residues (SNCA140). SNCA126 isoform lacks exon 3, SNCA112 isoform is lacking exon 5, and SNCA98 isoform is missing both exons 3 and 5. The four SNCA isoforms are differentially expressed in the brains of patients with PD and other forms of neurodegeneration29,30,31,32,33. Characterization of the aggregation of the SNCA isoforms by electron microscopy showed fibril bundles for the SNCA140, shorter fibrils for SNCA126, and interestingly annular structures for SNCA9834.
Because alternative promoter usage has been shown to influence mRNA splicing35,36, we wanted to determine to what extent the different SNCA isoforms would be affected by the CRISPR/SadCas9-mediated downregulation when targeting different transcriptional start sites of the SNCA promoter. After optimization of isoform-specific primers (Supplementary Table 3, Supplementary Fig. 5), we performed mRNA expression analysis for all four isoforms. The level of isoform expression in the floorplate progenitors is lower to the expression in human brain34, but the ratios of the shorter isoforms are comparable with about 0.003% expression of the SNCA112 compared to SNCA140 (set to 100%) and less than 0.001% for the SNCA126 and SNCA98 isoforms.
The level of SNCA downregulation for the four different sgRNAs was directly comparable to the data in clonal iPSC lines for the full-length SNCA140 isoform (Figs. 2B and 3). However, when we measured the smaller isoforms SNCA126, SNCA112, and SNCA98, only the two sgRNAs (382R and 510F) facilitated significant downregulation, whereas expression of the other two sgRNAs (228R and 792F) were not significantly different for the smaller SNCA isoforms (Fig. 3).
Rescue of mitochondrial (mt)DNA damage after CRISPR-guided a-syn downregulation iPSC-derived neuronal cultures from patient with SNCA triplication
A common PD phenotype is an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage37,38,39 which may lead to mtDNA damage, mutations and degradation, or directly trigger cell death40 and plays a role in aging and neurodegeneration41. The mitochondrial genome is particularly susceptible to accumulation of oxidative damage, which is a particular problem for the brain because neurons are post-mitotic and long-lived.
We differentiated the four clonal SNCA CRISPRi iPSC lines into floorplate progenitors (Supplementary Fig. 6). On day 15 of the differentiation process, we exposed cells to doxycycline at 1ug/ml to activate SadCas9 expression for five days before collection of cell pellets.
We applied the Mito DNADX assay, a robust quantitative real-time assay of mtDNA damage in a 96-well platform42. In brief, less PCR product will be produced when mtDNA damage or lesions block the ability of the DNA polymerase to replicate and the PCR amplification of a large fragment specific to the mitochondrial genome is analyzed43,44 Thus, mtDNA damage or repair slowing down or impairing DNA polymerase progression will be detected.
Five days after Cas9 expression was induced in iPSC-derived floorplate progenitors, we collected cell pellets and performed the Mito DNADX assay. SgRNA 382R that downregulates SNCA expression by 75% showed significant reduction of mtDNA lesions compared to the control sample. The other three sgRNAs that show less downregulation do not promote decrease in mtDNA damage (Fig. 4A). However, mtDNA copy number did not vary between samples (Fig. 4B).
We also performed the CellROX® Green Oxidative Stress assay in iPSC-derived neuronal cultures carrying the SNCA triplication. We detected a decrease in steady-state ROS production in cells with SNCA expression downregulated via CRISPRi in comparison to non-targeting control. We then treated these cultures with rotenone to induce mitochondrial damage and observed all sgRNAs tested significantly reduced the ROS production compared to control. The effect seems to be more pronounced for the sgRNA that shows the stronger downregulation (382R, 75% SNCA mRNA knockdown) (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Discussion
Alpha-synuclein has become a leading target for the development of new therapeutic strategies aimed at disease modification for PD and related synucleinopathies. Interest in alpha-synuclein as a therapeutic target has been greatly enhanced by the knowledge that increased expression of wildtype alpha-synuclein protein alone can lead to neurodegeneration, as observed in patients with duplications and triplications of the SNCA genomic locus and also common genetic promoter and non-coding variants of the SNCA gene (e.g. Rep-1 allele) which may upregulate alpha-synuclein expression7,9,45,46,47,48,49. It is thought that the mere overexpression of alpha-synuclein over time can lead to neurodegeneration and neuronal demise exemplified by these genetic studies. Especially the gene dosage effect of alpha-synuclein expression and severity of symptoms, age at onset and disease progression provides confidence about causality.
These clinical genetic observations and pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo studies have led to the premise that lowering the alpha-synuclein content and/or eliminating toxic alpha-synuclein species in cells could be the key to slowing, reversing, or even preventing the disease. Many different strategies have been proposed from reducing alpha-synuclein mRNA by RNA interference or antisense oligonucleotides, inhibiting alpha-synuclein aggregation, promoting intracellular degradation of alpha-synuclein, increase of extracellular alpha-synuclein degradation through active or passive immunotherapies to reduction of uptake of extracellular alpha-synuclein4,50. Unfortunately, recent clinical trials using alpha-synuclein antibodies failed their primary clinical endpoints and such programs were discontinued51.
While reduction of extracellular alpha-synuclein might not be sufficient to influence clinical disease course of PD or related alpha-synucleinopathies, it is critical to develop other strategies to modulate alpha-synuclein expression to understand the effects of different gene dosage levels and to expand the armamentarium of alpha-synuclein regulation for future therapeutic use.
CRISPR-mediated gene engineering has become an attractive tool and potential therapeutic platform for gene therapies. For alpha-synuclein, using CRISPR knock-out strategies, several SNCA knockout lines have been developed52,53. Another approach for SNCA downregulation uses targeted editing of DNA methylation of the SNCA gene promoter region which shows a downregulation of alpha-synuclein by 30%54.
Our study is built on previous data that showed evidence for proof of concept that the SNCA promoter can be successfully targeted by CRISPR/Cas9 interference19,52. The group found one sgRNA in the region of the transcriptional start site 2 (TSS2) of the SNCA promoter that showed a 50% SNCA downregulation in HEK293 cultures and human iPSC-derived neurons. In that study, the S. pyogenes version of CRISPR/Cas9 was used which is 4.2 kb in length. Here, we used S. aureus dCas9 guided to the promoter region of SNCA gene which also robustly mediated reduction of mRNA and protein levels in vitro. S. aureus Cas9 is one of the smaller Cas9 proteins which are developed for in vivo gene therapy application. Even smaller Cas9 proteins have been discovered and characterized such as CjCas955 or CasX56, but their PAM recognition sequences can be complex, thus lowering the yield of predicted sgRNAs.
Although the PAM sequence for the SaCas9 is more complex, we identified over 100 sgRNAs in the 3 kb promoter region of the SNCA gene which we narrowed down to 32 for the HEK293T screen and 22 significantly reduced SNCA mRNA expression.
Several smaller splice isoforms of the SNCA gene have been described and characterized57. There is some evidence that SNCA112 and SNCA98 promote alpha-synuclein seeding whereas SNCA126 seems to be protective30,58. Because of these unique and possibly disease-relevant features, we also tested to what extent the expression of SNCA isoforms have been affected by the SadCas9-mediated knockdown. Since alternative promoter start sites can have an effect on mRNA splicing, e.g. for the MAPT gene35—where alternative promoter usage leads to novel shorter transcripts in Alzheimer disease—we wanted to test if any of our selected sgRNAs targeting different transcriptional start sites would affect the downregulation or expression ratio of the different isoforms. All sgRNAs downregulated SNCA expression for the most abundant full-length SNCA140 form. Two of the sgRNAs downregulated all four tested SNCA isoforms, whereas the two sgRNAs that mediated less downregulation, did not affect expression levels of any of the smaller isoforms. This data demonstrates CRISPRi ability to selectively modulate different mRNA isoforms, opening the exciting possibility for future work to identify sgRNAs selectively sparing SNCA126 expression which is thought to be protective in the context of PD33. Characterization of SNCA protein levels in response to varying degrees of CRISPRi downregulation would further elucidate the relationship between SNCA isoforms and their translational potential.
Even though a lot of effort has been put into lowering the amount of alpha-synuclein by various technologies, there is still the open question of what is a safe degree of alpha-synuclein knockdown. We think that pre-clinical models of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons could help answering this question. This model has several advantages: first, it is based on a human background and the model has been derived from a patient with an gene copy number mutation of the SNCA gene28, expresses twice as much alpha-synuclein protein, shows robust cellular phenotypes for increased oxidative stress and impaired energy metabolism59,60, and clinically showed a severe form of Lewy body disease9,61. Second, inducible SadCas9 expression in mature neurons can mimic a therapeutic intervention in an adult organism, whereas CRISPR knockout iPSC lines for the SNCA genomic locus53 can elucidate the developmental importance of alpha-synuclein62,63. However, long-term inducible systems might affect cell health and viability and might not be predictive for in vivo outcomes. Third, this screen could give insights into target regions for new emerging epigenetic probes or small molecules.
While it remains imperative to experimentally evaluate off-target effects of the sgRNAs beyond in silico predictions, CRISPRi-mediated transcriptional repression has been acknowledged for its high degree of specificity22.
Previously, we reported that lymphoblastoid cell lines and iPSC-derived neuronal cultures from LRRK2 p.G2019S mutation carriers have increased mtDNA damage64,65. When we genetically corrected the LRRK2 mutation or treated the cultures with a LRRK2 kinase inhibitor mtDNA damage was no longer detectable. Thus, we concluded that the mtDNA damage phenotype can be unambiguously attributed to the LRRK2 p.G2019S mutation.
We also hypothesized a similar mtDNA damage phenotype also occurs for the SNCA genomic triplication as we have shown that neuronal cultures from an SNCA triplication case shows higher levels of oxidative stress28,59 and should also lead to mtDNA damage. We hypothesized that lowering a-syn expression by CRISPR-guided downregulation might improve mtDNA damage. However, only with a 75% downregulation of SNCA mRNA expression in the SNCA triplication, we achieved a significant rescue of mtDNA damage. This indicates that alpha-synuclein intracellular levels need substantial alteration to show a therapeutic effect.
In summary, CRISPR/Cas9 gene-engineering technologies with the power to precisely target genomic locations have the potential to translate into precision medicine66. Our studies show proof-of-concept in vitro that SNCA mRNA reduction leads to a functional rescue of pathophysiological phenotypes related to PD and neurodegeneration. Further studies in vivo will be critical to develop a translational program and show proof whether this approach could be a viable therapeutic strategy.
Methods
Cloning of CRISPR/sgRNA lentiviral constructs with fluorescent selection markers
A tetracycline-inducible promoter (TRE3G) was used to control the expression of S. aureus dCas9 in a lentiviral vector. To facilitate selection of cells by FACS, pHR:TRE3G-SadCas9-2xKRAB-p2a-tdTomato (Addgene ID #209298) was subcloned from a pHR:TRE3G-SadCas9-2xKRAB-p2a-zeo (A gift from Professor Stanley Qi), where zeocin resistance gene (zeo) was replaced by a fluorescent marker, tdTomato. Briefly, backbone was digested with BamHI and NotI to linearize vector. SadCas9-2xKRAB-p2a segment was amplified by PCR from backbone using high-fidelity polymerase (Phusion, NEB, Cat. No. M0530S); and tdTomato was PCR amplified from a proprietary expression vector using high-fidelity polymerase. Assembly PCR primers were designed to include at least 40 bp of homology with adjacent fragments. Digested backbone and PCR amplified fragments were joined via seamless cloning (NEBuilder® HiFi DNA Assembly Master Mix, NEB, Cat. No. E2621S). Assembled plasmid was Sanger-sequenced to ensure correct assembly and reading frame (Supplementary Fig. 9). The reverse tetracycline-controlled transactivator was expressed from pCMV-rtTA (rtTA-N144), a gift from Andrew Yoo (Addgene # 66,810).
sgRNAs were restriction enzyme-cloned into an expression vector tagged with blue fluorescent protein, pHR:mU6-sgRNA-EF1A-Puro-p2a-BFP, a gift from Professor Stanley Qi. Briefly, backbone was linearized using BstXI and XhoI, and subsequently dephosphorylated with 1U of Calf Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 18009019), following manufacturer’s protocol. sgRNAs were generated using PCR amplification with primers containing the appropriate restriction sites (Supplementary Table 2). sgRNA PCR products were digested with BstXI and XhoI to create compatible ends. Linearized vector and sgRNAs were ligated using T4 ligase (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. EL0014).
sgRNA design with CRISPOR tool
We used CRISPOR tool26 for the sgRNA design and selection. We divided the SNCA promoter region into three 1 kb segments spanning 3 kb upstream exon 2 (GRCh37/hg19; chr4:90,756,651–90,759,650) due to CRISPOR sequence size limitations. The SNCA promoter comprises three transcriptional start sites (TSS) and sgRNAs were designed at positions −50 to + 300 bp around each of the three TSSs. Designed S. aureus Cas9 sgRNAs are 21-bp long and are adjacent to a PAM spacer sequence 5’-NGGRRT-3’ (Supplementary Table 1). As a negative control, we used a sgRNA against a gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, gal4, which does not target the human genome.
Cell culture and neuronal differentiation
All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Human iPSCs were derived under IRB protocol (approval IRB-15028) and work was approved under stem cell research oversight committee and administrative panel on biosafety (APB). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
HEK293T cell culture (obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), CRL-3216): Cells were maintained in DMEM:F12 medium (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 11320033) supplemented with 10% tetracycline-free FBS (Takara Bio, Cat. No. 631367), 100 U/mL Penicillin–Streptomycin (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 15140122) and 1X MEM Non-Essential Amino Acids Solution (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 11140050). Medium was changed every two days and cells were passaged by enzymatic treatment with TrypLE (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 12604021) when 90–100% confluent. Cells were subcultured at 1:6 ratio.
Human iPSC culture: Human iPSCs were from a patient with SNCA-triplication (Iowa Kindred) and from a control sibling9,28. iPSCs were maintained under feeder-free conditions as colonies on 12-well plates coated with Geltrex™ (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. A1413302) diluted 1:70, using StemFlex™ medium (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. A3349401) supplemented with 100 U/mL Penicillin–Streptomycin (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 15140122). Confluent iPSC colony plates were passaged manually once a week. Manual passaging consisted of slicing the colonies into small square pieces with a 25-gauge needle and then pipetting the colony pieces onto a new plate Geltrex-coated plate. After each passage, cells were maintained for 24 h in medium supplemented with 1 µM RHO/ROCK pathway inhibitor Thiazovivin, THZ (ReproCell, Cat. No. 04–0017).
For experiments requiring exact cell numbers, iPSC colonies were dissociated using enzymatic treatment with Accutase (Innovative Cell Tech., Cat. No. AT104-500). Accutase was applied for 5 min until cells start to detach and cells were seeded at a subcultivated at a ratio of 1:6. Dissociated iPSCs were maintained as monolayers on plates coated with 10 µg/µL rhLaminin-521 (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. A29248). After each passage, cells were maintained for 24 h in medium supplemented with 1 µM THZ. iPSCs maintained as monolayers were propagated every 5 to 6 days. For SadCas9 activation, upon reaching confluency, cells were treated with 1 µg/mL doxycycline for 48 h and then collected for downstream experiments.
Floor plate progenitor differentiation: iPSCs were maintained as monolayers on plates coated with 10 µg/µL rhLaminin-521 in StemFlex medium, as described above. iPSCs were differentiated into midbrain floor plate progenitors via the PSC Dopaminergic Neuron Differentiation Kit (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. A3147701) in a stepwise fashion comprising two phases: specification and expansion. Specification medium induces iPSCs to differentiate towards midbrain lineage floor plate progenitors (FPps). Expansion medium promotes proliferation of FPps.
On day -1 of differentiation (plating day), cells were passaged using Accutase as described above and seeded at a density of 5.56 × 104 cells /cm2 in 6-well plates coated with 10 ug/mL rhLaminin-521 in StemFlex medium supplemented with 1 µM THZ. On the next day (Day 0), cells reached 20–40% confluence, and medium was replaced with specification medium, following manufacturer’s instructions. Culture media was changed on Days 3, 5, 7 and 9 of differentiation. On Day 10 of differentiation, FPp cells were enzymatically passaged with Accutase and seeded at 1:2 ratio in 2 mL of expansion medium supplemented with 2 µM THZ onto 6-well plates that were sequentially coated first with Geltrex and then with 15 ug/mL mouse laminin (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 23017015). Medium was replaced on Day 11 to remove THZ. When cells reach 100% confluency on Day 12–13, FPp cells were passaged and seeded at 1.67 × 105 cells /cm2 in 6-well plates using expansion medium supplemented with 2 µM THZ. Culture media is replaced every other day. For all experiments, doxycycline was added on day 12 for 5 days. Cells were collected and experiments were carried out between day 17–20.
Transient transfection
HEK293T cells (obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), CRL-3216) were seeded on 6-well plates at density of 2.22 × 104 cells/cm2 overnight. At 80–100% confluency, cells were transfected with 1 μg of each plasmid: pHR:TRE3G-SadCas9-2xKRAB-p2a-tdTomato (SadCas9-tdTomato), pCMV-rtTA and pHR:mU6-sgRNA-EF1A-Puro-p2a-BFP (sgRNA-BFP) (1:1:1), using 25 μL TransIT®-LT1 Transfection Reagent (Mirus Bio, Cat. No. MIR 2300) in a final volume of 1 mL DMEM medium supplemented with 10% tetracycline-free FBS (Takara Bio, Cat. No. 631367). After 24 h, medium was changed to DMEM:F12 medium supplemented with 500 ng/mL doxycycline to activate SadCas9 expression. Cells were collected for RNA extraction 72 h post-transfection/48 h doxycycline treatment. Experiments were performed in triplicates. To test multi guide sgRNAs effect on alps-synuclein expression, HEF293 cells were used. At 80–90% confluence, HEK293 cells were harvested the day of transfection. A maximum of 4.5 µg of plasmid (1.5 µg each): SadCas9-tdTomato, pCMV-rtTA, and sgRNA-BFP (1:1:1) using 24 µL TransIT®-LT1 Transfection Reagent in a final volume of 1000uL Opti-MEM medium (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 31985062) were combined and incubated for 20 min, then added to one well of a 6-well plate. Four different sgRNAs (510F, 228R, 382R, and 792F) individually, in dual combination, and one negative control without any sgRNA were used to screen for highest alpha-synuclein downregulation (Supplementary Fig. 2). After adding, the plasmid mixes in a well, 1.25 × 105 cells/cm2 were immediately added to each well with HEK293 maintenance media modified with 10% tetracycline-free FBS. After 24 h, medium was changed to HEK293 media (with Tet-free FBS) supplemented with 500 ng/mL doxycycline to activate SadCas9 expression. 48 h after doxycycline treatment, cells were sorted for both tdTomato and BFP. 50–60% cells were collected after sorting, pelleted, and stored at -80C for RNA extraction.
Lentivirus production
For lentiviral production, we used 2nd generation lentiviral packaging plasmid pCMVR8.74 (Addgene #22,036) with envelope-expressing plasmid pMD2.G-VSV-G (Addgene #12,259). HEK293T cells were plated 24 h prior to transfection in 10 cm plates at density of 2 × 104 cells/cm2. Plasmid DNA ratio was 9:8:1 for transfer (pHR:TRE3G-SadCas9-2xKRAB-p2a-tdTomato or pCMV-rtTA or pHR:mU6-sgRNA-EF1A-Puro-p2a-BFP) : pCMVR8.74 : pMD2.G-VSV-G respectively, in a total of 10ug DNA. A final volume of 5 mL with 25 μL TransIT®-LT1 Transfection Reagent was used for transfection. Medium was changed 24 h post-transfection. Supernatant containing lentiviruses was collected 48 h post-transfection, filtered with a 40 μm filter, and ultracentrifugated for 1.5 h at 25,000 rpm/107,000 g (Sorvall™ WX + , ThermoFisher) to concentrate virus. Viruses were resuspended in 75 μL PBS, aliquoted and stored at -80 °C.
Workflow to generate and clonal selection of SadCas9-sgRNA human iPSCs using Lentivirus transduction and Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)
Human iPSCs were plated 24–48 h before transduction at density of 1.25 × 105 cells/cm2 in 12-well plates. Cells were infected 12.5 μL of concentrated lentivirus pTRE-SadCas9-2xKRAB-dtTomato and 12.5 μL of concentrated lentivirus pCMV-rtTA in 400 μL of StemFlex medium supplemented with 6 ug/mL of polybrene (Millipore, Cat. No. TR-1003-G). After 24 h, media was replaced with StemFlex medium and changed every other day until cells reached 100% confluency. Confluent cells were expanded into 6-well plates for 1–2 weeks prior to FACS sorting.
Expanded SadCas9 transduced iPSCs were treated with 1 μg/mL doxycycline for 24 h prior to FACS. Briefly, on the day of sorting, 2–10 × 106 cells were dissociated using enzymatic treatment with Accutase for 5 min, centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 3 min, and re-suspended in 1–2 mL of cold PBS. Cell suspensions were filtered through a 100 µM nylon cell strainer (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 07-201-432) before acquisition on a flow cytometer (Sony, Model SH800). Sorter was equipped with three excitation lasers: 488 nm, 405 nm, and 561 nm; sorter channels used were FL 450/50, FL 525/50, and FL3 600/50.
Cells were sorted based on expression of tdTomato as a marker for expression of SadCas9. Using the 100 μm sorting chip at 50 kHz, an average threshold of 10,000 events per second, cells were sorted for FL3/tdTomato and FL2/PE (for auto compensation) with ultra-purity setup. Sorted cells were transferred to 48-well plates and cultured as described above. Sorted cells were a heterogeneous population showing different levels of SadCas9 expression. To achieve homogeneous levels of SadCas9 expression, SadCas9-positive iPSCs with various expression levels of SadCas9 were clonally selected using serial dilution. A final dilution of 0.5 cells/100 μL of medium was plated into 96-well plates (100 μL/well). Media was changed every 2–3 days for approximately 2 weeks until colonies originated from single cells (clonal) which were further expanded and cryopreserved.
Established clonal SadCas9-iPSCs were plated 24–48 h before sgRNA-lentivirus transduction at density of 1.25 × 105 cells/cm2 in 12-well plates. Cells were infected 25 μL of concentrated lentivirus pHR:mU6-sgRNA-EF1A-Puro-p2a-BFP in 400 μL of StemFlex medium supplemented with 6 ug/mL of polybrene. After 24 h, media was replaced with StemFlex medium and changed every other day until cells reached 100% confluence. Confluent cells were expanded into 6-well plates for 1–2 weeks prior to FACS sorting. No doxycycline treatment was used prior to sorting of sgRNA-iPSCs. On day of sorting, 2–10 × 106 SadCas9-sgRNA transduced iPSCs cells were dissociated using enzymatic treatment with Accutase for 5 min, neutralized with PBS, centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 3 min, and re-suspended in 1–2 mL of cold PBS.
Cells were sorted based on expression of BFP as a marker for expression of sgRNAs. Using the 100 μm sorting chip at 50 kHz, an average threshold of 10,000 events per second, cells were sorted for FL1/BFP and FL2/EGFP (for auto compensation) with ultra-purity setup. Sorted cells were transferred to 24-well plates. Each SadCas9-sgRNA iPSC lines were cultured, expanded and cryopreserved as described above.
Immunofluorescence
For staining of iPSC-derived FPps, rabbit anti-LMX1A (Abcam, Cat. No. ab31006) and mouse anti-FOXA2/ HNF-3 beta (Santa Cruz Bio., Cat. No. sc-101060) were used at 1:500 and 1:200 dilutions, respectively. Secondary antibodies were purchased from ThermoFisher: Goat Anti-Mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (Cat. No. A-10680) and Goat Anti-Rabbit Alexa Fluor 594 (Cat. No. A-11037), both at 1:500 dilution.
Plates were washed with DPBS (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 14040133) to remove media and debris. Cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/DPBS solution for 10 min, followed by three washes with DPBS. Cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X100 solution for 5–10 min, followed by one wash with PBS. Cells were blocked with blocking buffer containing 5% goat serum (ThermoFisher Cat. No. 16210064) in DPBS for 1 h, followed by three washes with PBS. Primary antibody was added in appropriate concentration and incubated overnight at 4°C. On the next day, all wells were washed three times with DPBS and secondary antibody was added and incubated on a rocker for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were washed with DPBS three times and a Hoechst 33,342 (ThermoFisher Cat. No. H3570, 1ug/mL) nuclear stain solution was added to each well and incubated for 5–10 min. Cells were washed three times with PBS and stored at 4°C before fluorescent imaging.
Western blotting
For Western blotting, iPSCs were cultured in 6-well plates. At 50% confluence, cells were treated with or without 1 µg/mL doxycycline for 48 h at 37 °C before harvesting. After 48 h treatment, cells were collected in DPBS and stored in −80 °C. Pellets were lysed using 1 × Triton X-100 (with protease and phosphatase inhibitor). Protein concentration was determined with a BCA Assay (ThermoFisher Cat. No. 23275). 20 µg protein was homogenized by 4 × Nupage LDS sample buffer (ThermoFisher Cat. No. NP0008) supplemented with β-mercaptoethanol. Samples were heated at 95◦C for 5 min. Denatured samples were loaded onto pre cast NuPAGE™ 4 to 12%, Bis–Tris gel (ThermoFisher Cat. No. NP0322PK2) and electrophoresed at 90 V for 1 h 30 min with 1X MOPS-SDS running buffer (ThermoFisher Cat. No. J62847.K2). Proteins were electrophoretically transferred on to PVDF membrane (VWR Cat. No. 82021–258) (PVDF membrane was activated in absolute methanol before use) in transfer buffer (20 mM TRIS pH8.6, 122 mM glycine, 20% methanol (v/v)) at 90 mV for 1 h 30 min. Membrane was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/TBST solution (1 × Tris-buffered saline with 0.2% Tween-20 detergent) for 30 min, wash 3 × with TBST solution for 5 min each, and then blocked in 5% milk/TBST solution for 30 min at room temperature on a shaker. Wash 3 × with TBST solution for 5 min each, followed by incubation with primary antibodies in 5% BSA/TBST solution for overnight at room temperature on a shaker. Primary antibodies included mouse SadCas9-clone 6H4 (1:1000, Millipore Cat. No. MAC142), mouse alpha-tubulin (1:2500, Cell Signaling Cat. No. 3873S), and rabbit alpha-synuclein (1:2500, Abcam Cat. No. ab138501). Membrane was washed 3 × with TBST solution for 10 min each, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (1:7500; goat anti-rabbit IRDye800CW (Li-Cor Cat. No. 926–32,211) or goat anti-mouse IRDye800CW (Li-Cor Cat. No. 926–32,210)) in 1% milk/TBST solution for 2 h at room temperature on a shaker. Membrane was washed 3 × with TBST solution for 10 min each, followed by last was with TBS solution. Membrane was imaged via near-infra red fluorescent detection using Azure Sapphire Fl Biomolecular Imager with the instrument’s Image Studio software. Blot image signals were quantified using Image Studio Lite software, and protein quantity was normalized with alpha-tubulin signal within the samples. Samples were run 3 × with different protein input on the gel. Statistical analysis were calculated using GraphPad.
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and qPCR
Cell pellets were collected by enzymatic dissociation with Accutase, washed once in 2 ml PBS, and stored at -80 °C freezer until use. RNA extraction and DNase treatment were performed using the PureLink™ RNA Mini Kit (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 12183025) following manufacturer’s guidelines. RNA concentration and quality were determined using the NanoDrop Technologies ND-1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher). cDNA synthesis was completed using 1 ug of RNA as input for random primer reaction (High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit; ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 4368814) following manufacturer’s guidelines. cDNA was diluted with nuclease-free water to a concentration of 10 ng/µL. For qPCR, 10 ng of cDNA was used as template. TaqMan® Gene Expression Master Mix (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. 4369016) and TaqMan probes for FAM-SNCA (ThermoFisher, Assay ID: Hs00240906_m1) and VIC-GAPDH (ThermoFisher, Assay ID: Hs99999905_m1) were used to amplify cDNA. qPCR reactions were run in CFX96 Real Time System thermal cycler (Bio Rad) or in QuantStudio 6 Flex thermal cycler (ThermoFisher). Ct values were obtained using built-in software. No template control (NTC) samples were included in each plate. RT-control samples were included for each round of RNA extraction and consisted of a cDNA reaction without addition of reverse transcriptase. NTC and RT controls did amplify in any of plates included in the data presented. Relative mRNA expression was calculated using 2-∆∆Ct method67 using GAPDH as a reference gene and Excel software for calculations. The calibrator sample was sgRNA-gal4, a sgRNA that does not target any human gene. All samples were run in three technical qPCR replicates. A minimum of two biological replicates were used for each sgRNA tested. Cq outliers were eliminated if SD > 0.5 Ct.
Functional Cellular Assays in iPSC-derived midbrain progenitors
For all fluorescence-based functional assays, iPSC-derived midbrain floor-plate progenitors (FPp) cells were treated with 1 μg/mL doxycycline on day 12 of differentiation. Cells were passaged and seeded at density of 1.43 × 105 cells/cm2 into 8-well chamber glass slides on day 14 of differentiation. On day 15 of differentiation, cells were treated with 20 μM rotenone for 18 h. After treatment, cells were stained with functional assay stains. Manufacturer’s instructions were followed for all assays, unless otherwise stated. After staining, cells were fixed in 10% buffered neutral formalin for 15 min and washed with PBS. Nuclei were stained with 1 μg/mL Hoechst 33,342 for 1 min. Cells were mounted with glass coverslips using ProLong™ Gold Antifade Mountant (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. P36930) and imaged using a fluorescence microscope (BZ-X700, Keyence). Image processing was performed using built-in image processor.
Quantifying mtDNA damage with a PCR-based assay
DNA isolation and quantification was performed as previously described43,44,68 using a high molecular weight genomic DNA purification kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (QIAGEN Genomic tip either 20/G or 100/G) and Quant-iT Picogreen dsDNA quantification. Following genomic DNA isolation, the purity and quality was assessed using a Nanodrop (ND-1000). DNA damage in the mitochondrial genome was measured utilizing the Mito DNADX the assay to calculate mitochondrial DNA lesion frequency as previously described42. Reaction mixtures used KAPA Long Range HotStart DNA Polymerase (KAPABiosystems) in a 96-well platform. Primers used for human short and long amplicons can be found in69. Each biological DNA sample was performed in triplicate on two independent days (for a total of 6 PCR reactions).
Statistical analyses
For gene expression, data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s post-test for multiple comparisons, using GraphPad software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Quantification of functional fluorescence signal
Raw image data from CellROX assay experiments were imported into CellProfiler for quantification70. Briefly, the nuclei DNA stain (Hoechst 33342, blue channel) was used to identify individual cells. Fluorescence intensity of CellROX green stain was measured in each individual nuclei and plotted in graphs.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Addgene plasmid repository under accession number #209298.
References
Langston, J. W. The Parkinson’s complex: parkinsonism is just the tip of the iceberg. Ann. Neurol. 59, 591–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20834 (2006).
Tanner, C. M. Advances in environmental epidemiology. Mov. Disord. 25(Suppl 1), S58-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22721 (2010).
Goldman, S. M., Umbach, D. M., Kamel, F. & Tanner, C. M. Head injury, α-synuclein Rep1 and Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analytic view of gene-environment interaction. Eur. J. Neurol. 22, e75. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12694 (2015).
Brundin, P., Dave, K. D. & Kordower, J. H. Therapeutic approaches to target alpha-synuclein pathology. Exp. Neurol. 298, 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.10.003 (2017).
Sardi, S. P., Cedarbaum, J. M. & Brundin, P. Targeted therapies for parkinson’s disease: from genetics to the clinic. Mov. Disord. 33, 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27414 (2018).
Langston, J. W., Schüle, B., Rees, L., Nichols, R. J. & Barlow, C. Multisystem Lewy body disease and the other parkinsonian disorders. Nat. Gene. 47, 1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3454 (2015).
Ross, O. A. et al. Genomic investigation of alpha-synuclein multiplication and parkinsonism. Ann. Neurol. 63, 743–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21380 (2008).
Book, A. et al. A meta-analysis of alpha-synuclein multiplication in familial parkinsonism. Front. Neurol. 9, 1021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01021 (2018).
Zafar, F. et al. Genetic fine-mapping of the Iowan SNCA gene triplication in a patient with Parkinson’s disease. NPJ. Parkinsons Dis. 4, 18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-018-0054-4 (2018).
Kasten, M. & Klein, C. The many faces of alpha-synuclein mutations. Mov. Dis.: Off. J. Mov. Dis. Soci. 28, 697–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25499 (2013).
Gorbatyuk, O. S. et al. In vivo RNAi-mediated alpha-synuclein silencing induces nigrostriatal degeneration. Mol. Ther. 18, 1450–1457. https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2010.115 (2010).
Khodr, C. E., Becerra, A., Han, Y. & Bohn, M. C. Targeting alpha-synuclein with a microRNA-embedded silencing vector in the rat substantia nigra: positive and negative effects. Brain Res. 1550, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.01.010 (2014).
Lewis, J. et al. In vivo silencing of alpha-synuclein using naked siRNA. Mol. Neurodegener. 3, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1326-3-19 (2008).
Zharikov, A. D. et al. shRNA targeting alpha-synuclein prevents neurodegeneration in a Parkinson’s disease model. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 2721–2735. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI64502 (2015).
McCormack, A. L. et al. Alpha-synuclein suppression by targeted small interfering RNA in the primate substantia nigra. PLoS One 5, e12122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012122 (2010).
Mittal, S. et al. beta2-Adrenoreceptor is a regulator of the alpha-synuclein gene driving risk of Parkinson’s disease. Science 357, 891–898. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3934 (2017).
La Russa, M. F. & Qi, L. S. The new state of the art: cas9 for gene activation and repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 35, 3800–3809. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00512-15 (2015).
Adli, M. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat. Commun. 9, 1911. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04252-2 (2018).
Heman-Ackah, S. M., Bassett, A. R. & Wood, M. J. Precision modulation of neurodegenerative disease-related gene expression in human iPSC-derived neurons. Sci. Rep. 6, 28420. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28420 (2016).
Qi, L. S. et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152, 1173–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022 (2013).
Larson, M. H. et al. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Nat/ Protocols 8, 2180–2196. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.132 (2013).
Gilbert, L. A. et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 154, 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.044 (2013).
Groner, A. C. et al. KRAB-zinc finger proteins and KAP1 can mediate long-range transcriptional repression through heterochromatin spreading. PLoS Gene. 6, e1000869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000869 (2010).
Thakore, P. I. et al. Highly specific epigenome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 repressors for silencing of distal regulatory elements. Nat. Methods 12, 1143–1149. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3630 (2015).
Gilbert, L. A. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell 159, 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.029 (2014).
Haeussler, M. et al. Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol. 17, 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1012-2 (2016).
Castro-Mondragon, J. A. et al. JASPAR 2022: the 9th release of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D165-d173. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1113 (2022).
Byers, B. et al. SNCA triplication Parkinson’s patient’s iPSC-derived DA neurons accumulate alpha-synuclein and are susceptible to oxidative stress. PloS One 6, e26159. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026159 (2011).
Beyer, K. et al. Differential expression of alpha-synuclein isoforms in dementia with Lewy bodies. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 30, 601–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2004.00572.x (2004).
Beyer, K. et al. Low alpha-synuclein 126 mRNA levels in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer disease. Neuroreport 17, 1327–1330. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000224773.66904.e7 (2006).
Beyer, K. et al. Differential expression of alpha-synuclein, parkin, and synphilin-1 isoforms in Lewy body disease. Neurogenetics 9, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10048-008-0124-6 (2008).
Beyer, K. et al. Identification and characterization of a new alpha-synuclein isoform and its role in Lewy body diseases. Neurogenetics 9, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10048-007-0106-0 (2008).
Beyer, K. & Ariza, A. alpha-Synuclein posttranslational modification and alternative splicing as a trigger for neurodegeneration. Mol. Neurobiol. 47, 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-012-8330-5 (2013).
Bungeroth, M. et al. Differential aggregation properties of alpha-synuclein isoforms. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 1913–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.02.009 (2014).
Huin, V. et al. Alternative promoter usage generates novel shorter MAPT mRNA transcripts in Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy brains. Sci. Rep. 7, 12589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12955-7 (2017).
Pecci, A., Viegas, L. R., Baranao, J. L. & Beato, M. Promoter choice influences alternative splicing and determines the balance of isoforms expressed from the mouse bcl-X gene. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 21062–21069. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M008665200 (2001).
Blesa, J., Trigo-Damas, I., Quiroga-Varela, A. & Jackson-Lewis, V. R. Oxidative stress and Parkinson’s disease. Front. Neuroanat. 9, 91. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2015.00091 (2015).
Sherer, T. B. & Greenamyre, J. T. Oxidative damage in Parkinson’s disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 7, 627–629. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2005.7.627 (2005).
Oh, S. E. & Mouradian, M. M. Cytoprotective mechanisms of DJ-1 against oxidative stress through modulating ERK1/2 and ASK1 signal transduction. Redox Biol. 14, 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2017.09.008 (2018).
Van Houten, B., Hunter, S. E. & Meyer, J. N. Mitochondrial DNA damage induced autophagy, cell death, and disease. Front. Biosci. 21, 42–54 (2016).
Pinto, M. & Moraes, C. T. Mechanisms linking mtDNA damage and aging. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 85, 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.05.005 (2015).
Qi, R. et al. A mitochondrial blood-based patient stratification candidate biomarker for Parkinson’s disease. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.07.479309 (2022).
Sanders, L. H. et al. LRRK2 mutations cause mitochondrial DNA damage in iPSC-derived neural cells from Parkinson’s disease patients: reversal by gene correction. Neurobiol. Dis. 62, 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2013.10.013 (2014).
Howlett, E. H. et al. LRRK2 G2019S-induced mitochondrial DNA damage is LRRK2 kinase dependent and inhibition restores mtDNA integrity in Parkinson’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 4340–4351. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddx320 (2017).
Singleton, A. B. et al. alpha-Synuclein locus triplication causes Parkinson’s disease. Science 302, 841 (2003).
Nalls, M. A. et al. Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Genet. 46, 989–993. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3043 (2014).
Maraganore, D. M. et al. Collaborative analysis of alpha-synuclein gene promoter variability and Parkinson disease. Jama 296, 661–670 (2006).
Campelo, C. & Silva, R. H. Genetic variants in SNCA and the risk of sporadic Parkinson’s disease and clinical outcomes: a review. Parkinsons Dis. 2017, 4318416. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4318416 (2017).
Piper, D. A., Sastre, D. & Schüle, B. Advancing stem cell models of alpha-synuclein gene regulation in neurodegenerative disease. Front. Neurosci. 12, 199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00199 (2018).
Sardi, S. P., Cedarbaum, J. M. & Brundin, P. Targeted therapies for Parkinson’s disease: From genetics to the clinic. Mov. Dis. Off. J. Move. Dis. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27414 (2018).
Knecht, L., Folke, J., Dodel, R., Ross, J. A. & Albus, A. Alpha-synuclein immunization strategies for synucleinopathies in clinical studies: A biological perspective. Neurotherapeutics 19, 1489–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-022-01288-7 (2022).
Heman-Ackah, S. M. et al. Alpha-synuclein induces the unfolded protein response in Parkinson’s disease SNCA triplication iPSC-derived neurons Hum. Mol. Genet. 26(4441), 4450. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddx331 (2017).
Zafar, F., Nallur Srinivasaraghavan, V., Yang Chen, M., Alejandra Morato Torres, C. & Schule, B. Isogenic human SNCA gene dosage induced pluripotent stem cells to model Parkinson's disease. Stem Cell Res 60, 102733, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2022.102733 (2022).
Kantor, B. et al. Downregulation of SNCA expression by targeted editing of DNA methylation: A potential strategy for precision therapy in PD. Mol. Ther. 26, 2638–2649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.08.019 (2018).
Kim, E. et al. In vivo genome editing with a small Cas9 orthologue derived from Campylobacter jejuni. Nat. Commun. 8, 14500. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14500 (2017).
Liu, J. J. et al. CasX enzymes comprise a distinct family of RNA-guided genome editors. Nature 566, 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0908-x (2019).
Gámez-Valero, A. & Beyer, K. Alternative splicing of alpha- and beta-synuclein genes plays differential roles in synucleinopathies. Genes https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9020063 (2018).
Beyer, K. Alpha-synuclein structure, posttranslational modification and alternative splicing as aggregation enhancers. Acta Neuropathol. 112, 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-006-0104-6 (2006).
Flierl, A. et al. Higher vulnerability and stress sensitivity of neuronal precursor cells carrying an alpha-synuclein gene triplication. PLoS One 9, e112413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112413 (2014).
Oliveira, L. M. et al. Elevated alpha-synuclein caused by SNCA gene triplication impairs neuronal differentiation and maturation in Parkinson’s patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 6, e1994. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2015.318 (2015).
Piper, D. A., Sastre, D. & Schule, B. Advancing stem cell models of alpha-synuclein gene regulation in neurodegenerative disease. Front. Neurosci. 12, 199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00199 (2018).
Raghavan, R. et al. Alpha-synuclein expression in the developing human brain. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 7, 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10024-003-7080-9 (2004).
Morato Torres, C. A. et al. The role of alpha-synuclein and other Parkinson’s genes in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21165724 (2020).
Gonzalez-Hunt, C. P. et al. Mitochondrial DNA damage as a potential biomarker of LRRK2 kinase activity in LRRK2 Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Rep. 10, 17293. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74195-6 (2020).
Pena, N. et al. G2019S selective LRRK2 kinase inhibitor abrogates mitochondrial DNA damage. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.30.517979 (2022).
Lino, C. A., Harper, J. C., Carney, J. P. & Timlin, J. A. Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches. Drug Deliv. 25, 1234–1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2018.1474964 (2018).
Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45 (2001).
Sanders, L. H. et al. Mitochondrial DNA damage: molecular marker of vulnerable nigral neurons in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 70, 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2014.06.014 (2014).
Ayala-Torres, S., Chen, Y., Svoboda, T., Rosenblatt, J. & Van Houten, B. Analysis of gene-specific DNA damage and repair using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Methods 22, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2000.1054 (2000).
Stirling, D. R. et al. Cell Profiler 4: improvements in speed, utility and usability. BMC Bioinf. 22, 433. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04344-9 (2021).
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to the patient and his family for participating and donating skin samples for this study. The study was supported by awards from the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (DISC2-09610 B.S., EDUC2-08394 B.S., D.P.), NINDS R01NS119528 (L.H.S.) and the Michael J. Fox Foundation (grant number: 16138, B.S.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.S., F.Z., C.A.M.T., L.H.S. and D.P. designed and conducted experiments, analyzed raw data, wrote sections of the manuscript, and prepared figures. L.S.Q. shared CRISPR plasmids and supported the design of the Cas9 vectors. D.K. provided feedback on design and data analysis. B.S. conceived and designed the study, obtained funding, and wrote manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sastre, D., Zafar, F., Torres, C.A.M. et al. Inactive S. aureus Cas9 downregulates alpha-synuclein and reduces mtDNA damage and oxidative stress levels in human stem cell model of Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep 13, 17796 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45078-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45078-3
This article is cited by
-
A short guide on blue fluorescent proteins: limits and perspectives
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.