Abstract
The radiological image of an intact tectorial membrane (TM) became an important favorable prognostic factor for craniovertebral instability. This study visualized the fascial layers of the TM and adjacent connective tissues with clinical significance by micro-CT and histological analysis. The TM firmly attached to the bony surface of the clivus, traversed the atlantoaxial joint posteriorly, and was inserted to the body of the axis showing wide distribution on the craniovertebral junction. The supradental space between the clivus, dens of the axis, anterior atlantooccipital membrane, and the TM contained profound venous networks within the adipose tissues. At the body of the axis, the compact TM layer is gradually divided into multiple layers and the deeper TM layers reached the axis while the superficial layer continued to the posterior longitudinal ligament of the lower vertebrae. The consistent presence of the fat pad and venous plexus in the supradental space and firm stabilization of the TM on the craniovertebral junction was demonstrated by high-resolution radiologic images and histological analysis. The evaluation of the TM integrity is a promising diagnostic factor for traumatic craniovertebral dislocation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The craniovertebral junction (CVJ) is a biomechanical and anatomic unit that includes the occiput and the upper two cervical vertebrae (atlas and dens of the axis)1. The ligaments of the CVJ inevitably play an important role in preserving the stability of the region, protecting the neural and vascular structures passing this junction while simultaneously allowing significant mobility2,3. Approximately one-third of all cervical spine injuries involve the CVJ4. Consequently thorough knowledge about the complex ligamentous anatomy of the CVJ is a prerequisite for accurate interpretation of the neural injuries in upper cervical trauma5.
The intrinsic ligaments which act as main stabilizers of the CVJ form three layers anterior to the dura mater including the odontoid ligaments (alar and apical ligaments), the cruciate ligament, and the tectorial membrane (TM)6,7. Among the main ligaments of the CVJ, the cruciate and the alar ligaments between the occiput and the median atlantoaxial joint have uniformly been described in the literature8,9. On the contrary, the detailed anatomy of the TM, another stabilizer of the CVJ remains inconsistent and the least explored of the intrinsic ligaments10,11.
The TM runs posterior to the cruciate ligament is intimately in contact with the dura mater, as a cranial continuation of the posterior longitudinal ligament supporting whole vertebrae2,10. In recent literature, intact TM appears to be an important favorable prognostic factor in atlantooccipital dislocation which is considered to be a frequently fatal injury12. Fiester et al. have proposed that the alteration of the supradental space (fat-filled space superior to the atlantoaxial joint, inferior to the basion of the clivus, and anterior to the TM) followed by injury of the TM may indicate a patient with significant CVJ instability13,14,15,16.
Osseous injury can be subtle while representing important radiological red flags for significant underlying ligamentous injury17. In the cases without the overt sign of subluxation or dislocation of the atlantooccipital joint, early diagnosis of unstable CVJ injuries by the ligamentous structures and treatment with post-surgical stabilization has shown to greatly reduce neurological deterioration and death7. Describing the various imaging appearances of the TM will increase the familiarity of TM tear patterns for the clinicians and help better predict the potential for unstable CVJ injuries and thus guide appropriate clinical management18. This potential of the TM in the clinical field and paucity of the basic research on the TM prompt us to investigate the structure of the TM by an alternative method for image analysis and histological observations. This study aimed to provide clear radiological images of the CVJ soft tissues by micro-CT and describe histological characteristics of the TM along with the cranium and upper cervical vertebrae that could contribute to the understanding of CVJ injuries.
Methods
Subjects
Five embalmed cadavers (3 men and 2 women) with a mean age of 76.6 ± 8.0 years were dissected in this study. The donors signed documents agreeing to their participation in the body donation program of the applicable medical school. The study obtained appropriate consent to use cadavers legally donated to the Surgical Anatomy Education Centre of the Yonsei University College of Medicine (approval No. 22-002). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Specimens having visible signs of deformity and operative procedures in the CVJ were excluded. In the prone position, the anatomists removed the skin, fascia, and muscles overlying the CVJ. The occiput and the posterior lamina of the atlas were removed by saw. Laminectomies of the axis, C3, and C4 were then conducted to remove the brainstem and spinal cord and exposed the ligamentous complex of the CVJ. The continuum of the clivus–atlas-axis was preserved intact and separated from the retropharyngeal space. Three cadavers were subjected to 3D topographic analysis of the micro-CT images and histological revalidation by the longitudinal section. Specimens from one cadaver were subjected to histological evaluation by transverse section. One cadaver was used for the noncalcified plastic section of the whole CVJ and conventional histological observations.
Micro-CT preparation and 3D visualization
Our micro-CT preparation technique for enhancing soft-tissue contrast was used. Briefly, the whole specimen of the CVJ including the clivus–atlas–axis-C3 from three embalmed cadavers were soaked in 1% phosphotungstic acid solution with 70% ethanol after serial dehydration (30%, 50%, and 70% for 24-h each). Micro-CT images were acquired using a micro-CT scanner (Skyscan 1173, Bruker, Kontich, Belgium), with a source voltage of 70 kVp, source current of 114 μA, and image pixel of 20 μm2. For a 3D visualization and analysis, the acquired section images were reconstructed using CTVox (Bruker, Kontich, Belgium). Representative 3D images of the TM are provided in online Supplemental Material 1.
Histology
Bony structures with intact soft tissues were cropped from clivus, dens of the axis, and body of the axis from each specimen. The tissue blocks were decalcified and processed for routine paraffin embedding. Longitudinal and transverse sections of the tissue block cut in 4 µm thickness were subjected to H&E, Masson’s Trichrome, and Verhoeff Van Giseon staining. To produce non-decalcified longitudinal sections of the CVJ including the clivus–atlas–axis-C3, a specimen was stored in 70% ethanol, dehydrated in a series of 80%, 95%, and 100% ethanol baths, and then cleared with acetone. The specimen was infiltrated with methyl methacrylate and polymerized. Plasticized blocks were then micro-ground and polished to approximately 70 μm thick using an Exakt Micro Grinding System. Polished samples were stained with Goldner’s trichrome.
Ethics statements
The study design was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Health System, though they exempted this study from a formal review due to the use of cadaver specimens. The study obtained appropriate consent to use cadavers legally donated to the Surgical Anatomy Education Centre of the Yonsei University College of Medicine.
Results
An inclined part of the occipital bone anterior to the foramen magnum sustains the midbrain as the clivus. The TM traversed the inner surface of the clivus and upper cervical vertebrae, surfacing to the brainstem and spinal cord, and continued to the posterior longitudinal ligament in the inferior body of the axis, or intervertebral space between axis and C3 (Fig. 1a).
The neural image by micro-CT provides clear identification of the soft tissues of the CVJ compared to the clinical magnetic resonance image (Figs. 1b,c, and 2).
Ligamentous structures of the CVJ in this study observed by sagittal view could be described as follows: the anterior atlantooccipital membrane (AAOM) in the foremost part, the apical ligaments between the plateau of dens and the clivus, and the cruciate ligament–TM–dura mater complex in the posterior part (Fig. 2a). The TM is firmly attached to the bony surface of the clivus showing wide distribution to the jugular tubercle (Fig. 2b). The venous plexus in the loose connective tissues gradually invaded the space between the inferior clivus and the cruciate ligament–TM–dura mater complex (Fig. 2c). The supradental space between the clivus, dens of the axis, AAOM, and TM contained profound venous networks within the loose connective tissues (Fig. 2a,d). The alar ligament bilaterally connected the superior dense to the occipital condyle served as the lateral boundary of the supradental space (Fig. 2e). The cruciate ligament has been distinguished from the TM below the impingement site of the dens to the cruciate ligament–TM–dura mater complex (Fig. 2f). From the level of the C3, the TM was continued as the posterior longitudinal ligament (Fig. 2g).
In the superior clivus, collagen fibers of the superior crus of cruciate ligament–TM–dura complex firmly attached to the bony surface in an interdigitated manner (Fig. 3a). On the inferior clivus, this complex became distinguishably intermingled with adipose tissues and vessels. The collagen bundles exhibited some directional change with abundant fiber branching (Fig. 3b).
As described above, since the impingement site to dens of the axis the cruciate ligament–TM–dura mater complex was distinguishable by each layer by micro-CT analysis. Between the hypertrophied cartilage on the plateau of dens and the superior crus of the cruciate ligament, the fat pad was always present. This supradental space contains extensive venous plexuses intermingled with multiple fibrous septa expanded to the bony surface of the other ligamentous structures (Fig. 4).
The morphology of the TM abruptly changed by region, as cornified tissues in the post-dental space, loosely arranged multiple layers in the insertion to the body of the axis and densely packed deep layer of the TM attached to the connected tissues of the intervertebral space between the axis and C3 (Fig. 5).
The TM contains dense regular connective tissues with an abundance of collagen fibers and interspersed elastic fibers. In the cranial origin of the TM, elastic fibers ran parallel to the longitudinal collagen bundles. In the TM layers, a deep layer of the TM adjacent to the bony surface of the clivus contained longitudinal thick elastic fibers (Fig. 6a). In the cervical vertebral level, the middle layer of the TM showed a marginal increase and central decrease of elastic fibers parallel to the collagen bundles. The spinal dura mater consists of multi-biased networks of numerous elastic fibers compared to the sparse elastic fibers of the cranial dura mater (Fig. 6b).
Discussion
Visualization of the cervical ligaments by micro-CT allows the contrast to the bone and the soft tissues including the vessels and loose connective tissues to be better observed. This study has materialized the high-resolution image of cadaveric human CVJ using micro-CT and validated the association between these radiological and histological features. As an early prognostic factor of neural injury, intact features of the fascial layers of the TM and anterior ‘supradental space’ were also depicted by histological observation.
To date, outcome prognostication in patients with an atlantooccipital dislocation has been based mainly on clinical indicators and osseous relationships on radiographs or cervical CT scans18. Recently, the TM regarded as a secondary stabilizer of the atlantooccipital junction has been a critical determinant as to whether a CVJ injury is stable or unstable since the evaluation of tectorial integrity allows for supplementary prognostication, and may facilitate the decision to opt for early surgical intervention12. The epidural space between the TM and the clivus (supradental space) is predominantly fat-filled recess superior to the atlanto-axial joint and inferior to the basion of the clivus14. This is a potential space that contains a small venous plexus and may become filled with blood if the clivus is fractured or the TM is injured17. In the setting of significant cervical hyperflexion-hyperextension injury in adult patients, the TM may tear with a resultant shearing injury of the adjacent venous plexus in the supradental space causing the “supradental sign”—the hematoma formation and effacement of the fat pad in the supradental space19. The supradental sign by imaging analysis is proved by histologic observations of the cruciate ligament–TM–dura mater complex departs from the inferior clivus. The ligamentous structure including the TM forms the posterior boundary of the supradental space filled with adipose tissues and profound venous plexus which is visible both by micro-CT and histologic sections. The adipose tissues compartmented by thin fibrous septa were widely distributed between the occiput and dens as a fat pad and posteriorly supported by the TM. The typical presence of the fat pad in the supradental space directly visualized on CT and MRI exams allows improvement of the sensitivity for diagnosing major CVJ injuries and further expedite follow-up cervical MRI to evaluate the remaining major CVJ ligaments for injury20. Although the venous plexus in this space has been thought to communicate with the extradural venous plexus and drained into the intraspinal plexus21,22,23,24, studies on their exact origins are insufficient. Further insights into the venous network of the supradental space could help the surgeons avoid troublesome venous bleeding during the transoral surgical approaches for the CVJ intervention24.
According to in vitro experimental study, the TM could be irreversibly stretched, especially when the head is forced to both flex and axially rotate, despite the atlantoaxial joint being the most mobile portion of the spine25,26. To confirm this property on the morphologic base, this study investigated the directions of fibers and elastic distributions on the TM. From the cranial origin to the insertion to the body of the axis, one-directional elastic fibers of the TM ran parallel to the longitudinal collagen bundles. At the sub-clival level, interspersed elastic fibers between collagen bundles decreased compared to that of the attachment site to clivus. Contrary to the TM layers, the spinal dura mater contained an increased number of multi-biased networks of elastic fibers compared to the sparse elastic fibers of the cranial dura mater. During the rotation of the CVJ, the dura mater encompassing the spinal cord may stretch multiple directions while the TM firmly stabilizes the atlantoaxial joint by restricting excessive rotation. Meanwhile, the TM at the level of the atlantooccipital joint and atlantoaxial joint was relatively condensed and stiff. As it reaches the body of the axis, the compact TM layer is gradually divided into multiple layers and the deeper TM layers are inserted to the axis in concurrence with the coarse attachment of the inferior crus of the cruciate ligament. Relatively incomplete supports of the ligamentous structures including the TM to the axis could explain an improved outcome of posterior C1–C2 fusion with Goel–Harms technique in the case of atlantoaxial dislocation27. Superficial TM layers become narrowed and elongated as the posterior longitudinal ligament on the body of C3. In other words, the ligamentous structure of the CVJ abruptly decreases at the level of the intervertebral disc and the body of C3 as the two main stabilizers (the cruciate ligament and TM) end in the axis. This result may explain the reason those surgical interventions at the C2–C3 level is associated with a higher rate of approach-related morbidity28.
Conclusion
This study visualized the fascial layers of the TM and the supradental space with clinical significance by both micro-CT and histological analysis. The evaluation of the TM integrity is a promising diagnostic factor for traumatic CVJ instability without a distinct sign of CVJ dislocation.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Change history
31 January 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28998-y
References
Fenoy, A. J., Menezes, A. H., Donovan, K. A. & Kralik, S. F. Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition in the craniovertebral junction. J. Neurosurg. Spine 8(1), 22–29 (2008).
Tubbs, R. S. et al. Ligaments of the craniocervical junction. J. Neurosurg. Spine 14, 697–709 (2011).
Bodon, G. et al. Introducing the craniocervical Y-ligament. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 41(2), 197–202 (2019).
Volle, E. & Montazem, A. MRI video diagnosis and surgical therapy of soft tissue trauma to the craniocervical junction. Ear Nose Throat J. 80(1), 41–44, 46–48 (2001).
Mantripragada, S., Kannivelu, A. & Peh, W. C. (2020). Magnetic resonance imaging of cervical ligamentous anatomy and traumatic ligamentous injuries. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 64(3), 368–376 (2020).
Jackson, R. S., Banit, D. M., Rhyne, A. L. III. & Darden, B. V. II. Upper cervical spine injuries. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 10(4), 271–280 (2002).
Lopez, A. J. et al. Anatomy and biomechanics of the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurg. Focus 38(4), E2. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14807 (2015).
Saldinger, P., Dvorak, J., Rahn, B. A. & Perren, S. M. Histology of the alar and transverse ligaments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15(4), 257–261 (1990).
Karaaslan, B., Börcek, A. Ö., Murat Uçar, M. & Aykol, S. Can the etiopathogenesis Chiari malformation be craniocervical junction stabilization difference? Morphometric analysis of craniocervical junction ligaments. World Neurosurg. 128, e1096–e1101 (2019).
Tubbs, R. S. et al. The tectorial membrane: Anatomical, biomechanical, and histological analysis. Clin. Anat. 20(4), 382–386 (2007).
Osmotherly, P. G. & Rivett, D. A. Reconsidering the tectorial membrane: A morphological study. J. Craniovertebr. Junction. Spine 11(3), 180–185 (2020).
Kimchi, G. et al. Integrity of the tectorial membrane is a favorable prognostic factor in atlanto-occipital dislocation. Br. J. Neurosurg. 34(4), 470–474 (2020).
Fiester, P., Soule, E., Natter, P. & Rao, D. Tectorial membrane injury in adult and pediatric trauma patients: A retrospective review and proposed classification scheme. Emerg. Radiol. 26(6), 615–622 (2019).
Fiester, P., Rao, D., Soule, E., Jenson, M. & Patel, M. Tectorial membrane injury, frequently identified in adult trauma patients who undergo occipital-cervical fusion for craniocervical instability. Cureus 13(4), e14254 (2021).
Fiester, P., Rao, D., Andreou, S., Soule, E. & Patel, J. Pediatric retroclival epidural hematoma in the acute trauma setting: A sign of tectorial membrane stripping injury. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 216(6), 1641–1648 (2021).
Fiester, P., Rao, D., Soule, E., Orallo, P. & Rahmathulla, G. Anatomic, functional, and radiographic review of the ligaments of the craniocervical junction. J. Craniovertebr. Junction Spine 12, 4–9 (2021).
Fiester, P., Rao, D., Soule, E., Patel, J. & Jenson, M. “Supradental space sign” on cervical spine CT—A sign of tectorial membrane injury in adults trauma patients. Emerg. Radiol. 28(5), 903–910 (2021).
Offiah, C. E. & Day, E. The craniocervical junction: Embryology, anatomy, biomechanics and imaging in blunt trauma. Insights Imaging 8(1), 29–47 (2017).
Kaplan, N. B., Molinari, C. & Molinari, R. W. Nonoperative management of craniocervical ligamentous distraction injury: Literature review. Glob. Spine J. 5(6), 505–512 (2015).
Filiberto, D. M., Sharpe, J. P., Croce, M. A., Fabian, T. C. & Magnotti, L. J. Traumatic atlanto-occipital dissociation: No longer a death sentence. Surgery 164, 500–503 (2018).
Parke, W. W. The vascular relations of the upper cervical vertebrae. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 9, 879–889 (1978).
Caruso, R. D., Rosenbaum, A. E., Chang, J. K. & Joy, S. E. Craniocervical junction venous anatomy on enhanced MR images. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 20(6), 1127–1131 (1999).
Rhoton, A. L. Jr. Jugular foramen. Neurosurgery 47(3), S267–S285 (2000).
Haffajee, M. R., Thompson, C. & Govender, S. The Supraodontoid space or ‘“apical cave”’ at the craniocervical junction: A microdissection study. Clin. Anat. 21(5), 405–415 (2008).
Riascos, R. et al. Imaging of atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial traumatic injuries: What the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 35(7), 2121–2134 (2015).
Oda, T. et al. Role of tectorial membrane in the stability of the upper cervical spine. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 7(4), 201–207 (1992).
Klepinowski, T., Limanówka, B. & Sagan, L. Management of post-traumatic craniovertebral junction dislocation: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis of casereports. Neurosurg. Rev. 44(3), 1391–1400 (2021).
Finn, M. A. & MacDonald, J. D. C2–C3 anterior cervical fusion technical report. Clin. Spine Surg. 29(10), E536–E541 (2016).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a faculty research grant of Yonsei University Medicine for 6-2021-0043. We are grateful to the people who very nobly donated their bodies to the Surgical Anatomy Education Centre at the Yonsei University College of Medicine. Additionally, the authors wish to thank Jun Ho Kim, Jong Ho Bang, and Tae-Jun Ha for their technical support (all are staff members of the Surgical Anatomy Education Centre at the Yonsei University College of Medicine).
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (No. 2020R1F1A1058123) and a faculty research grant of Yonsei University Medicine for 6-2021-0043. No other external funding or competing interests were declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.H.L., Y.H.L., and H.-M.Y. conceptualized the study, formal analysis, and writing of the original manuscript. Y.H.L. and H.-M.Y. proceeded with project administration, manuscript editing, and critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. S.H.L. illustrated the figures. S.H.L., T.-H.C., and H.-J.K. proceeded with gross dissection, 3D imaging analysis, and formal analysis. S.H.L., T.-H.C., H.-J.K., and J.E.H. proceeded with histologic experiments. All authors read and provided final approval of the version to be published. Y.H.L. and H.-M.Y. contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this Article was revised: The Funding section in the original version of this Article was incomplete. It now reads: “This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (No. 2020R1F1A1058123) and a faculty research grant of Yonsei University Medicine for 6-2021-0043. No other external funding or competing interests were declared.”
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, S.H., Cho, TH., Kwon, HJ. et al. An anatomical and radiological study of the tectorial membrane and its clinical implications. Sci Rep 12, 21480 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25213-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25213-2
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.