Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14808-4, published online 01 July 2022


The original version of this Article contained an error in the Results section, under the subheading ‘Spatial feature importance analysis’.


“In addition, it appears as if the binary classifiers disgust vs. sexual arousal and neutral (N) vs. sexual arousal are both more heavily dependent on the non-spatiotemporal estimated heart rate (EHR) frequency (i.e., F8), since their overall summaries presented above each spatial map are 82.03% and 81.99%, respectively, while the rest of the importance belongs to F8 (Figs. 7, 8, 9, 10).”


now reads:


“In addition, it appears as if the binary classifiers disgust vs. sexual arousal and neutral (N) vs. sexual arousal are both more heavily dependent on the non-spatiotemporal estimated heart rate (EHR) frequency (i.e., F8), since their overall summaries presented above each spatial map are 82.03% and 81.99%, respectively, while the rest of the importance belongs to F8.”


In addition, the original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Michael Gilead which was incorrectly given as Michael Gilad.


The original Article has been corrected.