Abstract
The matrix elements of relativistic nucleon–nucleon (NN) potentials are calculated directly from the nonrelativistic potentials as a function of relative NN momentum vectors, without a partial wave decomposition. To this aim, the quadratic operator relation between the relativistic and nonrelativistic NN potentials is formulated in momentum-helicity basis states. It leads to a single integral equation for the two-nucleon (2N) spin-singlet state, and four coupled integral equations for two-nucleon spin-triplet states, which are solved by an iterative method. Our numerical analysis indicates that the relativistic NN potential obtained using CD-Bonn potential reproduces the deuteron binding energy and neutron-proton elastic scattering differential and total cross-sections with high accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Since Einstein’s theory of special relativity in the early twentieth century, there are still issues when considering systems that contain more than two nucleons, as in such systems, pair nucleons are influenced by the presence and motion of the other nucleons. As the three- and four-nucleon bound and scattering problems can be numerically solved with controlled errors, they provide an ideal theoretical laboratory for investigating the relativistic effects in the few-nucleon systems. Several techniques are developed to study the relativistic effects in few-body systems. Among them, the Faddeev–Yakubovsky method provides an exact numerical treatment of three and four-nucleon systems.
The inputs for the relativistic Faddeev–Yakubovsky equations are the fully-off-shell (FOS) relativistic 2N t-matrices, which can be obtained with two different approaches. In the first approach, the FOS relativistic 2N t-matrices are obtained directly from the nonrelativistic 2N t-matrices applying a two-step process. In the first step, using an analytical relation proposed by Coester et al., the relativistic right-half-shell (RHS) t-matrices are obtained from the nonrelativistic RHS t-matrices1. In the second step, the FOS relativistic t-matrices are obtained from the RHS t-matrices by solving a first resolvent equation proposed by Keister et al.2. This approach has been successfully implemented in few-body bound and scattering calculations in a three-dimensional (3D) scheme3,4,5,6,7,8, without using a partial wave (PW) decomposition.
In a second approach, the relativistic FOS t-matrices can be calculated from the solution of the relativistic Lippmann–Schwinger (LS) equation using the relativistic 2N potentials. The input relativistic NN potentials can be obtained from the nonrelativistic potentials by solving a quadratic equation, using an iterative scheme proposed by Kamada and Glöckle9. We have recently implemented this iterative technique in a 3D scheme to calculate the matrix elements of relativistic two-body (2B) potentials for spin-independent Malfliet-Tjon (MT) potential as a function of the magnitude of 2B relative momenta and the angle between them. To do so, we formulated the quadratic operator relation between the nonrelativistic and relativistic NN potentials in momentum space leading to a 3D integral equation10. We successfully implemented this iterative approach to calculate the matrix elements of boosted 2B potential from the MT potential to study the relativistic effects in a 3B bound state11. Our numerical results showed that the relativistic effects lead to a 2% reduction in 3B binding energy using MT potential. Our exact and detailed numerical studies of relativistic effects in 3B bound states using spin-independent MT potential demonstrates that direct integrations in the 3D scheme can be utilized to achieve the same results obtained using a PW method and paves the path for an extension to realistic interactions that have a more complicated spin–isospin dependence. Considering modern nucleon–nucleon (NN) potentials by including spin and isospin degrees of freedom and calculating the relativistic NN potentials from realistic NN potentials is the task we address in this paper. This is the first step toward our goal for a fully relativistic treatment of triton and Helium-3 bound state properties and the long-term interest in studying the scattering problems at the few-GeV energy scale in a 3D scheme. We show that the representation of the quadratic equation in momentum helicity basis states leads to a single and four coupled 3D integral equations for NN singlet and triplet spin state, correspondingly. The single and coupled integral equations are solved using the mentioned iterative scheme, and the matrix elements of relativistic NN potentials are obtained from CD-Bonn potential12. Our numerical analysis indicates that the calculated relativistic potential reproduces the deuteron binding energy and differential and total cross-sections of neutron-proton (np) elastic scattering with very high accuracy.
The motivation for using the 3D scheme and implementing a direct integration method is to replace the discrete angular momentum quantum numbers of a PW representation with continuous angle variables and consider all partial wave components to infinite order, independent of the energy scale of the problem. Consequently, 3D representation avoids the very involved angular momentum algebra for permutations, transformations, and few-nucleon forces, and in contrast to the PW approach, the number of equations in the 3D representation is energy independent. The 3D scheme is successfully implemented in a series of few-body bound and scattering states calculations by different few-body groups, from Ohio-Bochum collaboration4,5,7,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25 to Tehran26,27,28,29,30,31,32 and Kraków33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41 groups.
In the “Relativistic NN potentials in a momentum helicity representation” section, we present the 3D formalism for the relationship between relativistic and nonrelativistic NN potentials. By projecting the quadratic relation between nonrelativistic and relativistic NN potentials in momentum helicity basis states, we obtain the matrix elements of relativistic NN potentials as a function of the magnitude of 2N relative momenta, the angle between them, and the helicity eigenvalues. We derive a single integral equation for NN total spin state \(s=0\) and four coupled integral equations for \(s=1\). In the “Calculation of relativistic NN interactions” section, we present our numerical results for the matrix elements of relativistic NN potential obtained from CD-Bonn potential in different spin and isospin channels. In the “Numerical tests for the relativistic NN potentials” section, we test the obtained relativistic potential by calculating and comparing deuteron binding energy and differential and total cross-sections of np elastic scattering with corresponding nonrelativistic results. Finally, a conclusion and outlook are provided in the “Conclusion and outlook” section.
Relativistic NN potentials in a momentum helicity representation
In this section, we show how to obtain the matrix elements of relativistic NN interactions in a 3D scheme from the nonrelativistic interactions by solving a nonlinear equation derived by Kamada and Glöckle. The relativistic interactions are designed to accurately reproduce the NN bound and scattering observables. To this aim and to check the accuracy of obtained relativistic interactions, as we show in the “Numerical tests for the relativistic NN potentials” section, one needs to solve the homogeneous and inhomogeneous LS integral equations (19), (21), and (22) in a momentum helicity representation to calculate relativistic deuteron binding energy and the scattering amplitudes to obtain the differential and total cross-sections.
The relativistic and nonrelativistic NN potentials, i.e., \({{\mathscr {V}}}_r\) and \(V_{nr}\), are related together by a quadratic operator equation as9
where m is the mass of nucleons, p is the relative momentum of two nucleons (\({\hat{p}}\) is the operator), and \(\omega (p)=2E(p)=2\sqrt{m^2+p^2}\). To calculate the relativistic NN potential \({{\mathscr {V}}}_r\) from a nonrelativistic potential \(V_{nr}\) in a 3D representation, we present Eq. (1) in momentum helicity basis states. The antisymmetrized momentum helicity basis states for a 2N system with total spin and isospin s and t, and the relative momentum \({\mathbf{p}}\) are introduced as16
where \(\hat{{\mathbf{p}}}\) is the unit momentum operator, \(\lambda \) is the eigenvalue of the helicity operator \({{\mathbf{s}}\cdot \hat{{\mathbf{p}}}} \), with the parity eigenvalues \(\eta _{\pi }=\pm 1\) and eigenstates \(|{\mathbf{p}};\hat{{\mathbf{p}}}\ s\lambda \rangle _{\pi }=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (1+\eta _{\pi } P_{\pi }) |{\mathbf{p}};\hat{{\mathbf{p}}}\ s\lambda \rangle \). The 2N helicity basis states are orthogonal and normalized as
The matrix elements of NN nonrelativistic and relativistic potentials in 2N helicity basis states, introduced in Eq. (2), are given as
Representation of the quadratic relation between nonrelativistic and relativistic NN potentials, given in Eq. (1), in 2N helicity basis states is as
The first and the second terms on the right-hand side of Eq. (6) can be evaluated straightforwardly. For evaluation of the third term, the completeness relation of Eq. (3) should be inserted. By these considerations, Eq. (6) reads as
By considering the following properties of NN potentials, one can obtain the negative helicity eigenvalue components of the potential from the positive ones as
The above relations are also valid for the relativistic potential \({{\mathscr {V}}}^{\pi s t}_{r,\lambda \lambda ''}({\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}}'')\). By using the properties of Eq. (8), one can show that the second term of Eq. (7), for \(\lambda ''=-1\) and \(\lambda ''=+1\) are equal together
For 2N singlet spin state, \(s=0\), Eq. (7) leads to a single integral equation to obtain the matrix elements of relativistic potential \({{\mathscr {V}}}^{\pi 0 t}_{r,00}({\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}}')\)
For triplet spin states, \(s=1\), Eq. (7) leads to four coupled integral equations, corresponding to helicity eigenvalues \(\lambda ,\lambda '=0,+1\), to calculate the matrix elements of relativistic potentials \({{\mathscr {V}}}^{\pi 1 t}_{r,00}({\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}}')\), \({{\mathscr {V}}}^{\pi 1 t}_{r,01}({\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}}')\), \({{\mathscr {V}}}^{\pi 1 t}_{r,10}({\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}}')\), and \({{\mathscr {V}}}^{\pi 1 t}_{r,11}({\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}}')\)
Equations (10) and (11) should be solved for each value of 2N total isospin \(t=0, 1\). For the numerical solution of single and coupled integral equations, i.e., Eqs. (10) and (11), by choosing momentum vector \({\mathbf{p}}'\) parallel to the \(z-\)axis, the azimuthal angular dependence of the matrix elements of nonrelativistic and relativistic potentials can be factored out as an exponential phase as
where \(x \equiv \hat{{\mathbf{p}}}\cdot \hat{{\mathbf{p}}}'\) and \(x'' \equiv \hat{{\mathbf{p}}}'' \cdot \hat{{\mathbf{p}}}'\). One can show that the matrix elements of \({{\mathscr {V}}}^{\pi s t}_{r,\lambda \lambda ''} ({\mathbf{p}},{\mathbf{p}}'')\) can be obtained as
where \(\gamma = x x'' + \sqrt{1-x^2} \sqrt{1-x''^2} \cos {(\phi -\phi '')}\). By these considerations, Eqs. (10) and (11) can be written as
where
The \(\phi ''\) integration in the interval \([0,2\pi ]\) can be simplified to \([0,\pi /2]\) interval by
Calculation of relativistic NN interactions
To calculate the matrix elements of relativistic potentials for different spin–isospin (s, t) channels, we solve the integral equations (14) and (15) using an iterative method proposed by Kamada and Glöckle9. The iteration starts with \({{\mathscr {V}}}^{(0){\pi s t}}_{r,\lambda \lambda '}(p,p',x) = \dfrac{4m V^{\pi s t}_{nr, \lambda \lambda '}(p,p',x)}{\omega (p) + \omega (p')}\) and stops when the maximal difference between the matrix elements of the relativistic potential \({{\mathscr {V}}}^{{\pi s t}}_{r,\lambda \lambda '}(p,p',x)\) obtained from two successive iterations drops below \(10^{-6}\) MeV fm\(^3\). After each iteration, to obtain the matrix elements \({{\mathscr {V}}}^{{\pi s t, \lambda '}}_{r,\lambda \lambda ''} (p,p'',x,x'')\) that appears in the kernel of Eqs. (14) and (15), we need to perform the azimuthal angle integration of Eq. (16). To speed up the convergence of the iteration in solving Eqs. (14) and (15), in some (s, t) channels even to be able to reach the convergence, we use the weighted average of relativistic potential obtained from two successive iterations as
The input to our calculations is a 3D form of CD-Bonn potential in momentum helicity representation obtained from the summation of partial wave matrix elements of the potential up to total angular momentum \(j_{max} = 20\). For the discretization of the continuous momentum and angle variables, we use the Gauss-Legendre quadrature. A combination of hyperbolic and linear mapping with 120 mesh points is used for the momentum variables, and for azimuthal and polar angle variables, a linear mapping with 40 mesh points is used. In our calculations, we use the nucleon mass \(m = \frac{2 m_p m_n}{ m_p + m_n} = 938.91852\) MeV and the conversion factor \(\hbar c = 197.327053 \ {\text {MeV fm}} = 1\), where proton and neutron masses are \(m_p = 938.27231\) MeV and \(m_n = 939.56563\) MeV12. The number of iterations needed to reach convergence in the matrix elements of relativistic potential calculations in different spin–isospin channels, for different values of the weight averaging parameters \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \), is shown in Table 1. Our numerical analysis indicates that for \((s=0, \ t=0)\) channel, the convergence can be reached only for \(\alpha =\beta =1\), whereas for \((s=0, \ t=1)\) and \((s=1, \ t=0)\) the fastest convergence can be reached by \(\alpha =2, \ \beta =1\). For \((s=1, \ t=1)\) the fastest convergence can be reached by \(\alpha =3, \ \beta =1\). It should be mentioned that Kamada and Glöckle have used \(\alpha = \beta = 1\) in their calculations to obtain relativistic potentials from AV18, CD-Bonn, and Nijm I, II potentials9. In Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4, the matrix elements of relativistic potential obtained from CD-Bonn potential in different spin–isospin channels are compared with corresponding nonrelativistic potentials. The differences between nonrelativistic and relativistic potentials are also shown. As we can see, while the nonrelativistic and relativistic potentials show similar structures, the difference between them is significant and is in the same order of magnitude as the potentials.
Numerical tests for the relativistic NN potentials
In this section, we present two numerical tests for NN bound and scattering states, which show the validity of our formalism and the accuracy of calculated relativistic potentials in the 3D scheme.
Deuteron binding energy and wave function
To test the accuracy of calculated relativistic NN potential in the \((s=1,\ t=0)\) channel, we calculate the deuteron binding energy and wave function for both nonrelativistic CD-Bonn and the obtained relativistic potentials. The relativistic form of the homogenous LS equation for describing deuteron binding energy \(E_d = m_d - 2m\) and wave function \(\psi _{M_d}(p)\) is given by the following coupled integral equations for wave function components \(\psi _0\) and \(\psi _1\)
where
In the nonrelativistic form, the free propagator is replaced by \((E_d - \frac{p^{2}}{m})^{-1}\), and the relativistic NN potential is replaced by the nonrelativistic potential \(V_{nr,M_{d}\Lambda '}^{+110}(p,p')\)17. In Table 2, we present our numerical results for deuteron binding energies obtained from both CD-Bonn and relativistic potentials. The relative percentage difference of \(0.06 \ \%\) indicates an excellent agreement between relativistic and nonrelativistic deuteron binding energies. In Fig. 5, we show the deuteron wave function components calculated for both relativistic and nonrelativistic CD-Bonn potentials. As we can see, the constructed relativistic potential reproduces the deuteron binding energy and wave function obtained by CD-Bonn potential with high accuracy.
np elastic scattering
For the second numerical test, we calculate the differential and total cross-section of np elastic scattering for the relativistic potential constructed from CD-Bonn potential. To study describe the relativistic np elastic scattering in momentum helicity space, the relativistic form of inhomogeneous LS equations for 2N t-matrices in singlet and triplet spin states can be obtained as
The on-shell momentum \(p_0\) for an incident projectile energy \(E_{lab}\) is defined by \(p_0 = \sqrt{ \frac{ m_p^2 E_{lab} (E_{lab} + 2m_n ) }{ (m_p + m_n)^2 + 2 m_p E_{lab} } }\)12. By replacing the relativistic free propagator \((\omega (p_{0})-\omega (p'')+i\varepsilon )^{-1}\) with the nonrelativistic one as \((\frac{p_{0}^{2}}{m} - \frac{p''^{2}}{m} +i\varepsilon )^{-1}\) and relativistic potential \({{\mathscr {V}}}_{r}\) with the nonrelativistic potential \(V_{nr}\), Eqs. (21) and (22) yield the nonrelativistic form of LS equations of Ref.16. The relativistic differential cross section of np elastic scattering as a function of the incident projectile energy is given by
where the matrix elements of the on-shell physical t-matrices can be obtained from the on-shell relativistic NN t-matrices of Eqs. (21) and (22) as
where \(m_{s_{i}}\) and \(m_{t_{i}}\) are the spin and isospin projection of single nucleons along the quantization \(z-\)axis, and the coefficients C are the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. In Fig. 6, we show the differential cross sections of np elastic scattering, calculated for relativistic and nonrelativistic CD-Bonn potentials, for the projectile energies \(E_{lab}=50, 96, 143\) and 200 MeV. Total cross-sections can provide a more detailed comparison between relativistic and nonrelativistic potentials. In Table 3, we present our numerical results for total cross-sections of np elastic scattering, obtained by relativistic and nonrelativistic CD-Bonn potentials, as a function of the incident projectile energy \(E_{lab}\). As we can see, the maximum relative percentage difference is less than \(0.01 \ \%\), indicating that the relativistic total cross-sections are in excellent agreement with the corresponding nonrelativistic cross-sections.
Kamada and Glöckle have shown in Ref.9 that the obtained relativistic potential from AV18 potential, in a PW decomposition, reproduces the nonrelativistic phase shifts with five significant figures with projectile energy in the domain \((1-350)\) MeV. As one can see in Table 3, our nonrelativistic and relativistic cross-section results are also in perfect agreement with five significant figures with an incident projectile energy in the broader domain (0.001–750) MeV. So we are convinced that the 3D formulation and calculations for relativistic potential provide the same accuracy as a PW calculation.
Moreover, in a prior study for calculating relativistic potentials from spin-independent MT potential10, which has no spin and isospin complexity of CD-Bonn, we obtained a relative percentage difference of \(0.06\%\) between nonrelativistic and relativistic deuteron binding energies and a maximum relative percentage difference of \(0.007\%\) in two-body total elastic scattering cross-sections, which can be compared with \(0.06\%\) and \(0.01\%\) relative percentage differences obtained in this study for CD-Bonn potential. This comparison indicates calculating relativistic NN interactions from realistic interactions in a 3D scheme provides almost the same accuracy as a spin-independent calculation.
Conclusion and outlook
In this paper, the quadratic equation, which connects the relativistic and nonrelativistic NN potentials, is formulated in momentum helicity space as a single and four coupled three-dimensional integral equations for 2N singlet and triplet spin states. In our numerical calculations, we implement the CD-Bonn potential to obtain the matrix elements of the relativistic potential as a function of the magnitude of 2N relative momenta, the angle between them, and spin and isospin quantum numbers. The quadratic integral equations are solved using an iterative scheme. Our numerical results indicate that calculated relativistic NN potential from the CD-Bonn potential reproduces 2N observables for deuteron binding energy and the differential and total cross sections of np elastic scattering with high accuracy. The implementation of relativistic NN potentials in the relativistic description of triton binding energy and wave function is currently underway.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Coester, F., Pieper, S. C. & Serduke, F. J. D. Relativistic effects in phenomenological nucleon–nucleon potentials and nuclear matter. Phys. Rev. C 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.11.1 (1975).
Keister, B. D. & Polyzou, W. N. Quantitative relativistic effects in the three-nucleon problem. Phys. Rev. C 73, 014005. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC,73.014005 (2006).
Hadizadeh, M. R., Elster, Ch. & Polyzou, W. N. The relativistic three-body bound state in three-dimensions. In EPJ Web of Conferences, Vol. 113, 03011. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611303011 (2016).
Hadizadeh, M. R., Elster, Ch. & Polyzou, W. N. Relativistic three-body bound state in a 3D formulation. Phys. Rev. C 90, 054002. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.90.054002 (2014).
Lin, T., Elster, Ch., Polyzou, W. N. & Glöckle, W. Relativistic effects in exclusive pd breakup scattering at intermediate energies. Phys. Lett. B 660, 345–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.01.012 (2008).
Elster, Ch., Lin, T., Polyzou, W. N. & Glöckle, W. Relativistic three-body scattering in a first order Faddeev formulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:0708.3868 (2007).
Lin, T., Elster, Ch., Polyzou, W. N. & Glöckle, W. First order relativistic three-body scattering. Phys. Rev. C 76, 014010. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.014010 (2007).
Liu, H., Elster, Ch. & Glöckle, W. Three-body elastic and inelastic scattering at intermediate energies. Nucl. Phys. A 790, 262c–266c. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.03.147 (2007).
Kamada, H. & Glöckle, W. Realistic two-nucleon potentials for the relativistic two-nucleon Schrödinger equation. Phys. Lett. B 655, 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb/com.2007.07.071 (2007).
Hadizadeh, M. R. & Radin, M. Calculation of relativistic nucleon–nucleon potentials in three dimensions. Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 18. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12209-6 (2017).
Hadizadeh, M. R., Radin, M. & Mohseni, K. A three-dimensional momentum-space calculation of three-body bound state in a relativistic Faddeev scheme. Sci. Rep. 10, 1949. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58577-4 (2020).
Machleidt, R. High-precision, charge-dependent Bonn nucleon–nucleon potential. Phys. Rev. C 63, 024001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.024001 (2001).
Elster, Ch., Thomas, J. & Glöckle, W. Two-body t-matrices without angular-momentum decomposition: Energy and momentum dependences. Few-Body Syst. 24, 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s006010050076 (1998).
Elster, Ch., Schadow, W., Nogga, A. & Glöckle, W. Three-body bound-state calculations without angular-momentum decomposition. Few-Body Syst. 27, 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s006010050124 (1999).
Schadow, W., Elster, Ch. & Glöckle, W. Three-body scattering below breakup threshold: An approach without using partial waves. Few-Body Syst. 28, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s006010070028 (2000).
Fachruddin, I., Elster, Ch. & Glöckle, W. Nucleon–nucleon scattering in a three dimensional approach. Phys. Rev. C 62, 044002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.62.044002 (2000).
Fachruddin, I., Elster, Ch. & Glöckle, W. New forms of deuteron equations and wave function representations. Phys. Rev. C 63, 054003. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.054003 (2001).
Fachruddin, I., Elster, Ch. & Glöckle, W. Nd breakup process in leading order in a three-dimensional approach. Phys. Rev. C 68, 054003. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.68.054003 (2003).
Liu, H., Elster, Ch. & Glöckle, W. Model study of three-body forces in the three-body bound state. Few-Body Syst. 33, 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-003-0019-x (2003).
Fachruddin, I., Glöckle, W., Elster, Ch. & Nogga, A. Operator form of \(^{3}{{\rm H}}\,(^{3}{{\rm He}})\) and its spin structure. Phys. Rev. C 69, 064002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.064002 (2004).
Liu, H., Elster, Ch. & Glöckle, W. Three-body scattering at intermediate energies. Phys. Rev. C 72, 054003. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.72.054003 (2005).
Lin, T., Elster, Ch., Polyzou, W., Witała, H. & Glöckle, W. Poincaré invariant three-body scattering at intermediate energies. Phys. Rev. C 78, 024002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.024002 (2008).
Glöckle, W. et al. A new treatment of 2N and 3N bound states in three dimensions. Few-Body Syst. 47, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-009-0064-1 (2010).
Veerasamy, S., Elster, Ch. & Polyzou, W. Two-nucleon scattering without partial waves using a momentum space Argonne v18 interaction. Few-Body Syst. 54, 2207–2225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-012-0476-1 (2013).
Hadizadeh, M. R. Three-body bound state calculations using three-dimensional low-momentum interaction \(\rm{V_{low-k}}\). Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2014, 043D01. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptu037 (2014).
Hadizadeh, M. R. & Bayegan, S. Four-body bound-state calculations in three-dimensional approach. Few-Body Syst. 40, 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-006-0169-8 (2007).
Bayegan, S., Hadizadeh, M. R. & Harzchi, M. Three-nucleon bound state in a spin–isospin dependent three dimensional approach. Phys. Rev. C 77, 064005. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.064005 (2008).
Bayegan, S., Hadizadeh, M. R. & Glöckle, W. A realistic formalism for 4N bound state in a three-dimensional Yakubovsky scheme. Prog. Theor. Phys. 120, 887–916. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.120.887 (2008).
Bayegan, S., Harzchi, M. & Hadizadeh, M. R. Low-momentum effective interaction in the three-dimensional approach. Nucl. Phys. A 814, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.10.002 (2008).
Bayegan, S., Shalchi, M. A. & Hadizadeh, M. R. Three dimensional calculations of NN bound and scattering states with a chiral potential up to N3LO. Phys. Rev. C 79, 057001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.057001 (2009).
Hadizadeh, M. R., Tomio, L. & Bayegan, S. Solutions of the bound-state Faddeev–Yakubovsky equations in three dimensions by using NN and 3N potential models. Phys. Rev. C 83, 054004. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.054004 (2011).
Radin, M., Mohseni, H., Nazari, F. & Hadizadeh, M. R. Four-body bound state calculations using three-dimensional low-momentum effective interaction \({{\rm V}}_{low{-}k}\). Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 26, 1750083. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301317500835 (2017).
Golak, J. et al. Two-nucleon systems in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. C 81, 034006. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.034006 (2010).
Glöckle, W., Golak, J., Skibiński, R. & Witała, H. The exact three-dimensional half-shell t-matrix for a sharply cut-off coulomb potential in the screening limit. Few-Body Syst. 47, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-009-0058-z (2010).
Glöckle, W. et al. 3N scattering in a three-dimensional operator formulation. The Eur. Phys. J. A 43, 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2010-10920-4 (2010).
Skibinski, R., Golak, J. & Witala, H. Numerical investigations of the three-dimensional proton–proton screened Coulomb t-matrix. arXiv preprintarXiv:1001.5175 (2010).
Skibiński, R. et al. Recent developments of a three-dimensional description of the NN system. Few-Body Syst. 50, 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-010-0204-7 (2011).
Golak, J. et al. A three-dimensional treatment of the three-nucleon bound state. Few-Body Syst. 54, 2427–2446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-012-0472-5 (2013).
Topolnicki, K., Golak, J., Skibiński, R., Witała, H. & Bertulani, C. First-order neutron–deuteron scattering in a three-dimensional approach. The Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 132. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2015-15132-x (2015).
Topolnicki, K., Golak, J., Skibiński, R. & Witała, H. Operator form of the three-nucleon scattering amplitude. Phys. Rev. C 96, 014611. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.014611 (2017).
Topolnicki, K., Golak, J., Skibiński, R. & Witała, H. Three nucleon scattering in a 3D approach at the first order. Few-Body Syst. 58, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-016-1163-4 (2017).
Fink, G. et al. Backward angle np differential cross sections from 22 to 50 MeV. Nucl. Phys. A 518, 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(90)90146-d (1990).
Montgomery, T. C., Bonner, B. E., Brady, F. P., Broste, W. B. & McNaughton, M. W. Neutron–proton differential cross section measurements at 25.8 and 50.0 MeV. Phys. Rev. C 16, 499–502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.16.499 (1977).
Griffith, T. C., Banford, A. P., Uppal, M. Y. & Williams, W. S. C. Neutron–proton scattering in the energy range 70 to 170 MeV. Proc. Phys. Soc. 71, 305. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/71/3/302 (1958).
Rahm, J. et al. np scattering measurements at 96 MeV. Phys. Rev. C 63, 044001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.044001 (2001).
Rönnqvist, T. et al. Backward angle n–p differential cross section at 96 MeV. Phys. Rev. C 45, R496–R499. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.45.R496 (1992).
Bersbach, A. J., Mischke, R. E. & Devlin, T. J. Neutron–proton forward elastic scattering from 58 to 391 MeV. Phys. Rev. D 13, 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.13.535 (1976).
Hürster, W. et al. Neutron–proton charge exchange scattering between 190 MeV and 590 MeV. Phys. Lett. B 90, 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90950-8 (1980).
Kazarinov, Y. M. & Simonov, Y. N. Scattering of 200 MeV neutrons by protons. Sov. Phys. JETP 16 (1963).
Franz, J., Rössle, E., Schmitt, H. & Schmitt, L. The psi np data and their effect on the charged \(\pi {{\rm NN}}\) coupling constant. Phys. Scr. 2000, 14. https://doi.org/10.1238/Physica.Topical.087a00014 (2000).
Acknowledgements
The work of M. R. Hadizadeh was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF-PHY-2000029 with Central State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.R.H. designed and directed the project; M.R.H. and M.R. developed the theoretical formalism; F.N. calculated the matrix elements of CD-Bonn potential in a 3D scheme; M.R.H. and M.R. calculated the matrix elements of relativistic potentials; all authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hadizadeh, M.R., Radin, M. & Nazari, F. Relativistic nucleon–nucleon potentials in a spin-dependent three-dimensional approach. Sci Rep 11, 17550 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96924-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96924-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.