Abstract
Prostate cancer remains the most common non-cutaneous malignancy among men in the United States. To discover potential serum-based biomarkers for high-risk prostate cancer, we performed a high-multiplex immunoassay utilizing patient-matched pre-operative and post-operative serum samples from ten men with high-grade and high-volume prostate cancer. Our study identified six (CASP8, MSLN, FGFBP1, ICOSLG, TIE2 and S100A4) out of 174 proteins that were significantly decreased after radical prostatectomy. High levels of CASP8 were detected in pre-operative serum samples when compared to post-operative serum samples and serum samples from patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). By immunohistochemistry, CASP8 protein was expressed at higher levels in prostate cancer tissues compared to non-cancerous and BPH tissues. Likewise, CASP8 mRNA expression was significantly upregulated in prostate cancer when compared to benign prostate tissues in four independent clinical datasets. In addition, mRNA levels of CASP8 were higher in patients with recurrent prostate cancer when compared to patients with non-recurrent prostate cancer and high expression of CASP8 was associated with worse disease-free survival and overall survival in renal cancer. Together, our results suggest that CASP8 may potentially serve as a biomarker for high-risk prostate cancer and possibly renal cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous cancer among men in the United States, accounting for more than one in five new cancer diagnoses. Approximately 33,000 deaths are due to prostate cancer annually, making it the second leading cause of cancer-associated deaths in men in the United States1. Although the 5-year survival rate for men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer is greater than 95%, it drops to 31% once the disease progresses to metastasis1. The high-risk prostate cancer accounts for 15% of all prostate cancer at diagnosis and commonly progresses to a lethal disease2. There are three common definitions of high-risk prostate cancer including pre-operative PSA levels > 20 ng/ml, Gleason score of 8–10, and clinical stage more than T2c3. Radical prostatectomy, surgical removal of the prostate gland, is commonly used as a treatment for high-risk prostate cancer2,3.
In recent years, an increasing number of cancer studies have used high-multiplex immunoassays for discovery of blood-based biomarkers14,15,16,17,18,19,20. Ideal biomarkers for prostate cancer should be specific for high-risk disease and able to be measured in a minimally or non-invasive manner. To identify new biomarkers for high-risk prostate cancer, we compared protein levels in pre-operative to post-operative serum samples from ten men with high-grade and high-volume prostate cancer by a high-multiplex immunoassay. In this study, we utilized pre-operative and post-operative serum from patients with high-risk prostate cancer (Gleason grade 4 + 5) to identify prostate cancer specific biomarkers and minimize changes in serum proteins due to patient heterogeneity including genetic background, age, pre-operative PSA levels, and other underlying medical conditions. Our study identified CASP8 as a promising protein biomarker for detection of high-risk prostate cancer and potentially renal cancer.
Materials and methods
Patient serum samples and tissue microarrays
De-identified patient sera utilized in this study were obtained from an existing tissue and serum repository in the Department of Urology at Stanford University. The patient-matched pre- and post-operative sera were collected from men with localized prostate cancer who either had high-risk prostate cancer (Gleason grade 4 + 5) or adverse outcomes including early recurrence and/or death from prostate cancer (Table 1). The pre-operative sera were collected from men immediately prior to surgery for prostate cancer. The patient-matched post-operative serum samples were taken between 13 days and 3 months after radical prostatectomy (Table 1). Additional serum samples were analyzed from patients with elevated serum PSA levels who underwent simple prostatectomy for BPH and were histologically confirmed to have no cancer. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were built as previously described utilizing tissue samples from the existing tissue and serum repository in the Department of Urology at Stanford University21–23. Informed consent was obtained from each prostate cancer patient. All samples were collected at Stanford University under approved Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol (IRB: 5628) and all methods were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of Regional Ethics Committee and Stanford University ethical guidelines and regulations.
Olink proteomics
To discover proteins with altered levels in high-risk prostate cancer, protein levels were measured in pre-operative and post-operative serum samples from ten men with high-grade and high-volume prostate cancer (Table 1) by Olink Proximity Extension Assay (PEA) technology (Olink Bioscience, Sweden). One hundred and eighty-four human proteins associated with immuno-oncology and oncology were evaluated (Table 2). The detection of proteins was achieved by antibody-DNA oligonucleotide pairs in which DNA is hybridized upon proximity binding of the antibodies to the target, leading to formation of PCR template sequences. A real-time qPCR was utilized to quantify the DNA sequences (Fig. 1A).
Analysis of mRNA levels in clinical datasets
To evaluate the expression of genes in prostate cancer, CASP8 and S100A4 gene expression levels in normal prostate and prostate carcinoma in Oncomine and Gene Expression Omnibus were analyzed24–28. The log2 median centered intensity for each gene was determined for each group. To test whether the expression of CASP8 correlated with progression in prostate cancer, the expression of CASP8 was tested in existing datasets for correlation with recurrence22. To evaluate the expression of CASP8 in renal cancer, bladder cancer, and adrenal carcinoma, CASP8 gene expression levels in normal and cancer tissues from Oncomine and Gene Expression Omnibus were analyzed29–36. Student’s t-test was used to compare each two groups (normal vs prostate cancer, normal vs metastatic prostate cancer, primary prostate cancer vs metastatic prostate cancer, normal vs renal cancer, normal vs bladder cancer, normal vs adrenal carcinoma, and non-recurrent vs recurrent cancer). To evaluate whether CASP8 correlates with outcome in renal cancer, median CASP8 mRNA expression levels were correlated with overall survival in the TCGA, PanCancer, 2018 datasets. Log Rank Test was used to analyze the disease-free survival, disease specific survival, and overall survival. Survival analysis was performed in Prism 9.0 software.
Immunohistochemistry
TMAs sections were freshly cut and heated at 64 °C for 1 h before rehydration. The slides were rehydrated with descending gradient alcohol for 5 min in each, and then incubated with 10 mM citrate buffer (pH = 6.0) at 95 °C for 30 min for antigen retrieval. Hydrogen peroxide (3%) was added to the TMA sections for 5 min. Slides were blocked with 2.5% goat serum at room temperature for 1 h. CASP8 antibody (sc-56070, 1:100, Santa Cruz) was added to the slides and incubated at 4 °C overnight. Slides were incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG ImmPRESS (TM) Secondary Antibody (MP-7452-15, Vector Laboratories) at room temperature for 1 h followed by staining with DAB kit in accord with manufacturer’s instructions (Dako). After staining with hematoxylin, slides were dehydrated and mounted. Tissue cores were scored from 0 to 2 based on staining intensity (0 is negative, 1 is low, 2 is medium/high). For each antibody, appropriate positive and negative controls were included. The TMA slides were scanned using a NanoZoomer (Hamamatsu).
Statistical analysis
Student’s t-test was used to compare two groups and calculate p-values. The statistical significance of the differences between normal versus BPH, normal versus prostate cancer, and BPH versus prostate cancer were calculated through the normal distribution N (0,1) of z-scores. All tests were two-sided, and p-values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, and n.s = not significant.
Results
Discovery of potential serum biomarkers for high-risk prostate cancer
We performed a high-multiplex immunoassay measurement on patient-matched pre-operative and post-operative serum samples from ten patients who had high-risk (Gleason grade 4 + 5) prostate cancer confirmed histologically at radical prostatectomy (Table 1). Seven of the ten men later developed biochemical recurrence, shown by a PSA > 0.05 ng/ml during follow-up after surgery (Table 1). The remaining 3 men showed no evidence of recurrence after > 7.5 years of follow-up. Levels of 92 human protein biomarkers related to immuno-oncology and 92 human protein biomarkers related to oncology were measured in the sera by Olink proteomics (Fig. 1A, Table 2). Ten proteins that were detected in less than 25% of the samples by the high-multiplex immunoassay were removed from our analysis. CASP8, S100A4, MSLN, FGFBP1, ICOSLG, and TIE2 were found significantly decreased after radical prostatectomy (Fig. 1B–E). Two proteins, CASP8 and S100A4, were not only significantly decreased in post-surgery serum samples but also exhibited low levels in serum samples from men with BPH (Fig. 1C–E). MSLN, FGFBP1, ICOSLG, and TIE2 were also elevated in sera from patients with BPH, suggesting that MSLN, FGFBP1, ICOSLG, and TIE2 were not specific for high-risk prostate cancer.
CASP8 levels are elevated in recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer
We further analyzed the mRNA levels of CASP8 and S100A4 in four different prostate cancer datasets. CASP8 mRNA expression levels were found to be consistently elevated across datasets in primary prostate cancer when compared to non-cancerous prostate tissues while S100A4 mRNA was differentially expressed between primary cancer and non-cancerous prostate tissues only in one out of four analyzed datasets (Fig. 2A–D and Supplementary Figure S1A–D). In addition, mRNA levels of CASP8 were higher in metastatic prostate cancer when compared to primary prostate cancer (Fig. 2D). We further compared the mRNA levels of CASP8 between patients with recurrent and non-recurrent prostate cancer. CASP8 levels were significantly elevated in the cases that recurred when compared to non-recurrent cases (Fig. 2E,F). These results demonstrate that CASP8 may serve as a potential biomarker for high-risk prostate cancer, and high levels of CASP8 are associated with the risk of prostate cancer recurrence.
CASP8 is highly expressed in prostate cancer tissues
We further evaluated CASP8 protein levels in prostate cancer tissues. We examined the protein levels of CASP8 in prostate cancer tissue microarrays (TMAs). The TMAs contained samples of prostate cancer (N = 26), BPH (N = 16), and benign prostate tissues (N = 16) (Fig. 3A,B). The TMAs were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis for CASP8 protein expression (Fig. 3A). A higher percentage of prostate cancer samples exhibited elevated protein levels of CASP8 when compared to benign prostate and BPH tissues (Fig. 3B).
High levels of CASP8 correlate with worse outcome in patients with renal cancer
We further tested whether CASP8 is elevated in other genitourinary cancers including renal, bladder, and adrenal carcinoma. CASP8 mRNA expression levels were elevated in renal cancer when compared to normal renal tissues across three different clinical datasets (Supplementary Figure S2A), while CASP8 mRNA expression levels had no significant differences between normal bladder tissues with bladder cancer (Supplementary Figure S2B). Moreover, CASP8 mRNA levels were not associated with recurrence in bladder cancer patients with different stages of the tumors (Supplementary Figure S2C). Additionally, mRNA levels of CASP8 were higher in adrenal carcinoma in comparison of normal adrenal tissues in one dataset (Supplementary Figure S2D).
We next tested whether the levels of CASP8 in renal cancer were associated with more aggressive disease by analyzing the mRNA levels of CASP8 in renal cancer tissues. Patients with renal cancer recurrence exhibited higher levels of CASP8 mRNA when compared to patients who did not recur, and increased expression levels of CASP8 were associated with worse disease-free survival in renal cancer patients (Fig. 4A, p = 0.0071). Likewise, high expression of CASP8 correlated with renal cancer-specific mortality (Fig. 4B, p = 0.01) and worse overall survival (Fig. 4C, p = 0.017). Taken together, these data demonstrate that high levels of CASP8 may serve as a biomarker for unfavorable outcome in patients with renal cancer.
Discussion
By performing a screen for proteins in pre-operative and post-operative serum from men with high-risk prostate cancer, we identified CASP8, MSLN, FGFBP1, ICOSLG, TIE2, and S100A4 proteins as candidate biomarkers for high-risk prostate cancer. Of these candidates, CASP8 and S100A4 appear to be the most attractive candidate markers since they were found at low levels in the serum from men with BPH, while several of the other candidates were also elevated in BPH. We confirmed over-expression of CASP8 mRNA and protein in prostate cancer tissues compared to controls, which is compatible with the observed drop in serum levels after prostatectomy. Intriguingly, CASP8 expression is higher in metastatic disease and recurrent prostate cancer, and is elevated in renal cancer and correlates with worse survival in renal cell carcinoma. This suggests that CASP8 could serve as a biomarker for high-risk disease, and additional validation studies are warranted.
CASP8, a caspase protein, plays a central role in apoptosis and necroptosis37. It has been shown that CASP8 induces cytokine production by participating in TRAIL-induced inflammatory signaling38,39. Inhibition of CASP8 and CASP10 associated RING protein has been demonstrated to cause a dramatic suppression of growth of different types of cancers40. Additionally, CASP8 D302H polymorphisms are associated with risk of several types of cancers including breast cancer, brain cancer, and prostate cancer, which indicates its potential utility for stratification of cancer patients41–46. It has been reported that patients with CASP8 (− 652) gene promoter polymorphism have higher risk of progression of prostate cancer to androgen resistant state47. Moreover, circulating CASP8 has been associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) risk48.
Our screen identified several additional candidate proteins in prostate cancer samples that could have clinical implications. Mesothelin (MSLN), a tumor-associated antigen, is broadly overexpressed on various malignant tumor cells, making it as an attractive candidate for targeted therapy49,50. Moreover, serum MSLN has been identified as a candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer51. Upregulation of secreted FGFBP protein may serve as a potential serum marker predicting the presence of high-risk premalignant lesions in pancreatic and colon cancer52,53. ICOSLG was identified as a potential biomarker of tumor progression to trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer using a pathway-based approach54. In addition, TIE2 was identified as the first tumor vascular response biomarker for VEGF inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer55. In patients with ovarian cancer, high circulating S100A4 transcript levels are associated with shorter progression‐free survival and overall survival, making it a potential prognostic biomarker for ovarian cancer56. Future work exploring the role of these proteins in prostate cancer, either as biomarkers or as potential drivers of aggressive prostate cancer, is warranted.
In summary, utilizing a high-multiplex immunoassay analysis of serum proteins from patient-matched pre-operative and post-operative serum samples from ten men with high-grade and high-volume prostate cancer, we identified CASP8 as a promising potential protein biomarker for detection high-risk prostate cancer. We further report that elevated levels of CASP8 protein and mRNA are detected in human prostate cancer tissues compared to benign and BPH patient tissues. Our study nominates CASP8 as a candidate biomarker for diagnosis of high-risk prostate cancer and warrants further large cohort validation studies.
References
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 70(1), 7–30 (2020).
Cooperberg, M. R., Broering, J. M. & Carroll, P. R. Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 28(7), 1117–1123 (2010).
Chang, A. J. et al. High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 11(6), 308–323 (2014).
Prensner, J. R. et al. Beyond PSA: The next generation of prostate cancer biomarkers. Sci. Transl. Med. 4(127), 12rv73 (2012).
Force, U.S.P.S.T. et al. Screening for prostate cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 319(18), 1901–1913 (2018).
Moradi, A. et al. Beyond the biomarker role: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the prostate cancer microenvironment. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 38(3), 333–346 (2019).
Rice, M.A. and Stoyanova. T. Biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. In: Prostatectomy. IntechOpen; (2018).
Eklund, M. et al. The Stockholm-3 (STHLM3) model can improve prostate cancer diagnostics in men aged 50–69 yr compared with current prostate cancer testing. Eur. Urol. Focus 4(5), 707–710 (2018).
Scott, E. et al. Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50 to 69 years (STHLM3): A prospective population-based diagnostic study. Gronberg H, Adolfsson J, Aly M, Nordstrom T, Wiklund P, Brandberg Y, Thompson J, Wiklund F, Lindberg J, Clements M, Egevad L, Eklund M. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1667–76. [Epub 2015 Nov 10]. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00361-7. Urol. Oncol. 35(3), 120 (2017).
Loeb, S. & Catalona, W. J. The Prostate Health Index: A new test for the detection of prostate cancer. Ther. Adv. Urol. 6(2), 74–77 (2014).
Bussemakers, M. J. et al. DD3: A new prostate-specific gene, highly overexpressed in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 59(23), 5975–5979 (1999).
Tomlins, S. A. et al. Urine TMPRSS2:ERG plus PCA3 for individualized prostate cancer risk assessment. Eur. Urol. 70(1), 45–53 (2016).
Stephan, C. et al. Comparative assessment of urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion with the serum [-2]proprostate-specific antigen-based prostate health index for detection of prostate cancer. Clin. Chem. 59(1), 280–288 (2013).
Graumann, J. et al. Multi-platform affinity proteomics identify proteins linked to metastasis and immune suppression in ovarian cancer plasma. Front. Oncol. 9, 1150 (2019).
Thorsen, S. F. et al. Gel-based proteomics of clinical samples identifies potential serological biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20(23), 6082 (2019).
Enroth, S. et al. High throughput proteomics identifies a high-accuracy 11 plasma protein biomarker signature for ovarian cancer. Commun. Biol. 2, 221 (2019).
Enroth, S. et al. A two-step strategy for identification of plasma protein biomarkers for endometrial and ovarian cancer. Clin. Proteomics 15, 38 (2018).
Mahboob, S. et al. A novel multiplexed immunoassay identifies CEA, IL-8 and prolactin as prospective markers for Dukes’ stages A-D colorectal cancers. Clin. Proteomics 12(1), 10 (2015).
Soderlund, S. et al. Plasma proteomics in CML patients before and after initiation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy reveals induced Th1 immunity and loss of angiogenic stimuli. Leuk. Res. 50, 95–103 (2016).
Shiqin, L. et al. Discovery of PTN as a serum-based biomarker of pro-metastatic prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 124(5), 896–900 (2021).
Eminaga, O. et al. MUC1 expression by immunohistochemistry is associated with adverse pathologic features in prostate cancer: A multi-institutional study. PLoS ONE 11(11), e0165236 (2016).
Hawley, S. et al. A model for the design and construction of a resource for the validation of prognostic prostate cancer biomarkers: The Canary Prostate Cancer Tissue Microarray. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 20(1), 39–44 (2013).
Howitt, B. E. et al. Identification and characterization of 2 testicular germ cell markers, Glut3 and CyclinA2. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 21(5), 401–407 (2013).
Taylor, B. S. et al. Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 18(1), 11–22 (2010).
Welsh, J. B. et al. Analysis of gene expression identifies candidate markers and pharmacological targets in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 61(16), 5974–5978 (2001).
Luo, J. H. et al. Gene expression analysis of prostate cancers. Mol. Carcinog. 33(1), 25–35 (2002).
Chandran, U. R. et al. Gene expression profiles of prostate cancer reveal involvement of multiple molecular pathways in the metastatic process. BMC Cancer 7, 64 (2007).
Yu, Y. P. et al. Gene expression alterations in prostate cancer predicting tumor aggression and preceding development of malignancy. J. Clin. Oncol. 22(14), 2790–2799 (2004).
Cutcliffe, C. et al. Clear cell sarcoma of the kidney: Up-regulation of neural markers with activation of the sonic hedgehog and Akt pathways. Clin. Cancer Res. 11(22), 7986–7994 (2005).
Dyrskjot, L. et al. Gene expression in the urinary bladder: A common carcinoma in situ gene expression signature exists disregarding histopathological classification. Cancer Res. 64(11), 4040–4048 (2004).
Giordano, T. J. et al. Molecular classification and prognostication of adrenocortical tumors by transcriptome profiling. Clin. Cancer Res. 15(2), 668–676 (2009).
Lee, J. S. et al. Expression signature of E2F1 and its associated genes predict superficial to invasive progression of bladder tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 28(16), 2660–2667 (2010).
Modlich, O. et al. Identifying superficial, muscle-invasive, and metastasizing transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: Use of cDNA array analysis of gene expression profiles. Clin. Cancer Res. 10(10), 3410–3421 (2004).
Riester, M. et al. Combination of a novel gene expression signature with a clinical nomogram improves the prediction of survival in high-risk bladder cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 18(5), 1323–1333 (2012).
Tun, H. W. et al. Pathway signature and cellular differentiation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE 5(5), e10696 (2010).
Yusenko, M. V. et al. High-resolution DNA copy number and gene expression analyses distinguish chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and renal oncocytomas. BMC Cancer 9, 152 (2009).
Fritsch, M. et al. Caspase-8 is the molecular switch for apoptosis, necroptosis and pyroptosis. Nature 575(7784), 683–687 (2019).
Henry, C. M. & Martin, S. J. Caspase-8 acts in a non-enzymatic role as a scaffold for assembly of a pro-inflammatory “FADDosome” complex upon TRAIL stimulation. Mol Cell 65(4), 715-729.e5 (2017).
Sprick, M. R. et al. FADD/MORT1 and caspase-8 are recruited to TRAIL receptors 1 and 2 and are essential for apoptosis mediated by TRAIL receptor 2. Immunity 12(6), 599–609 (2000).
McDonald, E. R. III. & El-Deiry, W. S. Suppression of caspase-8- and -10-associated RING proteins results in sensitization to death ligands and inhibition of tumor cell growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(16), 6170–6175 (2004).
Shephard, N. D. et al. A breast cancer risk haplotype in the caspase-8 gene. Cancer Res. 69(7), 2724–2728 (2009).
Sergentanis, T. N. & Economopoulos, K. P. Association of two CASP8 polymorphisms with breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 120(1), 229–234 (2010).
Zhang, Y. et al. A systematic analysis of the association studies between CASP8 D302H polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. J. Genet. 96(2), 283–289 (2017).
Cox, A. et al. A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk. Nat. Genet. 39(3), 352–358 (2007).
Lubahn, J. et al. Association of CASP8 D302H polymorphism with reduced risk of aggressive prostate carcinoma. Prostate 70(6), 646–653 (2010).
Bethke, L. et al. The common D302H variant of CASP8 is associated with risk of glioma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17(4), 987–989 (2008).
Kesarwani, P. et al. Influence of caspases 8 and 9 gene promoter polymorphism on prostate cancer susceptibility and early development of hormone refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int. 107(3), 471–476 (2011).
Aversa, J. et al. Prediagnostic circulating inflammation biomarkers and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A case-cohort study in Japan. Int. J. Cancer (2019).
Lv, J. & Li, P. Mesothelin as a biomarker for targeted therapy. Biomark. Res. 7, 18 (2019).
Yakushiji, H. et al. Novel single-chain variant of antibody against mesothelin established by phage library. Cancer Sci. 110(9), 2722–2733 (2019).
Kendrick, Z. W. et al. Serum IGFBP2 and MSLN as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for pancreatic cancer. HPB 16(7), 670–676 (2014).
Tassi, E. & Wellstein, A. The angiogenic switch molecule, secreted FGF-binding protein, an indicator of early stages of pancreatic and colorectal adenocarcinoma. Semin. Oncol. 33(6 Suppl 11), S50–S56 (2006).
Tassi, E. & Wellstein, A. Tumor angiogenesis: Initiation and targeting - therapeutic targeting of an FGF-binding protein, an angiogenic switch molecule, and indicator of early stages of gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res. Treat. 38(4), 189–197 (2006).
Nam, S. et al. A pathway-based approach for identifying biomarkers of tumor progression to trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 356(2 Pt B), 880–890 (2015).
Jayson, G. C. et al. Plasma Tie2 is a tumor vascular response biomarker for VEGF inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 4672 (2018).
Link, T. et al. Clinical relevance of circulating MACC1 and S100A4 transcripts for ovarian cancer. Mol. Oncol. 13(5), 1268–1279 (2019).
Acknowledgements
T.S. is supported by the Canary Foundation, the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (NCI) R37CA240822 and R01CA244281. J.D.B. is supported by NIH CA229933 and NIH CA196387. S.J.P is supported by NIH CA196387 and NIH CA196387.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.L., J.D.B. and T.S. designed research. S.L., F.G.M., C.A.Z., J.J.L., R.N., M.S., E-C.H., M.A., and K.K., performed research. J.D.B. and T.S. contributed reagents. S.L., F.G. M., C.A.Z., J.J.L., and T.S. analyzed data. S.L., S.J.P., J.D.B., and T.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Garcia-Marques, F., Zhang, C.A. et al. Discovery of CASP8 as a potential biomarker for high-risk prostate cancer through a high-multiplex immunoassay. Sci Rep 11, 7612 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87155-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87155-5
This article is cited by
-
The impact of circulating protein levels identified by affinity proteomics on short-term, overall breast cancer risk
British Journal of Cancer (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.