Abstract
Bone perfusion is an essential physiological measure reflecting vasculature status and tissue viability of the skeletal system. Arterial spin labeling (ASL), as a non-invasive and non-contrast enhanced perfusion imaging method, is an attractive approach for human research studies. To evaluate the feasibility of ASL perfusion imaging of knee bone marrow in the distal femoral condyle at a 3 T MRI scanner, a study was performed with eight healthy volunteers (three males and five females, 26 ± 2 years old) and two patients (male, 15 and 11 years old) with diagnosed stage II juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (JOCD). ASL imaging utilized a flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery method for labeling and a single-shot fast spin echo sequence for image readout. In addition to quantitative knee bone marrow ASL imaging, studies were also performed to evaluate the effects of prolonged post-bolus delay and varied labeling size. ASL imaging was successfully performed with all volunteers. Despite the benefits of hyper-intensive signal suppression within bone marrow, the use of a prolonged post-bolus delay caused excessive perfusion signal decay, resulting in low perfusion signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and poor image quality. Bone marrow perfusion signal changed with the labeling size, suggesting that the measured bone marrow perfusion signal is flow-associated. The means and standard deviations of bone marrow blood flow, spatial SNR, and temporal SNR from the quantitative perfusion study were 38.3 ± 5.2 mL/100 g/min, 3.31 ± 0.48, and 1.33 ± 0.31, respectively. The imaging results from JOCD patients demonstrated the potential of ASL imaging to detect disease-associated bone marrow perfusion changes. This study demonstrates that it is feasible to perform ASL imaging of knee bone marrow in the distal femoral condyle at 3 T.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Perfusion (or blood flow) is an essential physiological measure reflecting vasculature status and tissue viability. As in other tissues and organs, bone perfusion also plays a pivotal role in maintaining healthy status, preventing disease initiation and development, sustaining post-injury healing and regrowth, and facilitating therapeutic drug delivery for stimulated healing1,2,3. Imaging and monitoring bone marrow perfusion changes can assist the management of developmental skeletal diseases, such as chronic osteoarthritis4 and juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (JOCD)5.
In vivo evaluation of bone perfusion can be achieved by using different imaging modalities, such as positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-FDG or dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Although DCE MRI has been applied to measure bone marrow perfusion, the health risks of MRI with gadolinium-based contrast agents (e.g. nephrogenic systemic fibrosis)14 have raised significant concerns for its routine applications15. In contrast to these imaging methods, arterial spin labeling (ASL) imaging utilizes endogenous blood water as an intrinsic agent to measure tissue perfusion16. As a non-radioactive, non-contrast-enhanced and non-invasive approach, ASL imaging eliminates the concerns on the exposure of ionizing radiation or the potential health risks of gadolinium-based contrast agents when they are applied for human research studies. Thus, ASL is well suited for longitudinal monitoring of disease progression and routine evaluation of therapy response, particularly in patients with renal deficiency and in children.
However, ASL imaging of the skeletal system is challenging: (1) ASL imaging is a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) technique, and bone perfusion level is lower than those in highly perfused organs, such as the brain and kidneys17; and (2) complicated vascular structure of blood feeding arteries for the skeletal system and low blood flow velocities18,19 make it difficult to utilize high SNR ASL imaging methods, such as pseudo-continuous ASL20. Recently, the feasibility of measuring bone marrow perfusion using ASL imaging was demonstrated in the vertebrae at 3 T21, and also explored in the knee at 7 T22.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of knee bone marrow perfusion imaging using a pulsed ASL method at 3 T.
Results
Knee bone marrow perfusion imaging was successfully performed with all volunteers. Results from the study with five participants using two post-bolus delay times (PBDs) suggest that the longer the PBD, the lower the bone marrow perfusion signal, and that the use of a longer PBD can help to minimize hyper-intensive intravascular signals within the bone marrow (Fig. 1). Study results from perfusion imaging using varied labeling sizes with three participants indicate that measured bone marrow perfusion signal changes with the size of ASL labeling (Fig. 2).
Quantitative bone marrow perfusion imaging results from the study using a 600 ms PBD are presented in Figs. 3 and 4: Fig. 3 shows label and control images and blood flow and noise maps from one representative participant; Fig. 4 presents a box and whiskers plot of bone marrow blood flow and spatial and temporal SNRs from eight participants. The means and standard deviations of bone marrow blood flow, spatial SNR, and temporal SNR were 38.3 ± 5.2 mL/100 g/min, 3.31 ± 0.48 and 1.33 ± 0.31, respectively.
The imaging results from two JOCD patients are presented in Fig. 5. In the knees with diagnosed JOCD lesions, the blood flow measurements in ROIs proximal to the lesions were significantly higher than those in the same-size ROIs on the opposite sides of the knees: for both patients, p values from a two-tailed paired t test for perfusion values within two bilateral ROIs were less than 0.0001.
Discussion
Bone perfusion imaging can provide new insights into underlying mechanisms of biological changes induced by injuries or diseases, help prognosticate skeletal diseases and injuries, and evaluate therapy response based on perfusion changes1,2,3. Due to its non-invasive and non-contrast-enhanced features, ASL imaging is an attractive and desired approach for the assessment of knee bone marrow perfusion. To our best knowledge, this is the first study that demonstrated the feasibility of knee bone marrow perfusion imaging using ASL at 3 T.
Our results show that knee bone marrow is not highly perfused with blood flow much lower than those in the brain and kidneys20,23. Despite low perfusion level in knee bone marrow, adequate perfusion SNR can be achieved by using a moderate image resolution (2 ×2 ×10 mm3) and a large number of perfusion signal averages (50 averages) (Fig. 4). In addition, our quantitative perfusion imaging study used a 600 ms PBD, instead of a 1200 ms PBD, to avoid excessive perfusion signal decay (Fig. 1). Although a longer PBD will allow labeled blood spins have more time to travel down the vascular tree into the capillary bed and minimize intravascular hyper-intensive signals within the bone marrow, this also results in a significant drop in perfusion image SNR and poor image quality. Furthermore, because of the slow blood flow in the knee area, even with a 1200 ms PBD, hyper-intensive signals were still observed around the edges and at the central regions of knee bone marrow area (Fig. 1A). For bone marrow perfusion quantification, to avoid potential undesired biases due to residual hyper-intensive signals and subtraction errors, trimmed mean signals within ROIs were used in the final perfusion signal measurements by excluding the 5% of voxels with the lowest and highest values. Such an approach can also help to reduce the impact of subtraction errors resulting from residual small motion24.
Importantly, our results show that the measured perfusion signal changes with the size of the ASL labeling region (Fig. 2), indicating that the knee bone marrow perfusion measurements are flow-associated. This is because the larger labeling size, the more labeled blood spins; and the more labeled blood spins, the higher the perfusion signal. Of course, these results also suggest that because of the slow blood flow around the knee, a labeling size larger than 60 mm may not further improve perfusion SNR.
Encouragingly, imaging results from JOCD patients suggest that ASL imaging may have the potential to detect bone marrow perfusion changes associated with the diagnosed lesions. As shown in Fig. 5, there exists hyper-perfusion in the regions proximal to the OCD lesions. Such hyper-perfusion may be due to revascularization or neovascularization associated with a healing process1,25.
PET imaging and DCE MRI have been applied for the assessment of bone perfusion in the past years. However, these imaging modalities can only provide indirect information about bone perfusion (e.g., 18F-Fluoride uptake in PET imaging or pharmacokinetic parameters in DCE MRI). Recently, studies have been performed to investigate the potential ability of ASL imaging in measuring bone marrow perfusion. One spine ASL imaging study at 3 T showed that vertebral bone marrow perfusion measurements from ASL imaging were correlated to pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI21. Motivated by the fact that 7 T can specifically benefit ASL imaging with increased perfusion SNR23, one exploratory study was performed at 7 T, suggesting that further technical development is needed to overcome technical challenges in order to improve the quality of ASL imaging and increase the reliability of knee bone marrow perfusion measurements22. Knee bone marrow perfusion measurements from this study are comparable to those measured at 7 T22, but lower than those in the spine21, which may be because bone marrow perfusion varies across different skeletal regions.
Effective and uniform fat suppression is critical for successful bone marrow ASL perfusion imaging. Knee bone marrow, unlike the brain and kidneys, is highly rich in fat. This makes fat suppression highly important to ensure label and control image signals mainly from water spins and minimize subtraction errors by reducing label and control image signal intensity. In addition, B0 inhomogeneity can adversely affect fat suppression across image space, resulting in non-uniform fat suppression and poor perfusion image quality. To minimize B0 inhomogeneity within imaging region for improved fat suppression, Siemens’ advanced B0 shimming was applied, which performs B0 shimming twice by using sequentially acquired B0 maps.
Increasing signal gain for the ASL image acquisition is also helpful for successful bone marrow ASL perfusion imaging. In our study, the signal dynamic range of ASL imaging was specifically adjusted to increase the signal intensity difference between fat-suppressed bone marrow tissue and the background. Although the use of a large signal dynamic range can result in signal saturation within the skin and muscles of the knee, it ensures that the signal level of fat-suppressed bone marrow tissue is larger than that of the background.
Our study has several limitations. First, the imaging coverage of the implemented ASL method is limited, only supporting a single slice acquisition. To overcome this limitation and better facilitate future research and clinical applications, it will be necessary to evaluate alternative image readout methods that are amenable to multi-slice ASL imaging and are insensitive to susceptibility-associated artifacts and distortion, such as Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging (RESOLVE)26. Second, in this proof of concept study, ASL imaging parameters (e.g., PBDs) were empirically chosen with young subjects. For studies with other populations, such as the elderly, ASL parameters need to be further verified or optimized, and knee bone marrow perfusion values can also vary across different populations. Third, no background suppression27 was applied for our knee bone marrow ASL studies. Due to imperfect inversion, the application of background suppression can cause loss of perfusion signal that is already low in knee bone marrow. The potential benefits of background suppression can be assessed in the future. Forth, although our results have shown that ASL measurements within knee bone marrow are flow-associated, further validation studies are needed, such as investigating the correlations between blood flow measurements from ASL imaging and pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE MRI. Finally, although the potential ability of ASL imaging to detect disease-associated bone marrow perfusion changes has been demonstrated with two JOCD patients, these results should be interpreted cautiously. Both the direction (hyper-perfusion or hypoperfusion) and the origins of disease-associated perfusion changes need to be further investigated with more JOCD patients in the future. In addition, more studies should be performed to explore the prognostic value of bone marrow ASL imaging, such as whether the detected perfusion changes are associated with patient outcome.
In summary, this study demonstrates that it is feasible to perform ASL imaging of knee bone marrow in the distal femoral condyle at 3 T.
Materials and Methods
Participants
Eight young volunteers with no history of knee diseases or injuries (three males and five females, 26 ± 2 years old, mean ± standard deviation (S.D.)) participated this study. To investigate the potential ability of ASL imaging to detect disease-associated bone marrow perfusion changes, two male patients diagnosed with JOCD were also recruited for knee ASL imaging: one 15 year-old patient with JOCD in the right knee and another 11 year-old patient with JOCD in the left knee. These lesions were diagnosed as stage II according to the classification system proposed by Ellermann et al.28. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Minnesota, and performed in accordance with the institutional guidelines and regulations for human research. Prior to imaging study, written informed consent was obtained from each of the participants and the legal guardian of the JOCD patient after having full understanding of the study.
MRI
Knee imaging studies were performed on a Siemens 3 T MRI scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a 15-channel receive, 1-channel transmit knee coil (QED, Mayfield Village, OH). The imaging protocol included scout localizer, high-resolution anatomic imaging scans using T2-weighted and proton-density-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences, and knee bone marrow perfusion imaging.
ASL perfusion imaging utilized a FLow-sensitive Alternating Inversion Recovery (FAIR) method29 for labeling and a single-shot fast spin echo (ss-FSE) sequence for perfusion image readout (referred to as FAIR ss-FSE) to avoid severe susceptibility-associated image distortion and ghosting artifacts usually observed in EPI22. The sequence diagram and relative spatial locations of each RF pulse in the sequence are illustrated in Fig. 6. In this sequence, a single ss-FSE image is first acquired to measure the fully relaxed renal tissue magnetization (referred to as the M0 image) prior to the acquisition of label and control images. The ASL preparation module consists of: a pre-saturation RF pulse applied at the location of the imaging slice; an optimized HS4 adiabatic pulse that alternates between a small inversion slab for control images and a large inversion slab for label images; a specified delay time (TI1 in Fig. 6A) after the inversion RF pulse to define the temporal bolus width of the labeled spins; saturation RF pulses targeting a slab proximal and parallel to the imaging slice; and a post-bolus delay (PBD = TI-TI1, Fig. 6A) to allow the labeled blood to travel down the vascular tree into the small arterioles and minimize undesired hyper-intense intravascular signals. To help ensure label and control image signals within the bone marrow were dominantly coming from water spins, the ss-FSE image acquisition employed fat saturation. To boost the water signal level in the bone marrow, the signal gain was elevated for image data acquisition.
To minimize B0 inhomogeneity within the imaging region and improve fat saturation, Siemens’ advanced B0 shimming was applied. Siemens’ advanced B0 shimming method performs B0 shimming twice by using sequentially acquired B0 maps. To overcome B1+ inhomogeneity and ensure the adiabatic condition is met for the inversion RF pulse throughout the entire labeling region at the proximal side of the imaging slice, a nominal flip angle at least 1.5 times that needed for adiabatic inversion was applied for the HS4 inversion RF pulse with a 16 ms duration and a time-bandwidth product of 2030.
Knee bone marrow perfusion imaging was performed with a single oblique transverse slice as shown in Fig. 6B. To ensure at least ¾ coverage of the knee coil over the labeling region, the knees of the participants were positioned with the proximal aspect of the patella positioned at the center of the coil. To avoid ghosting artifacts due to blood flow in large vessels, the left-to-right phase-encoding direction was oriented perpendicular to the anterior-posterior direction of the knee.
Parameters for quantitative ASL knee bone marrow perfusion imaging were as follows: TR/TE = 3000/13 ms, flip angle = 90°, FOV = 140 × 140 mm2, matrix size = 70 × 70, in-plane resolution = 2 × 2 mm2, phase encoding direction = left to right, slice thickness = 10 mm, partial Fourier = 5/8, GRAPPA parallel acceleration factor (R) = 2 with 24 separately acquired reference lines, labeling time (TI1)/total delay time (TI) = 600/1200 ms; control/labeling inversion slab size = 30/230 mm; number of label and control images = 100; slab thickness/RF duration/interval of proximal saturation = 100 mm/25 ms/50 ms; and total imaging time = ~5 minutes. For each ASL scan, 200 noise images were acquired after the perfusion acquisition by turning off RF pulses to facilitate perfusion SNR analysis20.
To evaluate if the measurements of knee bone marrow ASL imaging are flow-associated, perfusion studies were performed with three volunteers using the same imaging parameters as described above except with application of varied labeling sizes: 0, 20, 40, 60 80, and 100 mm. For five participants, perfusion imaging using a 1200 ms post-bolus delay (PBD) was also performed to evaluate how an increase in total delay time affects the hyper-intense intravascular artifacts and spatial and temporal perfusion SNRs.
Image processing and data analysis
For each ASL series, 2D motion correction was performed using FSL toolbox (FMRIB, Oxford, UK)31. After motion correction, label and control images were pair-wise subtracted to obtain perfusion-weighted images. The perfusion-weighted images were subsequently averaged to get a mean perfusion-weighted image that was used for perfusion quantification. The calculation of the blood flow map and region of interest (ROI) analyses were performed using in-house scripts implemented in Matlab 8.6 (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).
Blood flow quantification utilized the single compartment blood flow quantification model32:
where r is the spatial location of imaging voxel, ΔM the perfusion signal from a mean perfusion-weighted image, M0 the fully relaxed magnetization of bone marrow, TI1 the sequence-defined temporal bolus width, TI the total delay time, T1b the longitudinal relaxation time of the arterial blood, 1660 ms33, and α the labeling efficiency, 0.9530.
Spatial and temporal SNR analyses were performed for perfusion signals within the bone marrow. The spatial noise map was estimated as the standard deviation map of 200 noise images20. The spatial SNR map was then estiamted as follows:
where S(r) represents perfusion signals, Navg the number of temporal perfusion signal averages, and σ(r) the spatial noise. The temporal SNR map was calculated as the ratio of the mean perfusion-weighted image to the temporal standard deviation of all perfusion-weighted images.
ROIs were conservatively defined on M0 images to cover the bone marrow as illustrated in Fig. 2. Trimmed mean signals within ROIs were used in the final perfusion signal measurements by excluding the 5% of voxels with the lowest and highest values24.
Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) software. Statistical significance was defined as a p < 0.05.
Data availability
The majority of data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Additional information is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Filipowska, J., Tomaszewski, K. A., Niedzwiedzki, L., Walocha, J. A. & Niedzwiedzki, T. The role of vasculature in bone development, regeneration and proper systemic functioning. Angiogenesis. 20(3), 291–302 (2017).
Laroche, M. Intraosseous circulation from physiology to disease. Joint Bone Spine. 69(3), 262–269 (2002).
Marenzana, M. & Arnett, T. R. The Key Role of the Blood Supply to Bone. Bone Res. 1(3), 203–215 (2013).
Hunter, D. J. & Bierma-Zeinstra, S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 393(10182), 1745–1759 (2019).
Schulz, J. F. & Chambers, H. G. Juvenile osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: current concepts in diagnosis and management. Instr Course Lect. 62, 455–467 (2013).
Wang, D, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of patellar vascular anatomy by novel three-dimensional micro-computed-tomography: Implications for total knee arthroplasty. Knee. (2019).
Nakamura, H. et al. Positron emission tomography with 18F-FDG in osteoarthritic knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 15(6), 673–681 (2007).
Seah, S. et al. The relationship of tibial bone perfusion to pain in knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 20(12), 1527–1533 (2012).
Nielsen, F. K., Egund, N., Jorgensen, A., Peters, D. A. & Jurik, A. G. Assessment of subchondral bone marrow lesions in knee osteoarthritis by MRI: a comparison of fluid sensitive and contrast enhanced sequences. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 17(1), 479 (2016).
van der Heijden, R. A. et al. Blood perfusion of patellar bone measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with patellofemoral pain: A case-control study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 48(5), 1344–1350 (2018).
Biffar, A. et al. Measurement of perfusion and permeability from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in normal and pathological vertebral bone marrow. Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 64(1), 115–124 (2010).
Budzik, J. F. et al. Perfusion of subchondral bone marrow in knee osteoarthritis: A dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging preliminary study. Eur J Radiol. 88, 129–134 (2017).
de Vries, B. A. et al. Quantitative subchondral bone perfusion imaging in knee osteoarthritis using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2019).
Gupta, A., Shamseddin, M. K. & Khaira, A. Pathomechanisms of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: new insights. Clin Exp Dermatol. 36(7), 763–768 (2011).
Fraum, T. J., Ludwig, D. R., Bashir, M. R. & Fowler, K. J. Gadolinium-based contrast agents: A comprehensive risk assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging. 46(2), 338–353 (2017).
Detre, J. A., Leigh, J. S., Williams, D. S. & Koretsky, A. P. Perfusion imaging. Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 23(1), 37–45 (1992).
McCarthy, I. The physiology of bone blood flow: a review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88(Suppl 3), 4–9 (2006).
Ramasamy, S. K. Structure and Functions of Blood Vessels and Vascular Niches in Bone. Stem Cells Int. 2017, 5046953 (2017).
LüDinghausen, M. V., Pahnke, J., McNamara, S. & Boot, C. Periosteal and Intraosseous arteries of the human femur: Sphincter-arteries in the medullary cavity. Clinical Anatomy 6(3), 135–145, https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.980060303 (1993).
Li, X. et al. Theoretical and experimental evaluation of multi-band EPI for high-resolution whole brain pCASL Imaging. NeuroImage. 106, 170–181 (2015).
Xing, D. et al. Feasibility of ASL spinal bone marrow perfusion imaging with optimized inversion time. J Magn Reson Imaging. 42(5), 1314–1320 (2015).
Li, X., Johnson, C. P. & Ellermann, J. 7T bone perfusion imaging of the knee using arterial spin labeling MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 83(5), 1577–1586 (2020).
Li, X., Auerbach, E. J., Van de Moortele, P. F., Ugurbil, K. & Metzger, G. J. Quantitative single breath-hold renal arterial spin labeling imaging at 7T. Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 79(2), 815–825 (2018).
Li, X. et al. Anteroposterior perfusion heterogeneity in human hippocampus measured by arterial spin labeling MRI. NMR in biomedicine. 26(6), 613–621 (2013).
Stegen, S., van Gastel, N. & Carmeliet, G. Bringing new life to damaged bone: the importance of angiogenesis in bone repair and regeneration. Bone. 70, 19–27 (2015).
Holdsworth, S. J. et al. Readout-segmented EPI for rapid high resolution diffusion imaging at 3 T. Eur J Radiol. 65(1), 36–46 (2008).
Robson, P. M. et al. Strategies for reducing respiratory motion artifacts in renal perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 61(6), 1374–1387 (2009).
Ellermann, J. et al. Insights into the Epiphyseal Cartilage Origin and Subsequent Osseous Manifestation of Juvenile Osteochondritis Dissecans with a Modified Clinical MR Imaging Protocol: A Pilot Study. Radiology. 282(3), 798–806 (2017).
Kim, S. G. & Tsekos, N. V. Perfusion imaging by a flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional brain imaging. Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 37(3), 425–435 (1997).
Garwood, M. & DelaBarre, L. The return of the frequency sweep: designing adiabatic pulses for contemporary NMR. J Magn Reson. 153(2), 155–177 (2001).
Woolrich, M. W. et al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. NeuroImage. 45(1 Suppl), S173–186 (2009).
Buxton, R. B. Quantifying CBF with arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging. 22(6), 723–726 (2005).
Lu, H., Clingman, C., Golay, X. & van Zijl, P. C. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla. Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 52(3), 679–682 (2004).
Acknowledgements
Study supported by the National Institutes of Health (P41 EB015894, R01AR070020, P30 NS076408, K01 AR070894, and UL1TR000114) and the University of Minnesota Foundation (UMF0003900).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Guarantors of integrity of entire study, X.L., C.P.J. and J.E.; study concepts/study design or data acquisition or data analysis/interpretation, all authors; manuscript drafting for important intellectual content, all authors; approval of final version of submitted manuscript, all authors; agrees to ensure any questions related to the work are appropriately resolved, all authors; literature research, X.L., C.P.J.; clinical case study, all authors; experimental studies, all authors; statistical analysis, X.L. and manuscript editing, all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Johnson, C.P. & Ellermann, J. Measuring Knee Bone Marrow Perfusion Using Arterial Spin Labeling at 3 T. Sci Rep 10, 5260 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62110-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62110-y
This article is cited by
-
Imaging in inflammatory arthritis: progress towards precision medicine
Nature Reviews Rheumatology (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.