Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22304-x, published online 01 March 2018
This Article contains errors.
In the legend of Figure 1,
“Phenotypic traits that justify the use of the model species. (a) Campula oblonga, (b) Bolbosoma capitatum and (c) Caligus elongatus as a model species of the biomass indirect estimation methods. Scale bars 0.5 mm, 2 cm and 5 cm respectively.”
should read:
“Phenotypic traits that justify the use of the model species. (a) Campula oblonga, (b) Bolbosoma capitatum and (c) Caligus elongatus as model species of the biomass indirect estimation methods. Scale bars 2, 20 and 1 mm, respectively.”
Additionally, in the legend of Figure 3
“Specimens and clay figurines of the model species. (a) Campula oblonga, scale bars 0.5 mm and 2 cm respectively; (b) Bolbosoma capitatum, scale bars 2 and 5 cm respectively; (c) Caligus elongatus, scale bars 1 mm, 5 and 5 cm respectively.”
should read:
“Specimens and clay figurines of the model species. (a) Campula oblonga, scale bars 2 and 20 mm, respectively; (b) Bolbosoma capitatum, scale bars 20 and 50 mm, respectively; (c) Caligus elongatus, scale bars 1, 50 and 50 mm, respectively.”
Finally, in the Materials and Methods section,
“Area By Depth By Density (Flat Section)”
should read:
“Area By Depth By Density (Flat Section) (Indirect Method 2.1)
“Volume Of Revolution By Density (Subcircular Section)”
should read:
“Volume Of Revolution By Density (Subcircular Section) (Indirect Method 2.2)”
“Complex Morphologies (combining flat and subcircular sections)”
should read:
“Complex Morphologies (combining flat and subcircular sections) (Indirect Method 2.3)”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Llopis-Belenguer, C., Blasco-Costa, I. & Balbuena, J.A. Author Correction: Evaluation of three methods for biomass estimation in small invertebrates, using three large disparate parasite species as model organisms. Sci Rep 8, 8664 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26011-5
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26011-5
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
