Abstract
Cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) have been shown to promote cardiac regeneration and improve heart function. However, evidence suggests that their regenerative capacity may be limited in conditions of severe hypoxia. Elucidating the mechanisms involved in CPC protection against hypoxic stress is essential to maximize their cardioprotective and therapeutic potential. We investigated the effects of hypoxic stress on CPCs and found significant reduction in proliferation and impairment of vasculogenesis, which were associated with induction of quiescence, as indicated by accumulation of cells in the G0-phase of the cell cycle and growth recovery when cells were returned to normoxia. Induction of quiescence was associated with a decrease in the expression of c-Myc through mechanisms involving protein degradation and upregulation of p21. Inhibition of c-Myc mimicked the effects of severe hypoxia on CPC proliferation, also triggering quiescence. Surprisingly, these effects did not involve changes in p21 expression, indicating that other hypoxia-activated factors may induce p21 in CPCs. Our results suggest that hypoxic stress compromises CPC function by inducing quiescence in part through downregulation of c-Myc. In addition, we found that c-Myc is required to preserve CPC growth, suggesting that modulation of pathways downstream of it may re-activate CPC regenerative potential under ischemic conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Heart failure is the leading cause of death from cardiovascular disease and the end result of a number of chronic illnesses, including hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease1. It has been estimated that approximately 1 in every 4 deaths in the United States is due to heart failure associated with ischemic heart disease2. Long-term survival after heart failure diagnosis remains poor despite recent improvements in pharmacological and surgical therapy3,4,5,6,7. In the last decade, multiple studies have suggested a primary role for myocyte loss in the induction and progression of heart failure8,9,10,11,12,13. Development of therapeutic approaches to regenerate and/or protect the heart through improved cell survival and production of functional myocytes may alleviate heart failure and reduce the number of deaths associated with ischemic heart disease.
Stem cell-mediated therapy to treat heart failure has been pursued as a potential alternative to current approaches to preserve myocardial function and prevent cardiac remodeling3, 4. However, multiple clinical trials have shown mixed results and modest impact on cardiac function14,15,16,17,18,19,20. The discovery of cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) capable of promoting myocardial regeneration in experimental models, suggested a new therapeutic venue involving direct stimulation of endogenous repair mechanisms in the heart21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30. Although CPC potential to replace myocytes lost after ischemic injury has been shown to be limited, the precise role played by CPCs in response to ischemic injury is largely unknown and optimization of CPC survival and function during myocardial infarction may be critical31, 32. Oxygen delivery through the vascular network is critical to prevent myocyte loss. Despite their vasculogenic properties, resident CPCs are not able to promote sufficient revascularization after ischemic injury, suggesting that the hypoxic environment may impair their regenerative potential. To date, few studies have investigated the factors and signaling pathways that regulate CPC survival, regeneration and differentiation in the setting of ischemic disease33. An essential goal for research in this area will be to elucidate the effectors and modulators of CPC stress susceptibility in order to maximize cardioprotective and stem cell therapeutic strategies.
The transcription factor c-Myc is well known for its role in the regulation of proliferation, differentiation and survival of many cell types34, 35. Recent studies have shown that c-Myc may be essential to preserve self-renewal and pluripotency of adult hematopoietic and embryonic stem cells36,37,38,39. The role of c-Myc in driving stemness triggered a series of studies on its potential targeting in cancer stem cells40, 41. In addition, c-Myc has been employed as an important tool in reprogramming during cell-mediated therapy to treat several conditions, including heart failure42. Here we report a novel role for c-Myc in controlling adult CPC cell fate decisions in response to stress. Our results suggest that downregulation of c-Myc under ischemic injury may contribute to impairment of CPCs regenerative potential.
Materials and Methods
Cell Lines and Culture Conditions
Cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) were isolated from mouse myocardium by magnetic cell sorting with anti-c-Kit antibody as previously described43. Cell identity was confirmed by flow cytometry analysis44. CPCs were maintained in HAM’S F12 media (Lonza) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 ng/mL mouse basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), 20 ng/mL mouse epidermal growth factor (EGF), 10 ng/mL mouse leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), 1% insulin-transferrin-selenite supplement (ITS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. All cells were cultured under 21% O2 and 5% CO2 atmosphere, at 37 °C. Ischemic hypoxia treatment consisted of incubation of cells under 0.5% O2 in a temperature and humidity controlled chamber (Coy Laboratory).
Cell Proliferation Assays
The effect of hypoxia on CPC proliferation was assessed by analyzing growth rates for 4–6 days (96–144 hours). Cells were plated at an initial density of 1 × 105 cells in 60 mm culture dishes, allowed to attach and placed under normoxia (21% O2) and hypoxia (0.5% O2) conditions the same day. The number of cells was computed daily using an automated cell counter (Bio-Rad Laboratories). For quiescence experiments, cells were cultured for 3 days (72 hours) in hypoxia and then transferred to normoxia for 3 more days. Cell numbers were computed every 3 days. Population doubling was estimated using a calculator tool available on line (http://doubling-time.com/). The effect of c-Myc inhibition on CPC growth was determined by staining cells with 1 μM of CellTrace Far Red Cell Proliferation Dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific) followed by treatment with 40 μM the c-Myc inhibitor 10058-F4 (Sigma-Aldrich, #F3680) or vehicle control (DMSO). After a period of 3 days, cells were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry for changes in mean fluorescence intensity (dye dilution is an indication of proliferation) using a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FloJo software. At least 10,000 events were computed per sample. To determine the involvement of GSK-3β in CPCs proliferation and c-Myc expression, growth curves were performed in the presence of the inhibitor TCS2002 (Tocris Bioscience, #3869) in doses ranging from 50–100 nM and DMSO vehicle control.
Cell Cycle Analysis
Progression through the cell cycle was assessed using a combination of Ki67 and 7-AAD DNA stain45,46,47. Briefly, CPCs were harvested by trypsinization after hypoxia and c-Myc inhibitor treatments performed essentially as described above, immediately fixed in 70% ethanol and stored at −20 °C until use. Aliquots of fixed cells containing at least 1 × 105 cells were transferred to test tubes. Cells were pelleted down and washed twice with staining buffer (1% FBS in PBS) followed by resuspension in 100 ul of staining solution containing 5 μl of Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-Ki67 antibody (BD Pharmingen, #561165) or isotype control (BD Pharmingen, #565572). Cells were incubated in antibody solution for 30–45 minutes at room temperature, washed in staining buffer and resuspended again in a second staining solution containing 5 μl of 7-AAD (BD Biosciences, #559925) for 10 minutes, also at room temperature. Ki67 staining was analyzed by flow cytometry alone and in combination with 7-AAD (double stained cells) for assessment of proliferation and cell cycle progression45,46,47, respectively. Data was collected using the BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software. At least 10,000 events were computed per sample.
Tube Formation Assay
The vasculogenic potential of CPCs grown under normoxia and hypoxia for 3 days (72 hours) was analyzed using a tube formation assay on Matrigel (BD Biosciences, #354234). Cells were harvested by brief trypsinization and plated on 24-well culture dish (5–6 × 104 cells/well) pre-coated with 300 μl of regular growth factor Matrigel in endothelial basal media (Lonza) supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin. After a period of 6 and 24 hours, samples were analyzed for tube formation potential. At least 6 images were collected at 4–10X magnification from random fields for each sample. Calcein-AM (Thermofisher Scientific, #L3224) was used in the last time point to determine cell viability.
Quantitative Detection of Senescence-Associated-β-Galactosidase Activity
Senescence associated-β-galactosidase activity was quantitatively determined in CPC lysates obtained from cells cultured under normoxia and hypoxia from 24–96 hours. Total protein concentration was determined by the method of Bradford (Bio-Rad Laboratories, #5000001 ). Samples were harvested and processed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Cell Biolabs, #CBA-231) using 10 μg of protein per assay. Activity was determined by fluorescence detection using a SpectraMax M5 plate reader (Molecular Devices). Results are expressed as fluorescence units.
Cell Death Analysis
Cell death was determined using Live/Dead staining and detection of lactate dehydrogenase activity. Live and dead cells were assessed in CPCs cultured under normoxia and 0.5% hypoxia every day for a total period of 4 days (96 hours) using Calcein-AM and Ethidium homodimer-1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #L3224) according to manufacturer’s instructions. A positive control was generated by treating cells with 200 μM hydrogen peroxide. Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity (LDH), which is released in culture supernatants due to an increase in permeability during cell death, was determined in culture supernatants using a Cytotoxicity Detection Kit (LDH) (Roche, #11644793001). CPCs were plated in 96-well plates in triplicate (1 × 103 cells/well) using phenol-red free culture media and allowed to grow under normoxia (21% O2) and hypoxia (0.5% O2) for 72 hours. After this time, LDH activity was measured in situ, according to manufacturer’s instructions. Results were normalized to the number of cells to compensate for difference in growth and activity expressed as absorbance units (AU).
RNA Isolation and Gene Expression Profiling by Quantitative RT-PCR
RNA was extracted from CPCs grown under normoxia and hypoxia using RNeasy kit (Qiagen, #74104) according to manufacturer’s instruction. All samples were subjected to in-column DNAse treatment (Qiagen, #79254) prior to cDNA synthesis. First strand cDNA was prepared using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcriptase kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #4368814). Reverse-transcribed cDNA was used for Quantitative RT-PCR using TaqMan probes for mouse c-Myc (Mm00487804_m1), Flk-1 (Mm01222419_m1), Vegf (Mm01281449_m1) and p21 (Mm04205640_g1) (Applied Biosystems, Life technologies). Fold-changes in hypoxia samples were calculated relative to normoxia control by the ΔΔCt method using at least 2 endogenous controls for normalization.
Protein Stability Assays
CPCs were incubated under normoxia and hypoxia for 48 hours and treated with 5 μg/ml of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich, #F3680). Protein lysates were collected from untreated normoxia and hypoxia controls (baseline) and from cycloheximide-treated samples every 10 minutes for a total period of 1 hour. To further confirm that hypoxia affected c-Myc protein degradation rate, samples cultured under hypoxia for 48 hours were also treated with 10 μg/ml of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Sigma-Aldrich, #M7449). Lysates were collected at 4 and 24 hours after treatment. In both cases samples were analyzed by western blot as described below.
Protein Expression Analysis by Western Blot
Protein lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer and quantified using Bradford Assay (Bio-Rad, #5000001). SDS-PAGE and Western blots were performed according to standard procedures using antibodies against the cell cycle regulators c-Myc (Cell Signaling, #5605), p21 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #SC-756) and Sirt1 (Abcam, #ab110304); the differentiation markers CDH5 (Cell Signaling, #2158 S), PECAM1 (Cell Signaling, #3528 S), α-SMA (Sigma, #A2547) and SM22-α (Abcam, #ab14106), the kinases GSK-3β (Cell Signaling, #9832 S), AKT (Cell Signaling, #9272) and phosphorylated forms phospho-GSK-3β (Ser9) (Cell Signaling, #5558 S) and phospho-AKT (Ser473) (Cell Signaling, #9271), and endogenous controls Actin (Sigma-Aldrich, #A2066), Gapdh (Cell Signaling, #5174) and Tubulin (Cell Signaling, #2146). Prior to blocking and antibody incubation, membranes were stained with Ponceau S reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, #P3504) to visualize protein bands and cut at specific sizes so different antibodies could be tested at the same time. Densitometry analysis of western blots was performed using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
Statistical Analysis
Data obtained from all experiments were analyzed for significance using Student t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by software-recommended post-tests, depending on sample distribution, using Microsoft Excel, Sigma-Plot and GraphPad Prism Software. For a given parameter, p < 0.05 was considered significant. All data are presented as means ± standard error.
Results
Hypoxic stress reduces CPC proliferation
Self-renewal is essential for expansion of resident progenitor cells in response to injury and efficient tissue repair. We investigated the effect of hypoxic stress on CPC proliferation. Cells were cultured under ischemic hypoxic (0.5% O2) and normoxic (21% O2) conditions, and proliferation estimated by counting cell numbers daily over a period of 96 hours. Proliferation of CPCs gradually declined under hypoxia in a time-dependent manner relative to normoxia-control on average by 43.31 ± 4.32% (34.70 ± 5.96% at 48 hours, 47.25 ± 10.35% at 72 hours and 48.00 ± 9.42% at 96 hours). Significant reduction in cell numbers was observed as early as 48 hours under hypoxia relative to normoxia (5.08 ± 0.43 × 105 vs 8.04 ± 1.03 × 105 cells/ml, p < 0.03, n = 5) (Fig. 1A, upper panel). This effect was specific to hypoxic stress as no difference in cell proliferation was observed in cells grown in 5% O2 (Supplementary Figure 1). The decrease in cell numbers observed under hypoxia was associated with an average increase in doubling time of 23.13 ± 1.55% (26.17 ± 6.32% at 48 hours, 21.34 ± 7.95% at 72 hours and 22.09 ± 6.73% at 96 hours) relative to cells grown under normoxia. The increase in doubling time was evident at 48 hours relative to normoxia (19.36 ± 1.31 vs. 15.40 ± 0.95 population doubling, p < 0.02, n = 5) and remained constant at 72 (20.34 ± 1.56 vs. 16.99 ± 1.37 population doubling, p < 0.04, n = 6) and 96 hours (20.30 ± 0.44 vs. 16.79 ± 0.64 population doubling, p < 0.02, n = 6) (Fig. 1A, lower panel).
Expression analysis of the cell cycle marker Ki67 showed that proliferation was reduced under hypoxia by 26.91 ± 5.18% (58.30 ± 6.86 vs. 79.43 ± 5.14% of Ki67 positive cells, p < 0.04, n = 3) at 48 hours and 26.95 ± 1.99% (59.20 ± 2.61 vs. 81.13 ± 3.87, p < 0.005, n = 3) at 72 hours relative to normoxia. At 96 hours, reduction in Ki67 expression in hypoxia was not significant, which is likely due to contact inhibition as normoxia cultures reach confluence earlier than those grown under hypoxia (Fig. 1B).
Hypoxic stress does not induce CPC cell death or cellular senescence
Most cell types respond to stress by undergoing apoptosis or senescence. In order to confirm that reduction in CPC numbers under hypoxia was not associated with cell death we used two different approaches. We performed a live/dead assay with ethidium homodimer-1 and calcein-AM during the course of growth under normoxia and hypoxia. In this assay, cell death is indicated by loss of calcein-AM staining (green) and uptake of ethidium homodimer-1 (red). Representative images of cells in culture at 24 and 72 hours under each experimental condition are shown in Fig. 2A. A positive control was generated for comparison purposes by treating CPCs with hydrogen peroxide. Results show that the number of cells labeled with calcein-AM is reduced in hypoxia relative to normoxia at 72 hours as expected. However, this was not associated with cell death as indicated by the lack of ethidium homodimer-1 staining (red) and preservation of the calcein-AM stain (green). In contrast, hydrogen peroxide-treated cells die with time, as indicated by loss of calcein-AM stain and uptake of ethidium homodimer-1 (H2O2, Fig. 2A lower panel). Hydrogen peroxide-treated cells also undergo significant morphological changes associated with death, while cells grown under normoxia and hypoxia maintain their normal morphological features (Fig. 2A, bright field images).
In addition to the live/cell dead assay described above, we also estimated cell death by detection of lactate dehydrogenase activity in culture supernatants, which is expected to leak from dying cells. Results show that there were no significant changes in activity with time in culture (72 hours relative to 24 hours) in normoxia (0.068 ± 0.01 vs. 0.083 ± 0.02 absorbance units, p < 0.45, n = 6) or hypoxia (0.049 ± 0.01 vs. 0.039 ± 0.01 absorbance units, p < 0.20, n = 6) (Fig. 2B), indicating that the hypoxia treatment is not triggering cell death with time. Interestingly, we found that LDH activity is significantly decreased under hypoxia relative to normoxia by 48.36 ± 6.40% at 24 hours (0.039 ± 0.01 vs 0.083 ± 0.023 absorbance units, p < 0.03, n = 6) and 27.06 ± 4.31% at 72 hours (0.049 ± 0.01 vs 0.068 ± 0.01 absorbance units, p < 0.004, n = 6).
We next investigated if one of the potential causes of reduced proliferation in CPCs was related to the development of senescence. Quantification of senescence-associated-β-galactosidase activity in CPCs grown under hypoxia relative to cells grown under normoxia did not show any significant difference between groups (Fig. 2C, n = 5).
Hypoxic stress does not affect CPC differentiation but impairs vasculogenesis
Reduction in cell proliferation may be a consequence of cellular differentiation. As previously reported, most mouse CPCs undergo differentiation into smooth muscle and endothelial lineages43, 48. To determine if the decline in CPC proliferation after exposure to hypoxic stress was due to an increase in cell differentiation, we analyzed the expression of endothelial and smooth muscle markers at 72 and 96 hours, after exposure to hypoxia. Our results show that hypoxia did not cause any significant changes in the expression of the smooth muscle markers α-SMA and SM22-α (Fig. 3A).
Analysis of CPC vasculogenic potential indicate that hypoxia severely impacted tube formation. Branching morphogenesis is an essential process required during vasculogenesis in which progenitor cells associated with the vasculature or located in the bone marrow are activated and migrate towards growth factor gradients to form new vascular structures. This process can be replicated in vitro by culturing cells in basement membrane matrix (Matrigel). We plated normoxia-control and hypoxia-treated CPCs on Matrigel and analyzed tube formation during a period of 24 hours. While normoxia control cells were able to form tubular structures as expected in as little as 6 hours after plating on Matrigel, hypoxia-treated cells remained dispersed in the matrix even after 24 hours (Fig. 3B, n = 5). Our results show that the vasculogenic potential of hypoxia-treated CPCs was impaired despite the presence of growth factors in the Matrigel matrix, suggesting that hypoxic stress affects CPC ability to respond to pro-angiogenic stimulation.
Hypoxic stress induces CPC quiescence
Our results show that the reduced proliferation observed after exposure of CPCs to ischemic hypoxia was not associated with an increase in cell death, development of senescence or cell differentiation. Moreover, CPCs vasculogenic potential was impaired. One possible explanation for our findings is that ischemic hypoxia may lead CPCs into a quiescence state. In order to test this hypothesis we performed cell cycle analysis of CPCs cultured under normoxia and hypoxia. In all time points tested, the percentage of CPCs in G0-phase was higher in hypoxia than normoxia. However, results were significantly different only at 48 (13.28 ± 3.07 vs. 4.53 ± 2.68% of cells, p < 0.003, n = 3) and 72 hours (20.80 ± 3.92 vs. 7.36 ± 3.97% of cells, p < 0.01, n = 3). Although the percentage of hypoxia-treated cells in G0-phase was still higher than normoxia at 96 hours, results were not significant (30.10 ± 5.97 vs. 21.93 ± 7.32, p < 0.06, n = 3), as normoxia-treated cells also start to accumulate in G0 (Fig. 4A). This is probably a result of contact inhibition as CPCs reach confluence faster under normoxia than under hypoxia.
To further confirm if hypoxia was inducing CPC quiescence, we determined if the decrease in cell proliferation could be reversed when cells were placed back under normoxia after hypoxia exposure (reoxygenation). As expected, CPCs exposed to ischemic hypoxia showed an increase in doubling time of approximately 19.89 ± 4.61% relative to normoxia (30.10 ± 1.89 vs. 25.31 ± 1.81 population doubling, p < 0.002, n = 7). After CPCs were moved back to normoxic conditions for 3 days (144-hour time point), signs of significant growth recovery were observed relative to hypoxia as indicated by a decrease in doubling time (30.64 ± 0.87 vs. 33.20 ± 0.86 population doubling, p < 0.03, n = 7), in the direction of control levels (27.64 ± 0.53 population doubling, p < 0.03, n = 7). Altogether, our findings suggest that hypoxic stress induces CPC quiescence (Fig. 4B).
Hypoxia-induced CPC functional decline is associated with reduced c-Myc expression
In order to identify the mechanism for CPCs functional decline under hypoxic stress, we next investigated the role of c-Myc, a transcriptional factor implicated in the cell fate decisions related to growth, proliferation, differentiation and survival, and an important mediator of stemness36,37,38,39. The expression of c-Myc is downregulated relative to normoxia control as early as 24 hours after CPC exposure to hypoxia, but significantly only after 48 hours (1.07 ± 0.33 vs 1.75 ± 0.44 c-Myc/Actin ratio, p < 0.02, n = 4) (Fig. 4C). Time-course analysis of c-Myc expression showed an average decline of 39.85 ± 2.43% under hypoxia. There was no significant difference in the percentage of decrease in c-Myc expression among time points (40.87 ± 7.83% at 48 hours vs. 35.24 ± 5.82% at 72 hours vs. 43.46 ± 7.95% at 96 hours) (Supplementary Figure 2), suggesting that once c-Myc expression is downregulated, the decrease is sustained with time. Comparison between c-Myc expression and cell numbers under hypoxia, relative to normoxia, shows a virtually identical rate of decline for both parameters with time. In fact, Pearson correlation analysis indicates a perfect fit (r = 0.993).
c-Myc regulates CPC proliferation and cell cycle progression
Treatment of CPCs for 72 hours with 10058-F4, a specific inhibitor of c-Myc that blocks its transcriptional activity, significantly reduced proliferation as demonstrated by a higher accumulation (143.10 ± 33.75%) of CellTrace proliferation dye in inhibitor-treated samples relative to vehicle control (1007.25 ± 194.02 vs 439.75 ± 104.93 mean fluorescence intensity, p < 0.02, n = 4) (Fig. 5A). Consistent with these results, we found that the expression of the cell cycle marker Ki67 was significantly reduced by 30.60 ± 8.30% (5090 ± 836 vs. 7226 ± 611 mean fluorescence intensity, p < 0.02, n = 4) after inhibition of c-Myc for the same length of time (Fig. 5B). To further confirm that c-Myc regulates CPC proliferation we performed cell cycle analysis. Our results show that 72 hours after c-Myc inhibition there is a significant increase in the number of cells accumulated in G0-phase relative to control by 53.6 ± 11.5% (41.22 ± 5.69 vs. 26.58 ± 1.87% of cells, p < 0.04, n = 4). This accumulation was associated with a decrease of 39.56 ± 9.1% in the number of cells in G1-phase relative to control (28.66 ± 5.56 vs. 46.72 ± 3.65% of cells, p < 0.02, n = 4) (Fig. 5D). Altogether, these findings support a role for c-Myc in the control of CPC proliferation.
c-Myc is known to control cell quiescence by direct targeting cell cycle proteins, among these, the cell cycle inhibitor p2134. We analyzed the expression of p21 under hypoxia and found that it was induced by 149.30 ± 41.33% (0.101 ± 0.009 vs. 0.046 ± 0.01 p21/Actin ratio, p < 0.005, n = 5) in CPCs exposed to hypoxia relative to normoxia (Fig. 6A). Therefore, we decided to investigate if p21 was also altered by c-Myc inhibition. Surprisingly, although p21 RNA expression was induced 1.91 ± 0.27-fold after inhibition of c-Myc (Fig. 6B), no changes were observed on p21 protein expression (Fig. 6C). To confirm the effectiveness of the inhibitor we analyzed the expression of c-Myc as it is known to regulate its own expression. As expected, c-Myc was significantly downregulated 40.12 ± 1.77% (0.061 ± 0.01 vs. 0.099 ± 0.016, c-Myc/Actin ratio, p < 0.03, n = 3) by inhibitor treatment.
Hypoxic Stress Affects c-Myc Protein Stability
The sustained decrease in c-Myc levels when CPCs are exposed to ischemic hypoxic stress suggests that a stable mechanism controlling c-Myc expression is activated under hypoxia. RNA analysis showed that reduction in c-Myc protein expression was not associated with changes in c-Myc RNA, suggesting that hypoxic stress affects c-Myc protein stability (Fig. 7A). To confirm this possibility, we analyzed c-Myc protein expression in CPCs cultured under normoxia and hypoxia for 48 hours after treatment with cycloheximide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis. Results show that in both normoxia and hypoxia c-Myc is rapidly degraded minutes after protein synthesis inhibition (Fig. 7B). However, under hypoxia, a significant decline in c-Myc expression occurred earlier than under normoxia, 20 min after protein blockage relative to baseline levels (0.55 ± 0.21 vs 1.09 ± 0.25, p < 0.001, n = 9) compared to 40 minutes (0.73 ± 0.25 vs 1.45 ± 0.41, p < 0.004, n = 4). The rate of protein degradation was higher under hypoxia, as indicated by reduction in c-Myc expression in all time points tested relative to normoxia, which was significant between 10–40 minutes. In just 10 minutes after protein synthesis blockage, c-Myc expression decreased 40.89 ± 8.37% in hypoxia relative to normoxia (1.23 ± 0.29 vs. 0.77 ± 0.22 c-Myc/Actin ratio, p < 0.006, n = 12). At the end of 40 minutes, c-Myc expression was down by 58.58 ± 2.79% (0.31 ± 0.13 vs. 0.73 ± 0.25 c-Myc/Actin ratio, p < 0.05, n = 4) (Fig. 7C). To further confirm that hypoxia was affecting c-Myc protein stability, CPCs were treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132. As expected, 48 hours in hypoxia caused a decrease in c-Myc expression of 37.19% ± 6.37 (0.25 ± 0.03 vs. 0.41 ± 0.04 c-Myc/Actin ratio, p < 0.03 n = 4) (Fig. 7D). This decrease was significantly reversed by proteasome inhibition (0.68 ± 0.08 vs. 0.25 ± 0.03 c-Myc/Actin ratio, p < 0.001, n = 4) (Fig. 7D), further supporting our findings that c-Myc protein degradation is activated under hypoxic conditions.
Reduction of c-Myc stability under hypoxia is independent of GSK-3β
GSK-3β is a major regulator of c-Myc protein stability that when activated promotes c-Myc degradation. Therefore, we investigated its role in c-Myc protein degradation under hypoxia. Surprisingly, we found that the expression of GSK-3β (Ser9), the inactive form of GSK-3β, was significantly increased under hypoxia (Fig. 8A), suggesting that although mechanisms to promote c-Myc stability were activated, increased degradation was still present. To confirm if GSK-3β has any impact on CPCs proliferation and c-Myc expression, we cultured CPCs in the presence of the GSK-3β inhibitor TCS2002. As expected, hypoxia caused a reduction in CPCs proliferation (n = 4, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005) in association with a decrease in c-Myc expression relative to normoxia (n = 3, *p < 0.05). However, inhibition of GSK-3β had no effect on CPC growth in either normoxia or hypoxia (Fig. 8B). Likewise, GSK-3β inhibition had no impact on c-Myc expression under either condition (Fig. 8C). These findings suggest that GSK-3β is not involved in the control of CPC growth or changes in c-Myc expression under stress conditions such as hypoxia or under normal growth.
Discussion
The goal of our study was to identify possible mechanisms that lead to impairment of CPC regenerative potential under ischemic stress. We provide evidence that ischemic hypoxia drives CPCs into a quiescence state, limiting both self-renewal and vasculogenic potential. These findings were associated with downregulation of the proto-oncogene c-Myc and upregulation of the cyclin inhibitor p21.
The adult stem cell niche works to preserve the balance of self-renewing, uncommitted progenitor cells with differentiated cells. This balance is achieved by the delicate regulation of both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Oxygen concentration is a critical component of niche biology. Oxygen gradients are often found in stem cell niches, where hypoxic regions help to preserve slowly dividing and undifferentiated immature cells49,50,51,52. How cells respond to hypoxia largely depends on oxygen concentration, duration of exposure and cell type. Our group has previously shown that changes in oxygen concentration play an important role in human cardiac stem cell proliferation and migration33. Mild hypoxic conditions in the range of 3–5% O2 have been shown to exert beneficial effects on different types of stem cells. Bone marrow-derived stromal cells grown under 3% O2 show increased self-renewal and significant decrease in differentiation, apoptosis and senescence53. Similarly, hypoxia maintains neural stem cells in an undifferentiated state and promotes survival and proliferation54,55,56. Such positive functional responses steered several studies on the use of hypoxia as a pre-conditioning strategy prior to cell transplantation to enhance therapeutic potential in experimental ischemia and other injury models57,58,59,60. Regarding CPCs, some studies have shown that mild-hypoxia (5% O2) confers improvement in proliferative capacity and vasculogenic potential61, as well as preservation of genomic stability through maintenance of redox balance62.
In the case of severe hypoxia (0.5–1% O2), studies are controversial. Extreme hypoxia mimicking ischemic injury as we tested has been used for pre-conditioning of CPCs prior to transplantation and shown beneficial effects58. Our results indicate that exposure to ischemic hypoxia (0.5% O2) severely impacted CPC proliferation and vasculogenic potential. In support of our findings, studies on MSCs have shown that 0.5% hypoxia also has a negative impact by triggering apoptosis63. The key factors that drive these differences are likely to be both timing and degree of hypoxia. In fact, the positive effect of 0.5% hypoxia on CPC function was time dependent, and when extended to more than 12 hours caused adverse effects leading to cell death. This result is further supported by a report showing potential benefits of short-term exposure of bone-marrow derived progenitor cells to 1% hypoxia, which were reversed by prolonged hypoxia64, similar to our findings. One of the main differences we observed in our study relative to others is that, despite reports showing an increase in cell death after long-term exposure to ischemic hypoxia, we did not find any evidence of alterations in cell survival.
Most cell types respond to stress by undergoing apoptosis, development of senescence or quiescence. We found that exposure of CPCs to hypoxic stress reduces cell proliferation by promoting quiescence. Impairment of CPC proliferation by hypoxia was not associated with development of senescence, and was in fact reversible, as CPCs placed back into normoxic conditions after exposure to ischemic hypoxia are able to recover their growth rate. This finding is supported by studies linking hypoxia to preservation of stem cell homeostasis and self-renewal51, 65. Although one of the main purposes of quiescence for adult stem cells is to preserve stemness, imbalance in the mechanisms involved in its regulation may compromise tissue regeneration66. Different from embryonic stem cells, due to their limited self-renewal potential, adult stem cells must develop mechanisms that allow rapid transition between quiescence and cell cycle re-entry. These mechanisms are essential for maintenance of stem cell niches within different tissues throughout life and response to regeneration needs after injury, while avoiding malignant transformation67. Adult stem cell quiescence is regulated by transcription factors that play an important role by targeting genes involved in the control of cell cycle progression68,69,70. In our work, we provide evidence that the expression of c-Myc is downregulated during hypoxia-induced CPC quiescence. The involvement of c-Myc in the regulation of CPC growth/quiescence state is further supported by our findings showing a significant effect of c-Myc inhibition on CPC proliferation and cell cycle progression. Regulation of hematopoietic stem cell quiescence by the transcription factor GATA-2 has been shown to depend on c-Myc control of cell cycle inhibitors such p2171. The cell division control protein Cdc42 regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence through modulation of c-Myc and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p2172. Outside of the hematopoietic niche, down-regulation of c-Myc and up-regulation of p21 also correlate with quiescence of pancreatic progenitor cells73. Our results show that p21 is upregulated under hypoxia, while c-Myc is downregulated. Surprisingly, although c-Myc inhibition induces the expression of p21 transcripts, it had no impact on p21 protein expression. These findings are supported by reports showing that p21 is a transcriptional target of c-Myc74. Furthermore, they bring other potential regulatory steps to the hypoxia scenario that may affect p21 protein expression independent of c-Myc. Our experiments are limited in this context, as it is unlikely that c-Myc inhibition alone will exactly image what is observed under hypoxia. For example, we have found that the expression of the histone deacetylase Sirt1 is also downregulated under hypoxia and plays a role in CPCs self-renewal (Supplementary Figure 3). Likewise, downregulation of Sirt1 in mesenchymal stem cells has been shown to inhibit proliferation and this effect was associated with upregulation of cyclin inhibitors p21 and p1675. Independent of the context, similar to our findings, most studies in the literature indicate that the control of cellular quiescence by c-Myc is associated with upregulation of p21 expression. Considering p21 as an endpoint, impairment of p21 function by deletion or knockdown has been shown to be sufficient to block quiescence, and high p21 levels are necessary not only to enter, but also maintain a quiescence state in different experimental models76. Although we have focused our work on the analysis of c-Myc and p21 expression, as a central regulator of proliferation, c-Myc is expected to target the cell cycle at many different steps. Therefore, we cannot discard an effect on several other proteins required for CPC cell cycle progression under hypoxia.
c-Myc has been recognized as a stress sensor77, and its expression is altered in different injury models, including acute myocardial infarction78,79,80,81,82. Under normal physiological conditions, c-Myc expression is tightly regulated by concerted action of extracellular kinase 1/2 (ERK) or c-JUN N-terminal kinase (JNK), and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) activity, through AKT-mediated phosphorylation83, 84. We found that hypoxia-induced downregulation of c-Myc in CPCs is mediated by mechanisms that involve protein degradation. Interestingly, although we observed activation of AKT pathway (Supplementary Figure 4) in our study and expected increase in the inhibited form of GSK-3β, indicating that mechanisms favoring stabilization of c-Myc were active, degradation was still evident. These findings suggest that other mechanisms involved in the control of c-Myc stability are affected in CPCs by hypoxic stress. Regulation of c-Myc levels by hypoxia could be affected during late steps of the protein degradation cascade involving ubiquitination as demonstrated for other stem cell types85,86,87,88. Alternatively, AKT has been shown to activate pathways that regulate GSK-3β-independent c-Myc degradation89 and GSK-3β-dependent stabilization of p2190. Although currently we do not have an explanation for altered kinase activities under hypoxia, activation of pro-survival mechanisms involving AKT is a common effect of hypoxia on different types of stem/progenitor cells, indicating an essential role of this pathway53, 57, 64.
Conclusions
Although CPCs have demonstrated beneficial regenerative effects in experimental models, insufficient myocardial repair under conditions of severe hypoxia such as ischemic cardiomyopathy suggests that their regenerative capacity in situ is limited. Identifying the molecular control switch that regulates hypoxia-induced quiescence in CPCs is essential when considering therapeutic approaches designed to stimulate endogenous cardiac regenerative potential in ischemic disease. The goal of the present study was to identify mechanisms that regulate CPC functions required for regeneration under ischemic hypoxia. Our work provides novel insights into the effect of hypoxia on the induction of CPC quiescence. Importantly, it suggests that hypoxia-induced deregulation of c-Myc expression and promotion of quiescence, even as a protective mechanism, may affect cardiac regeneration through impairment of essential cellular functions required for progenitor-induced tissue repair under ischemic injury.
Significance
Stem cell therapy is an emerging approach for the treatment of heart failure. The adult myocardium contains reservoirs of cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) capable of promoting revascularization and myocardial regeneration. However, ischemic stress impairs their regenerative potential. Identification of molecular mechanisms that impair CPC ability to promote regeneration is vital for therapeutic applications. Here we show that ischemic stress induces CPC quiescence while we also identify c-Myc as a novel regulator of ischemia-induced CPC functional impairment. Our findings provide significant insights into how hypoxic stress regulates essential progenitor functions required for myocardial regeneration.
References
Felker, G. M. et al. Risk stratification after hospitalization for decompensated heart failure. J Card Fail 10, 460–466 (2004).
Lloyd-Jones, D. et al. and the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2009 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 119, e21–e181 (2009).
Hare, J. M. Translational development of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for cardiovascular diseases. Texas Heart Inst. J. 36, 145–147 (2009).
Hare, J. Ma. C. S. V. Cardiac regeneration and stem cell therapy. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 13, 536–542 (2008).
Guntheroth, W. G. Improved outcomes of pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy and heart transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 45, 1733–1734 (2005).
Weng, K. P., Lin, C. C., Huang, S. H. & Hsieh, K. S. Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in children: a single medical center’s experience. J Chin Med Assoc 68, 368–372 (2005).
Towbin, J. A. et al. Incidence, causes, and outcomes of dilated cardiomyopathy in children. Jama 296, 1867–1876 (2006).
Chimenti, C. et al. Senescence and death of primitive cells and myocytes lead to premature cardiac aging and heart failure. Circ Res 93, 604–613 (2003).
James, T. N. Normal and abnormal consequences of apoptosis in the human heart. From postnatal morphogenesis to paroxysmal arrhythmias. Circulation. 90, 556–573 (1994).
Leri, A., Quaini, F., Kajstura, J. & Anversa, P. Myocyte death and myocyte regeneration in the failing human heart. Ital Heart J 2 Suppl 3, 12S–14S (2001).
Olivetti, G., Melissari, M., Capasso, J. M. & Anversa, P. Cardiomyopathy of the aging human heart. Myocyte loss and reactive cellular hypertrophy. Circ Res 68, 1560–1568 (1991).
Rodrigues, C. O., Shehadeh, L. A., Webster, K. A. & Bishopric, N. H. Myocyte deficiency as a target in the treatment of cardiomyopathy. Progress in Pediatric Cardiology 23, 49–59 (2007).
Torella, D. et al. Cardiac stem cell and myocyte aging, heart failure, and insulin-like growth factor-1 overexpression. Circ Res 94, 514–524 (2004).
Perin, E. C. et al. Effect of transendocardial delivery of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells on functional capacity, left ventricular function, and perfusion in chronic heart failure: the FOCUS-CCTRN trial. JAMA 307, 1717–1726, doi:10.1001/jama.2012.418 (2012).
Anversa, P., Kajstura, J., Rota, M. & Leri, A. Regenerating new heart with stem cells. J Clin Invest 123, 62–70, doi:10.1172/JCI63068 (2013).
Golpanian, S. et al. Concise Review: Review and Perspective of Cell Dosage and Routes of Administration From Preclinical and Clinical Studies of Stem Cell Therapy for Heart Disease. Stem Cells Transl Med 5, 186–191, doi:10.5966/sctm.2015-0101 (2016).
Hare, J. M. et al. Phase II Clinical Research Design in Cardiology: Learning the Right Lessons Too Well: Observations and Recommendations From the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN). Circulation 127, 1630–1635, doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000779 (2013).
Bolli, R. et al. Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): initial results of a randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet 378, 1847–1857, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61590-0 (2011).
Heldman, A. W. et al. Transendocardial mesenchymal stem cells and mononuclear bone marrow cells for ischemic cardiomyopathy: the TAC-HFT randomized trial. Jama 311, 62–73, doi:10.1001/jama.2013.282909 (2014).
Hare, J. M. et al. Comparison of Allogeneic vs Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Delivered by Transendocardial Injection in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: The POSEIDON Randomized Trial. JAMA 1–11, doi:10.1001/jama.2012.25321 (2012).
Beltrami, A. P. et al. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell 114, 763–776, doi:S0092867403006871 [pii] (2003).
Chen, X. et al. Adolescent feline heart contains a population of small, proliferative ventricular myocytes with immature physiological properties. Circ Res 100, 536–544 (2007).
Hierlihy, A. M., Seale, P., Lobe, C. G., Rudnicki, M. A. & Megeney, L. A. The post-natal heart contains a myocardial stem cell population. FEBS Lett 530, 239–243 (2002).
Linke, A. et al. Stem cells in the dog heart are self-renewing, clonogenic, and multipotent and regenerate infarcted myocardium, improving cardiac function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 8966–8971 (2005).
Matsuura, K. et al. Adult cardiac Sca-1-positive cells differentiate into beating cardiomyocytes. J Biol Chem 279, 11384–11391 (2004).
Messina, E. et al. Isolation and expansion of adult cardiac stem cells from human and murine heart. Circ Res 95, 911–921 (2004).
Oh, H. et al. Cardiac progenitor cells from adult myocardium: homing, differentiation, and fusion after infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 12313–12318 (2003).
Laugwitz, K. L. et al. Postnatal isl1 + cardioblasts enter fully differentiated cardiomyocyte lineages. Nature 433, 647–653 (2005).
Bearzi, C. et al. Identification of a coronary vascular progenitor cell in the human heart. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 15885–15890, doi:10.1073/pnas.0907622106 (2009).
Ellison, G. M. et al. Adult c-kit(pos) cardiac stem cells are necessary and sufficient for functional cardiac regeneration and repair. Cell 154, 827–842, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.039 (2013).
van Berlo, J. H. et al. c-kit + cells minimally contribute cardiomyocytes to the heart. Nature 509, 337–341, doi:10.1038/nature13309 (2014).
Hatzistergos, K. E. et al. cKit + cardiac progenitors of neural crest origin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 13051–13056, doi:10.1073/pnas.1517201112 (2015).
Bellio, M. A. et al. Physiological and hypoxic oxygen concentration differentially regulates human c-Kit + cardiac stem cell proliferation and migration. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 311, H1509–H1519, doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00449.2016 (2016).
Dang, C. V. et al. Function of the c-Myc oncogenic transcription factor. Experimental cell research 253, 63–77, doi:10.1006/excr.1999.4686 (1999).
Pelengaris, S. & Khan, M. The many faces of c-MYC. Arch Biochem Biophys 416, 129–136, doi:S0003986103002947 [pii] (2003).
Wilson, A. et al. c-Myc controls the balance between hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genes & development 18, 2747–2763, doi:10.1101/gad.313104 (2004).
Varlakhanova, N., Cotterman, R., Bradnam, K., Korf, I. & Knoepfler, P. S. Myc and Miz-1 have coordinate genomic functions including targeting Hox genes in human embryonic stem cells. Epigenetics & chromatin 4, 20, doi:10.1186/1756-8935-4-20 (2011).
Yoon, B. S. et al. Optimal suppression of protein phosphatase 2A activity is critical for maintenance of human embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Stem cells 28, 874–884, doi:10.1002/stem.412 (2010).
Cartwright, P. et al. LIF/STAT3 controls ES cell self-renewal and pluripotency by a Myc-dependent mechanism. Development 132, 885–896, doi:10.1242/dev.01670 (2005).
Ashihara, E., Takada, T. & Maekawa, T. Targeting the canonical Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in hematological malignancies. Cancer Sci 106, 665–671, doi:10.1111/cas.12655 (2015).
Mimeault, M. & Batra, S. K. Altered gene products involved in the malignant reprogramming of cancer stem/progenitor cells and multitargeted therapies. Mol Aspects Med 39, 3–32, doi:10.1016/j.mam.2013.08.001 (2014).
Yoshida, Y. & Yamanaka, S. iPS cells: a source of cardiac regeneration. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology 50, 327–332, doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.10.026 (2011).
Rodrigues, C. O. et al. Heterogeneity in SDF-1 expression defines the vasculogenic potential of adult cardiac progenitor cells. PloS one 6, e24013, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024013 (2011).
Florea, V. et al. Agonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone stimulate self-renewal of cardiac stem cells and promote their survival. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 17260–17265, doi:10.1073/pnas.1420375111 (2014).
Kim, K. H. & Sederstrom, J. M. Assaying Cell Cycle Status Using Flow Cytometry. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 111, 28 26 21–11, doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb2806s111 (2015).
Vignon, C. et al. Flow cytometric quantification of all phases of the cell cycle and apoptosis in a two-color fluorescence plot. PloS one 8, e68425, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068425 (2013).
Matsuoka, Y. et al. Low level of c-kit expression marks deeply quiescent murine hematopoietic stem cells. Stem cells 29, 1783–1791, doi:10.1002/stem.721 (2011).
Sultana, N. et al. Resident c-kit(+) cells in the heart are not cardiac stem cells. Nat Commun 6, 8701, doi:10.1038/ncomms9701 (2015).
Mohyeldin, A., Garzon-Muvdi, T. & Quinones-Hinojosa, A. Oxygen in stem cell biology: a critical component of the stem cell niche. Cell stem cell 7, 150–161, doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.007 (2010).
Davy, P. & Allsopp, R. Hypoxia: are stem cells in it for the long run? Cell cycle 10, 206–211, doi:10.4161/cc.10.2.14535 (2011).
Guitart, A. V., Hammoud, M., Dello Sbarba, P., Ivanovic, Z. & Praloran, V. Slow-cycling/quiescence balance of hematopoietic stem cells is related to physiological gradient of oxygen. Experimental hematology 38, 847–851, doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2010.06.002 (2010).
Sanada, F. et al. c-Kit-positive cardiac stem cells nested in hypoxic niches are activated by stem cell factor reversing the aging myopathy. Circulation research 114, 41–55, doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302500 (2014).
Rios, C. et al. Low Oxygen Modulates Multiple Signaling Pathways, Increasing Self-Renewal, While Decreasing Differentiation, Senescence, and Apoptosis in Stromal MIAMI Cells. Stem Cells Dev 25, 848–860, doi:10.1089/scd.2015.0362 (2016).
Santilli, G. et al. Mild hypoxia enhances proliferation and multipotency of human neural stem cells. PloS one 5, e8575, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008575 (2010).
Hosoyama, T. et al. Cardiosphere-derived cell sheet primed with hypoxia improves left ventricular function of chronically infarcted heart. Am J Transl Res 7, 2738–2751 (2015).
Pistollato, F., Chen, H. L., Schwartz, P. H., Basso, G. & Panchision, D. M. Oxygen tension controls the expansion of human CNS precursors and the generation of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Mol Cell Neurosci 35, 424–435, doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2007.04.003 (2007).
Rosova, I., Dao, M., Capoccia, B., Link, D. & Nolta, J. A. Hypoxic preconditioning results in increased motility and improved therapeutic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem cells 26, 2173–2182, doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-1104 (2008).
Yan, F. et al. Hypoxic preconditioning improves survival of cardiac progenitor cells: role of stromal cell derived factor-1alpha-CXCR4 axis. PloS one 7, e37948, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037948 (2012).
Hu, X. et al. A Large-Scale Investigation of Hypoxia-Preconditioned Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Myocardial Repair in Nonhuman Primates: Paracrine Activity Without Remuscularization. Circulation research 118, 970–983, doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307516 (2016).
Wakai, T. et al. Hypoxic preconditioning enhances neural stem cell transplantation therapy after intracerebral hemorrhage in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. doi:10.1177/0271678X15613798 (2015).
Jung, S. Y., Choi, S. H., Yoo, S. Y., Baek, S. H. & Kwon, S. M. Modulation of Human Cardiac Progenitors via Hypoxia-ERK Circuit Improves their Functional Bioactivities. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 21, 196–203, doi:10.4062/biomolther.2013.019 (2013).
Li, T. S. et al. Expansion of human cardiac stem cells in physiological oxygen improves cell production efficiency and potency for myocardial repair. Cardiovascular research 89, 157–165, doi:10.1093/cvr/cvq251 (2011).
Zhu, W., Chen, J., Cong, X., Hu, S. & Chen, X. Hypoxia and serum deprivation-induced apoptosis in mesenchymal stem cells. Stem cells 24, 416–425, doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0121 (2006).
Jian, K. T. et al. Time course effect of hypoxia on bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells and their effects on left ventricular function after transplanted into acute myocardial ischemia rat. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences 19, 1043–1054 (2015).
Hu, X. et al. Severe hypoxia exerts parallel and cell-specific regulation of gene expression and alternative splicing in human mesenchymal stem cells. BMC Genomics 15, 303, doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-303 (2014).
Rumman, M., Dhawan, J. & Kassem, M. Concise Review: Quiescence in Adult Stem Cells: Biological Significance and Relevance to Tissue Regeneration. Stem cells 33, 2903–2912, doi:10.1002/stem.2056 (2015).
He, S., Nakada, D. & Morrison, S. J. Mechanisms of stem cell self-renewal. Annual review of cell and developmental biology 25, 377–406, doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113248 (2009).
Liu, Y. et al. p53 regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Cell stem cell 4, 37–48, doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.11.006 (2009).
Viatour, P. et al. Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence is maintained by compound contributions of the retinoblastoma gene family. Cell stem cell 3, 416–428, doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.009 (2008).
Fukada, S. Molecular regulation of muscle stem cells by ‘quiescence genes’. Yakugaku Zasshi 131, 1329–1332 (2011).
Ezoe, S. et al. GATA-2/estrogen receptor chimera regulates cytokine-dependent growth of hematopoietic cells through accumulation of p21(WAF1) and p27(Kip1) proteins. Blood 100, 3512–3520, doi:10.1182/blood-2002-04-1177 (2002).
Yang, L. et al. Rho GTPase Cdc42 coordinates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and niche interaction in the bone marrow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 5091–5096, doi:10.1073/pnas.0610819104 (2007).
Petropavlovskaia, M., Bodnar, C. A., Behie, L. A. & Rosenberg, L. Pancreatic small cells: analysis of quiescence, long-term maintenance and insulin expression in vitro. Experimental cell research 313, 931–942, doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.12.012 (2007).
Claassen, G. F. & Hann, S. R. A role for transcriptional repression of p21CIP1 by c-Myc in overcoming transforming growth factor beta -induced cell-cycle arrest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 9498–9503, doi:10.1073/pnas.150006697 (2000).
Chen, H. et al. SIRT1 ameliorates age-related senescence of mesenchymal stem cells via modulating telomere shelterin. Front Aging Neurosci 6, 103, doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00103 (2014).
Perucca, P. et al. Loss of p21 CDKN1A impairs entry to quiescence and activates a DNA damage response in normal fibroblasts induced to quiescence. Cell cycle 8, 105–114, doi:10.4161/cc.8.1.7507 (2009).
De Nigris, F., Lerman, L. O., Condorelli, M., Lerman, A. & Napoli, C. Oxidation-sensitive transcription factors and molecular mechanisms in the arterial wall. Antioxidants & redox signaling 3, 1119–1130, doi:10.1089/152308601317203620 (2001).
Ham, P. B. 3rd & Raju, R. Mitochondrial function in hypoxic ischemic injury and influence of aging. Prog Neurobiol. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.06.006 (2016).
Zhang, T. et al. Bioinformatics analysis of time series gene expression in left ventricle (LV) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Gene 543, 259–267, doi:10.1016/j.gene.2014.04.002 (2014).
Gharib, S. A. et al. Computational identification of key biological modules and transcription factors in acute lung injury. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 173, 653–658, doi:10.1164/rccm.200509-1473OC (2006).
Feinman, R. et al. Molecular signatures of trauma-hemorrhagic shock-induced lung injury: hemorrhage- and injury-associated genes. Shock 28, 360–368, doi:10.1097/shk.0b013e318048565b (2007).
Ma, S. F. et al. Bioinformatic identification of novel early stress response genes in rodent models of lung injury. American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology 289, L468–477, doi:10.1152/ajplung.00109.2005 (2005).
Junttila, M. R. & Westermarck, J. Mechanisms of MYC stabilization in human malignancies. Cell cycle 7, 592–596 (2008).
Sears, R. C. The life cycle of C-myc: from synthesis to degradation. Cell cycle 3, 1133–1137 (2004).
Takeishi, S. et al. Ablation of Fbxw7 eliminates leukemia-initiating cells by preventing quiescence. Cancer Cell 23, 347–361, doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.026 (2013).
Reavie, L. et al. Regulation of hematopoietic stem cell differentiation by a single ubiquitin ligase-substrate complex. Nat Immunol 11, 207–215, doi:10.1038/ni.1839 (2010).
Thompson, B. J. et al. Control of hematopoietic stem cell quiescence by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Fbw7. J Exp Med 205, 1395–1408, doi:10.1084/jem.20080277 (2008).
Iriuchishima, H. et al. Ex vivo maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells by quiescence induction through Fbxw7α overexpression. Blood 117, 2373–2377, doi:10.1182/blood-2010-07-294801 (2011).
Yeh, E. S. et al. Hunk negatively regulates c-myc to promote Akt-mediated cell survival and mammary tumorigenesis induced by loss of Pten. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 6103–6108, doi:10.1073/pnas.1217415110 (2013).
Rossig, L., Badorff, C., Holzmann, Y., Zeiher, A. M. & Dimmeler, S. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 couples AKT-dependent signaling to the regulation of p21Cip1 degradation. The Journal of biological chemistry 277, 9684–9689, doi:10.1074/jbc.M106157200 (2002).
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Grants K01HL103184-01 and R03HL133638-02 (to C.O.R.). P.M.B. and C.N.T. were supported by an Undergraduate Education Grant awarded to the University of Miami from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI). M.A.B. was supported by an American Heart Association Predoctoral Award. I.H.S. and J.M.H. are supported by the NHLBI Grants 1R01HL134558-01, UM1 HL113460, and R01HL084275. We would like to thank Dr. Keith A. Webster and Dr. Wayne E. Balkan for critical reading of this manuscript, Ms. Audrey Medina for technical assistance and the University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Core for assistance with FACS analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.A.B., M.T.P. and V.F. designed experiments, collected and analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. C.O.R. designed the study, collected and analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. P.M.B., C.N.T., C.L. and A.B.B. collected and analyzed data. I.H.S. and J.M.H. wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
Dr. Hare has a patent for cardiac cell-based therapy; he holds equity in Vestion Inc.; maintains a professional relationship with Vestion as a consultant and member of the Board of Directors and Scientific Advisory Board; and is a shareholder in Longeveron LLC. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bellio, M.A., Pinto, M.T., Florea, V. et al. Hypoxic Stress Decreases c-Myc Protein Stability in Cardiac Progenitor Cells Inducing Quiescence and Compromising Their Proliferative and Vasculogenic Potential. Sci Rep 7, 9702 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09813-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09813-x
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.