Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Image-based prenatal predictors correlate with postnatal survival, extracorporeal life support use, and defect size in left congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the association between prenatal imaging predictors of patients with left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (LCDH) and postnatal outcomes.

Study design

CDH study group data were reviewed for LCDH infants born 2015–2019. Prenatal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were collected and correlated with postnatal information including CDHSG defect size (A through D or non-repair (NR)).

Results

In total, 929 LCDH patients were included. Both US and MRI imaging predictors correlated with postnatal survival (72.2%) and ECLS use (29.6%). Logistic regression models confirmed increased survival and decreased ECLS use with larger values for all predictors. Importantly, all prenatal values evaluated showed no significant difference between defect size D and NR patients.

Conclusions

This is the largest cohort of LCDH patients and demonstrates that prenatal imaging factors correlate with postnatal outcomes and confirms that patients in the non-repair group are prenatally similar to type D defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2: Survival and ECLS utilization.
Fig. 3: Logistic regression models.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Bianchi DWCT, D’Alton ME, Malone FD, eds. Fetology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2010.

  2. Burgos CM, Frenckner B, Luco M, Harting MT, Lally PA, Lally KP. Prenatally versus postnatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia—side, stage, and outcome. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54:651–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jancelewicz T, Brindle ME. Prediction tools in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Perinatol. 2020;44:151165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Metkus AP, Filly RA, Stringer MD, Harrison MR, Adzick NS. Sonographic predictors of survival in fetal diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31:148–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jani J, Nicolaides KH, Keller RL, Benachi A, Peralta CF, Favre R, et al. Observed to expected lung area to head circumference ratio in the prediction of survival in fetuses with isolated diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:67–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang SH, Nobuhara KK, Keller RL, Ball RH, Goldstein RB, Feldstein VA, et al. Reliability of the lung-to-head ratio as a predictor of outcome in fetuses with isolated left congenital diaphragmatic hernia at gestation outside 24-26 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:30.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jani JC, Benachi A, Nicolaides KH, Allegaert K, Gratacos E, Mazkereth R, et al. Prenatal prediction of neonatal morbidity in survivors with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:64–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Deprest JA, Flemmer AW, Gratacos E, Nicolaides K. Antenatal prediction of lung volume and in-utero treatment by fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion in severe isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14:8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison MR, Langer JC, Adzick NS, Golbus MS, Filly RA, Anderson RL, et al. Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero, V. Initial clinical experience. J Pediatr Surg. 1990;25:47–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Deprest JA, Hyett JA, Flake AW, Nicolaides K, Gratacos E. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 4: Should fetal surgery be done in all cases of severe diaphragmatic hernia? Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:15–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oluyomi-Obi T, Kuret V, Puligandla P, Lodha A, Lee-Robertson H, Lee K, et al. Antenatal predictors of outcome in prenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52:881–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barnewolt CE, Kunisaki SM, Fauza DO, Nemes LP, Estroff JA, Jennings RW. Percent predicted lung volumes as measured on fetal magnetic resonance imaging: a useful biometric parameter for risk stratification in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:193–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayer S, Klaritsch P, Petersen S, Done E, Sandaite I, Till H, et al. The correlation between lung volume and liver herniation measurements by fetal MRI in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:1086–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsao K, Lally KP. The Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group: a voluntary international registry. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008;17:90–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lally KP, Lasky RE, Lally PA, Bagolan P, Davis CF, Frenckner BP, et al. Standardized reporting for congenital diaphragmatic hernia-an international consensus. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:2408–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Putnam LR, Harting MT, Tsao K, Morini F, Yoder BA, Luco M, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia defect size and infant morbidity at discharge. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20162043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950;3:32–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morini F, Valfrè L, Capolupo I, Lally KP, Lally PA, Bagolan P. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: defect size correlates with developmental defect. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:1177–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group. Estimating disease severity of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the first 5 min of life. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:141–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lally KP, Lally PA, Lasky RE, Tibboel D, Jaksic T, Wilson JM, et al. Defect size determines survival in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e651–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mullassery D, Ba’ath ME, Jesudason EC, Losty PD. Value of liver herniation in prediction of outcome in fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:609–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Basta AM, Lusk LA, Keller RL, Filly RA. Fetal stomach position predicts neonatal outcomes in isolated left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016;39:248–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cordier AG, Cannie MM, Guilbaud L, De Laveaucoupet J, Martinovic J, Nowakowska D, et al. Stomach position versus liver-to-thoracic volume ratio in left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28:190–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Romiti A, Viggiano M, Savelli S, Salvi S, Vicario R, Vassallo C, et al. Comparison of mediastinal shift angles obtained with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with isolated left sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:269–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abbasi N, Cortes MS, Ruano R, Johnson A, Morgan T, Coleman B, et al. Variability in antenatal prognostication of fetal diaphragmatic hernia across the North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet). Prenat Diagn. 2020;40:342–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Snoek KG, Peters NCJ, van Rosmalen J, van Heijst AFJ, Eggink AJ, Sikkel E, et al. The validity of the observed-to-expected lung-to-head ratio in congenital diaphragmatic hernia in an era of standardized neonatal treatment; a multicenter study. Prenat Diagnosis. 2017;37:658–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mesas Burgos C, Hammarqvist-Vejde J, Frenckner B, Conner P. Differences in outcomes in prenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia compared to postnatal detection: a single-center experience. Fetal Diagnosis Ther. 2016;39:241–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Deprest J, Brady P, Nicolaides K, Benachi A, Berg C, Vermeesch J, et al. Prenatal management of the fetus with isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the era of the TOTAL trial. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:338–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ruano R, Lazar DA, Cass DL, Zamora IJ, Lee TC, Cassady CI, et al. Fetal lung volume and quantification of liver herniation by magnetic resonance imaging in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:662–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shieh HF, Barnewolt CE, Wilson JM, Zurakowski D, Connolly SA, Estroff JA, et al. Percent predicted lung volume changes on fetal magnetic resonance imaging throughout gestation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52:933–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Akinkuotu AC, Cruz SM, Abbas PI, Lee TC, Welty SE, Olutoye OO, et al. Risk-stratification of severity for infants with CDH: Prenatal versus postnatal predictors of outcome. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:44–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Werner NL, Coughlin M, Kunisaki SM, Hirschl R, Ladino-Torres M, Berman D, et al. Prenatal and postnatal markers of severity in congenital diaphragmatic hernia have similar prognostic ability. Prenat Diagnosis. 2016;36:107–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Harting MT, Hollinger L, Tsao K, Putnam LR, Wilson JM, Hirschl RB, et al. Aggressive surgical management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: worth the effort?: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Ann Surg. 2018;267:977–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sperling JD, Sparks TN, Berger VK, Farrell JA, Gosnell K, Keller RL, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: does laterality predict perinatal outcomes? Am J Perinatol. 2018;35:919–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. DeKoninck P, Gomez O, Sandaite I, Richter J, Nawapun K, Eerdekens A, et al. Right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia in a decade of fetal surgery. BJOG. 2015;122:940–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Study conception and design: EEP, PAL, MTH, GBM, and KPL; Data acquisition: PAL; Analysis and data interpretation: EEP, MK, and SC; Drafting of the manuscript: EEP, MK, and MTH; Critical revision: PAL, FK, FM, RP, KPVM, MTH, GBM, and KPL.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin E. Perrone.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A list of members and their affiliations appears in the Supplementary Information.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perrone, E.E., Karmakar, M., Lally, P.A. et al. Image-based prenatal predictors correlate with postnatal survival, extracorporeal life support use, and defect size in left congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Perinatol 42, 1195–1201 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01357-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01357-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links