Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Emerging technologies and the role of NGOs

Nature Nanotechnology volume 12, pages 397–400 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are involved in policy discussions surrounding the societal implications of emerging technologies. But what practices and strategies undertaken by these organizations are most influential in anticipating the longer-term societal implications of nanotechnology?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Science 322, 520–521 (2008).

  2. Science 338, 456–461 (2012).

  3. National Nanotechnology Initiative: Strategic Plan (National Science and Technology Council, 2016).

  4. Bainbridge, W. S. & Roco, M. C. (eds) Managing Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno Innovations: Converging Technologies in Society (Springer, 2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Bainbridge, W. S. & Roco, M. C. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence (Springer, 2016).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Bimber, B. The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment (State Univ. of New York Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan, M. G. & Peha, J. M. (eds) Science and Technology Advice for Congress (Routledge, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller, G. & Scrinis, G. in International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies (eds Hodge, G. A., Bowman, D. M. & Maynard, A. D.) 409–445 (Edward Elgar, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michelson, E. S. Assessing the Societal Implications of Emerging Technologies: Anticipatory Governance in Practice (Routledge, 2016).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerritzen, G., Huang, L.-C., Killpack, K., Mircheva, M. & Conti, J. Review of Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology Industry (International Council on Nanotechnology, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maynard, A. D. Nanotechnology: A Research Strategy for Assessing Risk (Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Macoubrie, J. Informed Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology and Trust in Government (Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davies, J. C. Managing the Effects of Nanotechnology (Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rodemeyer, M. New Life, Old Bottles: Regulating First-Generation Products of Synthetic Biology (Synthetic Biology Project, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hart Research Associates Public Attitudes Regarding New Technology from Editing DNA (Synthetic Biology Project, 2015).

  16. Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C. & Guston, D. H. in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies 3rd edn (eds Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., Wajcman, J.) 979–1000 (MIT Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guston, D. H. Soc. Stud. Sci. 44, 218–242 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fuerth, L. Anticipatory Governance: Practical Upgrades (Project on Forward Engagement, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Berube, D. M., Searson, E. M., Morton, T. S. & Cummings, C. L. Nanotechnol. Law Bus. 7, 152–163 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. White, D. D. et al. Sci. Pub. Pol. 37, 219–232 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Governance Structure and Operational Plan (International Council on Nanotechnology, 2009).

  22. Wilsdon, J. & Willis, R. See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream (Demos, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sadowski, J. & Guston, D. H. Tech. Assess. Theor. Prac. 24, 53–59 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Evan S. Michelson is a program director at the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. This Commentary was written fully in the author's personal capacity, and the views expressed here are those of the author alone and do not reflect those of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation or any of the Sloan Foundation's grantees. The author was previously an employee of the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars from 2005–2007. This affiliation was acknowledged to all interviewees contacted during the course of this study. Portions of this Commentary are drawn from the author's book, Assessing the Societal Implications of Emerging Technologies: Anticipatory Governance in Practice (Routledge, 2016). The author gratefully acknowledges Taylor & Francis for their permission to re-use this material.

Author information

Author notes

  1. michelson@sloan.org

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Evan S. Michelson is at the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, 630 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200, New York, New York 10111, USA,

    Evan S. Michelson

Authors
  1. Evan S. Michelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michelson, E. Emerging technologies and the role of NGOs. Nature Nanotech 12, 397–400 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.70

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.70

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing