Letter
Nature 451, 841-845 (14 February 2008) | doi:10.1038/nature06547; Received 13 September 2007; Accepted 7 December 2007
Two levels of protection for the B cell genome during somatic hypermutation
Man Liu1, Jamie L. Duke3, Daniel J. Richter4,8, Carola G. Vinuesa5, Christopher C. Goodnow5,6, Steven H. Kleinstein2,3 & David G. Schatz1,7
- Department of Immunobiology,
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA
- Interdepartmental Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02141, USA
- Division of Immunology and Genetics, John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University,
- Australian Phenomics Facility, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA
- Present address: Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3200, USA.
Correspondence to: David G. Schatz1,7 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.G.S. (Email: david.schatz@yale.edu).
Somatic hypermutation introduces point mutations into immunoglobulin genes in germinal centre B cells during an immune response. The reaction is initiated by cytosine deamination by the activation-induced deaminase (AID) and completed by error-prone processing of the resulting uracils by mismatch and base excision repair factors1. Somatic hypermutation represents a threat to genome integrity2 and it is not known how the B cell genome is protected from the mutagenic effects of somatic hypermutation nor how often these protective mechanisms fail. Here we show, by extensive sequencing of murine B cell genes, that the genome is protected by two distinct mechanisms: selective targeting of AID and gene-specific, high-fidelity repair of AID-generated uracils. Numerous genes linked to B cell tumorigenesis, including Myc, Pim1, Pax5, Ocab (also called Pou2af1), H2afx, Rhoh and Ebf1, are deaminated by AID but escape acquisition of most mutations through the combined action of mismatch and base excision repair. However, approximately 25% of expressed genes analysed were not fully protected by either mechanism and accumulated mutations in germinal centre B cells. Our results demonstrate that AID acts broadly on the genome, with the ultimate distribution of mutations determined by a balance between high-fidelity and error-prone DNA repair.
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Class switching and Myc translocation: how does DNA break?Nature Immunology News and Views (01 Nov 2004)
Research HighlightsNature Immunology News and Views (01 Apr 2008)
See all 9 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
BOB.1/OBF.1 controls the balance of TH1 and TH2 immune responsesThe EMBO Journal Article (11 Jul 2007)
Replication protein A interacts with AID to promote deamination of somatic hypermutation targetsNature Article (26 Aug 2004)
See all 42 matches for Research