Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:

Proton pump inhibitors significantly increase the intracellular concentration of nilotinib, but not imatinib in target CML cells

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

References

  1. White D, Saunders V, Lyons AB, Branford S, Grigg A, To LB et al. In vitro sensitivity to imatinib-induced inhibition of ABL kinase activity is predictive of molecular response in patients with de novo CML. Blood 2005; 106: 2520–2526.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. White D, Saunders V, Grigg A, Arthur C, Filshie R, Leahy MF et al. Measurement of in vivo BCR-ABL kinase inhibition to monitor imatinib-induced target blockade and predict response in chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4445–4451.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. White DL, Saunders VA, Dang P, Engler J, Zannettino AC, Cambareri AC et al. OCT-1-mediated influx is a key determinant of the intracellular uptake of imatinib but not nilotinib (AMN107): reduced OCT-1 activity is the cause of low in vitro sensitivity to imatinib. Blood 2006; 108: 697–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yin OQ, Gallagher N, Fischer D, Demirhan E, Zhou W, Golor G et al. Effect of the proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole on the oral absorption and pharmacokinetics of nilotinib. J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 50: 960–967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luciani F, Spada M, De Milito A, Molinari A, Rivoltini L, Montinaro A et al. Effect of proton pump inhibitor pretreatment on resistance of solid tumors to cytotoxic drugs. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 1702–1713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pauli-Magnus C, Rekersbrink S, Klotz U, Fromm MF . Interaction of omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole with P-glycoprotein. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2001; 364: 551–557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balayssac D, Authier N, Cayre A, Coudore F . Does inhibition of P-glycoprotein lead to drug-drug interactions? Toxicol Lett 2005; 156: 319–329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Illmer T, Schaich M, Platzbecker U, Freiberg-Richter J, Oelschlagel U, von Bonin M et al. P-glycoprotein-mediated drug efflux is a resistance mechanism of chronic myelogenous leukemia cells to treatment with imatinib mesylate. Leukemia 2004; 18: 401–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ozvegy-Laczka C, Hegedus T, Varady G, Ujhelly O, Schuetz JD, Varadi A et al. High-affinity interaction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with the ABCG2 multidrug transporter. Mol Pharmacol 2004; 65: 1485–1495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Severino G, Chillotti C, De Lisa R, Del Zompo M, Ardau R . Adverse reactions during imatinib and lansoprazole treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39: 162–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yin OQ, Giles FJ, Baccarani M, le Coutre P, Chiparus O, Gallagher N et al. Concurrent use of proton pump inhibitors or H2 blockers did not adversely affect nilotinib efficacy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2012; 70: 345–350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. White DL, Dang P, Engler J, Frede A, Zrim S, Osborn M et al. Functional activity of the OCT-1 protein is predictive of long-term outcome in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 2761–2767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stedman CA, Barclay ML . Review article: comparison of the pharmacokinetics, acid suppression and efficacy of proton pump inhibitors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14: 963–978.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Geus WP, Mathot RA, Mulder PG, Lamers CB . Pharmacodynamics and kinetics of omeprazole MUPS 20 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg during repeated oral administration in Helicobacter pylori-negative subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14: 1057–1064.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Desta Z, Zhao X, Shin JG, Flockhart DA . Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41: 913–958.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Andersson T, Holmberg J, Rohss K, Walan A . Pharmacokinetics and effect on caffeine metabolism of the proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole, lansoprazole, and pantoprazole. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 45: 369–375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer UA . Metabolic interactions of the proton-pump inhibitors lansoprazole, omeprazole and pantoprazole with other drugs. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996; 8 (Suppl 1): S21–S25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Translational Grant from the Leukemia Lymphoma Society of USA. Imatinib and nilotinib along with their 14-C-labeled variants were kindly provided by Novartis (Basel). Laura N Eadie is a PhD Scholar funded by the Leukemia Foundation of Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D L White.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

DLW and TPH have received research funding from Novartis Oncology. TPH has received Honoraria from Novartis Oncology. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, D., Eadie, L., Saunders, V. et al. Proton pump inhibitors significantly increase the intracellular concentration of nilotinib, but not imatinib in target CML cells. Leukemia 27, 1201–1204 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2012.295

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2012.295

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links