Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Resource
  • Published:

A training primer for Institutional Officials

Abstract

The laws and policies governing the care and use of animals in research in the US require institutions to establish training programs to assure that personnel are qualified for their roles in animal care and use programs. Few programs define specific training requirements for the Institutional Official (IO), one of the most important roles in an animal care program. In some cases, IOs may have little or no experience in biomedical science. In this article, the author provides an overview of the IO's role in an animal care and use program as defined by US government laws and policies for use in training IOs and chief executive officers. The author outlines the key responsibilities of the IO in an animal care program, the implications of noncompliance with federal requirements and some of the pitfalls in program design.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Council of Europe. European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. ETS 123. (2 December 2005). http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/html/123.htm.

  2. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the European Union Strategy for the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2012–2015 (2012) http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/actionplan/docs/aw_strategy_19012012_en.pdf.

  3. Animal Welfare Act Regulations. 9 CFR.

  4. Health Research Extension Act of 1985 Public Law 99-158. (20 November 1985).

  5. Public Health Service. Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 1986; amended 2002).

  6. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 8th edn. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011).

  7. USDA APHIS. Memorandum Of Understanding Among The Animal And Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department Of Agriculture And The Food And Drug Administration U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services And The National Institutes Of Health U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services Concerning Laboratory Animal Welfare. Aphis Agreement 11-6100-0027-Mu; Mou Number 225-06-4000. (2012) http://Grants.Nih.Gov/Grants/Olaw/References/Finalmou.Htm.

  8. Van Sluyters, R.C. A guide to risk assessment in animal care and use programs: the metaphor of the 3-legged stool. ILAR J. 49, 372–378 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reinhardt, V. The attending veterinarian's contract of employment: curse or blessing for animals in research institutions? J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 5, 73–74 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. USDA. USDA Policy Manual (USDA, Beltsville MD, 2011).

  11. USDA APHIS. Animal Care Resource Guide: Animal Care Inspection Guide (USDA, Beltsville, MD, 2001) http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/inspection_guide.shtml.

  12. Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare Guidance on Prompt Reporting to OLAW under the PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Notice NOT-OD-05-034. (National Institutes of Health, Washington, DC, 24 February 2005, updated 15 April 2010).

  13. Federation of Animal Science Societies. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching (FASS, Champaign, IL, 2010). http://fass.org/docs/agguide3rd/Ag_Guide_3rd_ed.pdf.

  14. USDA APHIS AC. Animal Care National Meeting. 19–22 April 2010, Kansas City, MO. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/downloads/meetings/ac_national_meeting_summary.pdf.

  15. Silverman, J. Disagreement between IO and IACUC. Lab Anim. (NY) 41, 63–65 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Dr. Steven Lasley and Dr. Sara Rusch for helpful review and commentary on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Pinson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinson, D. A training primer for Institutional Officials. Lab Anim 41, 198–203 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0712-198

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0712-198

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing