Original Article

Journal of Human Hypertension (2008) 22, 501–508; doi:10.1038/jhh.2008.20; published online 3 April 2008

Disturbed circadian blood pressure rhythm and C-reactive protein in essential hypertension

C Tsioufis1, D Syrseloudis2, K Dimitriadis1, C Thomopoulos1, D Tsiachris1, P Pavlidis2, M Selima1, I Kallikazaros2 and C Stefanadis1

  1. 1First Cardiology Clinic, University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
  2. 2Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece

Correspondence: Dr C Tsioufis, First Cardiology Clinic, University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, 43 Agias Marinas Street, Athens, Melissia 15127, Greece. E-mail: ktsioufis@hippocratio.gr

Received 12 December 2007; Revised 20 February 2008; Accepted 23 February 2008; Published online 3 April 2008.

Top

Abstract

We investigated the effect of the diverse definition criteria of the dipping and non-dipping status on the assessed differences in inflammatory activation between dippers and non-dippers with essential hypertension. 269 consecutive subjects (188 males, aged 50plusminus7 years) with untreated stage I–II essential hypertension underwent ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level determination. The population was classified into dippers and non-dippers based on the three following different definitions: true non-dippers (TND): non-dippers (nocturnal fall of systolic and diastolic BP of <10% of the daytime values, n=95) and dippers (the remaining subjects, n=174); true dippers and true non-dippers (TD–TND): non-dippers (nocturnal fall of systolic and diastolic BP<10% , n=95) and dippers (nocturnal fall of systolic and diastolic BPgreater than or equal to10% , n=75); systolic non-dippers (SND): non-dippers (nocturnal systolic BP fall of <10% of the daytime values, n=145) and dippers (the remaining subjects, n=124). Non-dippers compared to dippers in the TND, TD–TND and SND classification exhibited higher levels of log hs-CRP (by 0.11 mg l- 1, P=0.02; 0.13 mg l- 1, P=0.03 and 0.14 mg l- 1, P=0.02, respectively) and 24 h pulse pressure (PP) (by 4 mm Hg, P=0.006; by 5 mm Hg, P=0.003 and by 5 mm Hg, P<0.0001, respectively). Twenty-four hour PP and nocturnal systolic BP fall were independent predictors of log hs-CRP (P<0.05 for both) in multiple regression analysis. In conclusion, essential hypertensive non-dippers compared to dippers exhibit higher hs-CRP values, irrespective of the dipping status definition. Furthermore, ambulatory PP and nocturnal systolic BP fall interrelate and participate in the inflammatory processes that accompany non-dipping state.

Keywords:

non-dipping status, inflammation, pulse pressure

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

Extra navigation

.

natureproducts


ADVERTISEMENT