Original Article
Journal of Human Hypertension (2008) 22, 501–508; doi:10.1038/jhh.2008.20; published online 3 April 2008
Disturbed circadian blood pressure rhythm and C-reactive protein in essential hypertension
C Tsioufis1, D Syrseloudis2, K Dimitriadis1, C Thomopoulos1, D Tsiachris1, P Pavlidis2, M Selima1, I Kallikazaros2 and C Stefanadis1
- 1First Cardiology Clinic, University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
- 2Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
Correspondence: Dr C Tsioufis, First Cardiology Clinic, University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, 43 Agias Marinas Street, Athens, Melissia 15127, Greece. E-mail: ktsioufis@hippocratio.gr
Received 12 December 2007; Revised 20 February 2008; Accepted 23 February 2008; Published online 3 April 2008.
Abstract
We investigated the effect of the diverse definition criteria of the dipping and non-dipping status on the assessed differences in inflammatory activation between dippers and non-dippers with essential hypertension. 269 consecutive subjects (188 males, aged 50
7 years) with untreated stage I–II essential hypertension underwent ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level determination. The population was classified into dippers and non-dippers based on the three following different definitions: true non-dippers (TND): non-dippers (nocturnal fall of systolic and diastolic BP of <10%
of the daytime values, n=95) and dippers (the remaining subjects, n=174); true dippers and true non-dippers (TD–TND): non-dippers (nocturnal fall of systolic and diastolic BP<10%
, n=95) and dippers (nocturnal fall of systolic and diastolic BP
10%
, n=75); systolic non-dippers (SND): non-dippers (nocturnal systolic BP fall of <10%
of the daytime values, n=145) and dippers (the remaining subjects, n=124). Non-dippers compared to dippers in the TND, TD–TND and SND classification exhibited higher levels of log hs-CRP (by 0.11 mg l-
1, P=0.02; 0.13 mg l-
1, P=0.03 and 0.14 mg l-
1, P=0.02, respectively) and 24 h pulse pressure (PP) (by 4 mm Hg, P=0.006; by 5 mm Hg, P=0.003 and by 5 mm Hg, P<0.0001, respectively). Twenty-four hour PP and nocturnal systolic BP fall were independent predictors of log hs-CRP (P<0.05 for both) in multiple regression analysis. In conclusion, essential hypertensive non-dippers compared to dippers exhibit higher hs-CRP values, irrespective of the dipping status definition. Furthermore, ambulatory PP and nocturnal systolic BP fall interrelate and participate in the inflammatory processes that accompany non-dipping state.
Keywords:
non-dipping status, inflammation, pulse pressure
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
RESEARCH
Disturbed circadian blood pressure rhythm and C-reactive protein in essential hypertension
Journal of Human Hypertension Original Article
Association of blunted nighttime blood pressure dipping with coronary artery stenosis in men
American Journal of Hypertension Brief Communication
Ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure (AMBP) in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism
Journal of Human Hypertension Original Article
Ambulatory heart rate and target organ damage in never-treated essential hypertensives
Journal of Human Hypertension Original Article
