Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

A new immunoassay using monoclonal antibodies HMFG1 and HMFG2 together with an existing marker CA125 for the serological detection and management of epithelial ovarian cancer

Abstract

A new method with a low pH step to dissociate serum complexes has been developed to measure serum levels of antigens associated with ovarian cancer. The antigens are detected by monoclonal antibodies HMFG1 and HMFG2 and have been compared to an existing ovarian cancer associated antigen detected by the antibody CA125. Elevated HMFG1 was found in 56%, and elevated HMFG2 in 65% of 924 sera from 85 patients with ovarian cancer. CA125 was elevated in 85% of these sera. When the three markers were used in conjunction, 95% of sera from patients with ovarian cancer were positive--compared with 7% in sera from healthy control subjects. Therefore, the combination of HMFG1, HMFG2 and CA125 increases the diagnostic accuracy. If all three markers are normal in a patient previously treated for ovarian cancer then no further positive information regarding disease status can be obtained by ultrasound and CT scanning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhokia, B., Canney, P., Pectasides, D. et al. A new immunoassay using monoclonal antibodies HMFG1 and HMFG2 together with an existing marker CA125 for the serological detection and management of epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 54, 891–895 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1986.258

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1986.258

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links