Introduction

The Indian summer monsoon (ISM), as part of the large-scale Asian monsoon (AM) circulation system, transports large amounts of heat and moisture across the equator from the Indian Ocean to South Asia and as far deep as eastern China1. To date, significant debates exist with respect to identifying the primary drivers of the ISM variability on millennial1,2,3 to orbital4,5,6 timescales due, in large part, to uncertainties in reconstructing the different physical aspects of monsoon-related variability with various proxies. In the last few decades, results from many climate model simulations indicate that orbital-scale variations in AM strength vary nearly in-phase with changes in precession-dominated NHSI7,8,9,10,11. These results are supported by speleothem δ18O records from southeastern China, which place the East Asian monsoon (EAM) variability nearly in-phase at precession bands with July NHSI when the modern Asian summer monsoon intensity reaches its peak1,12,13 (Fig. 1). Together, these studies support the notion that the global monsoon variability, including the AM, is driven effectively by the land-sea temperature contrast, which in turn, respond sensitively to insolation change. On the other hand, however, numerous proxy records from the Arabian Sea indicate large discrepancies (~8 to 10 ka [thousand years]) between phase estimates of precession-induced changes in NHSI and ISM variability, the latter inferred mainly from reconstructions of wind strength and depth of the oxygen minimum zone14,15. This lag has been attributed to the cross-equatorial latent heat transport from the southern Indian Ocean, which acts in conjunction with the global ice volume and NHSI, in regulating the ISM variability on orbital timescales14,15.

Figure 1
figure 1

Comparison of ISM and EAM records over the past 280 ka.

(A) Simulated average summer (June–August) precipitation rate in the ISM region using a fully coupled global ocean–atmosphere model (FOAM)11. (B) Xiaobailong and Tianmen (grey) records, China26,27 in the transition area between ISM and EAM domains. The ISM record (this study) and composite EAM record25 are shown in red (C) and blue (D), respectively. (E) The atmospheric δ18O record from Antarctic ice-core EDC39 is plotted for comparison. The grey curves represent July 21 insolation at 65°N40. Vertical dashed lines depict correlations of abrupt ISM and EAM shifts. Yellow bars indicate glacial terminations I to III. Grey shadings depict interglacial time periods. Hiatuses occurred mainly during interglacial when NHSI was high. Both ISM and EAM show broadly similar orbital to millennial scale variations, but the ISM record has a larger amplitude. The two monsoon records are similar to the simulation result and follow NHSI broadly on the orbital scale. It is notable that the Xiaobailong record shows much larger glacial-interglacial changes than the Bittoo record.

To reconcile the contrasting phase estimates, it has been argued that the δ18O signatures in the Chinese speleothem records reflect seasonality in the amount and δ18O of precipitation, derived from different moisture sources with distinct δ18O signatures4. Furthermore, by deconvoluting seasonal components of speleothem δ18O records, it has been suggested that the summer component of the δ18O records (i.e., contributed by rainfall δ18O originated from the ISM) lags NHSI by ~8 ka at precession bands and is thus in phase with the Arabian Sea records4,15. Additionally, a number of studies indicate that upstream changes in δ18O of precipitation (δ18Op) in the ISM domain (rather than local precipitation variability) drive summertime δ18Op variations in southeastern China4,16. Hitherto, it has not been possible to test these hypotheses due to the absence of a summertime δ18Op record from the typical ISM domain, which can be independently used to estimate the phasing of ISM δ18Op changes relative to NHSI1.

Changes in Southern Hemisphere (SH) high-latitude temperature have also been proposed to influence the ISM variability over orbital and millennial timescales14. Reconstruction of Pleistocene ISM variability from lake sediments in Heqing basin, southern China suggests that the ISM minimum predated the global ice volume maximum by ~14–35 ka5 and its subsequent recovery occurred in the context of SH high-latitude cooling. These observations imply that cooler SH temperatures produce stronger ISM by enhancing the cross-equatorial atmospheric pressure gradient5, which appears to be in contrast to the idea that warmer SH temperatures promote the cross-equatorial latent-heat/moisture transport, producing stronger ISM14. Additionally, on the basis of comparisons between AM variability mainly from the low-resolution Hulu δ18O record17 and Antarctic temperature changes during the glacial period2,3, it has been suggested that SH climate processes dominate the millennial AM variability. However, such comparisons remain tentative because, besides complex precipitation seasonality4, the overall δ18O signal in Chinese speleothems is relatively small on the millennial timescale and thus possibly compromised by relatively large local signals or noises in their detail structures1. In addition, a recent improved high-resolution Hulu record indeed characterized the AM with more abrupt millennial events18 than the previous low-resolution data17.

In order to address the aforementioned fundamental issues, we developed a long (~280 ka, covering last three glacial-interglacial cycles) speleothem δ18O record of the ISM variability19 from Bittoo cave in North India (30°47′25″N, 77°46′35″E, ~3000 m.a.s.l.). The cave is located on the fringe of the ISM domain (Supplementary Fig. 1) with ~80% of annual precipitation (~1600 mm) falling during the summer (June to September). Peak summer rainfall in the study area occurs when a strong southeasterly flow develops over the central northern India, serving as a primary conduit for moisture from the Bay of Bengal towards the northwest and northcentral India20 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Our analyses of δ18Op and low-level monsoon wind trajectory patterns suggest that δ18Op variability in the study area results from large-scale upstream changes in monsoon circulation and moisture transport history19. These observations agree well with results from model simulations, which show that the δ18Op variability in the region is inversely correlated with the ISM intensity on both millennial16 and orbital8,9,21 timescales.

The Northern Indian record is a composite of seven stalagmite δ18O records based on 167 230Th dates and ~6100 δ18O measurements with an average temporal resolution of 50–100 years (Supplementary Figs 2–4, Tables 1 and 2). A strong degree of replication among various speleothem δ18O profiles (Supplementary Figs 3 and 4) suggests near-equilibrium growth of stalagmite calcite1. The record is characterized by abrupt excursions to extremely low δ18O values at rising limbs of NHSI (e.g., at ~109, ~191 and ~243 ka BP [before present, present = 1950 AD]), followed by hiatuses that coincide with intervals of high NHSI during interglacial periods (Fig. 1). In contrast, speleothem growth during the glacial times is continuous and extensive. One plausible explanation to account for initial jumps to extremely low δ18O values and subsequent hiatuses during high NHSI periods might involve a marked and abrupt intensification of ISM with depleted δ18O signatures. Additionally, stronger rainfall during the interglacial periods in the region may have either lead to undersaturation of Ca+2 in dripwater or flooding in Bitto cave, resulting in cessation of speleothem growth. Interestingly, we have also observed a similar pattern of speleothem growth/hiatuses from Hulu cave in China, which share broad geomorphologic similarities with Bittoo Cave (Supplementary Fig. 4).

The Northern Indian δ18O record is characterized by a large δ18O range (−2 to −12%). Although discontinuous in time, it broadly follows NHSI over the last 280 ka. The δ18O record is punctuated by numerous millennial-scale events (namely, the Indian Stadials/Interstadials), which correlate to their counterparts in Greenland22 and Chinese speleothem records13,23 (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 5). The magnitude of the positive excursions in our record (~5% for Heinrich, Dansgaard/Oeschger (D/O) and Younger Dryas (YD) events) is more than twice larger than those observed in the Chinese δ18O records. Nearly all stadials and periods of low NHSI in our record are characterized by a similarly high δ18O value (ca. −4%), which suggests near-cessation of 18O depleted ISM rainfall possibly due to the peripheral location of the study area within the ISM domain (Supplementary Fig. 1). This scenario is consistent with model simulations16,24 and modern meteorological observations19 over the area.

Figure 2
figure 2

Comparison of climate events in ISM and EAM records over the last 140 ka.

Left panel: (A) and (B) are dust41 and temperature30 records from Antarctic ice-core EDC, respectively. (C) Northern India δ18O record. (D) EAM δ18O record25. (E) Greenland NGRIP ice-core δ18O record22. Vertical grey bars indicate weak ISM events and their correlations to weak EAM events, cold events in Greenland and higher temperature and less dust loading in Antarctica. The yellow bar shows glacial termination T-II. Numbers depict the Indian (C), Chinese (D) and Greenland (E) Interstadials, respectively. These millennial-scale variations are synchronous within age uncertainties. Light-green shading marks the last glacial period. The synchronicities of MIS 3 and MIS 5e between the ISM and EAM demonstrate the in-phase variability of the two monsoon systems on the orbital timescale. Right panel: (A) Antarctic ice core EDML δ18O record42. The δ18O scale is reversed as compared with speleothem records. (B,C) ISM records from Bittoo cave stalagmites BT-2 (red) and BT-1 (orange). Error bars depict typical 230Th dating errors (2σ). (D) EAM record from Chinese speleothem records (Wulu record in black31 and Hulu record in purple25). (E) The central Europe temperature variation inferred from speleothem records32. (F) Greenland NGRIP δ18O ice-core record22. The striking similarity/difference of the ISM variability with/from Greenland/Antarctic records implies a dominant NH rather than SH control on ISM dynamics.

The Northern Indian and Chinese speleothem records25 share broad similarities (r = ~0.39, p < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 6). Both records exhibit the similar structure of the YD, D/O and Heinrich events and particularly the distinct peak around 18 ka BP, which is neither observed in Greenland nor Antarctic ice cores (Fig. 2). It is also evident that the Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 5e and well-dated MIS 3 portions in the Northern Indian record show no visible phase difference to NHSI or to its counterparts in EAM records12,13 (Fig. 2), suggesting nearly in-phase variability at precession bands. Although the Bittoo Cave record encompasses several hiatuses, making a robust statistical analysis difficult, the above observations indeed provide a strong test of the ISM precession variability, as the issue we addressed here is really an 8–10 ka lag versus nearly in-phase (to July NHSI) change on precession scale. In other words, since the MIS 5e and 3 are typical interglacial and glacial periods respectively, the in-phase relation of the ISM with NHSI during these two time periods precludes another relation along with a significant temporal lag, unless the phase relation is completely nonstationary across both interglacial and glacial periods, which however lacks a support of physical mechanism. Our data, together with other fragmentary ISM speleothem records (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 7) and EAM records1,9,12,13,26, support the view that speleothem δ18O (or δ18Op) variations are broadly in-phase between the two monsoon subsystems on both orbital and millennial timescales, although seasonal precipitation patterns differ depending on location in this vast monsoon region1. Additionally, a recent Chinese speleothem δ18O record from Xiaobailong cave from a transitional area between ISM and EAM domains20 displays a much larger glacial-interglacial amplitude (e.g., ~4% between MIS 3 and 5)27 than both our Northern Indian record and other Chinese speleothem records (~2% or less between MIS 3 and 5). However, the Xiaobailong record also demonstrates generally similar patterns and same timings in comparison with our Northern Indian record (r = 0.57, p < 0.001) (Supplementary Figs 2 and 6) and Chinese EAM records27 on both precession and millennial scales.

The covariance between ISM and EAM speleothem δ18O records is consistent with model simulations7,8,9,10,11,16,24. Additionally, previous studies have demonstrated a strong link between the EAM δ18Op and atmospheric δ18O (δ18Oatm), possibly through leaf water δ18O change28. A broad similarity is also observed between the Northern India δ18O record and δ18Oatm records (Fig. 1). If the AM exerts major control on δ18Oatm variations28, one would expect an approximate in-phase, rather than out-of-phase (or anti-phase) relationship between the ISM and EAM at precession bands. In the latter case, the overall AM influence on δ18Oatm will be largely canceled1 and thus, the striking similarity observed among the EAM, ISM and δ18Oatm records (Fig. 1) will be difficult to reconcile. Our finding thus further supports the hypothesis7 that low-latitude monsoon response to insolation shows no significant lag (Supplementary Figs 8–10).

The Northern Indian record provides a critical test on hypotheses concerning the role of cross-equatorial latent heat transport and the pressure gradient in pacing orbital-scale ISM variability. It has been hypothesized that a warmer southern Indian Ocean during boreal summer could provide significantly more latent heat to South Asia and thus intensifies the ISM with a temporal pattern that should be significantly out of phase with NHSI on the precessional timescale. This is because a warm southern Indian Ocean presumably lags high NHSI by nearly half a precession cycle (~10 ka)6,14. On the other hand, the Lake Heqing sediment record from southern China suggests that an overall cooler austral ocean and/or Antarctica strengthen the ISM via enhanced cross-equatorial pressure gradient. The Heqing record, however, lacks data from the last glacial period, which is critical for testing the SH role on the AM. Similar to the EAM speleothem records12,13, the Northern Indian record shows an ISM intensification after Heinrich event 6 (H6) at ~60 ka BP, which is approximately 40 ka prior to the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (Fig. 3), consistent with similar events observed in the Heqing record in previous glaciations5. In contrast, the sea-surface temperature records from the southern Indian Ocean29 and Antarctic ice cores30 indicate that the SH high latitudes underwent slight and gradual warming ~60 ka BP (Fig. 3). Another notable early ISM and EAM rise during the last glacial occurred at ~22 ka BP, ~2.5 ka prior to the LGM and ~3 ka after the Antarctic minimum temperature at ~25 ka BP30. However, these two early monsoon enhancements during the last glacial period coincide well with rising NHSI (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Early ISM increases prior to the LGM during the last glacial period.

(A) Benthic stack δ18O record43. (B) North India record (red) and July 21 insolation 65°N40 (grey curve). (C) EAM record25 (blue) and July 21 insolation 65°N40 (grey curve). (D) Antarctic temperature record from ice core EDC30 (brown) and southern Indian Ocean SST29 (purple). The vertical grey bars depict Heinrich events 1 and 6. Arrow-I marks the abrupt shift of both ISM and EAM at ~60 ka BP when Antarctic temperature reached a maximum about 40 ka prior to the LGM. Arrow-II depicts the ISM and EAM decline concurrently with temperature decreases of both Antarctica and southern Indian Ocean (arrow in D) rather than their temperature increases. Arrow-III indicates another early ISM and EAM rise at ~22 ka BP, about 2.5 ka prior to the LGM and about 3 ka after Antarctic temperature reached the minimum at ~25 ka BP. Both early monsoon rises appear to have coincided with NHSI rise rather than with an Antarctic temperature cooling (D), thus providing an alternative explanation.

The millennial events in our record have larger amplitudes than their Chinese counterparts, which allow a robust assessment of whether the ISM variability is dominantly controlled by NH or SH high-latitude climate forcing (Fig. 2). In particular, the two events corresponding to Greenland events 15a and 15b around 55 ka BP22 manifest clearly in our records (replicated in two different δ18O profiles) as well in the EAM31 and central European temperature32 records (Fig. 2). In contrast, the temperature over Antarctica shows a low-amplitude warming trend from 56 to 54 ka BP. This scenario, particularly the same pattern of Bittoo and the northern Alps records33 (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 7), is consistent with a major NH role in causing these abrupt changes in monsoon systems34. Furthermore, Indian stadials (interstadials) in our record are associated with increasing (decreasing) Antarctic temperatures and decreasing (increasing) dust loadings, thus manifesting a typical ‘bipolar seesaw’ pattern35. This interhemispheric pattern is incompatible with the hypothesis that temperature changes at high SH latitudes drive variations in the AM and or ISM. It is, however, plausible that monsoon changes in tropical-subtropical regions may themselves be an integral part of the ‘bipolar seesaw’ mechanism; and if so, millennial-scale Antarctic temperature changes could be alternatively viewed to be a result of low latitude monsoon changes, rather than a direct cause of it1. Indeed, the Antarctic temperature change is typically small and gradual on millennial-scale and hitherto needs a physical mechanism or an amplifier in order to explain how it dominantly drives the AM variability with a larger and more abrupt nature (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 7). The similarity between Antarctic temperature and AM δ18O records3 is most likely a manifestation of their responses to the same forcing: oceanic reorganization, such as sea surface temperature (SST), triggered by changes in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation34, rather than a direct causal link of one to the other1.

The Northern Indian record provides critical information with respect to understanding the ISM dynamics on orbital-millennial timescales. Our data reveal that at precession bands ISM variability is virtually in-phase with July NHSI and the EAM as well. While an intrinsic SH impact on the ISM is plausible via changes in cross-equatorial latent-heat/moisture transport and high-latitude temperatures, our analysis of Northern Indian and EAM, NHSI, Greenland temperature, global ice volume and temperature records from the southern Indian Ocean and Antarctica, suggests that the ISM variability is dominated on orbital to millennial scales by NH climate processes.

Methods

230Th dating method

The 230Th dating work was performed at two laboratories, the Isotope Laboratory at Xi’an Jiaotong University and the Minnesota Isotope Laboratory, University of Minnesota, using Thermo-Finnigan Neptune/Neptune plus multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers (MC-ICP-MS). The methods are identical in both laboratories. We use standard chemistry procedures to separate uranium and thorium for dating36. A triple-spike (229Th–233U–236U) isotope dilution method was employed to correct for instrumental fractionation and determine U/Th isotopic ratios and concentrations. The instrumentation, standardization and half-lives are reported in refs 37 and 38. All U/Th isotopes were measured on a MasCom multiplier behind the retarding potential quadrupole in the peak-jumping mode. We followed similar procedures of characterizing the multiplier as described in ref. 37. Uncertainties in U/Th isotopic data were calculated offline at 2σ level, including corrections for blanks, multiplier dark noise, abundance sensitivity and contents of the same nuclides in spike solution. Corrected 230Th ages assume the initial 230Th/232Th atomic ratio of 4.4 ± 2.2 × 10−6, the values for a material at secular equilibrium with the bulk earth 232Th/238U value of 3.8. The method and U decay constants are reported in ref. 38. We obtained 167 230Th dates (Supplementary Table 1). Age models for all stalagmites were established using the StalAge program (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Stable isotope measurements

The oxygen isotopic composition of stalagmite samples was analyzed at four laboratories, Universität Innsbruck, Austria; Nanjing Normal University, China; State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Isotope Laboratory, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China. A total of ~6100 samples were analyzed using an online carbonate preparation system (Gasbench II) interfaced with an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Deltaplus XL) or a Finnigan MAT-253 mass spectrometer with an on-line carbonate preparation system (Kiel-III or Kiel-IV). Results are reported in per mil (%), relative to the Vienna PeeDee Belemnite (VPDB) standard. Duplicate measurements of NBS19 and TTB1 standards show a long-term reproducibility of ~0.1% (1σ). All δ18O data are listed in Supplementary Table S2.

Statistics Analysis

The correlation coefficients between speleothem δ18O records are obtained using the bootstrap resampling method. The composite EAM25 and Xiaobailong27 records are recalculated based on linear interpolation in order to compare with our North India records on a common timescale. The sample size of each resampling is 500 and the total resampling performed is 2000. The results of statistics analyses are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kathayat, G. et al. Indian monsoon variability on millennial-orbital timescales. Sci. Rep. 6, 24374; doi: 10.1038/srep24374 (2016).