Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Scientists behaving badly

To protect the integrity of science, we must look beyond falsification, fabrication and plagiarism, to a wider range of questionable research practices, argue Brian C. Martinson, Melissa S. Anderson and Raymond de Vries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. OSTP Federal Policy on Research Misconduct http://www.ostp.gov/html/001207_3.html (2005).

  2. Teitelbaum, S. L. Nature 420, 739–740 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Korn, D. Nature 420, 739 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman, R., Weinstein, E., Marincola, E., Rosenbaum, J. & Solomon, F. Science 294, 2293–2294 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1992).

  6. Steneck, N. H. ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Swazey, J. M., Anderson, M. S. & Louis, K. S. Am. Sci. 81, 542–553 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ranstam, J. et al. Control Clin. Trials 21, 415–427 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Geggie, D. J. Med. Ethics 27, 344–346 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Asch, D. A., Jedrziewski, M. K. & Christakis, N. A. J. Clin Epidemiol. 50, 1129–1136 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1995).

  12. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 1993).

  13. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct (Natl Acad., Washington DC, 2002).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Research on Research Integrity Program, an ORI/NIH collaboration, with financial support from the National Institute of Nursing Research and an NIH Mentored Research Scientist Award to R.d.V. We thank the three anonymous reviewers, Nick N. Steneck and M. Sheetz for their insightful input and responses to earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martinson, B., Anderson, M. & de Vries, R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435, 737–738 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing