Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Transition from haploidy to diploidy

Abstract

As a direct consequence of sex, organisms undergo a haploid and a diploid stage during their life cycle. Although the relative duration of haploid and diploid phases varies greatly among taxa, the diploid phase is more conspicuous in all higher organisms. Therefore it is widely believed that diploidy offers more evoutionary possibilities1–3 and is thus nearly always selected for. We have now performed computer simulations to investigate one possible advantage of diploidy, that is, protection against the expression of deleterious mutations. Instead of comparing isolated haploid and diploid populations, we considered interbreeding haploids and diploids. Diploids invaded the population only when the dominance degree of a single deleterious mutation was smaller than about 1/2, and the condition allowing diploidy to invade depended on how harmful the mutation was.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stebbins, G. L. Variation and Evolution in Plants (Columbia University Press, New York, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maynard Smith, J. The Evolution of Sex (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein, H., Byerly, H. C. & Michod, R. E. Am. Nat. 117, 537–549 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. Am. Nat. 99, 439–450 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory (Harper & Row, New York, 1970).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kondrashov, A. S. & Crow, J. F. Nature 351, 314–315 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher, R. A. Am. Nat. 62, 115–126 (1928).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright, S. Am. Nat. 68, 25–53 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Charlesworth, B. Nature 278, 848–849 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kacser, H. & Burns, J. A. Genetics 97, 639–666 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis, J. & Wolpert, L. J. theor. Biol. 78, 425–438 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paquin, C. & Adams, J. Nature 302, 495–500 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haldane, J. B. S. Am. Nat. 71, 337–349 (1937).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kimura, M. Jap. J. Genet. Suppl. 36, 179–190 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perrot, V., Richerd, S. & Valéro, M. Transition from haploidy to diploidy. Nature 351, 315–317 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/351315a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/351315a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing