Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics

Abstract

Female mate choice is central to the theory of sexual selection1, but much of the evidence for the basis of this choice is inconclusive2–4. First, non-random mating may occur because of male-male competition3; and second, even if females can be shown to be choosing mates it is often difficult to tell exactly on what criteria they are choosing. Possible criteria include male genes5–10, parental ability3 and quality of the resources held by males11,12, but in the wild these factors are often interdependent3. Here we report a field experiment with pied flycatchers that eliminates the correlation between male characteristics and territory quality. We find that age, size, plumage colour and song repertoire of males are all uninfluential in female choice, and that territory quality is the single most important criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (Murray, London, 1871).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Halliday, T. R. in Behavioural Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 180–213 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Halliday, T. R. in Mate Choice (ed. Bateson, P.) 3–32 (Cambridge University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Partridge, L. in Mate Choice (ed. Bateson, P.) 227–255 (Cambridge University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zahavi, A. J. theor. Biol 53, 205–214 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. O'Donald, P. Genetic Models of Sexual Selection (Cambridge University Press, 1980).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lande, R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 3721–3725 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersson, M. J. Linn, Soc. 17, 375–393 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. Science 218, 384–387 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkpatrik, M. Evolution 36, 1–12 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davies, N. B. in Behavioural Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 317–350 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Askenmo, C. E. H. Anim. Behav. 32, 972–980 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alatalo, R. V., Carlson, A., Lundberg, A. & Ulfstrand, S. Am. Nat. 117, 738–753 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A. & Ståhlbrandt, K. Anim. Behav. 30, 585–593 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A. & Ståhlbrandt, K. Behav. EcoL Sociobiol 14, 253–261 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brooke, M. de L. J. Anim. EcoL 48 21–32 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. von Haartman, L. Ibis 98, 460–475 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alatalo, R. V., Gustafsson, L. & Lundberg, A. Am. Nat. 127, 241–245 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nilsson, S. G. Ibis 126, 407–410 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A. & Ulfstrand, S. in Habitat Selection in Birds (ed. Cody, M. L.) 59–83 (Academic, Orlando, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alatalo, R., Lundberg, A. & Glynn, C. Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323, 152–153 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/323152a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/323152a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing