Abstract
The highly potent and selective 5-HT6 receptor antagonist SB-271046 [5-chloro-N-(4-methoxy-3-piperazin-1-yl-phenyl)-3-methyl-2-benzothiophenesulfonamide] has previously been demonstrated to improve retention significantly in a spatial water maze paradigm in adult rats. However, SB-271046 did not have any effect on task acquisition. As these apparently contradictory findings may be reconciled by a prime influence of SB-271046 on memory consolidation, the ability of this compound to reverse the discrete temporal action of a cholinergic antagonist in the 6-h period following passive avoidance training was investigated. SB-271046, given orally, by gavage, 30 min prior to training Wistar rats in a step-through, light–dark passive avoidance task, was found to reverse significantly the amnesia produced by administering scopolamine (0.8 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) in the 6-h post-training period. The effect was dose-dependent over a range of 3–20 mg/kg. Further, we investigated the cognition-enhancing effects of chronic SB-271046 administration (10 or 20 mg/kg/day; 40 days) on the acquisition and consolidation of a water maze spatial learning task in a population of 20-month-old Wistar rats with age-related learning deficits. Drug treatment progressively and significantly decreased platform swim angle and escape latencies over the five sequential trials on four consecutive daily sessions compared to vehicle-treated controls. SB-271046 also improved task recall as measured by significant increases in the searching of the target quadrant on post-training days 1 and 3, when the animals would have been substantially drug-free. This significant improvement of task recall suggests SB-271046, in addition to inducing symptomatic cognition-enhancing actions, also attenuates age-related decline in neural function.
Similar content being viewed by others
INTRODUCTION
Serotonin receptors of the 5-HT6 subclass belong to the family of G protein-coupled receptors that positively influence adenylate cyclase (Monsma et al, 1993; Ruat et al, 1993). These receptors are mainly found in the central nervous system and ultrastructural studies suggest that they mediate a postsynaptic, rather than autoreceptor, role (Gérard et al, 1997; Hamon et al, 1999).
Recently, selective antagonists of the 5-HT6 receptor have become available. The first reported 5-HT6 receptor antagonists were Ro-04-6790 [4-amino-N-(2,6 bis-methylamino-pyrimidin-4-yl)-benzene sulfonamide] and Ro-63-0563 [4-amino-N-(2,6 bis-methylamino-pyridin-4-yl)-benzene sulfonamide] (Sleight et al, 1998). These were followed by the potent and highly selective 5-HT6 antagonists SB-271046 [5-chloro-N-(4-methoxy-3-piperazin-1-yl-phenyl)-3-methyl-2-benzothiophenesulfonamide], SB-357134 [N-(2,5-Dibromo-3-fluorophenyl)-4-methoxy-3-piperazin-1-ylbenzenesulfonamide] (Bromidge et al, 1999, 2001; Routledge et al, 2000; Stean et al, 2002), and the radioligand [125I]SB-258585 [5-iodo-N-[4-methoxy-3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl-phenyl]benzenesulfonamide] (Hirst et al, 2000).
Early studies with Ro-04-6790 demonstrated an increase in the stretching behavior (Bentley et al, 1999) and reversal of scopolamine-induced rotation in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats (Bourson et al, 1998). These observations suggested that 5-HT6 receptors mediate a tonic inhibition of cholinergic neurons and that 5-HT6 receptor antagonists may play a role in the treatment of learning and memory disorders (Reavill and Rogers, 2001). However, microdialysis studies have shown that SB-271046 modulates excitatory amino-acid neurotransmission (Dawson et al, 2000, 2001), which may also contribute to this receptor's role in cognition.
5-HT6 receptor antagonism alone appears to have positive effects on cognitive processes in rodents. In the Morris water maze task, 5-HT6 receptor antagonism with Ro-04-6790, SB-357134, and SB-271046 significantly improved task retention, but had little effect on task acquisition (Rogers and Hagan, 2001; Woolley et al, 2001). Furthermore, 5-HT6 receptor antagonists have been demonstrated to reverse learning deficits induced by cholinergic antagonists. For example, 5-HT6 receptor antagonist Ro-04-6790 reverses scopolamine-induced deficits in avoidance conditioning and autoshaping tasks (Meneses, 2001; Bös et al, 2001). These data suggest the cognition-enhancing properties of 5-HT6 receptor antagonists to be predominantly exerted in the post-training period of memory consolidation.
The cognitive deficits associated with normal aging correlate strongly with a significant decline in the cholinergic neurotransmission system, particularly in Alzheimer's patients (Coyle et al, 1983; Perry et al, 1992; Whitehouse et al, 1982). Since SB-271046 had been demonstrated to improve recall, but not acquisition, of a spatial learning task in normal animals and to prevent scopolamine-induced amnesia in mature animals, the current study investigated its influence on the cholinergic mechanisms of memory consolidation and age-related memory deficits. The ability of SB-271046 to reverse scopolamine disruption of a discrete temporal involvement of a cholinergic mechanism in the post-training period of avoidance conditioning (Doyle and Regan, 1993) was employed to investigate its influence on memory consolidation. Secondly, a water maze spatial learning paradigm, in which age-related cognitive deficits in rodents have been best characterized (Gage et al, 1984; Rapp et al, 1987; Gallagher and Pelleymounter, 1988; van der Staay and de Jonge, 1993), was employed to determine the cognition-enhancing potency of SB-271046 in aged animals.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Animal Maintenance
Experimentally naïve male Wistar rats were employed in all studies. The animals were purpose bred at the Biomedical Facility, University College Dublin, and maintained in standard laboratory conditions until the time of experimental use at either 80 days or 20 months old. Animals were introduced to the experimental holding rooms at least 3 days prior to the commencement of any study, housed individually during this period, and maintained at 22–24°C on a standard 12 h light/dark cycle, with food and water available ad libitum. All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of University College, Dublin, and were carried out by individuals who held the appropriate license issued by the Department of Health.
Drug Administration
SB-271046 was administered orally, by gavage, in 1% methylcellulose solution. All animals were examined and weighed daily. For acute studies, postnatal day 80 animals were administered a single dose of SB-271046 at 1, 3, 10, or 20 mg/kg 30 min prior to training in the passive avoidance paradigm (n=6 or 7). In the chronic studies, animals were treated once daily for 40 days with SB-271046 at a concentration of 10 or 20 mg/kg (n=6 or 7). Drug treatment ceased 24 h prior to the first training session in the water maze paradigm. In all cases, the drug was administered by gavage and vehicle-treated controls were employed for comparison.
Passive Avoidance Conditioning
Behavioral assessment
In this protocol, postnatal day 80 animals were introduced to the training environment 5 days prior to training, and individually housed according to standard conditions. Animals were left to habituate to the environment for days 1–3 with no handling; on days 4 and 5 animals were handled, their weight monitored and spontaneous behavior was assessed in an open-field apparatus for 5 min. The open-field apparatus consisted of black-painted wood 620 mm2 with walls 150 mm high. The white-painted floor of the apparatus was ruled from side to side, dividing it into a series of boxes 77 × 77 mm2. Locomotor activity was measured as the number of lines crossed in 300 s. Other behaviors assessed were rearing, grooming, piloerection, defecation, and posture. These behavioral assessments were carried out to monitor the possible unexpected drug effects confounding their behavior.
Apparatus
Animals were trained in a single-trial, step-through, light–dark passive avoidance paradigm. The training apparatus consisted of a chamber 300 mm in length, 260 mm wide, and 270 mm in height, constructed to established designs. The front and top were transparent, allowing the experimenter to observe the behavior of the animal inside the apparatus. The chamber was divided into two compartments, separated by a central shutter that contained a small opening 50 mm wide and 75 mm high set close to the front of the chamber. The smaller of the compartments measured 9 mm in width and contained a low-power (6 V) illumination source. The larger compartment measured 210 mm in width and was not illuminated. The floor of this dark compartment consisted of a grid of 16 horizontal stainless-steel bars that were 5 mm in diameter and spaced 12.5 mm apart. A current generator supplied 0.75 mA to the grid floor, which was scrambled once every 0.5 s across the 16 bars. A resistance range of 40–60 mΩ was calculated for a control group of rats (250–350 g), and the apparatus was calibrated accordingly. An electronic circuit detecting the resistance of the animal ensured an accurate current delivery by automatic variation of the voltage with change in resistance.
Training protocol
This was carried out as described previously (Fox et al, 1995). On the day of training, animals were placed facing the rear of the light compartment of the apparatus, immediately after spontaneous behavior was assessed. The timer was started once the animal has completely turned to face the front of the chamber. Latency to enter the dark chamber was recorded (usually <20 s), and having completely entered the dark compartment foot shock was administered to the animal, which immediately returned to the light compartment. Animals were then returned to their home cages. Between each training session, both compartments of the chamber were cleaned to remove any confounding olfactory cues. Recall of this inhibitory stimulus was evaluated 24 h post-training by returning the animal into the light chamber and recording their latency to enter the dark chamber, a criterion time of 600 s was employed. Animals were rendered amnesic by the intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of scopolamine (0.8 mg/kg, i.p.) at the 6 h post-training time point. The ability of SB-271046 to reverse this scopolamine-induced amnesia was determined by its acute administration at doses of 1, 3, 10, or 20 mg/kg given 30 min prior to passive avoidance training.
Water Maze Spatial Learning Paradigm
Behavioral assessment
Aged animals (20 months), previously administered SB-271046 for a period of 40 days, were introduced to the training environment and assessed for spontaneous behavior as described above.
Apparatus
The water maze apparatus consisted of a circular pool (1 m diameter, 80 cm high) constructed in black Perspex from established designs. The temperature was maintained at 26°C by a heating element, which was covered by a false bottom, and a pump was used to circulate the water. A platform (11 cm diameter) constructed from black Perspex was submerged 1.5 cm below the water surface. During training, the platform was hidden in one quadrant of the maze 30 cm from the sidewall. The black Perspex used in the construction of the maze and platform offered no intramaze cues to guide escape behavior. By contrast, the training room offered several strong extramaze visual cues to aid the formation of the spatial map necessary for escape learning. An automated tracking system, ‘Water maze 3.1’, was employed. This program analyzes video images acquired via a digital camera and an image acquisition board that determined path length, swim speed, angle of direction (defined as the angle between the initial direction of swim and the endpoint platform), and the number of entries and duration of swim time spent in each quadrant of the water maze.
Training
The standard protocol employed to evaluate spatial learning ability in aged animals has been described previously (Murphy et al, 1996). Each trial started with the rat placed facing the wall of the maze at one of three designated locations. The rat was allowed to explore the maze and the time taken to find the hidden platform, within a 60 s criterion period, was defined as the escape latency time. On the first trial, rats failing to locate the platform within the 60 s period were placed on it for 10 s. In subsequent trials, animals failing to locate the platform were not shown it again. Escape latencies were measured over five trials with an intertrial rest interval of 300 s. Animals were trained in daily sessions over 4 days. Recall of platform position was assessed by a probe test, at 1 and 3 days following the final training session, in which the platform was removed and animals were allowed to explore the maze for 60 s. The time spent in each quadrant was recorded and used to compare recall of the platform position by each treatment group.
Data Analysis
Data from the passive avoidance studies were analyzed by ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. Water maze behavioral parameters were monitored using Watermaze 3.1, a Labview® executable image motion analyzer written by Matthias Grossmann (Dresden, Germany). This was linked to a CCD camera via an image acquisition card (IMAQ-1408, National Instruments Co., UK). All data were calculated and graphed as mean±SEM for all trials of all sessions and the presence of significant difference between treatments was determined by repeat measures ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni or Mann–Whitney U-test analysis of this data set. In all cases, values of p<0.05 were deemed to be significant.
RESULTS
Acute Administration of SB-271046 Reverses Scopolamine-Induced Amnesia of a Passive Avoidance Paradigm in Mature Rats
In comparison to vehicle-treated control animals, scopolamine was effective at rendering animals amnesic, as its administration at the 6 h post-training time point significantly reduced the recall latency tested at 24 h post-training (p<0.01, Bonferroni post hoc analysis). SB-271046 reversed this scopolamine-induced amnesia in a dose-dependent manner, with significant effects observed after administration of 3, 10, and 20 mg/kg. Analysis of 24 h recall latencies revealed a protective effect against scopolamine-induced amnesia following pretraining administration of SB-271046 (Figure 1; F[3,25]=3.37, p=0.037).
Aged Rats Exhibit Spatial Learning Deficits in the Water Maze Paradigm
Across the 20 training trials in the water maze, both mature and aged animals progressively decreased their escape latencies over the sequential trials and sessions (F[19,240]=2.52; p=0.0007). Analysis of spatial learning behavior in the water maze showed significant differences between mature animals treated chronically with methylcellulose vehicle and similarly treated aged counterparts. As judged by their latency time to reach the platform, aged animals displayed a clear deficit in the acquisition of platform location compared with mature animals (Figure 2a and Table 1). The age-related acquisition deficit was found to be highly significant across all sessions (two-way ANOVA; F[1,240]=21.48; p<0.0001), with post hoc analysis revealing specific divergence on the first, third, and fourth days of training (p<0.05).
Analysis of a second behavioral measure, angle of swim, offered further evidence of this age-dependent spatial learning deficit. The angle of swim parameter measures the initial heading of the animal from the starting position in relation to a direct line to the platform location. As such, this parameter is a measure of the accuracy of the search strategy employed by the animal in solving the task. Initial acquisition, as judged by performance on the final trial of the first session, suggested mature and aged animals to be equivalent in their performance (Figure 2b). However, the swim angle of mature animals reduced significantly over the training sessions, while that of the aged animals did not show marked improvement in the search strategy employed (Figure 2b and c; F[1,47]=6.25, p=0.016). This difference in water maze learning became significant at the end of the fourth training session (p<0.05, Bonferroni post hoc analysis). These data reveal marked deficits in the learning ability of aged animals.
Chronic Administration of SB-271046 Enhances Spatial Learning in Aged Animals
Chronic treatment of aged animals with SB-271046 significantly reduced escape latencies in the water maze task (Figure 3a and Table 1). At a dose of 20 mg/kg SB-271046, the time required to locate the platform was significantly reduced by the final trial of the first session, as compared to the methylcellulose controls (Figure 3a). Task acquisition was also improved at a dose of 10 mg/kg from session 2 onwards. Analysis of escape latency over the course of training demonstrated significantly improved performance at both drug concentrations employed (F[2,200]=38.68, p<0.0001). Moreover, at the higher dose employed (20 mg/kg), analysis of performance by two-way ANOVA indicated chronic SB-271046 treatment not only to reverse age-related deficits in spatial learning ability of aged animals but also to enhance performance significantly over that observed in mature, methylcellulose-treated animals (F[1,240]=8.11; p=0.0048).
The improved spatial learning observed in aged rats treated chronically with SB-271046 could not be attributed to altered locomotor activity in the pretraining period (Table 2). Moreover, it was not attributable to improved motor ability, as swim speed was equivalent in drug-treated animals as compared to methylcellulose-treated controls (Table 3). Rather, quantitative analysis of search strategy revealed that chronic SB-271046 treatment decreased swim angle, as compared to that observed in age-matched, methylcellulose controls (Figure 3b). Specifically, at the highest dose employed (20 mg/kg), there was a significant reduction in departure angle from the start position to the hidden platform (F[1,43]=20.43; p<0.0001).
Chronic Administration of SB-271046 Improves Recall of a Spatial Learning Task in Aged Animals
The influence of SB-271046 on the recall of the spatial learning task was determined using a probe test, in which the escape platform was removed from the water maze, on days 1 and 3 following the final training session. Animals that had been previously treated by chronic administration with SB-271046 spent significantly more time searching in the target quadrant as compared to control animals (Figure 4). Chronic doses of 10 or 20 mg/kg SB-271046 resulted in the animal groups spending a significantly greater period of the test time in the target quadrant on post-training day 1 (Figure 4a). This perseveration towards the former location of the escape platform in the target quadrant is evident in the representative swim traces illustrated in Figure 4b.
The improved recall resulting from chronic SB-271046 treatment was persisting, as the animal groups receiving either 10 or 20 mg/kg maintained their preference for the target quadrant on post-training day 3 (Figure 4c). By contrast, the control animals showed little preference for the target quadrant on either post-training days 1 or 3. The improved recall for the target quadrant could not be attributed to enduring drug-induced change in swimming ability, as no change in the total swim distance was observed during the probe tests, and while an increase in swim speed was exhibited by the 20 mg/kg SB-271046 treatment group during the first probe trial, this is unlikely to effect the finding of increased preference for the target quadrant of the maze. If anything, this would have the opposite effect (Table 4).
DISCUSSION
The results of the present study demonstrate that an acute administration of a potent and selective 5-HT6 receptor antagonist, SB-271046, was able to reverse scopolamine induced amnesia significantly in a step-through, light–dark passive avoidance task in mature rats. Given the cholinergic hypothesis of age-related memory decline (Bartus et al, 1982), the cognition-enhancing effects of this 5HT6 receptor antagonist on the acquisition and recall of a spatial learning task following chronic drug administration were investigated in a population of aged Wistar rats. In these studies, SB-271046 was observed to improve task acquisition, as evidenced by the significant reductions in escape latency and swim angle over five sequential trials on four consecutive training sessions. SB-271046 also improved task recall 1 and 3 days after training in this paradigm. The reduced swim speed observed during training at the highest drug dose employed is unlikely to relate to impaired motor performance, given that SB-271046 exhibited no locomotion deficits in open-field studies, but suggests a direct effect on improving search strategy.
In contrast to previous studies that have demonstrated the lack of effect of 5HT6 receptor antagonists on spatial task acquisition in mature animals (Rogers and Hagan, 2001; Woolley et al, 2001), the current findings indicate SB-271046 to have a more profound cognition-enhancing action in aged animals, where effects on acquisition were demonstrated. These apparently contradictory findings may be reconciled by a prime influence of 5-HT6 receptor antagonists on cholinergic process(es) of memory consolidation, a conclusion supported by the ability of SB-271046 to reverse the amnesic action of cholinergic antagonists, 6 h post-training.
The role of 5HT receptors in learning and memory formation remains equivocal, but a large body of evidence now indicates that presynaptic 5HT1A, 5HT1B, 5HT2A/2C, and 5HT3 receptors and postsynaptic 5HT2B/2C and 5HT4 receptors are involved (Meneses, 1999). More recently, the cognition-enhancing potential of selective 5-HT6 receptor antagonists have been demonstrated in mature rats (Rogers and Hagan, 2001; Woolley et al, 2001). The precise mechanism(s) by which 5HT6 receptor antagonists mediate their cognition-enhancing action still remain to be elucidated. The results obtained in the present study suggest that these actions may, in part, relate to facilitation of the cholinergic system, a conclusion supported by the recent report that the 5-HT6 receptor antagonist Ro 04-6790 produced a modest, nonsignificant increase in extracellular acetylcholine levels as measured by in vivo microdialysis (Shirazi-Southall et al, 2002). However, it must be noted that 5-HT6 receptor antagonists also augment glutamate release in the frontal cortex and hippocampus (Dawson et al, 2000, 2001), a transmitter system integral to neuroplastic events associated with memory formation (Bliss and Collingridge, 1993). It is noteworthy that in these in vivo microdialysis studies, atropine, at doses previously reported to antagonize the cholinergic-like effects in 5-HT6 receptor antisense oligonucleotide studies (Bourson et al, 1995), had no effect on the SB-271046-induced increases in extracellular glutamate (Dawson et al, 2001), suggesting that the enhanced excitatory amino-acid neurotransmission was not a direct consequence of an enhanced cholinergic function. Immunohistochemical data on the localization of 5-HT6 receptors suggest that they may be located on GABAergic spiny neurons in the striatum (Gérard et al, 1997) and in GABAergic/peptidegic striatopalladial and striatal nigro output pathways (Ward and Dorsa, 1996). More recent data have demonstrated colocalization of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and 5-HT6 receptors in the rat cerebral cortex and hippocampus (Fone, 2000). Collectively, these data suggest that 5-HT6 receptor antagonists may modulate cholinergic and/or glutamatergic systems indirectly via disinhibition of GABAergic neurons.
In summary, we demonstrate that acute administration of SB-271046 reverses a scopolamine deficit in a passive avoidance task and chronically it has been shown to improve task acquisition and recall in a spatial learning paradigm in aged rats. Taken together, these results further support the rationale for the use of 5-HT6 receptor antagonists in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction associated with disorders such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease.
References
Bartus RT, Dean RL, Beer B, Lippa AS (1982). The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science 217: 408–417.
Bentley JC, Bourson A, Boess FG, Fone KFC, Marsden CS, Petit N et al (1999). Investigation of stretching behaviour induced by the selective 5-HT6 receptor antagonist, Ro-04-6790, in rats. Br J Pharmacol 126: 1537–1542.
Bliss TVP, Collingridge GL (1993). A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 361: 31–39.
Bromidge SM, Brown AM, Clarke SE, Dodgson K, Gager T, Grassam HL et al (1999). 5-Chloro-N-(4-methoxy-3-piperazin-1-yl- phenyl)-3-methyl-2-benzothiophenesulfon- amide (SB-271046): a potent, selective, and orally bioavailable 5-HT6 receptor antagonist. J Med Chem 42: 202–205.
Bromidge SM, Clarke SE, Gager T, Griffith K, Jeffrey P, Jennings AJ et al (2001). Phenyl benzenesulfonamides are novel and selective 5-HT6 antagonists: Identification of N-(2,5-dibromo-3-fluorophenyl)-4-methoxy-3-piperazin-1-ylbenzenesulfonamide (SB-357134). Bioorg Med Chem Lett 11: 55–58.
Bös M, Sleight A, Godel T, Martin JR, Riemer C, Stadler H (2001). 5-HT6 receptor antagonists: lead opptimisation and biological evaluation of N-aryl and N-heteroaryl 4-amino-benzene sulfonamides. Eur J Med Chem 36: 165–178.
Bourson A, Boess FG, Bös M, Sleight AJ (1998). Involvement of 5-HT6 receptors in nigro-striatal function in rodents. Br J Pharmacol 125: 1562–1566.
Bourson A, Borroni E, Austin RH, Monsma Jr F, Sleight AJ (1995). Determination of the role of the 5-ht6 receptor in the rat brain: a study using antisense oligonucleotides. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 274: 173–180.
Coyle JT, Price DL, DeLong MR (1983). Alzheimer's disease: a disorder of cortical cholinergic innervation. Science 219: 1184–1190.
Dawson L, Nguyen HQ, Li P (2000). In vivo effects of the 5HT6 receptor antagonist SB-270146 on striatal and frontal cortex extracellular concentrations of noradrenaline, dopamine, 5-HT, glutamate and aspartate. Br J Pharmacol 130: 23–26.
Dawson L, Nguyen HQ, Li P (2001). The 5HT6 receptor antagonist SB-271046 selectively enhances excitatory neurotransmission in the rat frontal cortex and hippocampus. Neuropsychopharmacology 25: 662–668.
Doyle E, Regan CM (1993). Cholinergic and dopaminergic agents which inhibit a passive avoidance response attenuate the paradigm-specific increases in NCAM sialylation state. J Neural Transm 92: 33–49.
Fone CF (2000). The 5-ht6 receptor: Potential CNS functions. Br J Pharmacol 131: 238P.
Fox GB, O'Connell AW, Murphy KJ, Regan CM (1995). Memory consolidation induces a transient and time-dependent increase in the frequency of NCAM-polysialylated cells in the adult rat hippocampus. J Neurochem 65: 2796–2799.
Gage FH, Dunnett SB, Bjorklund A (1984). Spatial learning and motor deficits in aged rats. Neurobiol Aging 5: 43–48.
Gallagher M, Pelleymounter MA (1988). Spatial learning deficits in old rats: a model for memory decline in the aged. Neurobiol Aging 9: 549–556.
Gérard C, Martres M-P, Lefévre K, Miquel M-C, Vergé D, Lanfumey L et al (1997). Immuno-localization of serotonin 5HT6 receptor-like material in the rat central nervous system. Brain Res 746: 207–219.
Hamon M, Doucet E, Lefévre K, Miquel M-C, Lanfumey L, Insausti R et al (1999). Antibodies and antisense oligonucleotide for probing the distribution and putative functions of central 5-HT6 receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology 21: 68S–76S.
Hirst WD, Minton JAL, Bromidge SM, Moss SF, Latter AJ, Riley G et al (2000). Characterization of [125I]-SB-258585 binding to human recombinant and native 5-HT6 receptors in rat, pig and human brain tissue. Br J Pharmacol 130: 1597–1605.
Meneses A (1999). 5-HT system and cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 23: 1111–1125.
Meneses A (2001). Effects of the 5-HT6 receptor antagonist Ro 04-6790 on learning consolidation. Behav Brain Res 118: 107–110.
Monsma FJ, Shen Y, Ward RP, Hamblin MW, Sibley DR (1993). Cloning and expression of a novel serotonin receptor with high affinity for tricyclic psychotrophic drugs. Mol Pharmacol 43: 320–327.
Murphy KJ, O'Connell AW, Regan CM (1996). Repetitive and transient increases in hippocampal neural cell adhesion molecule polysialylation state following multi-trial spatial training. J Neurochem 67: 1268–1274.
Perry K, Johnson M, Kerwin JM, Piggott MA, Court JA, Shaw PJ et al (1992). Convergent cholinergic activities in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 13: 393–400.
Rapp PR, Rosenberg RA, Gallagher M (1987). An evaluation of spatial information processing in aged rats. Behav Neurosci 101: 3–12.
Reavill C, Rogers DC (2001). The therapeutic potential of 5HT6 receptor antagonists. Curr Opin Invest Drugs 2: 104–109.
Routledge C, Bromidge SM, Moss SF, Price GW, Hirst WD, Newman H et al (2000). Characterization of SB-271046: A potent, selective and orally active 5-HT6 receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 130: 1606–1612.
Rogers DC, Hagan JJ (2001). 5-HT6 receptor antagonists enhance retention of a water maze task in the rat. Psychopharmacology 158: 114–119.
Ruat M, Traiffort E, Arrrang J-M, Tardivel-Lacombe J, Diaz J, Leurs R et al (1993). A novel serotonin (5-HT6) receptor: molecular cloning, localisation and stimulation of cAMP accumulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 193: 268–276.
Shirazi-Southall S, Rodriguez DE, Nomikos GG (2002). Effects of typical and atypical antipsychotics and receptor selective compounds on acetylcholine efflux in the hippocampus of the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 26: 583–594.
Sleight A, Boess FG, Bös M, Levet-Trafit B, Riemer C, Bourson A (1998). Characterization of Ro 04-6790 and Ro 63-0563: potent and selective antagonists at human and rat 5-HT6 receptors. Br J Pharmacol 124: 556–562.
Stean TO, Hirst WD, Thomas DR, Price GW, Rogers DC, Riley G et al (2002). Pharmacological profile of SB-357134: A potent, selective, brain penetrant and orally active 5-HT6 receptor antagonist. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 71: 645–654.
van der Staay FJ, de Jonge M (1993). Effects of age on water escape behavior and on repeated acquisition in rats. Behav Neural Biol 60: 33–41.
Ward RP, Dorsa DM (1996). Colocalization of serotonin receptor subtypes 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C and 5-HT6 with neuropeptides in rat striatum. J Comp Neurol 370: 405–414.
Whitehouse PJ, Price DL, Struble RG, Clark A, Coyle JT, De Long MR (1982). Alzheimer's disease, and senile dementia: loss of neurons in the basal forebrain. Science 215: 1237–1240.
Woolley ML, Bentley JC, Sleight AJ, Marsden CA, Fone KCF (2001). A role for 5-HT6 receptors in retention of spatial learning in the Morris water maze. Neuropharmacology 41: 210–219.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a research grant from GlaxoSmithKline.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foley, A., Murphy, K., Hirst, W. et al. The 5-HT6 Receptor Antagonist SB-271046 Reverses Scopolamine-Disrupted Consolidation of a Passive Avoidance Task and Ameliorates Spatial Task Deficits in Aged Rats. Neuropsychopharmacol 29, 93–100 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300332
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300332
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Spontaneous head twitches in aged rats: behavioral and molecular study
Psychopharmacology (2022)
-
Sulfur-containing therapeutics in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease
Medicinal Chemistry Research (2021)
-
5-Hydroxytryptamine receptor 6 antagonist, SB258585 exerts neuroprotection in a rat model of Streptozotocin-induced Alzheimer’s disease
Metabolic Brain Disease (2018)
-
Serotonin 5-HT6 Receptor Antagonists in Alzheimer’s Disease: Therapeutic Rationale and Current Development Status
CNS Drugs (2017)
-
The role of serotonin in memory: interactions with neurotransmitters and downstream signaling
Experimental Brain Research (2014)