Abstract
A reciprocating gait orthosis (RGO) is, among others, the most widely adopted device to restore the standing and walking capability of paraplegic patients. The aim of the present study was the evaluation of the energy demand (V̇02), and cardiopulmonary load (HR and V̇E) imposed on the subject by different working tasks while sitting in a wheelchair or standing using a RGO. In addition, a comparison with the performance of normal subjects was also attempted. The RGO use allowed a dramatic improvement of patients mobility and reach space in the workplace. A further advantage provided by the use of the RGO was represented by the increased mobility of the subjects with respect to the wheelchair confined situation. The energy demand and the cardiorespiratory load imposed on the subjects by the use of the RGO were not different from those observed both in the same subjects sitting in a wheelchair and in the controls. The energy demand slightly exceeded the values typical of light work and was, thus, compatible with the normal duration of a working day. On the other hand, the cardiac load corresponded to that typical of moderate activity, thus limiting the duration of the working task to 5-8 h. Based on the ergometry test, all of the working activities considered can be classified as aerobic activities, energy demand being under the ventilatory threshold.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Nowak E . Workplace for disabled people. Ergonomics 1989; 32: 1077–1088.
Kantor C et al. Report on a conference on motor prostheses for workplace mobility of paraplegic patients in North America. Paraplegia 1993; 31: 439–456.
Douglas R, Larson P F, D'Ambrosia R D, McCale R F . The LSU reciprocation gait orthosis. Orthopaedics 1983; 6: 834–39.
Monod H, Pottier M . Les adaptions respiratoires et circula-toires du travail muscolaire. In: J. Sherrer (ed). Physiologie du Travail. Masson et CIE, Tome 1, 209–291.
Lucia A, Fleck S J, Gotshall R W, Kearney J T . Validity and reliability of the Cosmed K2 instrument. Int J Sports Med 1993; 14: 380–386.
Marchetti et al. Idoneita' allo Sport Agonistico per Atleti su Sedia a Ruote. Editor Centro Ricerche Clinica S. Lucia, Roma, I Quaderni, 1992, pp 64–72.
Wassermann K, Whipp B, Koyal S, Beaver W . Anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1973; 35: 236–243.
Sachs L . Applied Statistics. A Handbook of Techniques, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag: New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo, 1984, pp 264–275.
Marchetti M et al. A first approach to RGO paraplegic walking. Ninth Congress of the International Society of Electrophy-siology and Kinesiology, Florence, Italy, 28 June - 2 July 1992, Book of Abstracts, 119.
Lind A R . Cardiovascular adjustment to isometric contractions: static effort. In: Shepherd JT, Abboud FM, Geiger SR (eds). Handbook of Physiology. The Cardiovascular System III, 3(2). American Physiological Society: Bethesda, Maryland, 1983, pp 947–966.
Hildebrandt G et al. Energy cost of propelling wheelchair at various speeds: cardiac response and effect on steering accuracy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51: 131–136.
Stoboy H, Wilson R B . Muscle strength and electrical activity, heart rate and energy cost during isometric contractions in disabled and non disabled. Paraplegia 1971; 8: 217.
Hirokawa S et al. Energy consumption in paraplegic ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and electric stimulation of the thigh muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 687–694.
Nene A V, Patrick J H . Energy cost of paraplegic locomotion with the ORLAU parawalker. Paraplegia 1989; 27: 5–18.
Puricelli R et al. Il consumo energetico durante il cammino di pazienti paraplegici traumatici adulti. Eur Med Phys 1993; 29: 235–44.
Di Prampero P E . The energy cost of human locomotion on land and in water. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7: 55–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernardi, M., Canale, I., Felici, F. et al. Ergonomy of paraplegic patients working with a reciprocating gait orthosis. Spinal Cord 33, 458–463 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1995.100
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1995.100